be an inferior lens (with such a
large zoom range) is counter-productive?
OK, I'm not looking for a full frame equivalent of the 18-250, in a
sense I already have one, the sigma 50-500. For what it is, and
especially what I paid for it, it's an awesome lens, but it falls in the
"way to
On 12/17/2016 9:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Is there anything even better, preferably not too expensive?
No. You can have better or you can have not too expensive, but not both.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML
So you're effectively looking for something like 28mm to something
between 300mm and 400mm.That's not too big... Well unless someone
has repealed the laws of physics that's not going to happen.I don't
think that can be made compact or light weight.
There is the FAJ 75-300 f4.5~5.6
On Sun, Dec 18, 2016 at 10:08:46AM +, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
> >niche of my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but
> >will still fit in my
On 17/12/16, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the
>niche of my 18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but
>will still fit in my camera bag and not weigh a ton.
>The da 55-300, despite nominally being an
Going to full frame, I no longer have a lens for the k1 to fill the niche of my
18-250, being reasonably long, if not particularly fast, but will still fit in
my camera bag and not weigh a ton.
The da 55-300, despite nominally being an aps lens seems to do ok on ff. Is
there anything even
-
From: "Bob W-PDML" <p...@web-options.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:36:56 AM
Subject: Re: Peso-Sinister Looking Turkey Vulture
He looks like my Latin teacher at school, or a character from Gormenghast.
ht
quot; <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 11:36:56 AM
Subject: Re: Peso-Sinister Looking Turkey Vulture
He looks like my Latin teacher at school, or a character from Gormenghast.
http://c300221.r21.cf1.rackcdn.com/mervyn-peake-steerpike-and-barquentine-1365974169_org.jpg
B
He looks like my Latin teacher at school, or a character from Gormenghast.
http://c300221.r21.cf1.rackcdn.com/mervyn-peake-steerpike-and-barquentine-1365974169_org.jpg
B
On 30 Nov 2016, at 12:00, Jack Davis
> wrote:
Yesterday P.M. with the
That was due to the ability to see
much the face, including the eye!
OK, never mind! :)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 8:05 AM, P.J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't know how you can call Turkey Vulture sinister looking, all Turkey
> Vul
I don't know how you can call Turkey Vulture sinister looking, all
Turkey Vultures are sinister looking. Unless you mean he's looking to
his left, in which case nevermind...
On 11/30/2016 6:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yesterday P.M. with the 150-450.
Am impressed by this lens!
C?
http
Am impressed that you could hold it steady ! :-)
Looks like the buzzard busted you -
ann
On 11/30/2016 6:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yesterday P.M. with the 150-450.
Am impressed by this lens!
C?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1134
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
ay, November 30, 2016 5:23:15 AM
Subject: Re: Peso-Sinister Looking Turkey Vulture
Yes, it is looking left. I think I can just about make out a louse on the
third feather. You can only look ahead now, no turning back.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 201
Yes, it is looking left. I think I can just about make out a louse on the
third feather. You can only look ahead now, no turning back.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Jack Davis
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 1:58 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Peso-Sinister Looking Turkey Vulture
Forever generous, Dan!
Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 4:13 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Ugly bird, but nice image.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Jack Davis
Generous comments, Malcolm!
Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 4:16 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1134
> +
>
> Great detail and great picture.
>
> Malcolm
Generous, Paul!
Appreciated!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 4:22 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Superb detail. I'm not surprised. :-)
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Nov 30, 2016, at 6:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yesterday P.M. with
Superb detail. I'm not surprised. :-)
Paul via phone
> On Nov 30, 2016, at 6:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Yesterday P.M. with the 150-450.
>
> Am impressed by this lens!
>
> C?
>
> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1134
>
> --
> PDML
Jack Davis wrote:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1134
+
Great detail and great picture.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
Ugly bird, but nice image.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Yesterday P.M. with the 150-450.
>
> Am impressed by this lens!
>
> C?
>
>
Yesterday P.M. with the 150-450.
Am impressed by this lens!
C?
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=1134
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
That doesn't work either. :)
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:12 PM, John wrote:
> Pick the outcome you want and work your way backwards, swimming upstream as
> it were.
>
> On 10/19/2016 1:33 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Amusing, but For Entertainment Only as they warn on DVD
Pick the outcome you want and work your way backwards, swimming upstream
as it were.
On 10/19/2016 1:33 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Amusing, but For Entertainment Only as they warn on DVD intros. When I
follow the chart properly I end up at F/64 Redux which misses by
considerably more than a
Amusing, but For Entertainment Only as they warn on DVD intros. When I
follow the chart properly I end up at F/64 Redux which misses by
considerably more than a country mile.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:04 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Ok, so maybe it isn't off topic.
