Cool. I wonder if Frank Theriault will see it? I hope he does.
IIRC he really liked Cartier-Bresson.
On 2/19/2023 5:11 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/02/13/the-lost-new-jersey-photographs-of-henri-cartier-bresson
Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2023/02/13/the-lost-new-jersey-photographs-of-henri-cartier-bresson
Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
<https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery>*
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pd
http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2010/apr/28/slide-show-henri-cartier-bresson/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thank you for the link Daniel.
One of the images in the slideshow struck me:
http://www.pixelsmithy.com/img/waistLevel.png
I've named the file that because, looking at the people's expressions,
it occurs to me that these people would not have these expressions if
the camera was at eyelevel and
2010/4/30 CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com:
One of the images in the slideshow struck me:
http://www.pixelsmithy.com/img/waistLevel.png
Neat. The lady somewhat reminds me of Christopher Walken though...
Cheers
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
One of the images in the slideshow struck me:
http://www.pixelsmithy.com/img/waistLevel.png
I've named the file that because, looking at the people's
expressions, it occurs to me that these people would not have
these expressions if the camera was at eyelevel and the
photographer looking
Thanks for that, Bob!
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
--
The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.
~ Dorothea Lange
98% of all cameras and lenses are sharper than 99% of all photographers.
Why, the Pentax of course! :)
Collin
**
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Which Ms are better? Pentax M lenses or Leica M lenses?
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Perhaps. But are the lenses really that good?
I'll bet the M's are better!
: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I think that is the essence of excellent photojournalism, actually.
The photo of Bresson's that leaps into my mind first as being all those
things is the one where a man is is leaping above
Hear! Hear!
Lukasz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of mike wilson
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi,
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I think that is the essence of excellent
Rob Studdert wrote:
The Leica R glass performs admirably but no better than the good Pentax glass from my
experience.
Several list members have remarked that the final one or two 50/1.4 Takumars were
arguably the sharpest/best normal nonmacro lens ever made. Why didn't Pentax stick
with
On 24 Apr 2002 at 5:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 24/04/02 05:33:44 GMT Daylight Time, Rob writes:
All their R
glass
is over sized and overweight IMHO. The Leica R glass performs admirably but no
better than the good Pentax glass from my experience.
I have a
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
For information: an article in (UK) Amateur Photographer some
years ago showed that this was a crop, as were some of his other
works.
I imagine I knew that at one time :)
Note: I am _not_ belittling HCB's skill as a photographer - I
_am_ somewhat
Hi,
I think those shots, all from the early 1950s, were made with a
pre-production, experimental Leica M3. It has long been Leica's habit
to have Magnum photographers test them, and recently Klaus Bjorn
Larsen tested the M7 for them.
Some of Elliott Erwitt's contacts from the time show the same
Why would Henri Cartier-Bresson make a lousy farmer?
Cos he hated crops.
D'oh. I can't belive I wrote that.
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
http
But he was Out standing in his field. Sorry, lousy farmer
joke.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Why would Henri Cartier
Well up till now I was only interested in landscapes (J.Cornish/A.Adams).
Alan
Just bought HC-B 'Masters of Photography' book.
I never thought much of HC-B's work until now.
My gosh, what had you seen before?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
A propos de Paris
Alan Abbott wrote:
Just bought HC-B 'Masters of Photography' book.
I never thought much of HC-B's work until now.
I am impressed.
Does anyone know of any other good examples of his work?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
You might be surprised by the number of Leica users here.
Lukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
I ... recently made a mistake of looking through a Leica
viewfinder and firing the shutter. Well - at first I wasn't even sure
whether it actually fired (sooo quiet and vibration free).
Enough already - it's
Neither can we!
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:19 PM
To: Pentax List
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Why would Henri Cartier-Bresson make a lousy farmer?
Cos he hated crops.
D'oh. I can't belive
Hi,
this question came up a few weeks ago and I sent a list of books with
some of my own thoughts about them. I no longer have the post, so I'd
be grateful if anybody who's saved it could repost it.
ALso, isn't the decisive moment at the heart of good photojournalism?
People have read too
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You might be surprised by the number of Leica users here.
Leica user? Judging strictly from the Leica discussion lists, I was
under the impression that that was an oxymoron.
[EMAIL
...Or, the number of folks who ~wish~ they had a Leica, Shel!
I think drooling over Leicas is fair game, even on a Pentax mail list. At least
it's a camera that has no equivalent in the Pentax line. A completely different
animal...
regards,
frank
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You might be
Perhaps. But are the lenses really that good?
I'll bet the M's are better!
Collin
At 07:56 PM 4/23/02 -0400, you wrote:
Subject: Re: Henri Cartier-Bresson
...Or, the number of folks who ~wish~ they had a Leica, Shel!
I think drooling over Leicas is fair game, even on a Pentax mail list
On 23 Apr 2002 at 20:37, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Perhaps. But are the lenses really that good?
I'll bet the M's are better!
Hi Collin,
Having owned Leica R gear and owning Leica M and Pentax SLR equipment I
wouldn't hesitate to say that I think that the Pentax 35mm SLRs complement the
He drove me nuts in the Adams documentary with his
pedantic, pontification. I did like the quote of HCB,
regarding Adams and Weston, The world is going to hell,
and they're taking pictures of rocks and trees.
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Annsan sez
I think Szarkowski loves his own
Which Ms are better? Pentax M lenses or Leica M lenses?
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Perhaps. But are the lenses really that good?
I'll bet the M's are better!
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
In a message dated 4/23/2002 10:28:12 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which Ms are better? Pentax M lenses or Leica M lenses?
For me, the Pentax ... I don't have a camera that takes the Leica ones. ;-)
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls at
Mike Johnston wrote:
I must confess that I stayed up TWO HOURS past my usual beddy-bye time last
night to watch the putative "interview" performed by Charlie Rose with Henri
Cartier-Bresson, and I'm pissed as a wet cat.
I was, as you put it, likewise "pissed.." beca
-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 11 January, 2001 06:46
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Charlie Rose and Henri Cartier-Bresson
I must confess that I stayed up TWO HOURS past my usual beddy-bye time last
night to watch the putative "interview" performed by Ch
: Thursday, January 11, 2001 09:45
Subject: Re: Charlie Rose and Henri Cartier-Bresson
Mike Johnston wrote:
I must confess that I stayed up TWO HOURS past my usual beddy-bye time last
night to watch the putative "interview" performed by Charlie Rose with Henri
Cartier-Bre
Hi,
Mike Johnston wrote:
I must confess that I stayed up TWO HOURS past my usual beddy-bye time last
[...]
great review
[...]
about it before gazing soulfully at the camera and truncating the
non-interview with a "see you next time."
NOT.
Cartier-Bresson is well-known for giving
dick graham wrote:
Charlie Rose is one of America's
most respected interviewers, with
good reason.
I like Charlie Rose, and I like the work he usually does.
Last night's show was an example of the show was just about
the bottom of the barrel.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
dick graham wrote:
Charlie Rose is one of America's
most respected interviewers, with
good reason.
I like Charlie Rose, and I like the work he usually does.
Last night's show was an example of the show was just about
the bottom of the barrel.
I enjoy Charlie
And I thught I was gonna miss the 37th Frame.
Mike, Bless you.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Johnston" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 7:46 AM
Subject: Charlie Rose and Henri Cartier-Bresson
I must confess that I stayed up TWO
35 matches
Mail list logo
