I see a mention of Bluetooth on the K3 mk III menu. How many other Pentax
bodies have it?
Sent from my iPhone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
ject: Re: Deals on used Pentax bodies
KEH.com has had used K-1's in stock from time to time since a couple of
weeks after they were first released. It's a great camera in a lot of
ways, especially image quality, but would be disappointing to someone
expecting the AF and metering techn
g from.
On 12/27/2017 11:50 AM, Alan C wrote:
Used K1's already? Some people have more cash then sense.
Alan C
-Original Message- From: Stan Halpin
Sent: 27 December, 2017 6:22 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Deals on used Pentax bodies
Roberts Photo in Indianapolis has quite a few u
Looks like they have some decent prices, but sheshe, I thought KEH's
new(ish) web site was annoying.
On 12/27/2017 11:22 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Roberts Photo in Indianapolis has quite a few used bodies (several S2, K-5,
K-3ii, K-1, etc) in stock. Also, if you care, buy a body, get a kit
Used K1's already? Some people have more cash then sense.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Stan Halpin
Sent: 27 December, 2017 6:22 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Deals on used Pentax bodies
Roberts Photo in Indianapolis has quite a few used bodies (several S2, K-5,
K-3ii, K-1
Roberts Photo in Indianapolis has quite a few used bodies (several S2, K-5,
K-3ii, K-1, etc) in stock. Also, if you care, buy a body, get a kit lens at
50%...
I have three preferred sources of gear, apart from PDML and misc eBay vendors.
Adorama, B&H, and Roberts. When I was using 645
On 2015-10-13 12:41 , P.J. Alling wrote:
There's a reason no one in the Pacific Northwest goes barefoot.
i go barefoot a lot in my garden, and even in dry Denver i've had a few
unfortunate snails smush between my toes; the slugs stay out of the way,
deep in the foliage, but the snails often c
There's a reason no one in the Pacific Northwest goes barefoot.
On 10/12/2015 8:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, P.J.
Alling wrote:
It's a banana slug, does it really matter.
Out in Santa Clara, some banana slugs are quit athletic:
http:/
On 2015-10-13 1:52 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Banana slugs are large, yellow hermaphrodites who engage in hours long sexual
couplings
but, from the college mascot perspective, do they really have fun?
;?>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm
than that.
I'm not sure that any of them do wireless transfer of raw files, like the EyeFi
Pro cards. I have one of those too and find its performance inconsistent and
unreliable.
I've not used any of the WiFi equipped Pentax bodies.
Godfrey
> On Oct 12, 2015, at 7:34 A
Hey! You're talking about my Alma Mater! :-)
"Uncle Charlie" was Charles Sinsheimer, a ex-Caltech man who despised the
banana slug as our mascot and proposed some silly sea animal as our mascot. We,
the student body at the time, disliked him and his absurd notion of turning
UCSC into a mini UCL
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Uncle Charlie's Summer Camp is in Santa Cruz, aka Santa Carla not Santa
> Clara.
They are all slugs out there, as far as I can tell.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
It's a banana slug, does it really matter.
Out in Santa Clara, some banana slugs are quit athletic:
http://www.ucsc.edu/about/mascot.html
Go Slugs!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhBndP2TgOM
Uncle Charlie's Sum
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> It's a banana slug, does it really matter.
Out in Santa Clara, some banana slugs are quit athletic:
http://www.ucsc.edu/about/mascot.html
Go Slugs!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 5:55 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 5:41 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>>
>> Kenneth Waller
>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "P.J. Alling"
>>
>> S
On 10/12/2015 5:41 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: WiFi bodies
On 10/12/2015 4:58 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
A fully laden banana slug isn
Ken Waller wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts"
>
>> Ken Waller wrote:
>>
A fully laden banana slug isn't much faster than an unladen one.
>>>
>>>You probably meant to say the unladen one isn't much faster than the laden
>>>one. I'd definitely bet on the unladen slug.
>>
>> African or European?
