Re: Boris 2019-03 - Chimping lady

sanfedele wrote: > I clicked and liked :-) > Nice street shot.. and the signage is fun - bordering on naughty > > ann > > On 1/18/2019 2:17 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > > Have a click: > > > > https://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2019/01/2019-03-chimping-lady.html &g

Re: Boris 2019-03 - Chimping lady

I clicked and liked :-) Nice street shot.. and the signage is fun - bordering on naughty ann On 1/18/2019 2:17 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: Have a click: https://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2019/01/2019-03-chimping-lady.html Thanks. -- ann sanfedele photography https://annsan.smugmug.com https

Boris 2019-03 - Chimping lady

Have a click: https://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2019/01/2019-03-chimping-lady.html Thanks. -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: PESO chimping

Tue Aug 10 17:09:56 CDT 2010 Larry Colen wrote: > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4878422527/in/set-72157624694407156/ > > At least I didn't call it "the chimp" Igor (with a subtle but clear roar, menacingly swinging an N*-brick): "And who did?" ;-) Cheers, Igor -- PDML Pentax-Disc

Re: PESO chimping

On 8/11/2010 1:17 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: Just a little fyi for those who might find it interesting...on most sites that I browse to on my android phone allow me to zoom in and out to view pictures and text. The one exception is Flickr. For some reason, it does not allow me to do that. I tr

Re: PESO chimping

Just a little fyi for those who might find it interesting...on most sites that I browse to on my android phone allow me to zoom in and out to view pictures and text. The one exception is Flickr. For some reason, it does not allow me to do that. I tried 4 different browsers and all of them beh

Re: PESO chimping

I didn't know Lenin was a photographer... On 8/10/2010 6:09 PM, Larry Colen wrote: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4878422527/in/set-72157624694407156/ At least I didn't call it "the chimp" -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- "Here's something to think about: H

PESO chimping

http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/4878422527/in/set-72157624694407156/ At least I didn't call it "the chimp" -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

frank theriault wrote: http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html I like the low angle of this shot. Christian -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Re: PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

heye on an APS-sized sensor body, and we all know that a semi-fisheye is like semi-sex, but my feeling is that as semi-sex is better than no sex at all, so a semi-fisheye is better than nothing. Seriously, this is a fun lens. Hope you enjoy: http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimp

Re: PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

ex is better than no sex at all, so a semi-fisheye is better than nothing. Seriously, this is a fun lens. Hope you enjoy: http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html cheers, frank == Nice. Like it. Not sure what semi-sex is, though. Sex on a semi (tr

RE: PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

> http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html Wonderful photo. Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

njoy: http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html cheers, frank == Nice. Like it. Not sure what semi-sex is, though. Sex on a semi (truck)? Sounds rather difficult. Marnie aka Doe ;-) - Warning: I am now filtering my

Re: PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

> semi-sex is better than no sex at all, so a semi-fisheye is better > than nothing. > > Seriously, this is a fun lens. Hope you enjoy: > > > http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html > > cheers, > frank > > -- > "Sharpne

PESO - More Chimping on the Tube

semi-fisheye is like semi-sex, but my feeling is that as semi-sex is better than no sex at all, so a semi-fisheye is better than nothing. Seriously, this is a fun lens. Hope you enjoy: http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html cheers, frank -- "Sharpne

Re: A question about chimping

I look, or chimp, every shot i take. Pentax or Nikon. I check the histogram, overall look of the photo, etc. I DON'T make the sound though.:-) Dave On 11/14/07, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I like chimping ;-). (Like - "I am alcoholic")

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "Ken Waller" Subject: Re: A question about chimping >> I don't think that checking histograms counts as chimping, though. > > Could be right. I thought looking at the LCD in general, was chimping. > I haven't used a

Re: A question about chimping

self as> and trashing a bunch I sudden realized I was only looking at a corner of as> the frame. ugh. Probably didn't as> have a decent shot anyway. sigh. as> ann >> >> >> >> >>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>To: pdml@pdml.net >>

