Not only that, I bet some or most FF Pentax
lenses already have enough margin on their
image cirles to accomodate sufficient
SR displacements just like the APS lenses
have enough for the APS sensors.
And even if they didnt and SR was not
possible across the full frame, you
still could do SR
I dont like the idea for anything between APS
and FF. If your going to go bigger than APS, might as
well go for the whole lens cirle which is about
2.25 times the area used now.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
Sent:
Adding SR to a FF camera would have less displacement overhead
than on aps camera because the magnitude of camera movement is
the same, possilby even less with slighty larger and more massive
body. In other words, add SR to a FF increases the body size
the same absolute amount approx. which is
the SR action doesnt change the crop lines
needed, it keeps the image recorded where
the fixed crop lines would be.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom C
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:22 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re:
SR works by using servos that dectect
camera body shake, and then apply
negative feedback to the sensor
positioning to counteract the body
shake, thus putting the sensor back where
it was before the body shook. The
shake still occurs in the body,
but effectively not in the sensor.
Its not
The image cirle of the lens is not
the same thing as the diameter
of the mount. The image circle can
be much larger.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kostas Kavoussanakis
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 1:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
in general would probably overrule you. Sooo...unless you want to
junk all your lenses...
-Tom
in SC
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I dont like the idea for anything between APS
and FF. If your going to go bigger than APS, might as
well go for the whole lens cirle which is about
2.25 times the area
If you think chromes look magical
projected or with a loupe, try
to get to see some 8x10 chromes
with no loupe or projector needed.
Simply awesome looking.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rick Womer
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006
This WR is one first class moron isnt
he?. He has to attack me even when he
doesnt even know or have read what I have
posting for days and I did not post
any comments to that effect. I questioned
it and challenged the truthfulness of
those concepts, but I didnt say anyone
was an idiot for saying
don't care whether their TV picture
sucks or is good, so lets just get over it and get on with the rest of
our lives, shall we?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 20 December 2006 01:03
To: 'Pentax-Discuss
] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 20 December 2006 02:56
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: The cause of the controversy
I hate to say it but GRAYWOLF is sorta busted
and my statements on that topic were
not wrong at all. That set clearly is stamped 1989
and he initally claimed
at home but I avoid
looking at the really good ones at home. It just spoils the impression.
DagT
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter
Have you ever asked yourself WHY?
Its not very logical that you
can appreciate a really good print
Why does image quality matter to you
in one format but not in another?
Image
quality is universal to me, I dont
care whether its a newspaper image,
a magazine image, a home theater image,
a black and whit print image, a web
image, a slide image, etc, etc, etc.
Better image quality is better than
Enjoying the incredibly wide ranging and sometimes
highly educational/spirtual films/shows/events you can see
on a good home theater is not just wasting time , but
I can see how trying to watch/experience them the way they
were meant to be seen with that kind of playback gear would be.
Can't you
Could you guys please explain what aspects of
the VFs you are referring to ? i.e. brightness,
contrast, magnification, eyepoint, accuracy/matching sensor,
ease of manual focus, information, etc etc etc.
When you say somethings better or worse about
one vs another its nice to know what parameters
Yes the huge resolution (but not only )benefit of HD
is lost on small screens watched from
way back. thats like buying a 16MP
FF dslr and only getting 4x6 prints
to stick on the fridge. Thats not what HD was develeped
for. It was developed so you could watch
a large screen image, even fairly close
They used to make everything good in America.
Now they almost dont make anything at all anymore.
Hell even Kodak used to make very high quality cameras
(not just film ) right here in the good old USA.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
What's a D?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Sharpe
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 3:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: another *ist-D question
Okay, so I've finally gone digital. I bought a D from Cameta Camera,
If thats what you meant you should have posted
that you just dont have enough time to watch television,
not that it's a waste of time. Whatever.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 3:28
second best.
And yes, I do prefer to listen to music live, but that is harder to
accomplish so I have a good stereo.
DagT
Den 20. des. 2006 kl. 20.53 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
I never claimed that HD equals a good print. Buts its way closer to a
good print/REALITY than analog TV is or ever
I have been using a HD DVR for about a year
now and have gotten very proficient with it.
