Thanks for your comment, Markus.
I was trying more for the silloette of the bullrushes,but i dont think i achieved that
very well.
Dave
> Hi Dave
> the picture is too minimalistic for my personal taste and I would like to
> see more details of the plants.
>
Hi Dave
the picture is too minimalistic for my personal taste and I would like to
see more details of the plants.
I like the idea behind.
happy Sunday
Markus
>
> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/bullrush.jpg
>
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/bullrush.jpg
Hi gang.
My weeklyy submission can be found at the above link.
I tppk it 2 weekends ago when the sun was out.lol Minor tweak in selective colour with
cyan. Just
wondering why my reflections ar
I saw this Brittish guy playing in the street on this cold winters day.
http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/p3264919.html
Got him with my SONY F717 (5MP) at 200ASA 1/200 sec. F. 5.0.
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
They will be proud to have a shot like this one to include in their
displays. It displays rider-horse control at it's best.
In my most humble opinion anyhow. . .
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was this a quarter horse?
Yes it is.
Great shot! Rider in total control. So was the horse, for that
Dave,
Now that is cool! Gotta believe you sold that one.
Well done,
Bruce
Thursday, March 11, 2004, 9:38:09 PM, you wrote:
bcin> Hi all.
bcin> Going through some shots and i thought i'd share this one
bcin> with ya all.One of the better
bcin> ones.
bcin> Dave
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all.
> Going through some shots and i thought i'd share this one with ya all.One of the
> better
> ones.
>
> Dave
>
> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/SLIDE_4728.JPG
Absolutely beautiful, Dave. I love the dust clouds... they're amazin
> Was this a quarter horse?
Yes it is.
>
> Great shot! Rider in total control. So was the horse, for that matter!
> Beautiful!
Thanks,this is 1 of 12 the Ontario Reining Horse Association wants to use to update
their
photo
displays.Printing starts tonight.LOL
Dave
> keith
>
> [EMAIL PROTEC
Was this a quarter horse?
Great shot! Rider in total control. So was the horse, for that matter!
Beautiful!
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all.
Going through some shots and i thought i'd share this one with ya all.One of the better
ones.
Dave
shot...
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
> fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
>
>
>
>
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To
Thanks Mark.She is our favorite. :-)
Although shot indoors,natural light from the bay window,a click with the colour cast
eyedropper in
Elements cleaned this up nicely.
Dave
> Beautiful cat, Dave. The details and colors in
the exposure are great.
>
>
Hello brooksdj,
A wonderful cat shot, those eyes are very expressive, kinda "ready to
strike" on it's prey. The DOF is also excellent, with the very sharp
face and blurred background.
Attila
Saturday, March 6, 2004, 6:01:30 AM, you wrote:
bcin> Colour shot from the D2h of Norm
Beautiful cat, Dave. The details and colors in the exposure are great.
- MCC
At 12:01 PM 3/6/2004 +, you wrote:
Colour shot from the D2h of Norman.The last time i sent
her picture in it was a
B&W.
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/PAW/NORMCOL.JPG
Dave
-
Mark Cassino Phot
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My PAW #3
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:01:30 US/Eastern
Colour shot from the D2h of Norman.The last time i sent her
picture in it was a
B&W.
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/PAW/NOR
On Mar 6, 2004, at 13:23, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
WOrks fine for me - I'm using Netscape 4.6 and a
dialup
The mystery car is still a mystery to me
Ferrari 308GTB. I wouldn't have known either :)
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
WOrks fine for me - I'm using Netscape 4.6 and a
dialup
The mystery car is still a mystery to me
annsan, car illiterate
On Mar 5, 2004, at 05:21, graywolf wrote:
I glanced at the source code. Your scripting software seems to produce
very clean code. What are you using?
Long story...