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 15, 2007, at 3:16 PM, William Robb wrote: >> How about shooting tethered to your laptop & review that way? > > I don't have the Remote Assistant for the K10 (is there such a beast) > operational, and I believe I would need to upgrade the firmware and > give up > the ability to play with

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "David Savage" Subject: Re: A question about chimping > > How about shooting tethered to your laptop & review that way? > I don't have the Remote Assistant for the K10 (is there such a beast) operational, and I believe I would

Re: A question about chimping

> I don't think that checking histograms counts as chimping, though. Could be right. I thought looking at the LCD in general, was chimping. Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: A

Re: A question about chimping

o my desktop cp,[iter, so I can cable USB from a powered hub to the camera and display it on my 21" monitor. Paul On Nov 15, 2007, at 6:16 PM, William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "David Savage" > Subject: Re: A question about chimping >

Re: A question about chimping

Tom C wrote: > It seems to me the term is now used often in a euphemistic derogatory > sense that implies one must not be a good photographer if they need to > look at their image to check it. [...] While I generally agree with what you're saying, Tom, I find it quite scary, and more than a lit

Re: A question about chimping

In a message dated 11/15/2007 8:50:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My point was that it's far better than having nothing to preview and can make the difference between getting a good shot and not getting one. Tom C. == Especially when one is in a locati

Re: A question about chimping

l > On Nov 15, 2007, at 6:16 PM, William Robb wrote: > >> >> - Original Message ----- >> From: "David Savage" >> Subject: Re: A question about chimping >> >> >> >>> >>> How about shooting tethered to your laptop & review that way? >&g

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" Subject: Re: A question about chimping > > On Nov 15, 2007, at 3:16 PM, William Robb wrote: > >>> How about shooting tethered to your laptop & review that way? >> >> I don't have the Re

RE: A question about chimping

> >> >> My point was that it's far better than having nothing to preview and can >> make the difference between getting a good shot and not getting one. > > It can as easily be the difference between getting a crappy shot and an even > crappier one, depending on what you are not photographing wh

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "Tom C" Subject: RE: A question about chimping > > My point was that it's far better than having nothing to preview and can > make the difference between getting a good shot and not getting one. It can as easily be the difference

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "Bob Blakely" Subject: Re: A question about chimping >I recently shot a hockey game (Ducks vs. Sharks). The first thing I did was > shoot an example shot from my view point. This gave me the info I needed > to: > > 1.Corre

Re: A question about chimping

is message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: "Tom C" > Subject: Re: A question about chimping >> >>, and to get it right one must see. > > Or one must have enoug

Re: A question about chimping

Ken Waller wrote: >If you don't occasionally chimp for exposure settings (overall & R G B), >you're a lot better photographer then I am. I don't think that checking histograms counts as chimping, though. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://

Re: A question about chimping

If you don't occasionally chimp for exposure settings (overall & R G B), you're a lot better photographer then I am. Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "ann sanfedele" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: A question

RE: A question about chimping

ving nothing to preview and can make the difference between getting a good shot and not getting one. Tom C. > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:00:22 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: A question about chimping > > Tom C wrote: > >>>>, and t

Re: A question about chimping

den realized I was only looking at a corner of the frame. ugh. Probably didn't have a decent shot anyway. sigh. ann > > > > >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>To: pdml@pdml.net >>Subject: Re: A question about chimping >>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:36:00 -0600 &g

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "Tom C" Subject: Re: A question about chimping > >, and to get it right one must see. Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities. > > You're right, it's a hallmark of many pro's to check and

Re: A question about chimping

William Robb wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Tom C" >Subject: Re: A question about chimping > >>, and to get it right one must see. >> >> > >Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities. > > >&g