>
>
Ok, so maybe it isn't off topic.
http://blakeandrews.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/photo-flo-chart.html
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
t; <pdml...@komkon.org>
To: "PDML" <PDML@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:09:22 AM
Subject: Re: 2 PESOs: Looking from above
Bruce,
Thank you for the suggestions.
Yes, I am using "clarity" slider in LR extensively for this types of
shots. (And in this case it
astel" (which in my mind has some correlation with
"pastoral").
I am looking at the two versions side-by-side, and I think I still like
the my version (more subtle) a bit better.
I wonder what others think. (If you don't mind, please don't remove your
version immediately so that
Here's an excellent Photoshop tutorial from Martin Evening (whose
books are among the best).
http://www.graphics.com/article-old/improving-midtone-contrast-photoshop
I expect you could do this with Gimp as well. Other than the Smart
Objects which you can safely ignore, the rest is pretty
Igor -
I fiddled with the first one in PS Elements with just the Histogram
Levels and came up with this...
https://app.box.com/s/ff2j9uihge0d22gfpb1j9nwn45nyvgpy
Black point = 12
White point = 212
Mid-tones = .65
I'll remove this in 24 hours...sooner if you desire.
-p
On 8/31/2016 10:49
Bruce,
Thank you for the suggestions.
Yes, I am using "clarity" slider in LR extensively for this types of
shots. (And in this case it is either maxed out or close to that).
I am stuck with LR <= 5.x, because of the 32-bit Windows that I have on
hand right now. So, the "haze" slider is not
r since the days 15 to 20 years ago when I was traveling the
>> higher
>> elevations in Colorado, Wyoming, California, etc..
>> Here I do see the obvious hazy, along with a dull, pinkish/purple.(??)
>>
>>
>> J
>>
>> - Original Message -
>
-StR" <pdml...@komkon.org>
To: "PDML" <PDML@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:49:23 AM
Subject: 2 PESOs: Looking from above
I like taking photographs from airplanes. It is usually not that simple, as
the contrast is decreased drastically. And not everything is "ph
Message -
From: "Igor PDML-StR" <pdml...@komkon.org>
To: "PDML" <PDML@pdml.net>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:49:23 AM
Subject: 2 PESOs: Looking from above
I like taking photographs from airplanes. It is usually not that simple,
as the contrast is decreased
I like taking photographs from airplanes. It is usually not that simple,
as the contrast is decreased drastically. And not everything is
"photogenic". :-) So, the yield is usually very low.
Here are a couple of very different pictures taken during my recent trip
to Europe:
1. Very pastoral
Critical editing is a sure fire way to improve your photography.
-Original Message-
>From: ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com>
>Subject: Re: PESOs: I'm looking at you & Surf's up!
>
>It's always hard to let go and to make choices... No need to prune for
>keepi
No, I just took it out of the reply from someone else's message.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 13, 2016, at 8:23 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Looks like later NIcole got it without scrambling
>
>
>> On 5/13/2016 11:19 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> Doesn't show that way
Looks like later NIcole got it without scrambling
On 5/13/2016 11:19 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Doesn't show that way on OS X v10.11.4 with Mail or iPad/iPhone v9.3.1 Mail for
me. All of AnnSan's mail posts look fine.
Godfrey
On May 13, 2016, at 7:27 AM, Nicole Jacque
noticed him there
under the pier!
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele" <ann...@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 5:58:11 AM
Subject: Re: PESOs: I'm looking at you & Surf's up!
Good point , Str
Doesn't show that way on OS X v10.11.4 with Mail or iPad/iPhone v9.3.1 Mail for
me. All of AnnSan's mail posts look fine.
Godfrey
> On May 13, 2016, at 7:27 AM, Nicole Jacque wrote:
>
> Did anyone else get Ann's email like this? I see the correct text as in
> Jack's reply,
-- glad I noticed him there
under the pier!
> - Original Message -
> From: "ann sanfedele" <ann...@nyc.rr.com>
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 5:58:11 AM
> Subject: Re: PESOs: I'm looking at you &
Did anyone else get Ann's email like this? I see the correct text as in Jack's
reply, so some people must have gotten the correct message.
> On May 13, 2016, at 5:58 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> R29vZCBwb2ludCAsIFN0cmluZ2VyCgpZb3UgaGF2ZSB0byBiZSBjYXJlZnVsIHNheWluZyAibWFy
>
l List" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 5:58:11 AM
> Subject: Re: PESOs: I'm looking at you & Surf's up!
>
> Good point , Stringer
>
> You have to be careful saying "mark" in the body of a post here:-
> )although your comment is MAR
I am hoping my cats will put in a good word for me.
> On May 13, 2016, at 4:18 AM, Mark Stringer <c...@cmstringer.com> wrote:
>
> I'm "looking at you" makes me think of "judgement day". On judgment day the
> sinner is to stand before God and be judged.
