On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Winston wrote:
> So I won't ask more from a $300 camera body.
How about pre-A compatibility? Can't be that hard or that expensive.
Kostas
m to the shortest when turning off the body.
And if you use wide aperture lenses, *ist can reach 1/4000 too, not so
shabby compared to MZ-S' 1/6000.
So far, I think *ist also has the widest AF coverage among other Pentax
bodies, and having wider and more sensitive AF mean more chance to cat
How about the build quality?
I really didn't liked the *ist. It feels like it would break in my hands;
even my MZ-6 is much better.
And I think MZ-S have a much better viewfinder, this is more important for
me than 11-points AF. That's what I don't like about my MZ-6... I almost
Hi Ryan,
I'm back in Jakarta already. I think MZ-S does not have enough feature
for me to abandon my *ist. The *ist is a capable camera with excellent
AF.
Now I'm back in Jakarta already!
Thanks
Winston
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
Hi Winston in Perth,
That's quite a good price for Aus.. I remember not too long ago there was an
MZ S with grip for AUD1100 and I thought that was a deal. If you do somehow
choose to abandon your new *ist to scrounge up enough for the MZ S though, I
think you'd want to skip that lens.
Is anybody going to Perth? Check out Downtown duty free shop in city
center (near Hay st.) Last week I saw Pentax MZ-s with Sigma 28-80 for
only A$999 (US$700). That makes the MZ-S alone $580. Too bad my wife did
not grant me permission to steal that beauty! Here the MZ-S is about
$820 body only
This one time, at band camp, "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The manual recommends against it.
> The reason is that it uses IR for tracking the film advance.
> It has to keep accurate track to be able to place exposure data between
> sprocket holes.
Thanks, I will use the K1000
Kind regar
3 08:54PM >>>
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: I really like the MZ-S!
> >Interesting idea. Do you think they'll go with F6 or F6D, etc., or
go
> for another name?
>
> How about the F5D?
I think that camera is already in production.
The D1 or some such.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: I really like the MZ-S!
> >Interesting idea. Do you think they'll go with F6 or F6D, etc., or go
> for another name?
>
> How about the F5D?
I think that camera is already in production.
The D1 or some such.
William Robb
>Interesting idea. Do you think they'll go with F6 or F6D, etc., or go
for another name?
>Steven Desjardins
They seem to do slightly less goofy names than some we could mention. :-)
How about the F5D?
Marnie aka Doe Based on name recognition.
gt;>
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Desjardins"
Subject: Re: I really like the MZ-S!
> The funny part is that if the do release an F6 very few people will
> care, since many of the already small group of potential F6 buyers
are
> now investing in digital.
The F6 will probably be a digital.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Desjardins"
Subject: Re: I really like the MZ-S!
> The funny part is that if the do release an F6 very few people will
> care, since many of the already small group of potential F6 buyers are
> now investing in digital.
The F6
graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>OTOH, I have hear persistant rumors of an upcoming Nikon F6.
Yeah, it'll come out around the same time as the Autofocus LX.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
OTOH, I have hear persistant rumors of an upcoming Nikon F6.
--
Bill Owens wrote:
I would be quite surprised if Pentax, or any other manufacturer, were to
release any more high end 35mm SLR's. I look for a less expensive DSLR,
then possibly an upgraded Igital*Dist. IMNHO, the days of high end
ith this firmware problem.
>
> It was fixed early in production because the second MZ-S that I
> purchased did not have this problem. It was purchased 4-6 months
> after the first one.
That's why I wrote "probably". I was certain that it was fixed in the
European and As
Me too. RE: Autofocus sensor, I'm a "focus and reocmpose" kinda guy.
And, to be honest, I've gone back to MF most of the time.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed. This doesn't come across as being fixed before
retail production.
Perhaps this was the case in your country handled by your importer,
but was not a worldwide case. Production models were shipped to the
US at least with this firmware problem.