Not only is it great for capturing all the shows
you really want to see, its playback scanning
goes beyond skipping commercials, I even
skip out entire portions of some shows now,
like skipping guests I dont
your opinions, the only thing I started with was that they were not
the same as mine. Accept it.
DagT
Den 20. des. 2006 kl. 22.47 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
Are you kidding? You cant see even a tiny
tiny fraction of what you can see on HD
home theater at the movies so its not
even remotely
fortunately.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Mann
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:19 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT-some actual numbers
On Dec 19, 2006, at 2:34 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote
I would be extremely concerned about this
banding issue and try to resolve it immediately.
I have processed many many
digital images both film and digital sourced, most of them 8 bit
pwer channel, and I
have almost never have seen any banding at all
unless it was a very very very low contrast
Why should I accept an opposing opinion
(especailly one I STRONGLY oppose) I that dont believe in or cannot be
backed
up with a good factual argument to support
it. I wont and never will. Its called conviction.
I dont expect everyone to agree with me on everything,
and many many things are gray
, 2006 4:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Why should I accept an opposing opinion
(especailly one I STRONGLY oppose) I that dont believe in or cannot be
backed up with a good factual argument
Papenfuss
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 4:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Why should I accept an opposing opinion
(especailly one I STRONGLY oppose) I that dont believe in or cannot be
backed up
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
I was arguing HDTV from many standpoints:
* Its picture quality is WAY WAY better than analog ever was and now
cheaper than the crappy old analog tvs from even 10 years ago.
* The original poster I was replying too said it
was just a big cash grab scam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:19 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I forgot something, THE PICTURE
No, it is true. I couldn´t care less about TV quality, but I love a
good print. So much in fact that I still make fiber based and
selenium toned BW prints from 6x6 negatives myself. Accept the
difference.
DagT
Den 19. des. 2006 kl. 23.04 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
I forgot something
an email filter
On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:30 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have already
stated this about 10 times,
That says it all, doesn't it?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
?
and plenty of people have given you the answer: they just don't give a
shit. So why not leave it at that?
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 19 December 2006 23:30
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject
You have not been listening to me or cant
comphrend my posts or have some other deficiency
I wont mention. I have already publically
stated more than once that I would not not buy a
Pentax digital slr ONLY because it did not fully support K/M lenses.
My posts on that topic were always about how
You spoke to soon, dude, see my reply.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 7:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Please everyone set up an email filter
Why would you insist on
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith McGuinness
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:30 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Because I dont belive it, that's why.
Why wouldnt they care
Good move and great price sold for. I am still seeing some new
*istD series kits selling for less but I dont
recall if they were istD, DL, or DS and which kit lenses
they had.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mike Hamilton
Sent:
It sounds like you are a special case of limited
income and that's unfortunate. That doesnt change
my opinion one bit that the average joe blow
and afford a nice HD set at todays low prices though.
They are no longer the luxury items they were
when they came out late last century.
jco
Sorry I missed your number.
$5K ? Not necessary.
You can get some nice HD sets as
little as $1200 now. I saw
a beautiful 42 sony at sears
for that price, probably
even cheaper elsewhere. There
are even a few CRT HD projectors left
selling now for only around $800-900.
K10D price range.
jco
debate the issue. Doesn't
matter. (BTW, it's awesome for jpeg slide shows.)
Paul
On Dec 19, 2006, at 7:40 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Exactly, I am forced to repeat myself over
and over a over again by arguments that
ignore what I have already stated. This was
in repsonse to his 2-3X cost
Also another dead giveaway to vintage
is that it's stereo audio tuner. That
didnt come out till '84 on any sets,
even my ultimate set from '83 had
a multiplex output for a future stereo
decoder to be available soon. I got
one a couple years later. this all brings
back great memories. Those were
I hate to say it but GRAYWOLF is sorta busted
and my statements on that topic were
not wrong at all. That set clearly is stamped 1989
and he initally claimed it was from 1983. I told
you all that in 1983 you couldnt get
any sets with video inputs on them except
on top line Sony and I stated that
it and wont
like it ever.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Digital Image Studio
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:36 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter
On 20/12/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL
on you. I will have nothing more to say. I hope
others will do the same.
