Hello Jens,
> Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 16:33:57 +0100
> From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Thanks for answering JC,
> I have no idea as to what series it may be.
> I tried to find in various places, without any luck. I just mailed Tokina,
> but I wonde
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2932155521&category=46
87
seems to have te same specs
I went to Columbus Camera Group to evaluate the Tokina 80-200/2.8 AT-X
manual-focus lens that they have on eBay.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1325843698
Here's what it's like:
#1 It has the screw-on metal hood. (Mine has the plastic clip-on.)
#2 Mechanic
Some one mentioned this the other day. There are
two -- one with seven elements and one other. Does
anyone know these things well? I've seen one AF
version on some US dealers page but now forget where.
Zen would say: "If you don't use them is there any
difference to the quality."
Don
--
Dr
The common corporate buyout is based on something of *particular*
value to the purchaser.
Often the remainder of the company of is little interest, unless of
course it is a profit center.
Since Tokina operates in more than one field, as does Pentax, I
wouldn't anticipate that
the photo im
The tokina is a 28 to 200, (all four versions I think). It's as close to
the sigma as to the tokina.
At 10:45 AM 5/31/2003 +0930, you wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2932155521&category=46
87
seems to have te same specs
Outside of a dog, a book is man&
Hi!
I'm looking for a telephotolens in the range 70-200 or 70-300. But I've got a
supergood deal on a new Tokina AF 35-300/4,5-6,7. Swedish listprice is: 460$ (US
listprice:200) but I would only have to pay 180$. I would use it as a tele-zoom (I
already have a Sigma 28-70/2,8 EX
> The seller also has a new Tokina AT-X 400AF 400mm f/5.6 for 250$. Seems like a good
>price to me. Comments on the lens or the price?
>
I have this lens. It is lightweight (can be hand held) for a lens this
long. I have always shot it at f8 and found it to be quite sharp. Others
re
> I'm looking for a telephotolens in the range 70-200 or 70-300. But I've got a
> supergood deal on a new Tokina AF 35-300/4,5-6,7. Swedish listprice is: 460$ (US
> listprice:200) but I would only have to pay 180$. I would use it as a tele-zoom (I
> already have a Sigma
My Tokina 400 f5.6 seems to have developed a stuck aperture - stuck wide
open! I want to make sure it is repaired at a reputable place (I had
another lens with a stuck aperture come back from a local shop with oil and
deep scratches on the rear element.)
Tokina has a repair service - has
Hello, list-
Ive seen some recent discussion on the list about some of the Tokina 400mm
telephotos but have only caught a few of the messages (I usually follow the
list via the archive which only seems to archive a small percentage of the
messages for some reason), so I apologize if this
Adorama carries the Kenko, Tamron and Tokina.
The Tokina is the lowest priced 7 element 2x.
I have/have had the Tamron and Promaster 4 and
7 element ones, the 7 element are far better
optically.(Tamron and Promaster are identical.)
They are very usable but image quality still
suffers noticably
Don Williams wrote:
> Zen would say: "If you don't use them is there any difference
> to the quality."
I think Zen ought to say if he's a Pentax user first.
Malcolm
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. februar 2006 14:24
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Tokina Doubler
Some one mentioned this the other day. There are
two -- one with seven elements and one other. Does
anyone know these things well? I've seen one AF
version on some US dealers page but now forget where.
On 8 Feb 2006 at 17:09, Jens Bladt wrote:
> It is probably the same teleconverter, that is KENKO MC7. It's excellent. (I
> read test test).
> I have the Tele Plus versione that is an adjustable Macro converter. It is
> excellent too.
> Regards
I had one of these, the contrast reduction compared w
Okey, new question about a lens. :)
I found a K-mount Tokina 135mm f/2.8 lens for a pretty small amount of
money, in near-mint condition.
But I can't really find much info about this lens.
