In a message dated 7/10/2002 8:37:43 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Here is the official link.
> http://www.pdml.net/LXGallery/index.html
>
Thank you, kind sir.
ERNR
My photographs hang on the virtual walls at http://members.aol.com/ernreed
-
This message is from the P
Thanks, Tom. Appreciate it.
Joe
>
> And here I was going to complement you on " Maison Carrée, Nîmes ". :-)
>
> Tom C.
>
> Actually - quite a beautiful shot Joe. I'm envious.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wed
And here I was going to complement you on " Maison Carrée, Nîmes ". :-)
Tom C.
Actually - quite a beautiful shot Joe. I'm envious.
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:45 PM
Subject: LX Gallery
>
try this
http://digilander.iol.it/aohc/selart10e.htm
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 3:33 PM
Subject: LX Gallery
> Greetings:
> I am seeking a written history of the Pentax LX camera f
Try this one if you haven't...though you probably have...
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/pentaxlx/
Jim
- Original Message -
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:33 PM
Subject: LX Gallery
> G
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 24, 2001 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> Bill,
>
> Might be nice to include the submission date on your LX
gallery page.
Thanks Bob. I missed that. I just updated the page, includi
Bill,
Might be nice to include the submission date on your LX gallery page.
Regards, Bob S.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
> -Original Message-
> From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> I dont understand why anyone would want a gallery
> shot only with LX bodies. The body doesnt really meam
> much IMHO. A gallery of images all shot with the same
> LENS makes much more sense to me at least
> JC
> -Original Message-
> From: dave o'brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Actually, that sounds like a good theme for a gallery: a shot taken at
> 50mm. (You can't really say it must be at f1.4 or whatever, as not
> everyone will have a 50mm prime.)
Been there...
Look at http://pug.komkon
I'm all for that. As long as we can use old photos. My
Spottie's lightmeter is currently (hopefully
temporarily) dead. Suppose I should learn to use it
without one.
Jody.
> OK, then lets do a spotmatic gallery too
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctio
A scroll of mail from "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 27
Apr 2001 20:03:29 -0400
Read it? y
>I dont understand why anyone would want a gallery
>shot only with LX bodies. The body doesnt really meam
>much IMHO. A gallery of images all shot with the same
>LENS makes much more sense to
tom wrote:
> This is true. I like scrapple.
Habbersetts, I presume?
m42 -( ex-EastCoaster )- Bill
-
Bill D. Casselberry ; Photography on the Oregon Coast
http://www.orednet
Hi,
> It is curious to what some people will eat. It seems to me that some people
> think that if you can keep it down for longer than 2 seconds, and it
> doesn't kill you, it is edible. Furthermore, some culture, somewhere, will
> have it as a delicacy.
Ronald McDonald springs to mind.
---
Jon Hope wrote:
>
> It is curious to what some people will eat. It seems to me that some people
> think that if you can keep it down for longer than 2 seconds, and it
> doesn't kill you, it is edible. Furthermore, some culture, somewhere, will
> have it as a delicacy.
This is true. I like scrapp
At 10:33 29/04/01, Dan wrote:
> >I've heard that as "honey is to bees", so is "Vega/Marmite to the naked
>mole rat". Curious what some people will eat.
I think the best description for vegemite I've seen is "looks like axle
grease, smells like axle grease, feels like axle grease, and tastes like
foreigners over here in the US, Marmite and Vegamite are both equally
disgusting ;-
As another foreigner (Scots), out with the Anzuk Forces in Singapore, I got
Vegamite in my shift-rations and it was always on the breakfast and loved
the stuff on toast.
I have never cared much for marmite,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, William Robb wrote:
> I suppose that in order to keep everyone content, would it be
> enough that the submission guideline for LX content was that you
> had to at least be aware that the LX existed to participate in
> it?
> Or is the ability to be aware also exclusionary from
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 1:26 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: LX Gallery
>
>
> "J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> >
> &g
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
> Reason : LX aint a man's camera. It's got
> that artsy fartsy "AE" mode.
