I'm going to be flip here, If I wanted my camera to think for me I'd get
a Sony.
That's not to say that Pentax auto focus is not among the least
sophisticated, of all the manufactures, but, really part of the joy of
photography is learning your equipment and subject to the point that you
get
I have owned Pentax DSLRs since 2008 (K200D) and I know that many here have
been invested in digital Pentax even longer. The main appeal to me, at the
time, was:
* Extensive Weather/Dust Sealing
* Used standard AA rechargeable batteries
* Pentax did not change the flange to focal plane distance or
Good to hear. I haven’t really been paying much attention. I’m not in a camera
buying position. My next will probably be a K-1 iii.
Paul
> On Nov 14, 2020, at 3:23 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 14, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> For birding it will need a viewfind
On Sat., Nov. 14, 2020, 1:34 p.m. Larry Colen, wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
> >
> > For those interested:
> >
> >
> https://photorumors.com/2020/11/13/new-pictures-of-the-pentax-k-3-mark-iii-flagship-aps-c-dslr-camera/
&
> On Nov 14, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> For birding it will need a viewfinder as bright as that of the K-1.
Isn’t that pretty much the big feature of it? They put all that time, money
and effort into a big bright new viewfinder, which is why it doesn’t have room
for gps.
For birding it will need a viewfinder as bright as that of the K-1.
Paul
> On Nov 14, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Nov 14, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
>>
>> On the K-5 the review button is on the left which always confuses me
>> switching with the K-1.
>>
>
> On Nov 14, 2020, at 11:57 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
>
> On the K-5 the review button is on the left which always confuses me
> switching with the K-1.
>
> Anyway, no GPS is visible so no astrotracer for you, Larry.
As long as I have astrotracer in the K-1, I don’t *need* it in any other
bod
://photorumors.com/2020/11/13/new-pictures-of-the-pentax-k-3-mark-iii-flagship-aps-c-dslr-camera/
Those idiots swapped the location of the green button and the review button
between the K-3-3 and the K1
It looks like they have a focus position joy-clit which bodes well for number
of focus points
Henk
> On Nov 14, 2020, at 11:17 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
>
> For those interested:
>
> https://photorumors.com/2020/11/13/new-pictures-of-the-pentax-k-3-mark-iii-flagship-aps-c-dslr-camera/
Those idiots swapped the location of the green button and the review button
between the K
For those interested:
https://photorumors.com/2020/11/13/new-pictures-of-the-pentax-k-3-mark-iii-flagship-aps-c-dslr-camera/
Henk
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
The question I have is will Nikon survive attempting to change from
DSLRs to Mirrorless. Canon probably will.
On 9/27/2020 2:45 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Being discussed on a Canon forum:
https://www.eoshd.com/news/will-canon-nikon-leaving-the-dslr-market-boost-pentax/
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
Being discussed on a Canon forum:
https://www.eoshd.com/news/will-canon-nikon-leaving-the-dslr-market-boost-pentax/
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
--
“The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
der.
> It is similar to cell-phones that turn off the screen when you bring it to
> your ear.
>
> Igor
>
>
> Toine Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:04:48 -0700 wrote:
>
> The sensor below the eyepiece: Maybe an EVF but why a pentaprism on
> the body. Maybe both DSLR and EVF. I hav
rote:
The sensor below the eyepiece: Maybe an EVF but why a pentaprism on
the body. Maybe both DSLR and EVF. I have wet myself :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and f
> It's been a very long time since I used a Pentax (or even Ricoh) camera now.
> The 2003 vintage Olympus E-1 that has been my favorite DSLR (along with my
> three favorite E-System lenses) is still on the shelf, works fine, etc, but I
> rarely use DSLRs anymore. My last, and prob
Seems like I am going to see the concept camera on the 28th of September,
on the Pentax-100-year even in the Netherlands ...
Regards, JvW
--
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com
Flickr : jvw_pentax
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I wonder if that's a real thing or just some kind of sarcastic comment by ADMIN?
On 9/21/2019 15:38:53, P. J. Alling wrote:
So the Pentax 100 years meeting is/was to be held today, or yesterday based on
your understanding of the international date line.
The New Flagship DSLR was/is
It's been a very long time since I used a Pentax (or even Ricoh) camera now.
The 2003 vintage Olympus E-1 that has been my favorite DSLR (along with my
three favorite E-System lenses) is still on the shelf, works fine, etc, but I
rarely use DSLRs anymore. My last, and probably final, P
Good grief.
At 3:38 PM -0400 9/21/19, P. J. Alling wrote:
So the Pentax 100 years meeting is/was to be held today, or
yesterday based on your understanding of the international date line.
