On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:52:59 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Gang.
>
> Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
> of: Local
> paper called
> Farm and Rural Life.
>
>
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=vie
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Gang.
>
> Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
> of: Local
> paper called
> Farm and Rural Life.
>
>
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389.jpg
>
> Hey, its a start.LOL
>
> Now
Congrats, Dave!
Well done!
Wendy
> Congratulations Dave!
> Do you know how they're going to set up the cover to use this shot? I
> mean, you have a horizontally-framed photo and most magazines are taller
> than they are wide.
>
> Good work!> --
> Mark Roberts
> Photography and writing
> w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
>of:
>Local paper called Farm and Rural Life.
>
>
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389.jpg
>
Congratulations Dave!
Do you know how they're going to
Way to go Dave!
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Paw: My first Cover Photo
Hi Gang.
Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
of: Local
paper called
Farm and Rural Life.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408
On 27/10/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the
>cover of: Local
>paper called
>Farm and Rural Life.
>
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/
>?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389.jpg
Way to go Brooksy.
Hi!
Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
of: Local
paper called
Farm and Rural Life.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389.jpg
Hey, its a start.LOL
Now i have to start shooting cows & sheep, as well as ho
Congrats. Great shot, it deserves to be on a cover. Keep em coming.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gang.
Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
of: Local
paper called
Farm and Rural Life.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=vie
It's always nice to have a photo deemed worthy of publication. When some
publication decides to publish your photo, it's quite gratifying. Good job!
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Paw: My first Cover
Thank you Sir.
Dave
> Great news, Dave. Very happy for you ;-))
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From:
> > Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the
> cover of: Local
> > paper called Farm and Rural Life.
> >
> >
>
Great news, Dave. Very happy for you ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the
cover of: Local
> paper called Farm and Rural Life.
>
>
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389
.jpg
Thanks Bruce.
As far as Reining pictures go,this is the money shot. The more dust the better.
Thanks for looking
Dave
> Very cool shot, Dave. I love those
where the dirt has kicked up and
> the moment is frozen. Congrats on the cover!
>
> --
> Bruce
Very cool shot, Dave. I love those where the dirt has kicked up and
the moment is frozen. Congrats on the cover!
--
Bruce
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 4:52:59 AM, you wrote:
bcin> Hi Gang.
bcin> Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this
bcin> shot made the the cover of: Loc
Thanks Gaurav.
I'm very thrilled to have this honour, and i know the ladies in question. They
DO look
good with
heads.LOL
Dave
> Congratulations! Its a great shot. Many times
better than the typical
> Rolling Stones
> cover. Great detail, perfect timing and
Congratulations! Its a great shot. Many times better than the typical
Rolling Stones
cover. Great detail, perfect timing and a story that is quite evident.
I would just want
to see the heads of the two ladies on the right top corner :-) But hey
the magazine
is not about them... All the best for mor
Hi Gang.
Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
of: Local
paper called
Farm and Rural Life.
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389.jpg
Hey, its a start.LOL
Now i have to start shooting cows & sheep, as well
meant it that way, not simply the out come of not considering the result.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 11:52 PM
Subject: Re[2]:
Hi!
KW> Boris, nice pose, good focus & light. If it were mine I'd crop out about
KW> half the distance from the boy's head to the top edge and either include all
KW> of his left arm or crop more of it out.
KW> So tell us how you like your *ist D.
Hmmm, cropping... The attraction of the Dark Side
quot;Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 2:45 PM
Subject: PAW - My first street shoot out :)
> Hi!
>
> http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/53038
>
> Went with photoclub member of which I
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/53038
Went with photoclub member of which I happen to be to shoot some
people today :).
What do you say?
Please be brutal as I need to learn. Actually, please always be brutal
:).
Boris, I like your photography, as a rule, but...
Hi!
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/53038
Went with photoclub member of which I happen to be to shoot some
people today :).
What do you say?
Please be brutal as I need to learn. Actually, please always be brutal
:).
--
Boris
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:33:16 +0200, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/50999
>
> What do you say?
>
I say that doesn't look like Israel, that's what I say!
I had no idea that parts of your country looked like that, Boris? Or
did you t
Boris Liberman wrote on 10.11.04 5:33:
> Hi!
>
> http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/50999
>
> What do you say?
Hi Boris,
I'd say it's a great stuff :-) Beautiful mountain view gradation, from
black, to almost white, overall smoothness adds for mood. Really nicely
done!
--
Pozdrowienia
S
Hello Boris,
First let me say that I am a succor for the layered mountain thing.
On that count, I love it. The foreground trees offset it nicely. I
would be curious as to what the color version looked like. It might
give me more ideas about how things went for your first round with the
camera.
Hi Boris ...
Unlike Kevin, I don't think the foreground needs much, if any, detail. I
like the idea of seeing just shades of grey. However, the foreground seem
out of synch with the rest of the scene - sharp verticals of an irregular
pattern against a rolling, gentle background. To my mind they
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 06:33:16 +0200
Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/50999
This is a nice scene. However, you said to be brutal...
For mine, the large black area in the fore ground is just that,
a large black area. I like to see some sort of de
Hi!
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/50999
What do you say?
--
Boris
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought I'll throw in some PAW's myself too.
These are some recent scans of some b/w ones I have developed and copied
myself.