I couple of years ago I wanted to build a photo database, and I also
wanted to learn about cgi-bin programming. So I married the t
his page and browse
> from there through all the PAWs every week. Good examples would certainly
> continue to be mentioned and discussed here, but this would remove the need to
> mention every single one every week (and this would remove some traffic). What
> do you think?
I have my PAW on
Anyone can feel free to send me a URL to their website and i will update
the list.
The list has beem updated a number of times, last time roughly 6 months ago.
Regards,
Paul
graywolf wrote:
Pretty much out of date, I think.
That seems to be the problem with most of the lists relating to this
l
In a message dated 3/4/2004 11:37:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Wouldn't it be nice if there was a web page with a compilation of
>> links to all
>> the sites where list members store their PAWs (something like an extra
>> column
>> to the PUG list of member's sites)?
Pretty much out of date, I think.
That seems to be the problem with most of the lists relating to this list.
Someone thinks it is a good idea. Then someone does it. Then they think, "It's
done". No one (at least og those those who volunteer) seem to realize that such
a list is an ongoing projec
Works fine with IE 5.5 and Firebird.
I glanced at the source code. Your scripting software seems to produce very
clean code. What are you using?
--
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
After putting my last couple of PAW images up, I decided to set up a
script-based site to make it easier to add pictur
Wouldn't it be nice if there was a web page with a compilation of links to all
the sites where list members store their PAWs (something like an extra column
to the PUG list of member's sites)? I then could bookmark only this page and
browse from there through all the PAWs every week. Good examples
David,
It works perfectly and looks great to me on IE6 at 1024 x 768 pixels and
text size = larger. I like your choice of a grey field to display photos
on.
regards,
Anthony Farr
It works perfectly, Dave. I love the propeller effect... At first, I thought
there were something falling off the plane...
Andy
-Original Message-
From: David Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My PAW site
Hi all,
After
Hi all,
After putting my last couple of PAW images up, I decided to set up a
script-based site to make it easier to add pictures. I'm getting lazy
and editing HTML is boring :)
I'd appreciate it if a couple of people could take a look at the new
pages to make sure they work for you. Here's a
Ok. Then I'll go back in May to take a more cliché photo. So I can submit in
June under the "cliché" theme!
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My PAW week 3 - Sunflo
Different views are unacceptable. You'll have to return and
make a more cliché photo.
Andy Chang wrote:
>
> http://unlimited.name/cpg/albums/userpics/10008/normal_06.jpg
> But I thought that there are plenty of pictures of blooming flowers, so a
> different view may be interesting.
http://unlimited.name/cpg/albums/userpics/10008/normal_06.jpg
This is my week 3 PAW entry. This one is taken not long ago at a family trip
with Pentax MZ50.
We came across some flower fields but most of the flowers were gone so there
is no "sea" of flowers to take.
But I thought that there are
Chang
Subject: Re: My PAW (Week 2) - Street at night
Hi!
AC> http://ecoli.idv.tw/photo/street.jpg
AC> This one was taken last year when I first got my Olympus 5050. Never
AC> tried a proper night scene before so I got on top of the roof of my
AC> office and took this pic.
Andy, this
Hi!
AC> http://ecoli.idv.tw/photo/street.jpg
AC> This one was taken last year when I first got my Olympus 5050. Never
AC> tried a proper night scene before so I got on top of the roof of my
AC> office and took this pic.
Andy, this is excellent. It reminds me of some views I have from my
office w
Hello Andy,
I like night shots and this one is quite nice. The composition is
good, like the vertical, usually see horizontals. The exposure seems
just about right for the background buildings and sky, which causes
the street and streaking cars to be quite bright. I like the star
effect on the
Regarding:
>
> FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
> FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
> FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
> FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
I think the lighting works well in all of them; I prefer the composition and
the expression of 007.
Afrai
Hi!
FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
FW> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
FW> Obviously comments welcome. These are 4 that I made last Saturday during
FW> a portrait workshop.