The New Flagship DSLR was/is to be exhibited there so I figured I
would do a search to see if there was
So the Pentax 100 years meeting is/was to be held today, or yesterday
based on your understanding of the international date line.
The New Flagship DSLR was/is to be exhibited there so I figured I would
do a search to see if there was more information on the new camera.
Instead I found this
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 08:08:13 + (UTC) Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
>
>I received this today from Pentaxforums and also from the Spanish Pentax/Ricoh
>importer.
>
>Read more at:
>https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pentax-news/new-pentax-dslr-prototype-to-be-exhibited.html#ixzz603
/20/2019 2:33 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 20, 2019, at 9:28 AM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:08:13AM +, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
I received this today from Pentaxforums and also from the Spanish Pentax/Ricoh
importer.
Read more at:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pen
The sensor below the eyepiece: Maybe an EVF but why a pentaprism on
the body. Maybe both DSLR and EVF. I have wet myself :)
On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 17:35, Ken Waller wrote:
>
> So the sky isn’t falling.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Jaume Lahuerta
> >Subjec
ntaxforums.com/articles/pentax-news/new-pentax-dslr-prototype-to-be-exhibited.html#ixzz603AzzCzi
>
> Hmm. It looks as though I'll probably be buying a camera next year …
>
It will be very interesting to see how it performs. There seems to be about a
2-3 year gap in APS vs FF sensor p
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:08:13AM +, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
> I received this today from Pentaxforums and also from the Spanish
> Pentax/Ricoh importer.
>
> Read more at:
> https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pentax-news/new-pentax-dslr-prototype-to-be-exhibited.html#ixz
So the sky isn’t falling.
-Original Message-
>From: Jaume Lahuerta
>Subject: New Pentax Flagship DSLR Prototype to be Exhibited
>
>I received this today from Pentaxforums and also from the Spanish Pentax/Ricoh
>importer.
>
>Read more at:
>https://www.pentaxfo
I received this today from Pentaxforums and also from the Spanish Pentax/Ricoh
importer.
Read more at:
https://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/pentax-news/new-pentax-dslr-prototype-to-be-exhibited.html#ixzz603AzzCzi
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
5 years and 21,000. Love it.
Rick
On Sat, Jun 2, 2018 at 18:49 Brian Walters wrote:
> Maybe I got a good one as well - never any problems with it. Admittedly
> it's
> only had fairly light use (shutter count less than 1 in 6 years).
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
>
> ++
Maybe I got a good one as well - never any problems with it. Admittedly it's
only had fairly light use (shutter count less than 1 in 6 years).
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
> On 03 June 2018 at
I'm still carrying my K5 after has been
since I bought it when it first came out. Wish I had a memory again...(?)
Only difference is it's a back up in
case?? Have used it a few times in
both single frame and burst mode.
Image quality still surprises me.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 2, 2018, at
Bill wrote:
"I'm not sure if they got everything fixed on the K5 during it's run, but in
addition to the AF issues, they had problems with spots of cement on the sensor
on early ones and buttons falling off. Apparently if you got a good one, they
were very good indeed. I wasn't so lucky."
I gu
Congratulations to Grace!
We all watched her grow up, and loved every image of it!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7.
> Grace uses the K7 now
Yes, and I didn't realize how
contentedly.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:48 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
>> Thanks, Bill!
>
> I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for m
I have a good K5. Excellent high ISO. Autofocus was as good as my K7. Grace
uses the K7 now. (She graduated from 8th grade today!)
Paul
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 4:47 PM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
>> I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
On 6/1/2018 11:46 AM, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems.
On 6/1/2018 1:26 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for
web postings.
Pentax has always taken it up the bum for having crappy video. It's
always been OK for me,
is the video any good on the K7? Im looking for an inexpensive backup body
that has video too and the K7s sure are cheap now. 720P is OK its for web
postings.
jco
On Fri, 01 Jun 2018 13:46:11 -0400, Alan C wrote:
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
IS
I used a K7 for about 4 years. I shot mostly in bright light. Good up to
ISO 400, tolerable at 800, hopeless beyond. (About the same as my
K110D!) Now I have a K5 which is OK even at 3200. Everything else seems
much the same as the K7. No electronic problems. Can't imagine why your
AF was so ba
On 6/1/2018 10:42 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
I was shooting a lot of studio at the time, so the K7 was very good for
me. It ended up being a far better camera than the K5 in my hands as I
got a Friday afternoon K5 that had pretty much every
Nice to know my kipping it was a good move.