Re: A question about chimping

P. J. Alling wrote: >Chimping is a bit different from reviewing, it usually includes sound >effects something like, "Ooh, Ooh, Ooh, looitthis. Ooh, Ooh..." ;-) > I think it has the looser interpretation now - the key being reviewing the shot reight after shooting or close to

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 15, 2007 11:33 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think the review screen is as useful a tool as Polaroids, it's just > too easy to miss stuff on the smallish screen. It's really no better than > the viewfinder in many respects. I'm taking the files to the 21" desktop > sc

RE: A question about chimping

bility to see a captured image immediately after exposure, is to a photographer, probably the single largest advantage offered by the technology. Tom C. > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: A question about chimping > Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:36:00 -0600 &

Re: A question about chimping

- Original Message - From: "Axel Belinfante" > of course, that studio usage may have been only a small part of > the total polaroid usage. Polaroid backs are rather big, clunky and inconvenient. They really only worked well in studio use, where lighting tends to not change until some

Re: A question about chimping

> >, and to get it right one must see. > > Or one must have enough confidence in their knowledge and abilities. experience, and tools/techniques that lead to reproducable results? > > You're right, it's a hallmark of many pro's to check and review their > > images on the spot in order to co

RE: A question about chimping

That's definitely monkey business. :-) Tom C. > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:26:07 -0500 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: pdml@pdml.net > Subject: Re: A question about chimping > > Tom C wrote: > >> It seems to me the term is now used often in a euphemistic dero

Re: A question about chimping

Reviewing the shot(s) on my digital camera is the same as shooting a Polaroid, only more efficient! Chimping. It sounds like a term a photo luddite would coin. Regards, Bob... --- It seems to me the term is now used often in a euphemistic derogatory sense that implies one

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 14, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Bob Blakely wrote: > What the hell is "chimping"? A disparaging description of checking the LCD that arose out of film camera users envying digital camera users the ability to check their exposures instantaneously. Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Disc

Re: A question about chimping

On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:02:09PM -0800, Bob Blakely wrote: > Reviewing the shot(s) on my digital camera is the same as shooting a > Polaroid, only more efficient! > > Chimping. It sounds like a term a photo luddite would coin. I believe it came from the exact opposite end of the

Re: A question about chimping

Chimping is a bit different from reviewing, it usually includes sound effects something like, "Ooh, Ooh, Ooh, looitthis. Ooh, Ooh..." ;-) Bob Blakely wrote: > Reviewing the shot(s) on my digital camera is the same as shooting a > Polaroid, only more efficient! > > Chim

Re: A question about chimping

And once again, here ya go! http://www.sportsshooter.com/special_feature/chimping/index.html Bob Blakely wrote: > What the hell is "chimping"? > > Regards, > Bob... > -- > "Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!" > --

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 15, 2007 8:02 AM, Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Reviewing the shot(s) on my digital camera is the same as shooting a > Polaroid, only more efficient! > > Chimping. It sounds like a term a photo luddite would coin. If the video that Cotty posted some time ago

Re: A question about chimping

Bob Blakely wrote: > Chimping. It sounds like a term a photo luddite would coin. It's more obvious when you're at an event or a "happening" or something and you see a whole group of photogs doing it all at the same time. Definitely shades of "oohh, oohh, aahh,

Re: A question about chimping

Reviewing the shot(s) on my digital camera is the same as shooting a Polaroid, only more efficient! Chimping. It sounds like a term a photo luddite would coin. Regards, Bob... -- "Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!" -- Guess the author! -- Guess the sou

Re: A question about chimping

looking at the (digital) photos you just took to check you got it right. the joke being if you like it you are going "oooh oooh" imitating the sound a chimp makes. ann Bob Blakely wrote: >What the hell is "chimping"? > >Regards, >Bob... >--

Re: A question about chimping

Bob, chimping is the process of reviewing the photographs just taken on the small screen of your digital camera. It has the same root as word chimp-anzee... Boris Bob Blakely wrote: > What the hell is "chimping"? > > Regards, > Bob... > -