Scanned in with a lowsy flatbed scanner, so don't whine about the
quality. :-)
http://www.bicekru.org/~eatfrog/pics/newpics/pentax/bw/
Thanks,
Henri
Hello Derby,
The samples that Butch showed me, looked nice, but did not look like a
soft focus lens. Do you have any samples of this technique that I
could examine?
Thanks,
Bruce
No worries, Bruce. Here is a jpeg and it's original file for comparison.
I think this works best when the backg
Thanks for the tip. I'll try that out.
It still is a totally different effect than soft focus. Soft focus is
not meant to smooth wrinkles per se, but it actually causes highlights
to expand and blur a bit - more like a halo. That is why a standard
diffusion filter doesn't do the trick.
Bruce
Try this:
http://www.mediachance.com/digicam/cleanskin.htm
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Any suggestions that would mimic a soft focus lens reasonably well?
>
(snip)
There are a number of soft focus filters available for
the Cokin filter contraption; as I recall, Cokin sells 2
or 3 types. The effect varies depending on f-stop, lens
focal length, and on where, in the contraption, the filter
is mounted. So you'd have some experimenting to do.
Bruce Dayton wrote
Any suggestions that would mimic a soft focus lens reasonably well?
Diffusers are not at all the same type of animal.
Zeiss softar filters are supposed to be good but very expensive. With the
*ist-D I think I would just use gaussian blur in PS, duplicate the
background layer first, then apply, the
Bruce,
I think him looking at her is on the right track.
The first shot is very pretty and dreamy, but the body language is wrong.
He's looking at us and she's contemplating something.
Better is your suggestion of him looking at her looking at the bouquette.
Clearly, the first shot has something
Hi!
BD> I don't have a soft focus lens in 35mm (sold it to Boris) and so
BD> haven't really played much yet with that style on the *istD. The
BD> focal lengths that Pentax offers just don't seem to be right. With
BD> the 67, the 120mm gave a equivalent of about 60mm which worked for
BD> both coup
Butch,
I just responded to Bob S. about the two shots. Perhaps what is
bothersome about the first shot is that their attention is divided.
He is looking at the camera and she is not. If he were looking at her
or something like that, it might feel comfortable.
Soft focus is quite tricky, because
Bob,
Thanks for the comments. This type of shot is less typical of what is
shown within the PDML and it seems that there are quite varying
opinions - all equally valid.
The attempt was to produce a dreamy shot. The soft focus has some
impact as does the pose and setting. In the first image, he
I'll add my 2¢
I actually like the second picture better. When I first saw the first
picture there was something about the dynamic between the husband and wife
that just didn't feel right to me. I still can't put my finger on it but I
know it makes me uncomfortable.
Also, concerning soft focus. I
Hi!
I am sorry if I jump in the middle of the train of somebody's thought
or something. Much traffic, little time. Anyway, I am quite amazed by
the difference between the two shots, Bruce. While the husband (he is
a husband already, is he not? ) virtually did not move, the wife
did quite some
Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 3:30 PM
To: Tanya Mayer Photography
Subject: Re: PAW - My first
Hello Tanya,
In the photos I made for her, I cloned those out. Of course, a major
hard drive meltdown a few weeks back caused me to lose those images.
I didn&
Hello Tanya,
In the photos I made for her, I cloned those out. Of course, a major
hard drive meltdown a few weeks back caused me to lose those images.
I didn't feel like doing it again for this showing - more interested
in people's opinion of the overall effect.
Thanks for mentioning though.
B
At 10:41 PM 24/02/2004, you wrote:
Seeing how there have been several comments on having the bride look
up rather than down, I have posted to the same web page, the other
version of this basic pose with her looking up.
You can see both images and let me know if you think the second image
is more t
Seeing how there have been several comments on having the bride look
up rather than down, I have posted to the same web page, the other
version of this basic pose with her looking up.
You can see both images and let me know if you think the second image
is more to your liking.
Here is the page ag
Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, here is my first one.
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html
>
> I would be curious as to what you think of this. It was shot
with a
> Pentax Soft lens and I have gotten strong response
Hi Bruce,
That's a very nice wedding shot. I love the fou
On 23 Feb 2004 at 21:02, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I would be curious as to what you think of this. It was shot with a
> Pentax Soft lens and I have gotten strong response - so far, people
> either really like the effect, or they really don't.
Hi Bruce,
Looking at the image from a technical perspec
creative effect, I think.
BTW, what did the bride think of it?
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - My first
Ok, here is my first one.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html
Told you.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Bruce ...
I really dislike the effect.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Ok, here is my first one.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html
I would be curious as to what you think of this. It was shot with a
Pentax Soft lens and I have gotten strong response - so far, p
Good use of the soft focus. Shel won't like it, I bet.
--
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Ok, here is my first one.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html
I would be curious as to what you think of this. It was shot with a
Pentax Soft lens and I have gotten strong response - so far, people
either really
Hi Bruce ...
I really dislike the effect.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> Ok, here is my first one.
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html
>
> I would be curious as to what you think of this. It was shot with a
> Pentax Soft lens and I have gotten strong response - so far, people
> either reall
Ok, here is my first one.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/paw.html
I would be curious as to what you think of this. It was shot with a
Pentax Soft lens and I have gotten strong response - so far, people
either really like the effect, or they really don't.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
51 matches
Mail list logo