No, it's a photographer's camera. If you really wanted to explore
your machismo, get a view camera. They don't have any artsy fartsy
"modes". (GD&R)
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Reason : LX aint a man's camera. It's got that artsy fartsy "AE"
mode.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J. C. O'Connell
> Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 12:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&g
OK, then lets do a spotmatic gallery too
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
At 11:11 28/04/00, you wrote:
>petit miam writes:
>
> > I think it should be Marmite vs Vegemite. BTW Vegemite
> > is far superior.
>
> No bloody way. That stuff is disgusting. There's not much better than a
>nuked cheese & marmite sandwich...
Sacrilege! Marmite tastes like that stuff you put
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
>
> 5.) I'm gonna think twice about expressing my opinion again,
which suppose is the desired result of all this hysteria.
>
I hope not.
FWIW, all I wanted to do was have a stupid little one off
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:15:44 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>I prefer Vitameatavegamin.
Yup. "It's tasty too!"
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery a
I prefer Vitameatavegamin.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "John Glover" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ok, I know what vegemite is, as one of my friend's roommates in college
was from Oz, but what is marmite?
>
> Marmoset paste?? LOL
>
> From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
Ok, I know what vegemite is, as one of my friend's roommates in college was from Oz,
but what is marmite?
Marmoset paste?? LOL
- Original Message -
From: "David A. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 10:11 PM
Sub
Pentax made the K1000 from 1976 to 1997, also 21 years. They sold a heck
of a lot more of them too.
Todd
At 12:07 AM 4/27/01 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>
>I think what Bill is proposing is an LX gallery _in addition to_ the
>regular PUG. In that way, it's not exclusionary. Pentax has never
>manufac
Ever hear of a wake? FWIW (for what its worth*), I don't own
a LX, but I
think it is a fine idea.
--Tom
* I suppose we have to do this with traditional internet
abriviation from now on, because newbies are too lazy to
read FAQ (frequently asked questions). ANVSIC (a not very
seriously intended c
petit miam writes:
> I think it should be Marmite vs Vegemite. BTW Vegemite
> is far superior.
No bloody way. That stuff is disgusting. There's not much better than a
nuked cheese & marmite sandwich...
Cheers,
- Dave
David A. Mann, B.E. (Elec)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
"Why is it
OK! Boggy and Fuzzy are out. I'm not sure about MISTY!
Otis Wright
Doug Brewer wrote:
> I'll try to keep this simple.
>
> 1.) I am not raining on anyone's parade. If anyone has been paying attention, I said
>I supported the idea of an LX celebration.
>
> 2.) I said that since the LX celebrat
Your spot on in my opinion. We are being treated to a 'Political' compromise
--- the packaging looks/sounds great, then you realize your right back were
you started from -- if your lucky.
At least the show will go on. The justification and rationalizing are best
forgotten, at least from here
I'll try to keep this simple.
1.) I am not raining on anyone's parade. If anyone has been paying attention, I said I
supported the idea of an LX celebration.
2.) I said that since the LX celebration was different from the PUG, it should not be
on the PUG server. Since it is a PDML project th
I dont understand why anyone would want a gallery
shot only with LX bodies. The body doesnt really meam
much IMHO. A gallery of images all shot with the same
LENS makes much more sense to me at least
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pd
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> Steve Larson wrote:
> >
> > What was this surprise? my curiosity has peaked. As if you`re going to
tell
> > me.
>
> Oh, I'm not telling. It's fabulously appropriate, tho'.
>
> > Who ya rootin for in the playoffs? My Kings are making a good
> > showing, eh?
>
> Obvio
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:33:42 -0600, aimcompute wrote:
>I don't really have any thing important to say... I just like to hear myself blab...
My boss is that way. :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the di
Bob Blakely wrote:
>
> Give it up. He doesn't give a damn how you feel. (Or if he does, it has a
> "but" attached to it.)
Go pick a fight somewhere else, Bob.
Shel & I will work out any differences ourselves, without your "help".
--
John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Silicon Graphics, In
am however, in the spirit and will "celebrate" tonight like the rest of
you.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> This is my opinion.
OK - So which one of you (Bill & Doug) is Doctor Jekyll and which one is Mr.
Hyde?
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 11:40 PM
Subject: LX Gallery
> A bit of background is in orde
I think it should be Marmite vs Vegemite. BTW Vegemite
is far superior.
Sorry, I am getting a bit carried away. It is 3:20am
and I am not allowed to go to bed. I get weird and
irrelevant when I'm tired.