Absolutely love the pigeon shot, Nicole!
J
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele" <ann...@nyc.rr.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 5:58:11 AM
Subject: Re: PESOs: I'm looking at you & Surf's
the birdie is
the winner for me. It's a money shot for a poster
ann
On 5/13/2016 7:18 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
I'm "looking at you" makes me think of "judgement day". On judgment day the
sinner is to stand before God and be judged. My interpretation of judgement day, with
Hear, hear!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stringer
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 1:18 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESOs: I'm looking at you & Surf's up!
I'm "looking at you" makes me think of "judgement day". On judgment day the
sinne
I'm "looking at you" makes me think of "judgement day". On judgment day the
sinner is to stand before God and be judged. My interpretation of judgement
day, with some levity but not entirely, is that humans will stand before the
animal kingdom and have to atone fo
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> 516, the post, is nice.
Very nice indeed!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Nicole Jacque wrote:
These pictures were from a stop in a little coastal town named Cayucos along
Hwy 1.
This guy was staring at me from the rafters under the pier:
https://flic.kr/p/GZYkbT
Surf’s up: https://flic.kr/p/H44ikq
Full album here: https://flic.kr/s/aHskAaag6X
516, the
These pictures were from a stop in a little coastal town named Cayucos along
Hwy 1.
This guy was staring at me from the rafters under the pier:
https://flic.kr/p/GZYkbT
Surf’s up: https://flic.kr/p/H44ikq
Full album here: https://flic.kr/s/aHskAaag6X
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
http://milwaukee.craigslist.org/pho/5573338349.html
That Mamiya 85/2.8 M42 might be a nice piece of glass.
I know there's someone not too far away ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
of this course? I just signed-up
(for May 16) and am curious what your take on it is.
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola <danmaty...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.openculture.com/2016/02/museum-of-modern-art-moma-launches-free-course-on-looking-at-photographs-as-art.html
Dan Matyol
ee-course-on-looking-at-photographs-as-art.html
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directl
ril 13, 2016 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Looking at you'
I like this, Ken. The composition is very effective, and the bird's
beak-in-the-air pose seems to say "What the hell do you think -you're-
doin, pal?"
Rick
On Apr 13, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
Thanks Paul, Igor,
I like this, Ken. The composition is very effective, and the bird's
beak-in-the-air pose seems to say "What the hell do you think -you're- doin,
pal?"
Rick
On Apr 13, 2016, at 1:24 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Thanks Paul, Igor, Ann, Jack & Dan for looking and commenting.
>
That is an annoying good photo.
So glad I could annoy you Larry. ;+)
Thanks to Mark C, Donald G, Nicole & Steve for commenting.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen" <l...@red4est.com>
Subject:
On 2016-04-11 14:30 , Ken Waller wrote:
A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
1/400sec, 800 ISO, handheld.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18216352
eye-catching!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Ken Waller wrote:
A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
1/400sec, 800 ISO, handheld.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18216352
That is an annoying good photo.
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
Thanks Paul, Igor, Ann, Jack & Dan for looking and commenting.
These are really tough little guys to capture - they flit around so quickly.
I thought the posture was a real plus for this image.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
Mark,
I've used the Tetenal C-41 Press Kit to do C-41 at home. It's fast and
reasonably easy, pretty stable too. The C-41 Press Kit chemistry was designed
for journalists on the go so it's not as fussy as some C-41 processing kits
are. B has it ...
Cute pose! It gives the picture a lot of character.
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 7:59 AM, Mark C wrote:
>
> Excellent!
>
> On 4/11/2016 4:30 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
>> 1/400sec, 800 ISO, handheld.
>>
>>
tell from their site…
http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
Good luck in your search.
stan
On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am
looking for someplace to get C-41 fil
of March so I am
looking for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations
for a good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
their websites either seem to be OK, though I was spoiled by the
$4.50 per roll that the local place charged. $11 - $12 per
wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a
good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab is good or not, but the C-41
process is bombproof enough that as long as the processor doesn't
as City, Custom Color was
>>>> THE place for 120 and other MF and large format film processing. They
>>>> may still be in that business though I couldn’t tell from their site…
>>>> http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
>>>>
gt;>> may still be in that business though I couldn’t tell from their site…
>>> http://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
>>>
>>> Good luck in your search.
>>>
>>> stan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> O
://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
Good luck in your search.
stan
On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am
looking for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations
for
two day service), which was why I finally went
digital.
On 4/11/2016 7:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a
good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com
On 4/11/2016 7:53 PM, Bill wrote:
On 4/11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab is good or not, but the C-41
Those are such fun flitty little birds. I like the angle view you caught.