>
>D
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: WiFi bodies
On 10/12/2015 4:58 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
A fully laden banana slug isn't much faster than an unladen one.
You pr
On 12/10/15, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>African or European?
Beat me to it again!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
On 10/12/2015 4:58 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
A fully laden banana slug isn't much faster than an unladen one.
You probably meant to say the unladen one isn't much faster than the laden
one. I'd definitely bet on the unladen slug.
African or European?
It's a banana slug, d
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: WiFi bodies
Ken Waller wrote:
A fully laden banana slug isn't much faster than an unladen one.
You probably meant to say the unladen one isn
Ken Waller wrote:
>> A fully laden banana slug isn't much faster than an unladen one.
>
>You probably meant to say the unladen one isn't much faster than the laden
>one. I'd definitely bet on the unladen slug.
African or European?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
---
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Re: WiFi bodies
On 10/12/2015 3:14 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2015-10-12 8:34 , Collin B wrote:
How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
Is it worth the investment?
(I ha
On 10/12/2015 4:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
On 10/12/2015 3:14 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, steve harley
wrote:
On 2015-10-12 8:34 , Collin B wrote:
How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
Is it worth the investment?
(I had earlier tried the
On 10/12/2015 3:14 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, steve harley wrote:
On 2015-10-12 8:34 , Collin B wrote:
How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
Is it worth the investment?
(I had earlier tried the EyeFi and personally found it unacceptable.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 2:49 PM, steve harley wrote:
> On 2015-10-12 8:34 , Collin B wrote:
>>
>> How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
>> Is it worth the investment?
>> (I had earlier tried the EyeFi and personally found it unacceptable.)
>
>
> i haven't looked into it,
On 2015-10-12 8:34 , Collin B wrote:
How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
Is it worth the investment?
(I had earlier tried the EyeFi and personally found it unacceptable.)
i haven't looked into it, but if any of them are 802.11ac, and well
implemented, they should b
On 10/12/2015 8:34 AM, Collin B wrote:
How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
Is it worth the investment?
(I had earlier tried the EyeFi and personally found it unacceptable.)
My X-T1 ha WiFI built in. If it's jpegs it isn't too bad, but its pretty
slow with raw files
How long does it take to transfer images from a WiFi DSLR to PC?
Is it worth the investment?
(I had earlier tried the EyeFi and personally found it unacceptable.)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi
The BG-4, 360FGZ, and L-bracket have all been spoken for.
>From this batch, the K-3 and K-5ii bodies are the only remaining items.
stan
On Aug 29, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I’ve decided to go ahead and sell off much of my APS-C K-Mount equipment and
> take the plun
Awesome!
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Stanley Halpin
wrote:
> I’ve decided to go ahead and sell off much of my APS-C K-Mount equipment and
> take the plunge with a 645 system.
>
>
> - K-5ii body. Approx 10,000 shutter activations. $450.
> - Battery Grip BG-4 for the K-5ii, K-5, or K-7 $50
I’ve decided to go ahead and sell off much of my APS-C K-Mount equipment and
take the plunge with a 645 system.
- K-5ii body. Approx 10,000 shutter activations. $450.
- Battery Grip BG-4 for the K-5ii, K-5, or K-7 $50 (Includes alternate
battery tray allowing use of AA batteries)
- K-3 body.
Thanks Paul, good food for thought. I never paid much attention to the lens
lineup for the 67 or 6x7 but I should have realized that it would all have been
old-tech with all of the limitations that implies. I am probably better off
buying a lottery ticket and using the winnings for the new 560mm
The P67 600/4 is a very old design. Apart from being hugely heavy it is also
notorious for chromatic aberration unless well stopped down. The P67 800/4 is
the same as the 600 but bigger and is difficult to find while the 800/6.7 is
pricey. The 500/5.6 can be had below $1k on a good day and is ne
I have noticed that used lenses in longer focal lengths (e.g., 600mm) are more
available and with more manageable prices in Pentax 67 mounts than K-mount. I
know it is feasible to use the 67 (or 645) lenses on my K-5ii with adapter. I
would imagine at that point I would have a totally manual len
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013, P. J. Alling wrote:
> On 2/13/2013 1:59 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>
>>Anyway, my original post was mostly a joke about electronics upgrade
>>cycles.
