Ann,
maybe if you pointed us to some of the great pics of him on line that
are perfect then we'd know what you're looking for and it would be a
lot easier to say wait, I think I got one. Not that I have many
motorbike shots, anyway. Just a thought.
Marcus
--
Am 25.04.2008 um 15:33
Thanks, Bob. I like that picture a lot, too.
Marcus
--
Am 21.04.2008 um 17:44 schrieb Bob Sullivan:
Marcus,
I like the yellow flowers best.
They show off the selected focus and bokeh.
Generally a pleasing set of photos...
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Marcus
, and since
the CA mainly appears towards the borders of the frame, why wouldn't
stopping down the lens have an influence on that?
Marcus
--
Am 21.04.2008 um 19:09 schrieb J. C. O'Connell:
CA usually cant be fixed by stopping down, its most likely
some other problem.
jco
-Original
welcome, as always.
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I am using a K200D, but as I understand it, the anti shake technology
is basically the same as in the K20D. I have managed to get sharp
pictures handheld at one second at night. I takes a little practise
but it works great.
Marcus
--
Am 19.04.2008 um 14:33 schrieb Bob Sullivan:
Still
Just out of curiosity, is there some standard way to test this? I have
not seen any focusing issues with my camera and lenses (because so
many pictures are out of focus, which is of course user error), but I
was wondering if there is a way to find out.
Thanks.
Marcus
--
Am 16.04.2008 um
That's a bomb, isn't it? ;-)
Marcus
--
Am 16.04.2008 um 09:46 schrieb John Francis:
So: who can tell me what this is?
http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/PAW.php?name=PAW0816
Most of the time I was shooting RAW with the K10D. But at the
end of the day I grabbed a few quick JPEGs with the *ist
of 20 MB/sec. They also come with a
lifetime guarantee, although I have yet so find or hear of someone who
actually ever had problems with a Sandisk Extreme III. Panasonic SDHC
cards are said to be fast and reliable, too, but they are also a
little more expensive.
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax
= ~37,5 MB/s (250x)
Marcus
--
Am 15.04.2008 um 15:58 schrieb Marcus A. Hofmann:
That card's listed as a Class 4 device. The SDCard.com web site
indicates this means that the manufacturer guarantees at least 4 MB/
sec
or higher write speed, which sounds pretty slow. How does that
compare
Am 15.04.2008 um 16:44 schrieb Paul Stenquist:
On Apr 15, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Marcus A. Hofmann wrote:
I have yet so find or hear of someone who
actually ever had problems with a Sandisk Extreme III.
I've had two of Extreme III SD cards fail, although not in the
storage media. The lock
Am 15.04.2008 um 18:32 schrieb John Francis:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:07:38PM +0200, Marcus A. Hofmann wrote:
A quick google turned up this, which may be interesting for
comparison:
WLAN 802.11g: 54 Mbit/s = ~3,2 MB/s (21x)
WLAN 802.11n: 540 Mbit/s = ~37,5 MB/s (250x)
Hmm. 540 = 54 x
I totally second that. That's exactly how I use the 40mm Limited.
Marcus
--
Am 14.04.2008 um 10:06 schrieb Tim Bray:
If you're going to walk around all day with a camera on your wrist you
don't want to be changing lenses, and you really don't want to be
fiddling with the lens-cap when
Thanks for looking, everyone. It's appreciated.
Marcus
--
Am 13.04.2008 um 19:41 schrieb Rick Womer:
LOL
The US Mail mailbox next to a German address is
intriguing, and the flag on the mailbox is (ahem) an
added twist.
Rick
--- Marcus A. Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'll give it
another try once I've learned how to use LR/PS a little better.
Marcus
--
Am 13.04.2008 um 19:30 schrieb Rick Womer:
That's amazingly sharp for a 1 sec hand-held exposure!
You're giving Steady Stenquist some competition!
