On 1/29/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I found a *istDS for $329.99 new in box with USA warranty and
> went with that.
That's a good price. I just sold mine (used) on eBay for $450 + shipping.
Enjoy it - you've got a good camera capable of some great images!
--
Cheers,
[EMAI
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bruce Dayton
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:09 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Thanks for the tips - Was : Differences between the *istD,
DS,DS2?
Sounds like you got a good deal. The DS is a good body, especially for
that kind of
Sounds like you got a good deal. The DS is a good body, especially
for that kind of price.
--
Bruce
Monday, January 29, 2007, 2:55:00 PM, you wrote:
JCOC> Thanks for the tips everybody, especially the
JCOC> part about the DL,DL2, K100D and K110D having
JCOC> inferior non prism finders, I know
Thanks for the tips everybody, especially the
part about the DL,DL2, K100D and K110D having
inferior non prism finders, I know I would not want those
at any price.
I found a *istDS for $329.99 new in box with USA warranty and
went with that. NO, it's not want I really want
which would be a much h
; To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>
>
> The D supports hyper program with two control wheels as opposed to one
> wheel on the Ds/Ds2 which doesn't support that mode. The D has a
> smaller grip, (or perhaps I should say th
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
P. J. Alling
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 1:14 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
The D supports hyper program with two control wheels as opposed to one
wheel on the Ds/Ds2
essen
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:01 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>
>
> On 1/26/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is the DS2 better or worse than the DS
>> or D and
;>>> Or are there somethings it's lacking compared to an original D?
>>>> thanks,
>>>> jco
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>>> Mat Maessen
> I'll ask again, maybe nobody noticed.
> What was the sequence of the model release dates?
>
> D, DS, DS2, DL , DL2 or what?
>
> jco
Are you thinking of buying one?
John
The information tra
Not quite, Paul. The cameras were released in the sequence
D-DS-DL-DS2-DL2
G
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Yes, you're sequence is correct.
>
>> D, DS, DS2, DL , DL2 or what?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The K110D & K100D came out at the same time.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/27/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So would this be the complete Pentax DSLR
> sequence of release :
>
> *istD, DS, DL, DS2, DL2, K100D & k110D, K10D?
>
> ??
>
> Or did the K110D actually come out later than the K100
D?
>
> ??
>
> Or did the K110D actually come out later than the K100D??
>
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 10:58 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss M
iday, January 26, 2007 10:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
Ergh, DS2 shortly after DL, not shortly after DL2.
-Adam
Adam Maas wrote:
> Not quite, it's D, DS, DL, DS2, DL2. The DS2 came very shortly after
> the DL2 and the DL actuall
dates?
>>>
>>> D, DS, DS2, DL , DL2 or what?
>>>
>>> jco
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>> Behalf Of
>>> Godfrey DiGiorgi
>>> Sent: Friday, Janu
AIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of
>> Godfrey DiGiorgi
>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:46 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:21
gt; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 9:46 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>
>
>
> On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote
Mail List
Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>> - When I'm working on a tripod, I leave it on for the maximum time
>> and turn on the histogram display.
>>
> Impossible with the -D without manua
On Jan 26, 2007, at 6:05 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 27/01/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Different needs beg different uses:
>>
>> - I leave review on for 1 second most of the time, just enough to see
>> if there are any saturation blinkies when I do a quick test sho
On Jan 26, 2007, at 5:21 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>> - When I'm working on a tripod, I leave it on for the maximum time
>> and turn on the histogram display.
>>
> Impossible with the -D without manually hitting INFO every time,
> no?
Yes, it's only possible using the DS and later bodies.
On 27/01/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Different needs beg different uses:
>
> - I leave review on for 1 second most of the time, just enough to see
> if there are any saturation blinkies when I do a quick test shot.
>
> - When it becomes distracting photographing people, I turn
> - When I'm working on a tripod, I leave it on for the maximum time
> and turn on the histogram display.