>
> Well, if you're going to resist LBA I'm not sure how we're going to
> do our job.
There's a guy named Donald Norman, an exper
ibe this method.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joseph McAllister"
> Subject: Re: Adorama: Last call on K-5 bodies-$739
>
>
>
> On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 , Darren Addy wrote:
I heard the term painting with light used to describe this method.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph McAllister"
Subject: Re: Adorama: Last call on K-5 bodies-$739
On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 , Darren Addy w
On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 , Darren Addy wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Segue for a bit with little reference other than "night shots".
>>>
>>> A beautiful image taken in Alaska by Todd Salat, and today's APOD.
>>
>> Yes, lovely.
>>
>>>
>>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> Segue for a bit with little reference other than "night shots".
>>
>> A beautiful image taken in Alaska by Todd Salat, and today's APOD.
>
> Yes, lovely.
>
>>
>> http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap130212.html
>>
>> How did he light the li
>
>
>
> Segue for a bit with little reference other than "night shots".
>
> A beautiful image taken in Alaska by Todd Salat, and today's APOD.
Yes, lovely.
>
> http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap130212.html
>
> How did he light the lilies?
> Without the flash being observed in the photo?
What was the
On Feb 14, 2013, at 01:29 , Bipin Gupta wrote:
> The mighty B&H. They sold me a K-20D in
> April 21, 2009 with a shutter count of (625). The camera manufacturing
> date was April 15, 2008 - one year from the date of sale. Lucky for me
> the K-20D turned out to be a work horse - great night shots
Yep, a great bargain. But do note I picked up a brand new K-5 with the
DA 18-135 WR for CAD 979.99 + Tax shipped, from Henry's Toronto.
The shutter count was (1) from the first photo. And from the
Ricoh-Pentax packaging, I could make out it was a brand new Kit - lens
and camera in one big un-opene
on 2013-02-13 11:48 P. J. Alling wrote
The price has been drifting lower since last July. I've seen it hitting $699.
various places since December, (wish I'd caught that $660 price since it's
below my current buy threshold, Oh well).
yes, that was when it hit my threshold; the overall drift dow
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
>
>> K-5's pixel pitch is 4.81
>> K-30's pixel pitch is 3.18
>> That has to mean more noise at equiv. ISOs
>
> That is in error--a DxO brain fart. It's the same megapixels in the
> same size
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> K-5's pixel pitch is 4.81
> K-30's pixel pitch is 3.18
> That has to mean more noise at equiv. ISOs
That is in error--a DxO brain fart. It's the same megapixels in the
same size sensor, so the pixel pitch is obviously the same.
http://www.pe
The K-30 is not really even close to the K-5, specs-wise.
K-5 is 14-bits per pixel
K-30 is 12-bits per pixel
That's not just a number, that translates to a 1.1EV improvement in
dynamic range for the K-5 over the K-30 (which is significant).
K-5's pixel pitch is 4.81
K-30's pixel pitch is 3.18
That
On 2/13/2013 1:33 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Well, if you're going to resist LBA I'm not sure how we're going to do
our job.
I think it's time for an intervention of sorts.
Perhaps an Auditing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUB
On 2/13/2013 1:59 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't know what it would cost to rent a K30 for your trip, but there are
a lot of good arguments that buying a K-5 at this price would be a better
deal. A good chunk of the price would be covered by not having t
It is amusing to think back on how long I thought I'd use my K-x before
I'd finally have to upgrade. I mean, I was actually worried about the
shutter life at one point!