It is also a really nice photo, though I think
, when I ran across this mailbox.
Wyh would one... I mean, what the heck?!
http://tinyurl.com/683384
http://www.ntony.net/engine/image/medium/db3b41e11478803e65a653b3e631a94b.jpg
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
, though, and I have only tried two or three times.
Marcus
--
Am 10.04.2008 um 02:29 schrieb Gaƫtan Beauchamp:
Hello everyone!
It seems that I cannot post an email to the list with 8 links in that
message to photos on photo.net. There is something that I just don't
understand. By the way, thank
Cape Hoorn is named
after this beautiful little town.
Thanks,
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks for the hint. This seems to have been the problem.
Marcus
--
Am 10.04.2008 um 08:25 schrieb John Francis:
At a guess, I'd say that your email program (Apple Mail?) elects
to send a message with image links in an encoding that the list
management software rejects. It doesn't happen
Thanks to all who took the time to look and share some thoughts. I
still don't know why I like this shot so much, though. But maybe it
isn't too important to know why.
Marcus
--
Am 10.04.2008 um 18:45 schrieb P. J. Alling:
I like this shot, what bugs me, (and this isn't a criticism of you
I like the pics. Keep them coming.
--
Am 08.04.2008 um 00:39 schrieb Rebekah:
It seems that an increasing majority of the emails I receive from the
list are PESOs. If I could do so delicately, I'd like to try and
suggest that we as a list impose a limit of sorts on ourselves
concerning
to
the 21mm Limited, because that package will be awesome to take hiking.
I really think that it is quite impossible not to be satisfied with
the 40mm.
Marcus
--
Am 06.04.2008 um 05:17 schrieb Christine Aguila:
- Original Message -
From: Marcus A. Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got the 18
a hard
time telling where the particular shot was taken, even though it is a
place that I know well during the day.
Marcus
--
Am 05.04.2008 um 07:46 schrieb P. J. Alling:
Bad title but it's late.
I was walking across Yale's campus tonight after taking in a concert,
when she said I don't
out that sRGB-files are named IMGP, while
AdobeRGB files are named _IGP. Is there a reason for that? Can I
turn it off? I think IMGP is quite OK, I don't want files to have
a name beginning with an underscore.
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
... ;-)
Thanks. Marcus
If you must capture in-camera JPEGs, there's not much you can do
about it if you want Adobe RGB colorspace (which I recommend for JPEG
capture, btw).
Otherwise, use software to transfer the files from card to computer
which does a renaming operation for you. I've begun to rename
*
50-135 with it, and that's really a great setup to get started. I'll
get a 21 Limited as soon as I find one, but they seem to be either
sold out or overpriced around where I live.
Marcus
Cheers
p
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney, Australia
display, and only then did I realize the picture was
actually loaded when I scrolled around to find the two persons in the
lower right corner. And I am still not sure what the actual motive is,
besides the two persons... mountains? Is it supposed to look like that?
Marcus
Easter traditions
What exactly does chimping mean? I looked it up in several
dictionaries, but it was not there. Please explain for a non-native
speaker. ;-) Nice shot, btw.
Thanks. Marcus
--
Am 31.03.2008 um 06:15 schrieb Christine Aguila:
Nice one, Paul. You know, people have views about chimping
Thanks, William.
Marcus
--
Am 31.03.2008 um 06:55 schrieb William Robb:
- Original Message -
From: Marcus A. Hofmann
Subject: Re: Chimps
What exactly does chimping mean? I looked it up in several
dictionaries, but it was not there. Please explain for a non-native
speaker
copyrights is fluent, a part remains that cannot be
waived. This is common opinion, although not without controversy.
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
Thanks Paul.
I just found out that I qualify for an academic license, which is a
lot cheaper than the regular version, and ordered Photoshop. Now all I
hope is that I will actually find the time to learn the very basics,
at least.
Marcus
--
Am 25.03.2008 um 18:39 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED
the
original Jpegs.
