On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 08:02:32 +0100 (BST)
Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I read some time ago that there were made emperical tests with
> > groups that were compared. One group of patients got the prayers
> > of a group of people, the other not. All that for a certain time.
> > An
Not questioning your seriousity here, Bernd, but...when you write
"scientifically proved", then what *exactly* do you mean?
Inquiring scientist wanting to know.
--thomas
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:39:14 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (U+B Scheffler) wrote:
> It is scientifically proved that the prayer of
his series (beyond the *istD) will bring of pronouncation
troubles
--thomas
> Andre
> --
>
>
--
----
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://voop.free.fr/
On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:18 +0100 (BST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Dallman) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (mike wilson) wrote:
>
> > I don't know the OM series well at all but I think all of the
> > shutters are electromechanical.
I know them quite well :)
>
> The OM-
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 14:10:29 +0100
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> > I think that the big LCD on the back is superflorus
>
> I'm not buying one, then. My hayfever and the thought of having to
> stand it
Actually, I just popped into my local camera pusher's shop and
demanded to borrow and *ist with an FA-J lens. I played around with
it for a while before returning it, and my observations were
generally positive. For an entry-level camera, it seems quite good:
packed with features (which I found fai
ays
when departing in both the Paris and Waterloo ends.
--thomas
>
> regards,
> Anthony Farr
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Heide Clausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> (snip)
> >
> > Well, in London, I actually asked to
On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:20:12 -0400
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC the _checked_baggage_ X-ray machines can vary the intensity.
> (Not that this contradicts anything folks have said about the
> carry-on X-rays, even if I'm right.) I didn't think the carry-on
> scanners could
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:09:15 +1000
"Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the resolution of the Canon projector? Can it utilise the
> full resolution of the digital files, or are they resized, perhaps
> downwards, to fit the projectors LCD? Also, if LCD monitors can't
> be calibrated
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:41:15 -0500
Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On March 25, 2003 05:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Any thoughts or comments before i possible waste some developing
> > time. BTW it's rated it at 50 with just a standard uv filter for
> > the test.
>
>
>
> > and they're making money on them because some people actually
> > finds it useful. If not, why did they buy it?
>
--
---
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
---
Guys,
Remember when I joined the list, I complained that the optics for my
MZ-S had this flimsy plastic feel, and that I missed the sturdyness
of my zuikos? It was followed by an interresting thread about if the
"feel" had any significance on the pictures - or if I was just being
superficial and g
ggest innovation from Olympus with the OM77 was, that it was
> >the first body to come with a build-in flash
> >
> >
> >Sorry 'bout the long OT post. I am still a zuikoholic, although I
> >have added a healthy amount of pentaxianism to my medical
> >journal
> >
> >--thomas
>
--
---
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
---
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 15:12:36 +0100
"Rüdiger Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo,
> there was so much discussion about "How sexy is the *istD" that an
> important news was not comented.
>
> >From Mike:
> Oly will show the 4/3 system on PMA (see below)
>
> It seems very important, that the
January 16, 2003, 6:22:58 PM, you wrote:
>
> KT> On 1/16/03 9:17 PM, "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> My Nihongo is totemo warui!
>
> KT> Hey, where did you learn that! :-))
>
> KT> Cheers, Ken
>
--
--
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:40 PM
> Subject: Re: The Brotherhood
>
>
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2003 14:27:51 -0500, Bill Owens wrote:
> >
> > > Bill, KG4LOV
> > > >
> > > > -Mat
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:56:55 -0500
"Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh,
>
> I ordered extra ones, rubber eye cap and findercap, because I knew
> I'd lose them. Of course, now that I have them, I probably will
> never lose one :)
>
> Brad.
heh...
Mine fell off at the most inconvenient
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 18:03:55 -0500
"Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:39:11 +0100, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>
> > > > they'd rather make a lover profit than no profit atall.
> > >^
>
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 08:55:08 -0500
"Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:54:10 +0100, Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
>
> > they'd rather make a lover profit than no profit atall.
>^
>
> You sure h
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:48:11 +0100
Jean-Baptiste Fargier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks, Danke, Merci all of you
>
> i think i'll go for the MZ-S + its grip (it reminds me of my former
>
> beloved Contax RTS-III , but lighter) and a zoom : the rest will be
>
> 2nd-hand manual lenses...
Oh
On Thu, 05 Dec 2002 10:04:58 -0500
Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Herb Chong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >why this obsession with feel?
>
> Good question. Focus feel has never been visible in any photograph
> I've ever taken.
It's probably two things: something that "feels good"
On Wed, 04 Dec 2002 18:58:45 -0500
Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me, Pentax was a no-brainer. My wife shot a K-1000 as a
> reporter for half a decade, so when I got the bug, I studied a
> little bit, and the PDML more than anything put me in K-mount. My
> first camera was a KM,
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 21:21:59 -0500
"J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Made a bonehead mistake today. Shot 4 rolls of
> film at ISO 100 (mostly flash), Problem was the
> last roll was ISO 400 film ( Fuji NPH). Should
> I be okay with the 2 stop overexposure on the last
> roll or is the
TECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 10:00 AM
> > To: PentaxList; pdml
> > Subject: MS-S special ??
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/product/camera/mzs-sp/
> >
> >
>
--
---
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
---
Hey,
I've tried googeling, but with very limited success...so I
try to ask here. I hope it is not one of those "asked a
million times" questions.
I've got the BG-10 for the MZ-S, which has the option of
using an IR remote. Everywhere, I see the reference to
"Optional infrared remote", but I
ven with the
BG-10 attached.
Again, this being my preferences - to others, the power of
the F5 may be the priority, weight and size being secondary
or of no concern.
If you want really big, then take a 4x5" :)
--
---
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civil
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 10:10:27 -0400
"Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Which Nikon body do you own, or have had the long term
> use of? Or is this just another of Pal's "I'll make up
> anything to defend Pentax".
>
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?=
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 09:16:25 -0400
"Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 12:39:35 +0200, Thomas Heide Clausen
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure that it is to do with that seminar. The
> > laptops-scan-seperately has been proced
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 07:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Francis Alviar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to ask those who have recently concluded
> travel
I have done way too much travel, so I can answer this :)
> if there have been changes to airport security
> since this summer? Are the screeners using
Hello all,
I've been lurking the list for a while, but thought I would
break my silence and introduce myself...so...
I'm really a zuikoholic, i.e. someone who's 'addicted' to
the mighty fine glass in the Olympus Zuiko lenses. For
years and years I've been shooting with Olympus manual
focus equip
30 matches
Mail list logo