-- Walt
On 2/13/2013 12:59 PM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
Anyway, my original post was mostly a joke about electronics upgrade
cycle
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> I don't know what it would cost to rent a K30 for your trip, but there are
> a lot of good arguments that buying a K-5 at this price would be a better
> deal. A good chunk of the price would be covered by not having to rent a
> K30, and the UI will be p
The price has been drifting lower since last July. I've seen it hitting
$699. various places since December, (wish I'd caught that $660 price
since it's below my current buy threshold, Oh well).
On 2/13/2013 1:09 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2013-02-13 10:06 Darren Addy wrote
...and free shippi
on 2013-02-13 10:06 Darren Addy wrote
...and free shipping. http://www.adorama.com/IPXK5.html
That's $10 less than Beach Camera is offering them through Amazon.
bizarre price fluctuations at this stage in product cycle; i bought mine in
December for $660 shipped from BuyDig (which is said to b
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
>>
>> The K-5 is such a great camera... if you've been on the fence, this is
>> the same body that was a grand not that long ago and there still isn't
>> an APS-C camera that can surpass it.
>
> Not even the K-5 IIs?
That depends. The IIs seems to outpe
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013, Darren Addy wrote:
>
> The K-5 is such a great camera... if you've been on the fence, this is
> the same body that was a grand not that long ago and there still isn't
> an APS-C camera that can surpass it.
Not even the K-5 IIs?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Seconded.
I paid the same amount Adorama is asking for their used body (and just
passed the 10,000-actuation mark on the shutter over the weekend), and
I'm well-nigh ecstatic.
-- Walt
On 2/13/2013 11:06 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
...and free shipping. http://www.adorama.com/IPXK5.html
That's $1
...and free shipping. http://www.adorama.com/IPXK5.html
That's $10 less than Beach Camera is offering them through Amazon.
Adorama also has a used one for $649.
The K-5 is such a great camera... if you've been on the fence, this is
the same body that was a grand not that long ago and there still
on 2013-01-03 18:15 Larry Colen wrote
I'd guess that the two worth keeping would be the K1000, for simplicity, and
the ZX-50 for features.
one thing not mentioned by others is that for the ZX lower numbers are better;
i have a ZX-5n with a battery grip and roll of film in it that i still need
ep my photo and camera gear. A few years back I used to peruse
craigslist for interesting Pentax gear. A lot of the interesting
lenses came with film bodies. Plus, I got a couple from my mom. As
such, I've got an assortment of film bodies that I've never even
used. I'll want to
enses came with film bodies. Plus, I got a couple from
my mom. As such, I've got an assortment of film bodies that I've never even
used. I'll want to keep one or two, just because, but should find better homes
for the rest. Since all of my Pentax experience was either with a Spotmatic
Larry's words:
I'm attempting to do a much needed cleanup of the closet that I use
to
keep my photo and camera gear.
A few years back I used to peruse craigslist for interesting Pentax
gear.
A lot of the interesting lenses came with film bodies. Plus, I got a
couple from my mom
and camera gear.
> A few years back I used to peruse craigslist for interesting Pentax gear. A
> lot of the interesting lenses came with film bodies. Plus, I got a couple
> from my mom. As such, I've got an assortment of film bodies that I've never
> even used. I'll
- Original Message -
Subject: Which bodies are worth keeping?
I'm attempting to do a much needed cleanup of the closet that I use to
keep my photo and camera gear.
A few years back I used to peruse craigslist for interesting Pentax gear.
A lot of the interesting lenses came
Regards film cameras I have only mechanical, manual exposure bodies
(if they have meters at all). Of the set you have above, I'd keep the
K1000 or acquire an MX, sell the rest. It's my film photography ideal
... when I'm working with film, I'm taking my time and shooting,
thin
ar. A lot of the interesting lenses came with film
bodies. Plus, I got a couple from my mom. As such, I've got an
assortment of film bodies that I've never even used. I'll want to
keep one or two, just because, but should find better homes for the
rest. Since all of my Penta
back I used to peruse craigslist for interesting Pentax gear. A
> lot of the interesting lenses came with film bodies. Plus, I got a couple
> from my mom. As such, I've got an assortment of film bodies that I've never
> even used. I'll want to keep one or two, just beca
I'm attempting to do a much needed cleanup of the closet that I use to keep my
photo and camera gear.