It was fixed early in production because t
Hi,
John F wrote:
> They came out with a firmware upgrade for the MZ-S fairly fast
> (to fix the frame-overlapping problem).
To Pentax's credit, they "fixed" this before retail production started.
Anyone who had this problem had probably been sold a beta tester.
mike
on 11.11.03 18:05, Mark Erickson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Remember the good old days when the 67 brotherhood dominated the list and we
> all longed for the new flagship? I went out shooting a night-time project
> last night with my MZ-S and I have to say that I really, really li
Jose R. Rodriguez schrieb:
Even though the *istD is a very nice camera, I have recently considered purchasing the MZ-S.
I just ordered one...
I really like all of its feature, especially the way it handles and that the body is made of a magnesium alloy.
... for exactly the same reasons. I
I have to agree, the MZ-S is a real pleasure to use. Even when I'm not
using it, I want to pick it up and take pictures. As well, the data
imprinting is very useful. If you shoot several rolls of film in a single
day, it's easy to put them in order (over 160 rolls so far, and more pl
I hope for both. :) That is, I hope that film will be here for quite
a while as well as I would like to see an MZ-S like digital camera.
Not that I think istD is not good, it looks to be a terrific camera
among it's digital peers, but every time I pick up MZ-S instantly I
feel very big ur
Mark,
Before I sold off my 35mm gear, MZ-S was my camera of choice. It is a
wonderful camera - great interface, size and ergonomics were just
right for my hands.
I, too, hope film sticks around.
Bruce
Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 9:05:05 AM, you wrote:
ME> All,
ME> Remember the go
Or even better - give us the digital with the mz-s ergonomics and
handling (but give us an extra thumb wheel so we can change aperture
from the body OR the lens too).
I love soo much about the istD, but whenever I pick up the mz-s it just
feels s right!
> -Original Message-
>
All,
Remember the good old days when the 67 brotherhood dominated the list and we
all longed for the new flagship? I went out shooting a night-time project
last night with my MZ-S and I have to say that I really, really like it. I
like pretty much everything about it. I've been ge
You may also take a look at this thread:
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=004pEL
BR, Margus
"David S." wrote:
> You are correct. The PZ-1 has no mirror lock up, the PZ-1P has the
> mirror lock up feature when you use the 2 second timer.
>
> gregcooper wrote:
> >
> > Some peo
P-TTL mode... pre-flash!!
My God, I'm glad I use an LX, no such complex considerations/errors. Tell me, does the
MZ-S have a PMT mode?
Anton
Thanks for the info Joe and Bruce(how many beer do i owe you now,Bruce)
Ok,i'll try that with the IF button.Vic touched on it when i meet up with him,but we
went
over quite a bit
in a short time,it was probably mentioned and duly forgotton
So in the normal area of shooting,say in sun or enough
This one time, at band camp, "David Madsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone who is considering an MZ-S should visit Dario's wonde
My main advice would be to think very hard before selling the LX and the lens.
You might really regret it afterwards, because none of the cameras mentioned,
comes close to the quality feel that makes the LX so outstanding. Even the MZ-S
is no match, although it is far better than the PZ1 - but
Anyone who is considering an MZ-S should visit Dario's wonderful site, which
describes it very well. I will say, Dario, that I have found that I
actually use that "HOLD" switch from time to time. I use my trusty Vivitar
283 on my MZ-S in indoor situations, which means setting the
Dave,
Unless the camera can set flash exposure compensation like the 1p then
you will have to do it the old fashioned way. Basically set to manual
mode, meter and set your camera settings. Then use standard exposure
compensation so that the flash will fire less than needed for full
exposure.
So
The PZ-1 does utilize the ambient light reading along with TTL flash
-- but in the situation you describe, the straight shot of a person
under a tree would likely come out with too much flash on the
subject, at least for most people's tastes.