>
Impossible with the -D without manually hitting INFO every time,
no?
-Cory
--
*
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., P
>> I also recall that the -D does not provide the option of a
>> displaying a histogram after taking a shot. It's available, but only
>> after poking through a menu or something.
>
> Or something. Just push the "Info" button.
>
> Personally I turn auto-review off, so it doesn't really matte
Different needs beg different uses:
- I leave review on for 1 second most of the time, just enough to see
if there are any saturation blinkies when I do a quick test shot.
- When it becomes distracting photographing people, I turn it off.
- When I'm working on a tripod, I leave it on for the m
Ditto. After a month or two I switched my D to no review mode. With
my K10D, I immediately set it up to eliminate the auto-review. It's a
distraction for sure. Like you, when I want to see what I'm shooting,
I push the review button.
Paul
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:17 PM, Digital Image Studio wrot
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Stan Halpin wrote:
>
>> Not based on personal experience, but the general consensus is that the
>> primary shortcomings of the *ist-D compared to the more refined later
>> D-series brethren are the D's smaller, slower, write buffer and its
>> smaller LC
On 27/01/07, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I turn auto-review off, so it doesn't really matter to me
> whether or not the image that isn't being displayed has a histogram.
> If I'm reviewing images I'm already pushing buttons - one more push
> isn't going to make that much d
you are saying is the DS2 is the best of
>>> all the pre-K series Pentax DSLR models in all respects?
>>> Or are there somethings it's lacking compared to an original D?
>>> thanks, jco
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:44:00PM -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
> I also recall that the -D does not provide the option of a
> displaying a histogram after taking a shot. It's available, but only
> after poking through a menu or something.
Or something. Just push the "Info" button.
Per
;>> So what you are saying is the DS2 is the best of
>>>> all the pre-K series Pentax DSLR models in all respects?
>>>> Or are there somethings it's lacking compared to an original D?
>>>> thanks,
>>>> jco
>>>>
>>>>
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Stan Halpin wrote:
> Not based on personal experience, but the general consensus is that the
> primary shortcomings of the *ist-D compared to the more refined later
> D-series brethren are the D's smaller, slower, write buffer and its
> smaller LCD. I was thoroughly pleased wi
age-
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>>> Mat Maessen
>>> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:01 PM
>>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>>>
>>>
>>&g
half Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:16 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>
>
> The original D has better build quality than any of its siblings, and
> it
> can be fitted with a battery grip. Fun
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> >Subject: RE: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
> >Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:28:17 +
> >
> >The write s
D] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
The original D has better build quality than any of its siblings, and it
can be fitted with a battery grip. Functionally, The DS2 is the
The way your spitting these messages out, I'd guess your buffer is either
pretty small or maxed out. :-)
Tom C.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: RE: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>Date: Fri,
ay, January 26, 2007 4:16 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>
>
> The original D has better build quality than any of its siblings, and it
> can be fitted with a battery grip. Functionally, The DS2 is the best.
l respects?
> > Or are there somethings it's lacking compared to an original D?
> > thanks,
> > jco
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> > Mat Maessen
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007
t; From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mat Maessen
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:01 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
>
>
> On 1/26/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
riday, January 26, 2007 4:01 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
On 1/26/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the DS2 better or worse than the DS
> or D and in what way?
The DS2 has a larger LCD screen than the DS. It
On 1/26/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the DS2 better or worse than the DS
> or D and in what way?
The DS2 has a larger LCD screen than the DS. It also incorporated the
change including AF-continuous mode from the DS version 2.0 software
into its 1.0 software. So if you have a
Anybody quickly know the major
differences between the *istD, DS, DS2?
Is the DS2 better or worse than the DS
or D and in what way?
I know the DL and DL2 have inferior
finders now, but whats the differences
in these other three models?
Is ANY one model of the istD series cameras
better than all
41 matches
Mail list logo