Jody.
> All too often this list gets into Ford vs Chevy /
> Coke vs Pepsi
_
Steve Larson wrote:
>
> What was this surprise? my curiosity has peaked. As if you`re going to tell
> me.
Oh, I'm not telling. It's fabulously appropriate, tho'.
> Who ya rootin for in the playoffs? My Kings are making a good
> showing, eh?
Obviously, we're cheering for the Leafs who've d
What are "Kings" The female version of "Queens?"
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> What was this surprise? my curiosity has
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
>
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > Excluded from this offer are: Chris Brogden,
> > Aaron Reynolds (who know why they're excluded) and César Metamoros,
> > who, if he doesn't alre
At 09:04 PM 4/26/01 -0400, you wrote:
>An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displaces a regularly scheduled
gallery, violates the welcome spirit of the PUG.
>
>Doug
>
My 2 Cents: As a non-LX owner, its OK. The LX is a truely 'cult-status'
camera, and just as they made recent GOLD versions of
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Excluded from this offer are: Chris Brogden,
> Aaron Reynolds (who know why they're excluded) and César Metamoros,
> who, if he doesn't already know why he's excluded, will shortly.
And a doozy of a surprise it was! Trust me, gentlemen and ladies, it's
worth it.
Oh,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Arnold Stark wrote:
> > The PUG has made its mark by being inclusive. Let's not start something we don't
>want to continue.
>
> How can the PUG be inclusive if it excludes exclusiveness?
*LOL* Probably the best comment in this thread so far. :)
chris
-
This message is
Translation deleted --- I can't do better than Bob's kind interpretation.
Seriously, endeavors like the LX Gallery are better entertainment and
education than the last few flame wars I happened to catch (not that I'm
against flame wars--some are quite entertaining). I really don't see the
probl
Shit, who wants to see a bunch of pictures
of Pentax LX's???
:)
JCO
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:41:38 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>It was said for fun. Did you think something else? Doesn't matter, have fun
>anyway!
I always have fun :-)) (LX or not... pout, pout) :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Imagine the wailing and teeth-gnashing around here if an autofocus-only gallery were
>proposed for the PUG. There would be the email equivalent of people chaining
>themselves to the bulldozers. I have to admit there would some entertainment value.
>
> But...
>
> The P
ent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> Hi Bob
>
>
> At 7:11 PM -07004/26/01, Bob Blakely caused thus to appear:
> >Bullpucky!
>
> Okay.
>
> >
> >Exactly how is the "welcome spirit of the PUG" violated? I think that
"
Hi Bob
At 7:11 PM -07004/26/01, Bob Blakely caused thus to appear:
>Bullpucky!
Okay.
>
>Exactly how is the "welcome spirit of the PUG" violated? I think that "Wide
>Angle Point of View" should be eliminated as it violates this so-called
>"welcome spirit of the PUG" in as much as some Pentax us
Ah. Well, okay, then. I guess he told me.
Doug
At 7:24 PM -07004/26/01, Bob Blakely caused thus to appear:
>I took it that it means that Otis doesn't agree with you and thinks your
>thinking in the matter is reflects a view hampered by bog fog.
>
>Regards,
>Bob...
>
>Give blood. Play hockey.
-
Ahhh
It was said for fun. Did you think something else? Doesn't matter, have fun
anyway!
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Gary L. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:14:11 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>
> >I should think why not! Borrow one! It's about the ca
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:14:11 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
>I should think why not! Borrow one! It's about the camera, not you. Borrow
>one and show it off!
Gee Bob, chill out. That was done tounge in cheek!
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
Oh, I'm sorry. I expressed my opinion. I didn't know I wasn't supposed to do that.
I shall never challenge your authority again, sir.
Doug
At 8:54 PM -06004/26/01, William Robb caused thus to appear:
>My family doesn't have opposable thumbs, being dogs and all.
>However, I didn't bitch abou
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 26, 2001 9:04 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery Questions answered
> Strong language warning below:
Or not. I must be mellowing in my drunken stupor. Ah well, back
to
it up for you if you like.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 26, 2001 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displaces a regularly
scheduled gallery, vio
Strong language warning below:
- Original Message -
From: "Gerald Cermak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: April 26, 2001 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery Questions answered
> This is a good point. I have many pics from the last couple
of months
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Otis Wright, Jr. wrote:
> And what foggy bog were you looking out over when you figured that out?