Thanks, Bill!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 9:34 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
>> resisted.
>
> To me, it had the best colour of any
At 11:23 AM 6/1/2018, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
The K-70 does not - it can use only the Pentax D-LI109 7.4 volt
lithium ion battery. I have seen no external supply options for the
K-70, and none are shown on the Ricoh site.
Do all pen
On 6/1/2018 10:16 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
To me, it had the best colour of any Pentax DSLR, but it was really only
good at base ISO. It used an updated from the K20 Samsung sensor. Great
at base ISO, but it went to hell in a hurry as the ISO was
OK, so I forgot about the K7..which I
resisted.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> K20D, then the K7, then the
On 6/1/2018 9:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
K20D, then the K7, then the K5.
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
Yes, but you have to buy the external battery grip and be prepared for
really c
K20D ?
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 1, 2018, at 8:23 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
>
> what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
>
> Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
>
> Do all pentax Dslrs have interchangable
what was the last top of the line Pentax DSLR before the K-5 series?
Do all Pentax Dslrs have some means of using AA batteries?
Do all pentax Dslrs have interchangable focus screens?
--
J.C. O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
Using Opera&#
the contact, looking from the back of
> the camera, that is the nearest at the right side.
> I measured another flashgun with "ready" contact: the "ready" voltage
> generated by that flash is about 2.7V.
> After firing, the voltage drops to zero and comes back when the gun
ut 2.7V.
After firing, the voltage drops to zero and comes back when the gun is
ready for the next flash.
The K1 (and probably all DSLR) uses the signal to
* to light the flash ready sign in the viewfinder
* to limit the shutter-time to the max flash sync time
* to add "flash did fire
A couple of years back the Chicago Tribune fired all their photographers
& told their reporters to use their iPhones to get photographs to go
along with news articles, so if he was using an actual DSLR, I'm
guessing he was NOT the press.
On 1/20/2017 9:49 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
Yes
Yes, Paul, I had seen those before.
A typical setup that I had seen (and it makes sense): a "steady" frame,
a mic, and a monitor.
In this case, it was just a bare DSLR, no monitors/mics/.
Cotty: yep, that makes sense, and that's what I was guessing.
But it still looked a
guration.
>> In front of what I think was the family walking through the halls, there
>> was a guy with a hand-held DSLR-shaped camera (without any bracket), who
>> was definitely taking a video.
>>
>> It's interesting what was the point...
>>
On 20/1/17, Igor PDML-StR, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>I just caught a glimpse of the live broadcast of the inauguration.
>In front of what I think was the family walking through the halls, there
>was a guy with a hand-held DSLR-shaped camera (without any bracket), who
>was de
I just caught a glimpse of the live broadcast of the inauguration.
In front of what I think was the family walking through the halls, there
was a guy with a hand-held DSLR-shaped camera (without any bracket), who
was definitely taking a video.
It's interesting what was the point...
Act
You should also note your aperture when you get that center blue spot. You
may find it is not there at other apertures. The problem is usually a FLAT
rear lens element (as seen from the sensor side). Using a lens with a
non-flat rear element should not exhibit the problem.
On Friday, November 4, 2
On 11/3/2016 9:15 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Collin B wrote:
At work I got the FA50/2.8 macro to have something AF for working in the
darker warehouse area.
But what I've seen, and it's not just a Pentax situation, when using it with
the florescent lights for piece shots I get this blue dot in the
Collin B wrote:
>At work I got the FA50/2.8 macro to have something AF for working in the
>darker warehouse area.
>But what I've seen, and it's not just a Pentax situation, when using it with
>the florescent lights for piece shots I get this blue dot in the middle of
>the image. Have yet to work
Yeah that's pretty unfortunate but you are definitely seeing sensor reflection.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
I think that blue dot is the reflection of light off the sensor being
reflected back by the rear element of the lens. I don't think any light
placement can eliminate it. The sensor surface is a lot shinier than
film is. Some great lenses cannot be used because of it.
On 11/3/2016 1:59 PM, C
At work I got the FA50/2.8 macro to have something AF for working in the
darker warehouse area.
But what I've seen, and it's not just a Pentax situation, when using it with
the florescent lights for piece shots I get this blue dot in the middle of
the image. Have yet to work with light placement t
Panasonic got no lolly. ;)
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> I'm not sure if this has been posted.
>
> Anyway...
>
> http://www.tipa.com/awards-en/pentax-k-1
>
> Not bad for a camera that hasn't been released yet. Mind you, everyone
> seems to get a lolly with the TIPA awar
I'm not sure if this has been posted.