With the PZ-1, you can adjust flash compensation wit
Ok so i read a bit of the PZ-1 manual at lunch(Bwaa haaa h,i really do
use
these things)and
the daylight sync flash has me concered,again,sorry folks.
It basically staes that in ttl auto the camera will set a speed between 250 and 60
according to ambient
light.But no more details.
In manual mode, the F100 & N80 control the aperture with the index finger and
sp with the thumb. This can be switched, via a custom function, on the F100.
BR
From: "Dave Miers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I only have minoltas and the PZ - ZX pentax line to compare this too, but if
I were take a guess
mber 05, 2003 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: MZ-S oddness
> I don't think there's a function to cancel the P-TTL. I believe you will
> have to configure the 360 for autoflash or manual to prevent the pre-flash
> from firing the slaved strobes.
>
> Bill
>
> - Ori
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Dave Miers wrote:
> I only have minoltas and the PZ - ZX pentax line to compare this too, but if
> I were take a guess here it may be an industry standard that the index
> finger controls the shutter with the thumb controlling the aperature as the
> aforementioned products line
On 5/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> I were take a guess here it may be an industry standard that the index
>> finger controls the shutter with the thumb controlling the aperature as the
>> aforementioned products lines conform to this standard.. Maybe someone can
>> tell me if canon and n
On 5/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Sorry about that.
>should have checked instead of taking from the top of my head.
Oh it wasn't the top of his head he was talking from !!
;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
The combination of the MZ-S with the 360FGZ gives excellent flash
capabilities. Why there isn't a 500FGZ is one of those little mysteries
only Pentax understands.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458
I can't remember who, but someone asked why my statement below made sense to
me.
I couldn't put my finger on it (so to speak) until now (other than the fact
that it "just felt right").
Here's my explanation. My last cameras were an LX and MX. With those
cameras I used my right thumb to turn the
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> They didn't. The wheels in the Z1p and the *istD perform identical
> functions.
> Jostein must know something I don't!
:-)
Sorry about that.
should have checked instead of taking from the top of my head.
Jostein
---
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 2:13 PM
Subject: MZ-S oddness
> Last weekend I took a roll of Kodak T-Max 100 with the MZ-S
> When developed, the film is hopelessly under exposed, as if
> the flashes had never been used. I was using an off camera
> FGZ-360 fl
Maybe I shouldn't say anything here, since of the three discussed I have only a
PZ-1. I've handled a PZ-1p and an MZ-S once each, and read a lot about them.
But for what it's worth, here goes:
The only thing that makes me consistently wish I had the PZ-1p rather than the
PZ-1
Advantages of each:
PZ-1p
---
1/250 flash sync (MZ-S is 1/180)
Aperture control from body
Higher fps rate
Flash compensation from camera body
Faster max shutter speed
Longer battery life
MZ-S
---
More rugged build quality
Having once held John's MZ-S, all I can say is that it is a very fine camera.
Haven't held the PZ-1, but if money were no object I'd definitely get the
MZ-S.
My .02 -- based on nothing much -- except some random fondling. ;-)
Marnie aka Doe Well, except the fact that it'
it is usually not
needed to compensate anything. But of course it is only useable with
AF360FGZ flash unit so far. You can use exposure compensation for older TTL
flashes, but it is less convenient on MZ-S, as you have to switch to manual
mode and then use on-body compensation dial.
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
It's all relative. If you are used to classic interface of LX, then MZ-S
would be easier to master and use. But Z-1P is excellent camera too, after a
while it is as easy to use as MZ-S and for some even easier. I like very
good, contrasty and HP type viewfinder, build quality, electroni
Peter: I have all three cameras so I can speak with some knowledge. First
off, I would not sell the LX. You will regret it. If you have two LXs, by all
means sell one. But I would not be without an LX.
Second: I would not say the PZ1 (P) is a better interface than the MZ-S. In
fact, if you are
;I'm considering buying an autofocus camera to replace an LX.