Paul
On Dec 19, 2006, at 9:56 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I hate to say it but GRAYWOLF is sorta busted
and my statements on that topic were
not wrong at all. That set clearly is stamped 1989
and he initally claimed
Integrated circuts!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Sorenson
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:15 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The cause of the controversy
Looking at the inside of the cabinet - what a change from
Beware of mirror lenses, the bokeh is
not nice enuff to be classified as bokeh,
its really odd looking donuts.
Secondly the vast majority of them
are optical dogs in my experience.
I just got a celestron 500mm in a
ebay package deal, not here
yet, but I will post something
on it once I get it.
... I think I saw a refrigerator with a flat panel TV on the door.
Way cool, except that I might miss something when I opened the door.
Shit, that's not good..
Shel
[Original Message]
From: J. C. O'Connell
I guess what I am saying is the things you spend the
most time doing in your short
Cant you read?, I DIDN'T bring it up.
But to expect me to never reply when
necessary if and when someone else DOES is not
reasonable at all. That just gives
free licence to revisionist history
of the discussion.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Yup, Today - one roll of Tmax 100-24 for some test shots
I took with a mamiya sekor 21mm F4 lens I recently
obtained. Havent scanned any of them yet though.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Erickson
Sent: Wednesday, December 20,
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith McGuinness
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:57 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Please everyone set up an email filter
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Well you didnt post that, you posted you.
?
The didnt give a shit about picture quality
the
difference.
DagT
Den 19. des. 2006 kl. 23.04 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
I forgot something, THE PICTURE (quality) IS NOT
IMPORTANT for a lot of people? Are you crazy? I am posting this
stuff
in a photo forum inhabited by mostly photographers.
They should know better than that unless all
a long way toward solving your problems.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 12:09 AM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
YES I WILL RESPOND, DONT
EVER EMAIL ME HERE LIKE THIS AGAIN.
IF YOU DO I WILL REPORT
YOU TO THE LIST, ITS GOT
TO BE HARRASSMENT AND ABUSE
OF THE LIST PRIVACY RULES.
STICK TO THE LIST. NO MORE PRIVATE
much.
I'd be embarrassed to own up to that.
Dave
At 11:12 AM 18/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
SOME REAL NUMBERS -
I recently installed some run hour meters
on my new tube audio gear for maintenance
reasons so I know when to test the tubes
and when to recalibrate the gear. I had a few
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Mann
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 4:10 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT-some actual numbers
On Dec 18, 2006, at 3:12 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
That quality
and that quantity of Pleasure is a GOOD thing and its
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, HDTV/Home theater is embarrsing to people with no taste or
culture whatsoever.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
:14 PM 18/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I am a being repeatedly harrased by Paul Stenquist
in private emails. He will not stop
emailing me with harrassing letters.
He has been asked repeatedly to stop
with no harrassment in return and he
wont. He got my private email address
from this list
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ken Takeshita
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 8:53 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private
emails
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=
Paul
] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 8:48 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT-some actual numbers
Dave's another, who lives in a PAL broadcast region.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you upgraded to HD? I
emails
HAR!
I did send him an e-mail asking him to lay off Tom in regard to the
television. Of course he had to get the last word in. I decided to see
if I could outlast him. The man needs help. Paul
-- Original message --
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am
: Re: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private
emails
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a being repeatedly harrased by Paul Stenquist
in private emails. He will not stop
emailing me with harrassing letters
J.C. you're clearly over-reacting
be quite distressing.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You think anyone EVER has the right
to use email addresses from the list
to send private repeated harrassing emails
when they have been told repeatedly
and NON HARASSINGLY to stop? NO, that
is never right under
Will not stop sending me harrasing private
emails
I only wish you could keep ALL of this private.
DagT
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private
emails
You think anyone EVER has the right
to use email addresses from the list
. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the person doesnt stop doing it even
when politely asked to stop emailing me TWICE?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes it is because its quite WRONG to
be using someones private email box
to repeately harrass them under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
And especailly when they were asked
repeatedly and politely to STOP.