Re: A question about chimping

What the hell is "chimping"? Regards, Bob... -- "Gort, klaatu barrada nikto!" -- Guess the author! -- Guess the source! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PD

Re: A question about chimping

Indeed, I often noticed that whatever is blinking on camera screen is not blinking in the LR ;-). Boris Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Just FYI: > > The reason for this is that the histogram and saturation blinkies are > calculated from the preview JPEG embedded in the RAW file. > > Godfrey --

Re: A question about chimping

Just FYI: The reason for this is that the histogram and saturation blinkies are calculated from the preview JPEG embedded in the RAW file. Godfrey On Nov 14, 2007, at 7:40 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks for this. Good info. I hadn't realized that the jpeg > settings affected the hist

Re: A question about chimping

Thanks for this. Good info. I hadn't realized that the jpeg settings affected the histogram. Paul -- Original message -- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:50 AM, David Savage wrote: > > > On Nov 14, 2007 6:20 PM, Boris Liberman

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:50 AM, David Savage wrote: > On Nov 14, 2007 6:20 PM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thanks. But then again what are these settings of sharpening and >> contrast that you set so that histogram is as close as possible to >> the >> RAW data? >> > > The in camer

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 14, 2007 6:20 PM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. But then again what are these settings of sharpening and > contrast that you set so that histogram is as close as possible to the > RAW data? > The in camera contrast, saturation & sharpening settings? Press Menu, and th

Re: A question about chimping

On Nov 14, 2007 2:30 PM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > I like chimping Mark! Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above

Re: A question about chimping

looking a bit blurred in this case. > > So I rarely "chimp" at all ... I turn off auto-review. But I leave > histogram and saturation blinkies running when I do digital preview > for checking exposures intentionally. > > Godfrey > > > On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:

Re: A question about chimping

. Godfrey On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:30 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > I like chimping ;-). (Like - "I am alcoholic") But I am curious ;-). > > Well, seriously now. On K10D one may zoom in as much as 20x into the > image. Can anyone tell me what does it mean in terms of lookin

A question about chimping

Hi! I like chimping ;-). (Like - "I am alcoholic") But I am curious ;-). Well, seriously now. On K10D one may zoom in as much as 20x into the image. Can anyone tell me what does it mean in terms of looking at the photo on the computer screen? And what is K10D equivalent of 100

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

Good idea. Dave On 8/31/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > frank theriault wrote: > > >Okay, first of all, thanks to everyone for their comments on the > >colour version of this one. And, thanks to Mark for clueing me in to > >the BW plug-in on PS that's in my computer (that he sold m

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

Nice Frank. Looks good on my uncalibrated work monitor. And it's certainly not too noisy for a high ISO pic. It would be very difficult to come up with something that clean with ISO 3200 BW film. Paul -- Original message -- From: Rebekah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Good

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

frank theriault wrote: >Okay, first of all, thanks to everyone for their comments on the >colour version of this one. And, thanks to Mark for clueing me in to >the BW plug-in on PS that's in my computer (that he sold me). > >This ain't perfect, but it's a damned sight better than my earlier >ham-

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

Good job, I like it better in B&W too. rg2 On 8/31/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Its a pretty good conversion. Do you remember what filter you used. I > find i have to try em all.:-) > > I like ther B&W version better BTW > > Dave > > On 8/31/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

Its a pretty good conversion. Do you remember what filter you used. I find i have to try em all.:-) I like ther B&W version better BTW Dave On 8/31/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, first of all, thanks to everyone for their comments on the > colour version of this one. And

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

This would have been a great Rockwell Post cover. Love it! Jack --- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, first of all, thanks to everyone for their comments on the > colour version of this one. And, thanks to Mark for clueing me in to > the BW plug-in on PS that's in my computer (t

PESO - Tube Chimping - The B&W version!