Anyway...
http://www.tipa.com/awards-en/pentax-k-1
Not bad for a camera that hasn't been released yet. Mind you, everyone
seems to get a lolly with the TIPA awards.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
h
On 3/21/2016 1:22 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
Probably nothing you didn't already know about the K-1 here, but nice
to read such a glowing review:
Read more at
http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/reviews/digital-slrs/pentax-k-1-review
And another take on Weather Sealing ...
http://petapixel.com/2016
Probably nothing you didn't already know about the K-1 here, but nice
to read such a glowing review:
Read more at
http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/reviews/digital-slrs/pentax-k-1-review
--
“The Earth is Art, The Photographer is only a Witness ”
― Yann Arthus-Bertrand, Earth from Above
--
PDML
On 19/2/16, Jaume Lahuerta, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://www.dpreview.com/opinion/4721880615/the-long-difficult-road-to-
>pentax-full-frame
Interesting headlines from you and I ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
http://www.dpreview.com/opinion/4721880615/the-long-difficult-road-to-pentax-full-frame
Regards,
Jaume
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016, at 09:19 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
> april 1? how appropriate...
Rumours are an announcement on Feb 18 which probably sees it in the
shops mid March - or maybe even April 1. Remembering the April 1 joke
about the full frame Pentax a few years ago, if the people at Ricoh hav
april 1? how appropriate...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 12/15/2015 8:47 AM, Alan C wrote:
Look what they're asking for older S/H Pentax DSLR's in SA.
There have been a spate of adverts in the last week. I've converted to
US$.With std. lens unless otherwise stated.
K20D 570; K200D 570; K10D (2 lens) 400; K10D 200;
K100D 500 & 280; Kx (2 lens
Look what they're asking for older S/H Pentax DSLR's in SA.
There have been a spate of adverts in the last week.
I've converted to US$.With std. lens unless otherwise stated.
K20D 570; K200D 570; K10D (2 lens) 400; K10D 200;
K100D 500 & 280; Kx (2 lens) 320; Kr 600.
Mostly more than the
my SanDisk cards only once or twice.
Sorry for the lack of solid number, but I HTH,
Igor
Larry Colen Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:56:29 -0700 wrote:
Does anyone have any specifications for the bus speed for the SD cards in
our DSLR bodies? Under the rubric of Class 10 cards, different cards are
sold w
Does anyone have any specifications for the bus speed for the SD cards
in our DSLR bodies? Under the rubric of Class 10 cards, different cards
are sold with different data rates. My recent purchases vary from 40 to
90 MbPS. The last time I bought cards, boosting speed from 40 to 80 or
90 cost
Darren Addy wrote:
> We have a web project at work that involves digitizing some 35mm
> slides.
> I have an Epson Perfection V600 Photo which could do the job, but I
> decided to snag a Pentax Bellows II and slide attachment off of eBay
> and hope to do the job with my K-3.
>
> By my calculation
dust removal as
well!
HTH
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Darren Addy
Sent: Friday, 11 September 2015 08:25
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Any words of wisdom for slides to DSLR with bellows + slide attachment?
We have a
Depending on what quality you need and how many slides you have, the cheap way
I used may work:
To make a digital slide show to run at my son's rehearsal dinner, I pulled
slides from different times during his childhood, and had his fiancee's mother
send me some of hers--maybe 60 or 70 slides i
I suspect the scanner will do a better job. My Epson 850 makes gorgeous scans
from 35 mm transparencies. Just printed a razor sharp and beautifully rendered
18 x12 print from a 30 year old Kodachrome.
Paul via phone
> On Sep 10, 2015, at 7:33 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> I've scanned many
I've scanned many, many slides over the years using all manner of different
setups. Each has its pluses and minuses.
I worry about using older bellows units with DSLRs because of dust. Bellows are
great at capturing dust in their many nooks and crannies.
One of the more successful copy setups
Darren,
I never found the right lens combination to use with the bellows to
capture the whole slide.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> We have a web project at work that involves digitizing some 35mm slides.
> I have an Epson Perfection V600 Photo which could
I used an old m42 screw mount bellows for several years with my
snowflake photos. I was leery about putting the m42 to K adapter onto
DSLR / SLR, just because removing the adapter can be fiddly. So I put
the adapter on a 12mm extension tube and mounted the bellows on that,
then mounted the
We have a web project at work that involves digitizing some 35mm slides.
I have an Epson Perfection V600 Photo which could do the job, but I
decided to snag a Pentax Bellows II and slide attachment off of eBay
and hope to do the job with my K-3.