If he cant respond to my list posts
in public on the list, he has
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the person doesnt stop doing it even
when politely asked to stop emailing me TWICE? Its
incredible behavior and abuse of list information.
(using my
sending me harrasing private
emails
He took it off list to spare everyone else, and what did you do? Drag
this crap out in public.
Thanks John.
Dave
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it is because its quite WRONG to
be using someones private email box
to repeately
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 10:14 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Paul Stequest Will not stop sending me harrasing private
emails
Then why are we having to read about it?
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/19/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Believe, I
have been getting your insults to other people into my private
mailbox for weeks, and I'm getting tired of it.
DagT
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How would like a bunch of insulting private
emails coming into your private email box
and the person doesnt stop doing it even
when
harrasing private
emails
Yes it is.
Dave
On 12/19/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NO its not the same and you know it.
If you dont mind, how about he sends all
these private messages to you instead? Hell,
why not even if you do mind?, I did and kept
getting them.
jco
and dragging us all in.
Sorry if that is not what you wanted to hear...
Please grow up.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 18 December 2006 14:08
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Paul Stequest Will not stop
is allowed to answer.
Nice rules!
If you want the list owner, send your emails to him, not to the rest
of us.
DagT
Den 18. des. 2006 kl. 16.43 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
Hi, I like to stick to the topics under discussion
and do not engage in personal attacks
unless I am absolutely forced
EDTV is not the same as HDTV, it is somewhere
in between analog and HD, closer to analog
however on resolution as its usually DVD
resolution and sufficent for analog broadcasts. But at that size,
you dont really need HD resolution. They (EDTVS) have kinda disappeared
from
the market which is
form of arguments,
inciting the same amount of flame, and pleaded the same level of
innocence.
There's only two ways out. Let him win by either unsubscribing or
arguing with him; or ignore him.
It's like at the zoo. Don't feed the troll.
Jostein
On 12/18/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED
it. And having said that, I´ll shut
up myself. Maybe I´ll just unsubscribe like many others, so soon you
will have this list all by yourself. Nice, don´t you think?
DagT
Den 18. des. 2006 kl. 17.54 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
No, thats not what I am saying. I am
saying I dont want private hate/harrassment
at
the list archives, maybe a third of the posts are of you arguing with
someone, don't you yourself think that is rather strange?
There now, doesn't it feel better to have that out in the open?
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You think anyone EVER has the right
to use email addresses from the list
I dont call someone an idiot for disagreeing
with me, I call them an idiot for what they
just posted usually and only after they have started with
the personal attacking first. To call someone
an idiot for just disageeing makes no sense,
thats not on topic.
jco
-Original Message-
From:
life.
If you filter them out, you really have no business commenting later
because you are totally in the dark with regards to what has been
discussed.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 8:19
, they just are.
It's a shame really, you seem like a smart guy. It's just you appear to
be
unable to play nicely with others.
Cheers Happy Holidays,
Dave
At 10:44 AM 19/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Secondly, if someone wants to comment on my latest posts,
I suggest they be able to read them
.
Cheers,
Dave
At 12:41 PM 19/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
You should go back and read any of the
posts where I started out with WRONG WRONG WRONG.
They are not directed at anyones opinions,
they are directed at factual errors and misconceptions
that someone had posted to SUPPORT their opinions
Yes I need help, from the list masters
to get this psycho stalker Paul Stenquist
off my back and out of my private email box.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 8:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 17 December 2006 01:28
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: K10D review online
I dont follow you, if you have to do this processing
at home with special ACR or Pentax sofware to open and print the RAW
files, then its not as portable
My God, this is the HDTV era for 8 years
already! Get yourself
a good HDTV and get free DVDS ( they look
way better on a progressive scan HDTV
than any analog 4x3 set can ) from the
library. You dont know what you're missing,
especailly if you can appreciate good
imaging/cinematography and being a
I get TONS of these ebay and paypal spoofs.