On 4/11/16 6:34 PM, pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:30:32 -0400
From: "Ken Waller"<kwal...@peoplepc.com>
To: "pentax list"<pdml@pdml.net>
Subject: PE
Excellent!
On 4/11/2016 4:30 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
1/400sec, 800 ISO, handheld.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18216352
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
://www.customcolor.com/servicecenter/products_services.html
Good luck in your search.
stan
On Apr 11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
-- Original Message - From: "Stanley Halpin"
> <s...@stans-photography.info>
> Subject: Re: Looking for a Film Lab
>
>
>> These are the only two Michigan shops I have had any dealings with. Both
>> were full service, could handle anything. Doubt
Oh, you mean this place http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17963887
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Stanley Halpin" <s...@stans-photography.info>
Subject: Re: Looking for a Film Lab
These are the only tw
11, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
>
> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
>
> I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and t
Excellent! Great background tonality.
Paul via phone
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 5:53 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> Lovely shot, Ken - and what a cutie
> ann
>
>> On 4/11/2016 4:30 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
>>
,
Igor
Mark C Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:52:33 -0700 wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a
good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
their websites either
Thanks, Zos - I'll look into those. Both Richard's and North Coast are
less than the $11 per roll I was initially looking at. The devil is in
the details, though (ie. - shipping fees, extra charges to cut (or not
cut) film, etc.)
On 4/11/2016 9:06 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
North Coast Photo
cal pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
their
websites either seem to be OK, though I was spoiled by the $4.50 per roll
th
s://thedarkroom.com/product/film-developing/
> http://www.richardphotolab.com/
>
> And you look at a few others:
> https://www.slrlounge.com/list-mail-order-film-developing-labs/
>
> HTH,
>
> Igor
>
>
> Mark C Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:52:33 -0700 wrote:
>
> The local pro lab close
://www.richardphotolab.com/
And you look at a few others:
https://www.slrlounge.com/list-mail-order-film-developing-labs/
HTH,
Igor
Mark C Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:52:33 -0700 wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any
Ken,
I would have thought that it would be hard to handhold this cute guy
even if you capture it. :-)
I observed an interesting effect with it:
While viewing it on my laptop's screen, - in the size that it first
appears on photo.net page, the face seems to be a bit too soft.
If I click on
n Addy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Remind me where you are located Mark?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am l
ocated Mark?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
>>>> for
>>>> someplace to get C-41 film processed
16 at 6:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
>>> for
>>> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
>>>
>>> I've heard of oldschool
Good to hear that, Bill.
On 4/11/2016 7:53 PM, Bill wrote:
On 4/11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab
where you are located Mark?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotol
On 4/11/2016 5:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
This won't help in terms of whether a lab is good or not, but the C-41
process is bombproof enough
Remind me where you are located Mark?
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Mark C <pdml-m...@charter.net> wrote:
> The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking for
> someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good lab?
&g
The local pro lab closed its doors at the end of March so I am looking
for someplace to get C-41 film processed. Any recommendations for a good
lab?
I've heard of oldschoolphotolab.com and thedarkroom.com and based on
their websites either seem to be OK, though I was spoiled by the $4.50
per
Lovely shot, Ken - and what a cutie
ann
On 4/11/2016 4:30 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
1/400sec, 800 ISO, handheld.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18216352
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
Nice pose and good detail, Ken.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 11, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Great image, with a nice posture on the bird and an uncluttered background.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
>> On
Great image, with a nice posture on the bird and an uncluttered background.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
> 1/400sec,
A White-breasted Nuthatch captured with a K3 & FA 300mm f4.5 - @ f5.0,
1/400sec, 800 ISO, handheld.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18216352
Comments appreciated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Septuagenarians seldom need to pad their resumes.
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I like this aspect of the free course:
>> "Financial Aid is available for learners who cannot afford the fee.”
There is indeed a fee is you desire a certificate. I don't need one.
Septuagenarians seldom need
um-of-modern-art-moma-launches-free-course-on-looking-at-photographs-as-art.html
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
it goes. It's free and I can do it at my own pace - not
much to lose.
Mark
On 3/27/2016 8:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
http://www.openculture.com/2016/02/museum-of-modern-art-moma-launches-free-course-on-looking-at-photographs-as-art.html
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com
se and will be interested in
>> seeing how it goes. It's free and I can do it at my own pace - not much to
>> lose.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>> On 3/27/2016 8:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>>> http://www.openculture.com/2016/02/museum-of-modern-art-moma-lau
rested in
> seeing how it goes. It's free and I can do it at my own pace - not much to
> lose.
>
> Mark
>
> On 3/27/2016 8:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>> http://www.openculture.com/2016/02/museum-of-modern-art-moma-launches-free-course-on-looking-at-pho
201 - 300 of 1962 matches
Mail list logo