I have put up an example: http://ntony.codewut.de/temp/test.html
If you look at it in Safari and Firefox, you will see what I mean.
Maybe someone can explain what is happening there? How do you deal
with that?
Thanks.
-Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Andreas, David,
thanks for the explanations. I think I get it now.
Marcus
--
Am 26.03.2008 um 12:30 schrieb David Savage:
Unlike Safari, FF isn't yet colour space aware.
I posted these some time ago comparing FF2 FF3alpha
FF2 (~240kb):
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1123
I was wondering what PESO, PEOW, GESO etc. mean?
-Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
/261e6b593cff231ce1e4b7ebfafc529a.jpg
http://ntony.codewut.de/engine/temp/image/original/fdd3dc638e4fa69c16baadd03c96807e.jpg
http://ntony.codewut.de/engine/temp/image/original/045890c7b9ac167bf016f1e5ae15d5a8.jpg
Greetings to Holland.
Marcus
Am 25.03.2008 um 23:25 schrieb Henk Terhell:
Jostein, thanks. Indeed we had
Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for. And thanks to the leg-
pullers for the good laugh. :-)
-Marcus
--
Am 25.03.2008 um 10:52 schrieb Cotty:
On 25/3/08, Marcus A. Hofmann, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was wondering what PESO, PEOW, GESO etc. mean?
Have a look at this page
Paul, I assume you're talking about Adobe Photoshop (which I am
hesitating to buy, because I am not sure if I really need such
expensive software)?
Marcus
--
Am 13.03.2008 um 15:59 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Marcus (and all others who responded).
I use the channel mixer for BW
Paul, that's a very nice shot. Reminds me of a new years eve party a
while ago, where at 0:00 everyone was busy with their cellphones...
Btw, how do you do your b/w conversions? Looks good.
Marcus
--
Am 13.03.2008 um 11:39 schrieb Paul Stenquist:
Is everyone sleeping? I've been overpesoed
I like it a lot, for the mood, I believe.
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 23:00 schrieb Struan Donald:
Hi,
I figure the best way to start on this sort of list is with a photo:
http://flickr.com/photos/mr_stru/2322023174/sizes/m/
ISO 200, f/10, 1/100 sec
K100D, kit lens
Rather a grabbed shot so
speed of the DA* 16-50 is worth the extra cash, or if the DA 21 will
be all right for me. My guess is that it will.
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 17:17 schrieb Tim Bray:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Marcus A. Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But the bundled 18-55mm/3.5-5.8 lens is kind
Adam,
thank's for the explanation. Looks like I missunderstood something
there. Obviously, there are a lot of new things to learn after so many
years. ;-)
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 18:08 schrieb Adam Maas:
No, there's a fair difference between those two lenses. The 28 would
perform
.
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks for the recommendation, Christine. Weight is indeed not an
issue. I also found some positive reviews meanwhile, so I think I'll
go and pick one up this afternoon.
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 12:42 schrieb Christine Aguila:
Marcus: I'm not the best one to talk equipment, but I did
not
quite as fast, and it doesn't have the motor-in-lens autofocus. The
DA* 50-135 is also considered a fine lens. Your Minolta lenses can't
be used on the Pentax.
On Mar 11, 2008, at 6:50 AM, Marcus A. Hofmann wrote:
Hello.
I have recently bought a new K200D. I did photograph a lot until
Thanks, Godfrey.
I was thinking along the same lines. I am really satisfied with the
images the DA 40 produces, and if the DA 21 comes close, I'd rather
save the extra cash on the DA* 16-50, since I already have the DA 40.
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 16:14 schrieb Godfrey DiGiorgi:
Minolta
with such similar focal lengths. But I can see the idea behind it.
It's appreciated.
