- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> If I had to buy all new lenses for any DSLR,
> I wouldnt buy a pentax DSLR. The main advantage
> of buying a Pentax DSLR is if you already have
> a bunch of Pentax Lenses. If you
higher level DSLR bodies with FF if wanted or needed...
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:16 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>> It must be nice
yep, I meant "comparing" instead of "using".
Thanks for the clarification request.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:19 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: R
> you are calling not performing as well. I dont
> think its fair or show's much understanding
> to describe them that way when you are using
> DA lenses optimized for APS on APS with FF lenses
> which are optimized for FF but not using
> them FF and are only using them on APS. Sure
This s
>> It must be nice to be able to spend large sums of money to replace
>> perfectly function lenses for a marginal increase in performance and
>> functionality. Mandated deprication (read: loss of aperture coupler)
>> aside, obtaining 95% of the optical performance for 10% of the expense
>> so
rform the best DA lenses.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
> It
Tim Øsleby
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 6:43 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
I'm sorry to say this: Couldn't agree more ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On Feb 7, 2007, at 4:35 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
> It must be nice to be able to spend large sums of money to replace
> perfectly function lenses for a marginal increase in performance and
> functionality. Mandated deprication (read: loss of aperture coupler)
> aside, obtaining 95% of the
graywolf wrote:
> I will have you know that "I" have the maturity of a 10 year old.
> So there! Yadda, yadda, ya!
That's OK, 'cause I don't have any at all, so it still averages out to a
five year old. ;-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
> Since I had a bunch of older lenses and have replaced them with the
> latest and most current FA and DA lenses over the past year, I'll
> assert from the practical experience of comparing my results directly
> that the latest lenses perform better with my *ist DS and K10D than
> the older lenses
On 2/07/07 6:35 PM, "William Robb", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want/need AF, then legacy lenses are not as good.
Next Pentax project after SR should be an in-body AF, making all MF lenses
AF :-).
Contax did it with a body-in-body weird solution. With much more compact
image sensor, it s
I'm sorry to say this: Couldn't agree more ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 8. februar 2007 00:35
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS t
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
My statement came out too strong. My experience is limited.
I should have said _I_ find nothing wrong with the legacy lenses I have
_tried_.
I think the point remains. We tend to uncritically assume
Since I had a bunch of older lenses and have replaced them with the
latest and most current FA and DA lenses over the past year, I'll
assert from the practical experience of comparing my results directly
that the latest lenses perform better with my *ist DS and K10D than
the older lenses do
From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 23:17:49 +0100
My statement came out too strong. My experience is limited.
I should have said _I_ find not
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 7. februar 2007 22:33
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> If I filter out the insults in this p
/3 is going to beat them)
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 4:33 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby&quo
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> If I filter out the insults in this post I tend to agree.
> There is nothing wrong about the legacy lenses, except a limitation or
> two.
> Why do we assume that the latest toys are the bes
William Robb wrote:
> I haven't done any objective testing (the swimming pools around here are
> frozen over)
You are TOO funny, Bill.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Behalf Of J.
C. O'Connell
Sent: 7. februar 2007 03:11
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
You are an [EMAIL PROTECTED] idiot to post such stupid nonsense. I dont
"collect"
ancient lenses
and other "crap", I like to acquire high quality
A, maybe.
Cotty wrote:
> On 6/2/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
>>
>
> Now hold on old boy. Four, maybe.
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Ger
I will have you know that "I" have the maturity of a 10 year old.
So there! Yadda, yadda, ya!
-graywolf
(Hum...? My smell checkers do not recognize "yadda" as a proper word.
Must not have asked any 10 year olds about it.)
Doug Franklin wrote:
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>> Because we have the matur
mike wilson wrote:
>> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> The cost of ownership of any camera is high when all you do is
>> collect thousands of dollars worth of ancient lenses and other crap,
>> and can't take a picture to save your life.
>>
>> For those who make a living with
On 07/02/07, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A filter is a wonderful thing.
> Now I miss the inflamitory nonsense.