A few years back I used to peruse craigslist for interesting Pentax gear. A
lot of the interesting lenses came with film bodies. Plus, I got a couple from
my mom. As such, I'
The 50/1.2 and the Kirk plate for K20D battery grip have sold. The remaining
items will show up on eBay @ about 11:00pm EST this evening.
If anyone has second thoughts, search eBay on my seller name: stanh
stan
On Dec 14, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Some of the items I listed last w
Some of the items I listed last week have sold and been delivered to their new
home. I've added one lens to the list . . .
For Sale - 14Dec 2012
Overview:
K20D + spare battery $250
K20D + Handgrip D-BG2 + 3 spare batteries $300
Kirk camera plate PZ-117 (ArcaSwiss-standard tripod attachment plate
Have moved to the K-5 generation of cameras and am in the midst of a
re-evaluation of what lenses I "need" to hold on to. See below for details. Not
listed either because I have not totally decided whether to sell or keep are an
Olympus E-PL2 with its associated EVF and 14-42mm lens (plus variou
I haven't listed these in a while:
K10D $300
*istD with grip $250
Olympus evolt300 wiht 14-42 lens $250
K 300 f4 $250
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directl
I have for sale:
*ist Ds
K10D
FA100 2.8 macro
k300 F4
Contact me with an offer. Thanks.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directi
jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/eBay/28_2_front.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/eBay/28_2_side.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/eBay/28_2_rear.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/wilensky/eBay/28_2_surface.jpg
Bodies:
Black Pentax PZ-1p: EX+, no crack by battery door. Includes strap,
body
Alas, I’ve decided that I must get rid of some stuff I never use anymore before
I can justify buying a K7. I’ve never sold anything before, but here goes:
Pentax 645 with 120 insert and 75 mm 2.8 lens. I bought this from KEH and
hardly used it. Body was bargain grade and lens was excellent (K
>> Sent: 22 May 2009 19:19
>> To: Pentax List
>> Subject: K-7 size compared to a few other camera bodies
>>
>>
>> W H D
>> K-7: 131 x 97 x 73 mm
>> *ist-D: 129 x 95 x 60 mm
>> K10D: 142 x 101 x 70 mm
>> K200D:
Fascinating. But I'll bet it can't pee up a wall as high as a Nikon.
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
> Behalf Of John Francis
> Sent: 22 May 2009 19:19
> To: Pentax List
> Subject: K-7 size compared
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM, John Francis wrote:
> o The K-7 is pretty close to the size of the Olympus E620,
> except for the extra depth (most of which is probably
> due to the register distance).
>
The difference between the E620 and the K7 is the grip, not the mount
register. The
particular order:
o Digital cameras are much thicker than film bodies.
o The PZ-1p was *enormous* for a Pentax film body.
o The K-7 is very close in size to the *ist-D, except
for the depth. So if you liked the size of the *ist-D,
you will probably be happy with the feel of the K
Maybe Pentax thinks this IS Disneyworld. Unlike Disneyworld,
they have a lot of competition, without good priced lenses
and bodies, they are going to get killed by Canon and Nikon
and Sony.
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml
...maybe they're willing to sell more lenses, so keep the bodies cheaper
than they'd like... at least the extra stock already produced and not
properly unloaded. How many lenses they sell for each extra camera??
New management often look for "those lenses are just wonde
If Pentax new lenses are seeing big jumps in prices,
why wouldnt the new bodies be next ? ? ?
JC O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 7:44 AM
To: P
gt;
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Does anyone have any good info about new Pentax bodies. I still have to
>> replace my istD and not sure to wait or buy a K10d or K20d...