> >
> >Reading between the lines on some recent posts, people seem to value their
> >PZ-1p higher than the MZ-S.
> >
> >My impressions are that the autofocus on the MZ-S is faster (which I
> >probab
s (or even
beyond) and embrace this new fangled autofocus thing.
I'm considering buying an autofocus camera to replace an LX.
Reading between the lines on some recent posts, people seem to value their
PZ-1p higher than the MZ-S.
My impressions are that the autofocus on the MZ-S is faster (which I
I agree that the layout is fundamentally intuitive for me. Great camera all
around, with the exception of the weatherproofing, sometimes a problem for me
in Vancouver's rainy weather.
Quoting John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Jostein" <[EM
They didn't. The wheels in the Z1p and the *istD perform identical functions.
Jostein must know something I don't!
Quoting Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > It has one wheel for your right hand thumb to adjust shutte
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > It has one wheel for your right hand thumb to adjust shutter speed, and
> one
> > wheel for your index to adjust the aperture.
> > Cheers,
> > Jostein
>
> This makes logical sense to me, whereas the *ist-D's layout
It's amazing how much difference of opinion there is on these two cameras.
Probably since they are both great cameras. I have owned both and wish I
still did, but I had to sell one for financial reasons. I chose to keep the
MZ-S and I do not regret that decision in the least. I have the ba
> I'm thinking of moving my photography from
the
70s to the 80s (or even
> beyond) and embrace this new fangled autofocus thing.
> So the question is fairly simple.
>
> If I can buy an MZ-S for £450, a PZ-1P for £300 and a PZ-1
>
> If I can buy an MZ-S for 450, a PZ-1P for 300 and a PZ-1 for 200 which
> are typical s/h prices in the UK, what should I go for?
That really *has* to be your decision. We don't know what's important to
you. You've read the list of differences between the PZ-1 and th
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Peter Jordan wrote:
> Reading between the lines on some recent posts, people seem to value their
> PZ-1p higher than the MZ-S.
>
> My impressions are that the autofocus on the MZ-S is faster (which I
> probably don't need as I don't do many action shots
I'm thinking of moving my photography from the 70s to the 80s (or even
beyond) and embrace this new fangled autofocus thing.
I'm considering buying an autofocus camera to replace an LX.
Reading between the lines on some recent posts, people seem to value their
PZ-1p higher than the
Hi!
Alan, may I correct you? The MZ-6 came after MZ-S and it has full
support for all K mount lenses except power zoom (KAF2)... And it
could be then that MZ-6 was the last one .
Boris
On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 21:09:37 -0800
"Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Fully, and p
Doug Franklin a écrit:
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:15:21 -0500, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Does the MZ-S support k mount lenses fully or
is it similar to the istD in that regard?
The MZ-S support all Pentax lenses Screew mount (with adaptor), K, M, A,
F, FA.
The news FAJ aren't usable in ma
Fully, and probably the last.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Does the MZ-S support k mount lenses fully or
is it similar to the istD in that regard?
JCO
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:15:21 -0500, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Does the MZ-S support k mount lenses fully or
> is it similar to the istD in that regard?
Supports them fully, as far as I can tell. Well, you don't get matrix
metering (it uses center-weighted with pre-A lenses, I thi
Does the MZ-S support k mount lenses fully or
is it similar to the istD in that regard?
JCO
J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
Alan wrote:
>>Can it use the IR beam of the inner flash (or an external dedicated flash)
>>as a focus aid even if I don't intent to use the flash?
AC> You must use AF500FTZ then, the built-in flash won't do that. Don't know
AC> about AF360FGZ.
Affirmative. The projected pattern area is large
I'm beginning to see the Z1p as a valuable replacement for the LX when
stage photographing although I'm not sure how much more it will give me
compared to the SF-1n (I have not yet tried for such purpose). I don't
need 1/8000 but 4 i/s is interesting as is 1/250 sync. Noise is a major
factor,
on 11.09.03 21:49, Andre Langevin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is the focus aid for manual lenses working fine in low light on a PZ1p?