> All I see are some ripples on the waters,
> as others beat the idiot senseless.
No, they're just fighting over the whoopee cushion.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
riginal Message -
> > From: "J. C. O'Connell"
> > Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> >
> >
> >> You are one sick, deluded, puppy. I specifically state
> >> that DSLRS are not cheap small mass market items for the
> >> masses,
> >
>
>
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/02/06 Tue PM 11:06:47 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
> The cost of ownership of any camera is high when all you do is
> collect thousands of dollars worth of
The ladies on the list bring up the average. :-)
Cheers,
Dave (the crawler)
On 2/7/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/2/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
>
> Now hold on old boy. Four, maybe.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
On 6/2/07, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
Now hold on old boy. Four, maybe.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pe
I was going to say that...
David Savage wrote:
> At 12:46 PM 7/02/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
>>
>
> ...combined maturity level?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>> Tom C wrote:
>>
I don't care what you state or think, or even w
At 12:46 PM 7/02/2007, P. J. Alling wrote:
>Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
...combined maturity level?
Cheers,
Dave
>Tom C wrote:
> >> I don't care what you state or think, or even what the facts might or
> >> might not be, John, when I respond to you.
> >>
> >> You're lik
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
Ding-ding-ding-ding. We have a winner! :-)
We're (mostly) guys ... /OF COURSE/ we have the maturity of five year
olds. :D
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Because we have the maturity level of a 5 year old?
Tom C wrote:
>> I don't care what you state or think, or even what the facts might or
>> might not be, John, when I respond to you.
>>
>> You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
>> noise. People sit on it unawares and o
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
> The question is begging to be asked then. Since you guys know the way
> whoopee cushions work and what they do, and you've squeezed this one
> before
> and heard it's funny n
camera and pay for film/processing instead of a DSLR
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom C
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 6:25 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
It's all a big cycle. Digital cameras by their
AIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 6:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
The cost of ownership of any camera is high when all you do is
collect thousands of dollars worth of ancient lenses and othe
On Feb 6, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> I don't care what you state or think, or even what the facts might or
>> might not be, John, when I respond to you.
>>
>> You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
>> noise. People sit on it unawares and others think they've far
Good point. A lot of bear baiting going on around here.
Paul
On Feb 6, 2007, at 8:03 PM, Tom C wrote:
>> I don't care what you state or think, or even what the facts might or
>> might not be, John, when I respond to you.
>>
>> You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
>> n
>I don't care what you state or think, or even what the facts might or
>might not be, John, when I respond to you.
>
>You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
>noise. People sit on it unawares and others think they've farted.
>It's amusing for a little while. Then you get
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> In a message dated 2/6/2007 1:43:53 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
> noise. People
In a message dated 2/6/2007 1:43:53 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
noise. People sit on it unawares and others think they've farted.
It's amusing for a little while. Then you get bored, leave it on th
But they're expensive disposable cameras...
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "J. C. O'Connell"
> Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
>
>> You are one sick, deluded, puppy. I specifically state
>> that DSLRS are n
I know one would interpret this sentence ;)
2007/2/7, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Norm's chicks have dentures?
>
> William Robb wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Norm Baugher"
> > Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> >
Norm's chicks have dentures?
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Norm Baugher"
> Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
>
>> You need to get out more, all my chicks have teeth.
>>
>
> Norm, having them inden
MAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 15:06:47 -0800
>
>The cost of ownership of any camera is high when all you do is
>collect thousands of dollars worth of ancient lenses
On 2/06/07 5:56 PM, "J. C. O'Connell", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ok, but I said it recently too. Nothing has changed.
> Cant see ANY contradictions though, the very fact
> that they ARE "disposable" is what makes them expensive
> to buy and "toss" in favor of something much better in only a few
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:33 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
&g
The cost of ownership of any camera is high when all you do is
collect thousands of dollars worth of ancient lenses and other crap,
and can't take a picture to save your life.
For those who make a living with a camera, a DSLR saves a tremendous
amount of money over its useful lifespan.