Okay, first of all, thanks to everyone for their comments on the colour version of this one. And, thanks to Mark for clueing me in to the BW plug-in on PS that's in my computer (that he sold me). This ain't perfect, but it's a damned sight better than my earlier ham-fisted attempt: http://tinyur

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

On Aug 27, 2007, at 5:24 AM, frank theriault wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/2etrth > > Okay, serious question: I shot this one @3200 ISO. Not much noise in > colour. I mean it's there, but I don't find it offensive. > > When I try converting it to B&W, it looks horrible. Godfrey, I know > you did

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

Frank, I just installed a set of plugins for my Elements 3.0 from photofreebies.com It includes what seems to be a good b/w conversion tool. I don't know what tools you use but it also works in Irfanview for a quick look. John G. frank theriault wrote: > On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

Frank, Is that is their reaction to the picture they took of you? John G. Being a yankee and allit took a minute to figure out the tube reference.I thought you had gone swimming! John G ann sanfedele wrote: > frank theriault wrote: > > >> http://tinyurl.com/2etrth >> >> http

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

frank theriault wrote: >http://tinyurl.com/2etrth > >http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtLBTV2ieVI/AoM/v5QYx3Be2fw/s1600-h/aug_27+003.jpg > >This is what comes of using a Canon... > >;-) > > hey - careful there! Hillarious shot , Frank... >Okay, serious question: I shot this one @3

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

On 8/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: BTW, The grain of ISO 3200 BW film in 35mm size is every bit as noticeable as the noise of 3200 K10D pics. For some shots it works, for others it's ugly. Whenever I've used 3200 film (I usually used 1600 BW pushed one stop) the results hav

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

I use the Channel Mixer as well, but I apply much more red channel. My typical mix is 80% red, and about 10% each on green and blue. I frequently follow up with some curves adjustment and sometimes shadow/highlight. The noise reduction in CS2 can help reduce the noise. BTW, The grain of ISO 3200

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

On 8/27/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/2etrth > > http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtLBTV2ieVI/AoM/v5QYx3Be2fw/s1600-h/aug_27+003.jpg > > This is what comes of using a Canon... > > ;-) > > Okay, serious question: I shot this one @3200 ISO. Not much

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

On 8/27/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > frank theriault wrote: > > >"Method"? > > > >I don't really have a method, per se. I just hit "desaturate", then > >adjust the levels. > > > >Am I to take it there's some other way that works better? > > Lots of ways ;-) > One of my favorites i

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

I'll leave the noise question for Godfrey, but I seriously like this picture. Says it for so many of us who are trying to keep up with new technology. Jack --- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/2etrth > > http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtLBTV2ieVI/AoM

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

These expressions are so funny. Had a nice laugh with this one. On 8/27/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://tinyurl.com/2etrth > > http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtLBTV2ieVI/AoM/v5QYx3Be2fw/s1600-h/aug_27+003.jpg > > This is what comes of using a Canon... > > ;-) >

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

frank theriault wrote: >"Method"? > >I don't really have a method, per se. I just hit "desaturate", then >adjust the levels. > >Am I to take it there's some other way that works better? Lots of ways ;-) One of my favorites is software called "BW Plus" that does B&W conversions simulating the us

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

On 8/27/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Love the expression. She hadn't just snapped a shot of you by any chance :-) > > WRT B&W. How are you making your conversions? > > Here's a quick & dirty conversion using the channel mixer method: > >

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

Frank, you can add an artifical "grain" pattern to mask the noise. (There are fancier ways of doing it but I just lay it on top of the base image in photoshop adjust the opacity until it's what I'm looking for, and sometimes play with the blending options). I find that helps a lot. frank theria

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

Hi Frank, Hope you don't mind - I had a go at a B & W conversion too. I used Noiseware to take care of the noise, and used Picture Window Pro to extract luminance, for this - http://picasaweb.google.com/petergly/OnePhoto/photo#5103359639462043442. I don't use photoshop - too complex and exp