By my calculations, the K-3 should give the equivale
Yeah. I know. Still, I wish they could find or build the machinery
needed to manufacture it.
I understand it will never happen because there's not enough demand for
it that they'd be able to turn a profit. Doesn't change me wanting it.
On 2/10/2015 10:25 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
They don't h
Ken Waller wrote:
> Until my *ist D, all I ever shot since the mid 60's was slide film - so
> you're not alone.
> My mode of operation is much the same in digital as it was with film
> with the exception that I can zero in on the exact exposure I want,
> thanks to the histogram, especially using
You can trust someone on this list to tell you about the negatives about
any issue.
Yo MARK !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
Ken Waller wrote:
I wasn
They don't have the machinery for type 55 films. The plant they bought from
Polaroid was designed to produce the integral film types: SX-70, 600, and
Spectra. Pack type films take entirely different machinery to manufacture.
G
> On Feb 10, 2015, at 7:08 PM, John wrote:
>
> Sounds like it was
Sounds like it was probably Type 55.
I wish the Impossible Film Project would bring it back.
On 2/10/2015 5:00 PM, Mark C wrote:
Several yeas ago - 2002 or 3 as I recall - I took a workshop led by
Mark Klett who used Polaroid negatives at that time for some of his
landscape work. He gave an in
Back in the day, when my studio camera was an RB67 I often used this
same film/process for B/W portraits. It had good resolution, great
tonal gradation and was virtually grainless.
-p
On 2/10/2015 4:00 PM, Mark C wrote:
Several yeas ago - 2002 or 3 as I recall - I took a workshop led by
Mar
Ken Waller wrote:
I wasn't aware there was a Polaroid film with a negative.
I new this list was good for something.
You can trust someone on this list to tell you about the negatives about
any issue.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
lm. To be honest
though, if I were shooting film professionally, particularly landscape
or studio, I'd use my DSLR in much the way that people used to use
Polaroids to make sure everything was right before taking shots where I
wouldn't know if it was right for hours or days.
There
Mark C wrote:
Well... "To hold its own" is an expression that implies demonstrating
competence in a difficult situation including situations where the
object of the expression is out-matched. It does not imply superiority
or even equality but rather simply being competent and competitive. My
sp
Several yeas ago - 2002 or 3 as I recall - I took a workshop led by
Mark Klett who used Polaroid negatives at that time for some of his
landscape work. He gave an in-field demonstration - basically using a
view camera with Polaroid back. After he extracted the negative he put
it in a rack whic
annels. It leaves me more time to
spend on compositions and orientations.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Smith"
Subject: RE: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
Ken Waller wrote:
> My real interest is forest and la
Ken Waller wrote:
> > My real interest is forest and landscape images, and the great
> > majority of these are done with ISO as low as it can go, on a tripod.
> > In general terms, it's this I miss film for.
>
> What's to miss - you can still shoot at low ISO ?
> Not understanding your comment.
I wasn't aware there was a Polaroid film with a negative.
I new this list was good for something.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
I extracted the polaro
Well... "To hold its own" is an expression that implies demonstrating
competence in a difficult situation including situations where the
object of the expression is out-matched. It does not imply superiority
or even equality but rather simply being competent and competitive. My
specific use in
aller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Smith"
Subject: RE: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
Larry Colen wrote:
But you then go on to look only at resolution. I can pretty much
guarantee that any photo that I've taken in the past several yea
and catered to many pros who were slide shooters. His work was
simply outstanding.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John Coyle"
Subject: RE: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
I still like to shoot film, but only B&W, and
FWIW
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpCOoNh6evE
On 2/10/2015 2:00 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I extracted the polaroid negative (FP-100c film using a Polaroid Land
350 camera), scanned that, and printed it. I think that's 'real' film
… :-)
I'd been meaning try the process for a while. Basical
I extracted the polaroid negative (FP-100c film using a Polaroid Land 350
camera), scanned that, and printed it.
I think that's 'real' film … :-)
I'd been meaning try the process for a while. Basically, you take a photo, wash
the backing off the negative with a light chlorine solution, and the
On 10/2/15, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Whew. Can you tell I'm not working this week? ];-)
And sitting it out nicely ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-
to do it? You scanned it and
printed from the scan - correct ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
Um, yesterday. I printed two of my Polaroid shots to 9x12.
G
On Feb
st time you saw an enlargement
from a Polaroid?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "John"
Subject: Re: 35mm film v 35mm DSLR
On 2/8/2015 2:42 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Which produces better photos and print quality, 35 mm
1 - 100 of 5039 matches
Mail list logo