>>
>> Thanks Joe
>> http://photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
&g
--- On Tue, 8/19/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Any new info on new Pentax bodies
>> To: pdml@pdml.net
>> Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 10:15 AM
>> Does anyone have
I noticed a serious price drop of the K20D in the last weeks. Can't wait :)
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 7:15 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any good info about new Pentax bodies. I still have to
> replace my istD and not sure to wait or buy a K10d or K20d...
>
Should have some info on such coming out of next month's Photokina.
Jack
--- On Tue, 8/19/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Any new info on new Pentax bodies
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Tuesd
I've heard of a K2000D as a possibility, but nothing at the higher
end. The K10D and K20D are excellent bodies and nice upgrades over the
*istD though, I'd have little hesitation in recommending them.
Any announcements will come in the next few weeks as the leadup to
Photokina, the prem
Does anyone have any good info about new Pentax bodies. I still have to replace
my istD and not sure to wait or buy a K10d or K20d...
Thanks Joe
http://photo.net/photos/pjjdxn
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Leon, just keep in mind this might change.
All DA* till now are indeed Dual-AF lenses. Future DA* might be SDM-only.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PD
2008 at 8:52 PM, Leon Altoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Could someone who has one of the DA* lenses (16-50 specifically at the
>> moment, but I want to know for both) let me know if they auto focus on
>> the older bodies such as the *is
* lenses (16-50 specifically at the
> moment, but I want to know for both) let me know if they auto focus on
> the older bodies such as the *istD and *istDS?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Leon
>
> http://www.bluering.org.au
> http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
>
>
> --
> PDML P
Hi All,
Could someone who has one of the DA* lenses (16-50 specifically at the
moment, but I want to know for both) let me know if they auto focus on
the older bodies such as the *istD and *istDS?
Thanks.
--
Leon
http://www.bluering.org.au
http://www.bluering.org.au/leon
--
PDML
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Loveless"
> Subject: Re: Aperture operation on film bodies
>
>
>
>>> On my system, flashing neon lights put on an amazing show, a small
>>> orchestra plays a rousing
>>>
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: Aperture operation on film bodies
>>
>> On my system, flashing neon lights put on an amazing show, a small orchestra
>> plays a rousing
>> Brahms symphony and my wife puts on leather underwear
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Walter Hamler"
> Subject: Re: Aperture operation on film bodies
>
>
>> Damn I'm dumb!!
>>
>> I was expecting "something" to happen when I hit the Alt-Prt Scr keys.
>
> On
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Hamler"
Subject: Re: Aperture operation on film bodies
> Damn I'm dumb!!
>
> I was expecting "something" to happen when I hit the Alt-Prt Scr keys.
On my system, flashing neon lights put on an amazing show, a small
Worlds? You mean you're clueless in more than one?
David J Brooks wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2008 1:38 PM, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> OK. I am clueless.
>>
>
> Welcome to my worlds.:-)
>
>
>
>
>> Walt
>>
>> BTW, the Alt-Print Screen does nothing to capture a screen shot. My
ed the question on the aperture
simulator. Now I understand. Really makes sense now.
Walt
On 2/20/08, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Walter Hamler"
> Subject: Aperture operation on film bodies
>
>
>
> >
y other DA lenses and the same thing. Why
>> is my thinking wrong here?
>>
>
> Bodies that can't control the aperture simply push the aperture lever on
> the lens to close down the aperture as far as it will go. An aperture ring
> on a lens physically stops this
On Feb 20, 2008 1:38 PM, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK. I am clueless.
Welcome to my worlds.:-)
> Walt
>
> BTW, the Alt-Print Screen does nothing to capture a screen shot. My
> keyboard says "System Required" on the Print Screen key. ???
When you do the alt-print screen, hold
- Original Message -
From: "Walter Hamler"
Subject: Aperture operation on film bodies
> BTW, the Alt-Print Screen does nothing to capture a screen shot. My
> keyboard says "System Required" on the Print Screen key. ???
Press the F Lock key.
I'm usin
1 - 100 of 1278 matches
Mail list logo