It can be sluggish sometimes, but confirmation works - of course it needs
good contrast.
> Can it use the IR beam of the inner flash (or an external dedicated
>
Hi,
Andre wrote:
What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter +
winding (compared
to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a reference)?
Can't compare them to the references, as I don't have either but,
compared to each other, I would say that the MZ-S
Hi,
Andre wrote:
> What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter + winding (compared
> to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a reference)?
Can't compare them to the references, as I don't have either but,
compared to each other, I would say that the
Andre Langevin schrieb:
>
> What are the relative noise level of PZ-1p and MZ-S for shutter +
> winding (compared to SF-1n and MZ-5n cameras I already know as a
> reference)?
Hello Andre!
That's not an easy question!
I would not only take the absolute noise level into acc
For MZ/ZX series you need FG so you the built-in flash can pop--up.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Do I need Hot Shoe Adapter F? or FG? Do both fit on the MZ-S, or just one?
_
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and
Thanks, Michel. I was just about to send a memo to the list
saying, "nevermind". (gosh, the list is slow, eh?). I also found the same info
on Boz's website. He has a table listing in detail which equipment pieces are
needed in order to connect a given body and a given flash.
http://www.bdimitr
of those, too.
Can anyone reliably tell me which one I need? I can't remember. It's going on
the MZ-S and connecting to that shorter cord that Pentax has (f5P?). Do I need
Hot Shoe Adapter F? or FG? Do both fit on the MZ-S, or just one? Judging from
the descriptions @ B&H website,
Can anyone reliably tell me which one I need? I can't remember. It's going on
the MZ-S and connecting to that shorter cord that Pentax has (f5P?). Do I need
Hot Shoe Adapter F? or FG? Do both fit on the MZ-S, or just one? Judging from
the descriptions @ B&H website, the "F&q
> does the *ist do high speed sync with the AF 360GZ flash like the MZ-S
Yes, it does. *ist has P-TTL, wireless flash, flash exposure compensation
and high speed sync with AF360FGZ.
--
--Lawrence Kwan--SMS Info Service/Ringtone Convertor--PGP:finger/www--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.
thanks
all hope that D*ist appers soon...If not future of
Pentax seems to be rather poor :(
Cheers
Alek
- Original Message -
From: "Heiko Hamann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: MZ-S, 43Ltd, Super A
> Hi A
Hi Alek,
on 25 Jul 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>So the condition of Super A is fine?Clean inside?
Yes, it is in perfect shape and works well. I bought it used and only
shot 2 rolls with it but the pictures were fine ande the metering is on
the same good level as my MZ-5n (at least on prints
amann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: FS: MZ-S, 43Ltd, Super A
> Hi folks,
>
>
> I was looking for a 77ltd for some time and some weeks ago I found a kit
> consisting of a MZ-S, the 43ltd and the 77lt
The MZ-S has a very precise transport system, needed to data imprinting.
That's why you need to be careful while inserting the film. That's also
why the MZ-S gives you, all the time, 37 frames out of 36 exposure film.
Z-1p gives 37 frames too so I don't think it is particular pr
Hello Michel,
I always used the LR6 indicator.
If the battery low symbol appears on the display
the batteries are nearly empty and must be changed
as soon as possible.
Regards
Wolfgang
--- Michel_Carrère-Gée
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Wolfgang
Höll a écrit:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using NiMh
Wolfgang Höll a écrit:
Hi,
I'm using NiMh-batteries in the BG1 for about 1,5
years.
Some NiMh battery types don't supply enough voltage
and don't work at all.
So I use the german "Haehnel" batteries with 2000 mAH
capacity. They advertise with 1,25 volts per battery.
One fully loaded set is suffic
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 13, 2003 9:29 PM
Subject: Re: Using NiMh batteries in BG1- grip with MZ-S?