G
O
On 6/2/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You need to get out more, all my chicks have teeth.
Their *own* teeth.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
t but a few years
of them and they rapidly depreciate in value due to rapid
evolution.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:33 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
--
repairing
the old.
If my *ist D breaks it's going in the dumpster.
Tom C.
>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:33:22
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
No. you're mistaken.
2007/2/6, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> the digital SLR camera market segment is not
> about sma
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> Correct. Nothing has changed since then and I think
> you are wrong on the date, I said that in 2006. The DSLR BODIES
> are still in the early evolving stage and they ARE
> "
cheap cameras for the masses.
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Thibouille
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:45 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
> Yea
much better
and at a price I can still afford. ( although I may sell my 5x7! ).
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 5:11 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> the digital SLR camera market segment is not
> about small cheap mass market items, its about
> high image quality for the few willing to pay
> for it. The digital p&s market is about small
> cheap cameras for the masses.
high image quality? I thought 4x5 film was about h
t
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> You are one sick, deluded, puppy. I specifically state
> that DSLRS are not cheap small mass market items for the masses,
On October 20, 2004 you cal
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "J. C. O'Connell"
> Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
>> You are one sick, deluded, puppy. I specifically state
>> that DSLRS are not cheap small mass market items for the
>> masses,
>
I don't care what you state or think, or even what the facts might or
might not be, John, when I respond to you.
You're like a whoopee cushion: you squeeze it and it makes a funny
noise. People sit on it unawares and others think they've farted.
It's amusing for a little while. Then you get
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> You are one sick, deluded, puppy. I specifically state
> that DSLRS are not cheap small mass market items for the
> masses,
On October 20, 2004 you called them disposable ca
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 3:13 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:01 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> the digital SLR camera market segment is not
> about small cheap mass market i
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher"
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> You need to get out more, all my chicks have teeth.
Norm, having them indentured to you isn't the same thing.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:01 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> the digital SLR camera market segment is not
> about small cheap mass market items, its about
> high image quality for the few willing to pay
> for it.
Is that why you bought an obsoleted, older consumer model Pentax DSLR
because it was as ch
You need to get out more, all my chicks have teeth.
Norm
Thibouille wrote:
> I'd really want... maybe when chicks will have teeth.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Yeah that's why, historicaly, industry went from large/medium format to
smaller format.
Industry, mostly, don't care about what you/I/everyone else want/need
Yeah that's why, historicaly, industry went from large/medium format
to smaller format.
Industry, mostly, don't care about what you/I/everyone else want/need.
The industry only cares about how much money they will make selling
this or that.
If things are smaller they sell beter, and there's beter
: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> all, but I really see FF digital, even from Pentax,
> as inevitable evolution, regardless of whether the
Semiconductors (i.e. sensors) get MUCH more expensive to produce
than the simple increase in area they occupy. Som
The big question is will they be compatible with tomorrow's HDTV systems.
Norm
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> Its not moot because the thread evolved into
> discussion of future usability/performance of
> FF vs. DA lenses and having no K mount FF camera today does
> not preclude simple discussion of f
> all, but I really see FF digital, even from Pentax,
> as inevitable evolution, regardless of whether the
Semiconductors (i.e. sensors) get MUCH more expensive to produce
than the simple increase in area they occupy. Something like 10x-100x to
produce FF as opposed to APS-sized IIRC.
On 5/2/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You
>acted semi-rationally for about three messages so I turned it off,
Fatal mistake!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
>This thread WAS about the dearth of used Pentax glass available at the
>moment.
>Your hijacking notwithstanding.
>Until Pentax has a 24x36mm K mount DSLR on the ground, any further
>discussion on this is moot.
>
>William Robb
>
Pentax is doomed.
If I'm proved totally wrong, I'll be happy. They a
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> But that's not what this thread was
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> But that's not what this thread was all about.
This thread WAS about the dearth of used Pentax glass available at the
moment.
Your hijacking notwithstanding.
Until Pentax has a 24x3
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
JCO: Blow it out your shorts.