FW> Camera PZ-1, lens 24
Hello Shel,
While I certainly understand what you are saying, I would have to say
that your terminology is different than most. I think a portait is
what you would call a "flattering, nicely lit picture of someone."
Something that goes deeper might be more akin to a "study" or some
such. Most o
Silly me. It's all that experimenting with whisky. I just thought he'd
aged a bit between exposures.
John
On 23 Feb 2004 15:12:29 +0100, Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There were two sitters actually. But I agree with you.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:27, John Forbes wrote:
16 works b
Shel,
How would you do that? Would you place them in their work area, or at
home, or doing their favorite sport? Something like that?
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:02, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hi Fritz ...
>
> The exposures seem to be pretty good, but these pics don't
> do much for me. IMO, they're n
There were two sitters actually. But I agree with you.
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:27, John Forbes wrote:
> 16 works best for me. It looks totally uncontrived and natural. I'd
> hazard a guess it's the sitter's favourite.
>
> John
>
> On 23 Feb 2004 12:46:26 +0100, Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECT
Frits Wüthrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
> http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
> Obviously comments welcome.
Hi Frits,
In my opinion the first shot (portret007) is the most appealin
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret007.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret016.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret019.jpg
http://www.wuthrich.cc/portret036.jpg
Obviously comments welcome. These are 4 that I made last Saturday during
a portrait workshop.
Camera PZ-1, lens 24-90mm, film Fuji NPH400, and the
At 10:05 AM 2/22/2004 +, Cotty wrote:
The marina from Mars! ;-)
Ah - looks like the toning worked after all!
- MCC
-
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-
]
Sendt: 22. februar 2004 00:24
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: SV: my PAW
You are right. The sun was very hard - and I'm not used to the MZ-S: I
should have corrected like + 2 (Very bright Scandinavian Winther sky). Maybe
I overdid developing as well (Ilfotech). But I think, for pics like this
Hi!
MC> I missed the ealier discussion on this PAW thing - thought it was a pet
MC> photo thread. But Picture of the week, makes sense and a great idea.
MC> Not shot this week, but I finally got around to scanning it last week -
MC> http://www.markcassino.com/paw/082419_paw.jpg
MC> The Chicago
Hi!
AG> This can't go in the Curved PUG coming up, so I'm posting it here. :)
AG> http://www.beyondthepath.com/photos/misc/candle.jpg
I hope it does not offend you, but to me it looks like a scene from
some kind of Indiana Jones (sp?!) movie. It definitely fits the name
of your site - Beyond the
On 22/2/04, SHEL IN THE BAY (geddit?) disgorged:
>Indeed ... Sailed to Angel Island many times, hiked around
>and picnicked.
>
>Cotty wrote:
>
>> I grew up sailing on the San Francisco Bay (berthed San Leandro) and
>> looking at your shot all I can hear is the slap of the halyards on the
>> masts
tively low, offsetting that.
Just a lovely scene!
thanks,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
Indeed ... Sailed to Angel Island many times, hiked around
and picnicked.
Cotty wrote:
> I grew up sailing on the San Francisco Bay (berthed San Leandro) and
> looking at your shot all I can hear is the slap of the halyards on the
> masts in the wind. We had a 23 foot sloop and many's the time we
On 21/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Not shot this week, but I finally got around to scanning it last week -
>
>http://www.markcassino.com/paw/082419_paw.jpg
>
>The Chicago Marina.
>
>Shot with an ME Super and FA 43 f1.8 on Tri-X, developed in Microdol-X
>1:3. The faux-sepia tone is inspired
Bundling several replies into one:
Keith Whaley wrote:
This is not an artifact of the exposure process, but you could actually
see this phenomenon with your own eyes, before you took the shots?
I guess that the camera reads the data off the sensor during exposure,
and the effect you see is some
Hi Paul -
Thanks - that is indeed Lake Michigan, IIRC, the shot was taken from the
north end of Grant park, looking south. The bump on the horizon in the
middle of the frame is the dome on Shedd Aquarium.