> >I've had similar problems with my PZ1P & PZ1. Only realized the caus
I've had similar problems with my PZ1P & PZ1. Only realized the cause after
sending both to Pentax for repairs (transport motors were replace etc) &
still having the issue. Since then, I pay more attention to the amount of
leader I insert and I haven't had the problem re-occur on either body.
But I
cur on either body.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Using NiMh batteries in BG1- grip with MZ-S?
> >Sometimes my MZ-S has problems with the film
> >transport.
> >I think it's not the power supp
ufficient for about 20 to 30
films.
Sometimes my MZ-S has problems with the film
transport.
I think it's not the power supply but the way the film
is inserted into the transport system. In case I put
in the film (Fuji Sensia) somewhat too long into the
transport cogwheel the transport always
s
Alan Chan a écrit:
You would also need to consider the current
requirements. NiMH batteries are capable of
supplying a lot of current without much voltage
drop, something alkalines are not capable of. Some
cameras are designed not to be able to work with
batteries which could supply too much curren
You would also need to consider the current
requirements. NiMH batteries are capable of
supplying a lot of current without much voltage
drop, something alkalines are not capable of. Some
cameras are designed not to be able to work with
batteries which could supply too much current. There
were horro
Jan van Wijk a écrit:
Hi,
This has probably been discussed before, but I can't find it ...
Does anyone have practical experience using NiMh rechargable
batteries with the MZ-S BG10 grip ?
I am not sure the camera would operate reliably with just 4 * 1.2 V
instead of the regular 4 *
Vic wrote:
Looking at the first shot with the MZ-S and the LX, It's hard to believe that
when Pentax said it was making a new LX, they were not referring to the MZ-S.
The similarities are unmistakable...
REPLY:
Actually, the boss of Pentax camera division uttered that he wanted to make
Aaarghh! I need to have one of those chrome MZ-S! Gearlust again!
Pål
I hope you post those, please give an update if you do.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Stan Halpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> They ARE nice. My project this weekend is to do some shots of old vs. new:
> the LX with 30mm next to the MZ-S with 31mm, LX+40mm vs MZ-S+4
:-)
Somebody was looking for a chrome MZ-S?
I found a green one!
:-)
Well, don't take this too serious.
But the japanese seemed to be very inspired artistically by this body...
http://www004.upp.so-net.ne.jp/kitsune/shashin/gentlemen.htm
Perhaps can someone tell us what goes on
on 7/01/03 11:19 AM, tom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>> "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> After more than two years lusting for the MZ-S,
Try:
http://www.pentax-fan.jp/BODY/MZS.html
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Cameron Hood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: Got the MZ-S afteral
>
> Any pics of a CHROME MZ-S with Chrome Limiteds out there?
>
> C.
>
>
Any pics of a CHROME MZ-S with Chrome Limiteds out there?
C.
I love the grip, I just can't seem to keep a camera that I use that shiny.
At 06:05 PM 7/1/03 +1000, Rob wrote:
On 1 Jul 2003 at 9:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/P3032974m.jpg
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[
-Original Message-
> From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >After more than two years lusting for the MZ-S, and all
> the time thinking
> >"yes I like it, but no I do not need it&
Jan van Wijk wrote:
>
> After more than two years lusting for the MZ-S, and all
the time thinking
> "yes I like it, but no I do not need it", I finally bit
the bullet and got one.
>
> If I would wait any longer they might get extinct :-)
>
> Just got it today,
> > If you give it to me I'll show you how great it would look on the LX :-)
>
> It would look a bit like this (much nicer then on the MZ-S IMHO :-)
>
> http://members.ozemail.com.au/~geroc/P3032974m.jpg
You keep posting such pictures here, and I'll put you in my "killfile" ;-)))
Regards,
Lukasz
601 - 700 of 4099 matches
Mail list logo