>
> Otis Wright
Are you referring to me or to Doug?
chris
> Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> > An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displaces a regularly scheduled gallery,
>viol
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Gerald Cermak wrote:
> Is this rule bendable? Why does it exist? Does it imply some
> unwritten theme must apply - like "LX Celebration" - or "shots not
> easily attainable with a camera other than an LX"? Some other silly
> thing like that?
I think the idea is to do it i
What does that mean?
Doug
At 9:45 PM -04004/26/01, Otis Wright, Jr. caused thus to appear:
>And what foggy bog were you looking out over when you figured that out?
>
>Otis Wright
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from
I took it that it means that Otis doesn't agree with you and thinks your
thinking in the matter is reflects a view hampered by bog fog.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What does that mean?
>
> At 9:45 PM -04004/26/01, Otis Wright, Jr. caused
eryone else than they do.
Nevertheless, they still single out excellence and hand out medals for
meritorious service... and not everyone gets to participate!
That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer
I should think why not! Borrow one! It's about the camera, not you. Borrow
one and show it off!
Regards,
Bob...
Give blood. Play hockey.
From: "Gary L. Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:35:59 -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> >1) Image must have been made with the LX and any P
If it's not the "PUG," then why does it need to be in the PUG? If it's not in the
spirit of the PUG and not in the intent of the PUG, then why put it on the PUG site?
You're right in that I don't object at all to an LX commemorative gallery. I just
think it should go somewhere else. I'd host it
Just out of curiosity how much is a new LX worth in Japan?
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displa
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Doug Brewer wrote:
> An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displaces a regularly
> scheduled gallery, violates the welcome spirit of the PUG.
But it's not the "PUG" as such (Pentax User's Gallery). It's more like an
LX User's Commemorative Gallery--along the same lines as
An exclusive gallery, whether or not it displaces a regularly scheduled gallery,
violates the welcome spirit of the PUG.
Doug
At 6:46 PM -05004/26/01, Chris Brogden caused thus to appear:
>
>But the LX gallery won't replace the regular gallery, Doug. There will
>still be a normal gallery, a
William Robb wrote:
> 2) Image must be created specifically for this gallery.
> Thanks
> William Robb
That means a pic taken before today cannot be used? I have a perfect pic
taken about 2 months ago.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Geez Robb, you're acting like you're the gallery maintainer or something!
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6:35 PM
Subject: LX Gallery Questions answered
> Question:
> Contempor
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Doug Brewer wrote:
> Imagine the wailing and teeth-gnashing around here if an
> autofocus-only gallery were proposed for the PUG. There would be the
> email equivalent of people chaining themselves to the bulldozers. I
> have to admit there would some entertainment value.
Bu
;To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:38 PM
>Subject: Re: LX Gallery
>
>
>> Will this be followed up by a K1000-only gallery? Then a
>> PZ-1p gallery? an MX-only gallery?
>>
>> Doug
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photograph
Thats what you get for doing your emails when half asleep.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
In honor of the LX and this upcoming gallery, I'
day, April 26, 2001 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
In honor of the LX and this upcoming gallery, I'm offering a small
gift to the first five LX owners on this list who send me their name
and address off list. Excluded from this offer are: Chris Brogden,
Aaron Reynolds (who know why
So I need to get a LX now.
Frits
>
> There will be a special Pentax Users Gallery for August 2001, in
> addition to the already scheduled gallery. I invite members who
> own LX cameras to submit a photo taken with their LX and a
> Pentax made lens contemporaneous with the LX (please, in
> keep
TECTED]
> Subject: Re: LX Gallery
>
> Will this be followed up by a K1000-only gallery? Then a
> PZ-1p gallery? an MX-only gallery?
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > There will be a special Pentax Users Galler
That logic is certainly impeccable.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: LX Gallery
> Will this be followed up by a K1000-only gallery? Then a
&g
Will this be followed up by a K1000-only gallery? Then a
PZ-1p gallery? an MX-only gallery?
Doug
Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There will be a special Pentax Users Gallery for
August 2001, in
> addition to the already scheduled gallery. I invite
members who
> own LX cameras t
78 matches
Mail list logo