Re: PESO - Tube Chimping

Love the expression. She hadn't just snapped a shot of you by any chance :-) WRT B&W. How are you making your conversions? Here's a quick & dirty conversion using the channel mixer method: Cheers, Dave On 8/27/07, frank theriault <[

PESO - Tube Chimping

http://tinyurl.com/2etrth http://bp3.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/RtLBTV2ieVI/AoM/v5QYx3Be2fw/s1600-h/aug_27+003.jpg This is what comes of using a Canon... ;-) Okay, serious question: I shot this one @3200 ISO. Not much noise in colour. I mean it's there, but I don't find it offensive.

Re: About "Chimping"

> > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In a message dated 5/2/2007 8:58:38 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Just curious, > > Anyone knows where the term "chimping" (as in checking the lcd of your > camera) comes from? or who was the fir

Re: About "Chimping"

First came to light, when a Mr. C.I. Mpanzee, looked over a photographers shoulder to see his recent portrait shot. Dave On 5/2/07, Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious, > > Anyone knows where the term "chimping" (as in checking the lcd of your

Re: About "Chimping"

oops, I tried google before but with a complicated search string... now I see On 5/2/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the first google entry that comes up answers your question > > Fernando Terrazzino wrote: > > Just curious, > > > > Anyone kn

Re: About "Chimping"

y > very well go, "ooh, ooh, ooh," much like our lower primate cousins. > Paul > -- Original message -- > From: "Fernando Terrazzino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Just curious, > > > > Anyone knows where the term

Re: About "Chimping"

In a message dated 5/2/2007 8:58:38 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just curious, Anyone knows where the term "chimping" (as in checking the lcd of your camera) comes from? or who was the first to coin that term? Is it related to our fellow

Re: About "Chimping"

Are they lower because they are short? G On May 2, 2007, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > When a photographer looks at his LCD screen, he usually bends > forward a bit, giving him the curved spine look of a chimp. If he > likes what he sees, he may very well go, "ooh, ooh, ooh," much l

Re: About "Chimping"

Of course. -- Original message -- From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Are they lower because they are short? > > G > > On May 2, 2007, at 9:08 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > When a photographer looks at his LCD screen, he usually bends > > forward

Re: About "Chimping"

Since the first google entry that comes up answers your question Fernando Terrazzino wrote: > Just curious, > > Anyone knows where the term "chimping" (as in checking the lcd of your > camera) comes from? or who was the first to coin that term? Is it > relat

Re: About "Chimping"

- From: "Fernando Terrazzino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Just curious, > > Anyone knows where the term "chimping" (as in checking the lcd of your > camera) comes from? or who was the first to coin that term? Is it > related to our fellow primates? > > >

About "Chimping"

Just curious, Anyone knows where the term "chimping" (as in checking the lcd of your camera) comes from? or who was the first to coin that term? Is it related to our fellow primates? -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferand/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http:

Re: PESO - Chimping

> >From my limited experience of shooting in snowy winter conditions, it > looks about right considering the light. Exactly my thoughts. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PESO - Chimping > >From my

RE: PESO - Chimping

Subject: Re: PESO - Chimping It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the mention. -- Bruce Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32 AM, you wrote: SB> Bruce, SB> I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the photo. Do you SB> see that on your system as we

Re: PESO - Chimping

Snow with a blue sky above always images with a blue tint and throws that blue tint onto everything else. I usually reduce the blue a little bit: our eye tends to filter it out where the camera just records it. G On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: > It might be time to re-cali

Re: PESO - Chimping

>From my limited experience of shooting in snowy winter conditions, it looks about right considering the light. Dave On 1/5/07, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the mention. > > -- > Bruce > > > Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32

Re: PESO - Chimping

Ditto. J --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the > mention. > > -- > Bruce > > > Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32 AM, you wrote: > > SB> Bruce, > > SB> I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the > photo.

  1   2   3   >