G
On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:02 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "J. C. O'Connell"
> Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
>> Your "do not care" argument does
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 9:02 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> Your "do not
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> Your "do not care" argument does not change
> any of the facts in my post
You ignore the fact that the DA lenses are outperforming FA lenses right
now. What happens in a few
JCO: Blow it out your shorts.
G
On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:02 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "J. C. O'Connell"
> Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
>> Your "do not care" argument does not change
>> any of t
Looksw like gmail filters work very well.
Go Godders go
Dave
On 2/5/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You always miss the point, JCO. You've been missing the point on
> every thread you abscond with for the two years I've been on this
> mailing list because you're obsessed with y
007 6:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
You always miss the point, JCO. You've been missing the point on
every thread you abscond with for the two years I've been on this
mailing list because you're obsessed with your and only your point of
vi
dont matter in the real world,
they ARE real world issues related to lens type used
and sensor types used.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:27 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re:
NO FS this Friday?
The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
> Sent: 05 February 2007 18:33
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: R
half Of Tim Øsleby
>>Sent: 05 February 2007 18:33
>>To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
>>Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>>
>>I don't get this. What matters (for me) is that the DA does a
>>similar or
>>better job. The reasons why they do are as
y 2007 18:33
>> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
>> Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>>
>> I don't get this. What matters (for me) is that the DA does a
>> similar or
>> better job. The reasons why they do are as interesting as the
>> po
You always miss the point, JCO. You've been missing the point on
every thread you abscond with for the two years I've been on this
mailing list because you're obsessed with your and only your point of
view on anything in the known universe.
Let me respond in little tiny words that even you m
] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:58 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Di
>
>
> The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
>
> Yer probably an Anglican.
>
I'm half Catholic. They should at least tell me about his moustache.
--
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
"The future will look out for itself, and I'll reckon with it when I need
to."
:-)
Tom C.
>From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Subject
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> But you wont be able to if you traded away all your Pentax
> FF lenses for DA lenses will you without buying them
> all over again!
You are, of course, presuming that there is a 24x
- Original Message -
From: "K.Takeshita"
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>> If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
>> whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
>
> Of course "everybody
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
Yer probably an Anglican.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/05/07 3:58 PM, "Godfrey DiGiorgi", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
> whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
Of course "everybody" here thinks so, but saying so will turn everybody off
too, Godfrey :-)
If a new camera that requires new lenses comes out, I'll decide
whether to buy it and whatever new lenses I need for it at that time.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The Pope has a new beard? Why am I always the last to know?
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
> Sent: 05 February 2007 18:33
> To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
> Subject: RE: NO FS t
Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
When there exists a "FF" Pentax digital SLR to work with, I'll
consider what turd to polish and whether it looks more lovely.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML
When there exists a "FF" Pentax digital SLR to work with, I'll
consider what turd to polish and whether it looks more lovely.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
D] On Behalf Of
Tim Øsleby
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:33 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
I don't get this. What matters (for me) is that the DA does a similar or
better job. The reasons why they do are as interesting as the popes new
beard IMO.
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.
C. O'Connell
Sent: 4. februar 2007 02:53
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
I think you are mistaken because full frame
lenses only need to have 2/3 the resolution
to MATCH/BEAT DA lenses in terms of overall resolution.
you
On 2/2/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total at KEH,
> Ebay looks to have been picked over like last week's kill, and nothing at
> all offered on the PDML...
Well, I just put my FA 300mm up on ebay tonight...
http://cgi.ebay.c
But you and I might be sekeleton pieces before that happens, if it
happens at all.
In this case who has been waiting all his life for something that
would never happen and as a consequence use less than ideal quality
optics?
Using DA lenses, at least, you know what you use NOW is the best
possible
On Feb 3, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> I'm in an argumentative mood, can you tell?
Mark!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
.3 crop, which would be find. But full frame ain't gonna
> >> happen. The cards have already been dealt.
> >> Paul
> >> On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:08 AM, William Robb wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
> >>>
101 - 200 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