- MCC
At 08:01 PM 2/21/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Mark,
I like this. Nice composition, ni
Hi Mark,
I like this. Nice composition, nice framing. The Microdol X seems to
have served yo well in terms of keeping the contrast under control. Is
this on Lake Michigan?
Best,
paul
On Feb 21, 2004, at 7:25 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I missed the ealier discussion on this PAW thing - thought it wa
Reducing the shadow on the face would require dodging, same as one does
in PhotoShop for color or, for that matter, in color printing. Burning
in would make it darker still. That being said I prefer the shadow as
is. It helps establish the mood. The angular light is part of the
composition in t
I missed the ealier discussion on this PAW thing - thought it was a pet
photo thread. But Picture of the week, makes sense and a great idea.
Not shot this week, but I finally got around to scanning it last week -
http://www.markcassino.com/paw/082419_paw.jpg
The Chicago Marina.
Shot with an M
I like the first one, though I think it would be stronger if you could
dodge the shadow that hits the person on the right. The contrasting facial
expressions are engaging.
- MCC
At 11:51 PM 2/21/2004 +0100, you wrote:
Hi
I met a bunch of hobos at the locat marketplace today.
A few crowns to the
On 21 Feb 2004 at 9:32, Stan Halpin wrote:
> The Palm Zire 71 is in fact a Palm PDA. Has a built in lens.
> Looking at mine, I see no evidence of a mechanical shutter
> of any kind.
>
> In David's shot, at least some of the visual phenomenon must
> be due to the multiple reflections in the dou
EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 22. februar 2004 00:15
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: my PAW
>In a message dated 2/21/2004 2:52:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
&g
>In a message dated 2/21/2004 2:52:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>http://gallery46369.fotopic.net/
>Jens Bladt
Very nice. Good character study and good composition.
I'd probably like it better though, if there was a tinge less shadow on the
right guy's face. Burning i
Any explanation for the effect? I like the effect.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann"
Subject: Re: my PAW
> I might as well jump on this bandwagon.
>
> http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/plane.html
>
> Unretouched, straight fro
I sure couldn't figure it out.
frank theriault wrote:
What a wild effect!!
Anyone have any idea what causes that? I've never seen that before.
Amazing.
From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: my PAW
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 200
y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: my PAW
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:53:57 +
Isn't it the slit of the shutter repeatedly catching the propeller as the
former moves down a
A fascinating -- and quite beautiful -- image. Is it over the south
island? The propeller effect is amazing. I can't imagine what could
have caused it to form such an image. Nice pic.
On Feb 20, 2004, at 11:29 PM, David Mann wrote:
I might as well jump on this bandwagon.
http://www.digistar.com
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: my PAW
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:29:59 +1300
I might as well jump on this bandwagon.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/plane.html
Unretouched, straight from the camera.
Cheers
; -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: my PAW
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:29:59 +1300
I might as well jump on this bandwagon.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/plane.html
Unretouched, straight from the
>In a message dated 2/20/2004 8:34:08 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I might as well jump on this bandwagon.
>http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/plane.html
>Unretouched, straight from the camera.
>Cheers,
>- Dave
That is really weird.
And ubercool.
Marnie aka Doe I
Looks like maybe the aircraft moved slightly during the exposure and caught
the spinning propeller blades in different places in its rotation? Somewhat
like vehicles wheels moving backwards and the vehicle itselg moving forward
in video?
Just a guess
Bill
> What a wild effect!!
>
> Anyone hav
>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: my PAW
Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:29:59 +1300
I might as well jump on this bandwagon.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/plane.html
Unretouched, straight from the camera.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://ww
e optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.
> The pessimist
> fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
>
>
>
>
> >From: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
rom: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: my PAW
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:47:43 -0500
This can't go in the Curved PUG coming up, so I'm posting it here. :)
http://www.beyondthepath.com/photos/misc/candle.jpg
68 matches
Mail list logo