Marcus
--
Am 11.03.2008 um 13:35 schrieb J. C. O'Connell:
I would get a good 28mm prime. The sma-A F2.8 is
nice if you like manual focus, the later F and FA
versions would do if you want AF. But in any case
a 28mm
I actually like the focus point slightly in the background and a bit
off center...
Marcus
--
Am 09.03.2008 um 20:51 schrieb P. J. Alling:
I haven't been particularly inspired lately, but last night I went
to an
opening. The work was interesting. I took along the *ist-Ds with the
85mm
the camera, 5 MB)
Marcus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I have just picked up a nice MX and need to put a 50 on it. My old kit was a
Spotmatic and an SMC 50/1.4, now stolen. I use this mostly to supplement my
Leica M outfit, filling in the gaps between it's shortcomings, and as a backup.
I'm interested in the early K 50/1.4 because it appears to be
How well do you like using the LX for manual exposure?
I read something about it displaying EV in full stops
only, but I don't quite understand without seeing
inside the viewfinder. In manual exposure, is it as
user friendly as say an MX? Thanks.
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free
Does the MX self timer pre-fire the mirror before the exposure?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax
I hope one of you bought that K SMC 30mm that just
sold BIN for $133.50 on Ebay after a little over 2
hours.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1334181564
Cool lens.
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the
That may be the funniest thing I have ever read!
Thanks for the good laugh.
Marcus ;)
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 14:19, Fred wrote:
Well, I just let all my lenses know about this
poor 15/3.5, so that
they know from now on they'll have to all be extra
good (defined as
sharp
Hello, Indeed Pentax was multi-coating there lenses
very early. That coating is what first attracted me to
there lenses. I had an SPF not to long ago. The screw
mount SMC 50mm f1.4 that it came with is the finest
lens I have ever used.
--- Frantisek Vlcek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
wrt
Can someone please settle this once and for all? I to
have a Super-Takumar that has yellow tinged elements.
I have been told by multiple people that this is just
the old coating. I have also read several sources on
the Internet that state that this is the result of the
radioactively doped glass
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always been happy with the performance of the
SMC-A* 200mm f2.8
wide open. In fact, 90% of my shooting with that
lens is wide open or
at f4.
-Aaron
Aren't a lot of telephoto lenses optimized for wide
open shooting because of the need
Is is correct that the M 85mm f2 is widely considered
a dog? Very soft wide open?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
would even consider owning such trash is
beyond me.
Where have you heard that it's a dog? I was
thinking of using mine
today, but if it's a bad as you say, I'll just stay
home and clean the
cat box.
Marcus wrote:
Is is correct that the M 85mm f2 is widely
considered
a dog? Very
I apologize if I offended anyone with my original
question.
I wrote:
Is is correct that the M 85mm f2 is widely
considered a dog? Very soft wide open?
Shel. Your last reply was what I was looking for in
the first place. Thank-you
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
use it in manual
with a handheld meter . . .
stan
From: Marcus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 04:07:20 -0800 (PST)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Pentax fast glass?
Warren, I think you may have ruined me for life. I
looked
On that note. Am I the only one who gets uneasy about
buying cameras from people who can't properly use one?
--- Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow! It's so fast even the camera couldn't capture
it clear.
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
-
This
market, and the
prices are not driven up so much by collectors, which
I believe is the case with the Pentax lenses.
Can anyone comment directly on the comparative
performance of these lenses, or offer any advice?
Thanks in advance,
Marcus
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http
Firstly, thank-you all very much for the advice and
very helpful information you have offered.
My _tentative_ choice of 50mm f1.4 A over M is based
solely on my interpretation of Mr Yoshihiko statement:
Yoshihiko - A is not optically identical to M.
The
Wow, that lasted a whole hour and 45 minutes. Reminds
me of the Plabel Makina 67 on Ebay Germany last year
that went BUY IT NOW for just under $300!
--- Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And NOT on eBay...go figure...
Speaking of eBay, one just went (almost immediately,
not too
surprisingly)
63 matches
Mail list logo