Dont ever log into ebay or paypal from
an email link no matter how real they
seem or look as the vast majority, nearly
all of them are fake. Go the these sites on your
own to log in if you have to.
joco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(as I have
explained) why it should not, so I will try and I will let you know.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 17 December 2006 14:36
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: K10D review online
What your saying is the tamron adaptall2 PK-A adapter behaves
the same a the K adapter? Or does it behave somehwhere inbetween?
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Francis
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 1:01 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss
a scam to get you to buy new HD-DVD's or Blu-Ray DVD's to
replace your DVD collection, while ensuring you can't record TV
broadcasts for your archive.
-Adam
Who *may* go HD when he gets an Xbox 360, but only for the games which
actually do benefit from more resolution.
J. C. O'Connell wrote
Not to push the issue, but does this set
even have the very old by now Composite
NTSC video input? I doubt it because I bought
the very first set available in America
back in 1983 that had one, a component
system by Sony ( seperate tuner and monitor)
called the Profeel, and it cost $1850
for the
Mail List
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:38:38 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
You are DEAD WRONG about HDTV being
mostly a scam. Its the greatest
home entertainment product of all time
snip
You're not contradicting Adam.
IMO, of course
HDTV is better than SEX!
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob W
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 1:55 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: It's snowing in hell --OT
[...]
You are DEAD WRONG about HDTV being
mostly a scam.
Maybe thats why you're blind?
:)
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bob W
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 1:55 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: It's snowing in hell --OT
[...]
You are DEAD WRONG about HDTV being
mostly a
the point?
--
Bob (the only thing I watch is Strictly Come Dancing)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
Sent: 17 December 2006 17:53
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: It's snowing in hell --OT
My God
Isnt owning a world class HD home theater worth way more than
owning a K10D? (excepting if you are a full time pro
photographer and need one to earn a living), I think it certainly is.
How much use do you get
of each during the life of the product? I spend way more time watching
home theater
than
the compression (These LCD's are 1920x1200 and can play back the
1920x1080 1080p spec at native resolution)
Can we say 'no compression artifacts'?
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
thats not advertising hype I read somewhere, THAT'S MY
HONEST OPINION OF HDTV! I simply love it and even
after a few years I
: It's snowing in hell --OT
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:56:59 +0100, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
thats not advertising hype I read somewhere, THAT'S MY
HONEST OPINION OF HDTV! I simply love it and even
Well, I gave you my honest opinion on home entertainment ;-)
As Marx said: 'TV
, and
480i isn't all that far behind.
Outside of gaming and maybe sports, HD offers absolutely nothing I
value. And I don't watch much sports.
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
ARE YOU BLIND? I have been enjoying
glorious HDTV for several years now and after
the first few months I couldnt even watch
bad.
-Adam
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Who says the programs are shit? There is TONS
of great HD programs now like MOVIES, All primetime TV shows, and
SPORTS. I am a big movie buff and when I see my favorite films in HD
for the first time it's mindblowingly way more enjoyable compared to
what
Uniformed leading the blind
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Malcolm Smith
Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2006 2:26 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: It's snowing in hell --OT
Graywolf wrote:
Graywolf got a new pet, a
My library allows ordering titles online
at home which is all I do. They actually call
me when they come in and I just go pick them
up. I never browse the shelves anymore once
I found out I could do that. Maybe you should
check into that at your library. It's great.
And a least 90% of the time,
Subject: Re: It's snowing in hell --OT
Got one for $15?
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
My God, this is the HDTV era for 8 years
already! Get yourself
a good HDTV and get free DVDS ( they look
way better on a progressive scan HDTV
than any analog 4x3 set can ) from the
library. You dont know what
wouldn't have HDTV if it meant I couldn't have a nice digital
camera. The camera comes first.
Paul
On Dec 17, 2006, at 2:29 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Isnt owning a world class HD home theater worth way more than owning a
K10D? (excepting if you are a full time pro photographer and need one
to preach from on high?
Yes it has the RCA jacks, so once again JC is wrong in his opinion. Only
he could turn a farcical but accurate post into a flame war.
JC, if you will send me a donation for the price of one of those HDTV's,
I will use the money to fix the car, thanks.
J. C. O'Connell
901 - 1000 of 4017 matches
Mail list logo