Here's a pic of it: http://images.tradera.com/484/5847484_1.jpg
Anyone know this one, any good, i
This all brings to rememberance a discussion at the PMA convention in
Orlando back in Feb. It all started when I asked a Tokina rep why they did
not make the 12~24 zoom in the PK mount. He indicated that it would not be
sold in great enough quantities because Pentax was almost bankrupt and the
Here are a couple of images that I shot with my new 300mm f2.8 MF. They are
a bit soft being scanned at very low res, and shot wide open on Kodak Gold
400, handheld using a z-1 and 1.7x AF converter (effectively 510mm at f4.5),
and an AF500FTZ for fill. If this is what this thing can do without tr
A couple of weeks ago I asked the list about a wide-angle replacement for my
Tokina 19-35mm f3.5-4.5. Well, I have had to revise my desire to replace
this little lens since getting some film back today. The trannies I have
just got back are from a recent trip to Tasmania. I must say the little
Thought i would chime in on this one too. I have two tokina lenses the
28-70 26./2.8 and the 80-200 2.8 I cant say enough good things about these
lenses. they are great performers in all conditions. i would highly
recommend them.
__
D O T E
If you don't mind manual focus, the SMC PENTAX-A 70-210/4 is excellent yet
affordable.
regards,
Alan Chan
>I'm looking for a telephotolens in the range 70-200 or 70-300. But I've got
>a supergood deal on a new Tokina AF 35-300/4,5-6,7. Swedish listprice is:
>460$
How does Tokina's 24mm 2.8 stack up against other
primes? I was thinking about picking one up and
obviously don't want a lemon.
Thanks,
Deb
Yahoo! Games - play chess, backgammon, pool and more
http://games.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to htt
I notice there is a Tokina 24mm F2.8 lens for sale on eBay. With under three
days left, it¹s at $75 US. I have one of these lenses and it¹s very, very
sharp. Only negative I can think of is it takes 52mm filters instead of the
49mm that many Pentax lenses take.
RW
-
This message is from the
Hey Gang,
I recently read some online reviews of a Tokina
28-105 AF lens to fit Pentax AF cameras. It
sounds like a really solid lens with a metal body.
Problem is, I can't find one anywhere. Anybody
have good "sources" for these older lenses? Where do
old lenses go once the major
Hi Gang,
Has any ever used or actually own a manual focus Tokina 300mm F2.8 SD lens?
I am interested in some comments on these thingy's.
Cheers
Shaun.
March 24, 2001 2:41 PM
Subject: Tokina Repairs
> My Tokina 400 f5.6 seems to have developed a stuck aperture - stuck wide
> open! I want to make sure it is repaired at a reputable place (I had
> another lens with a stuck aperture come back from a local shop with oil
and
> deep scratche
Five or six years ago I sent one of my Tokina lenses in for minor repairs.
The work was done fast the lens was given a general cleaning. I cannot
address price as it was a warranty repair.
George Baumgardner
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http
Greetings:
I hope I am not being sacrilegious asking here about the Tokina version
of the 50-135/2.8, but I'd really like this range in a lens with a
tripod mount. Does anyone know whether Pentax is planning to offer the
lens with a mount, or if not, where I can buy a Tokina?
Thank yo
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: Tokina AT-X 17mm
> Does the focusing turn in the same direction as pentax lenses?
Is it a
> rectilinear design? Is it available new? Ar
Replies embedded:
Hello, list-
IÂve seen some recent discussion on the list about some of the Tokina 400mm
telephotos but have only caught a few of the messages (I usually follow the
list via the archive which only seems to archive a small percentage of the
messages for some reason), so I
Does anyone have experience with the 800mm F8 screwmount? I could use it
with the adapter on my K-mount cameras for wildlife, if it is sharp enough.
I make 8x10s, 11X14s, occasional 16X20s. I might be a lot better off to get
Pentax¹s 1,000mm SMC F8, even though it will cost a lot more.
RW
Here is the note THK sent me today when they sent the lens out. Thought it
might be of interest to you all.
Cheers,
Mike
--
> Glad we could be of service to you. We feel our current staff and service
> policies can accomodate the need
Hi, I've just picked the above lens for a small sum, prior to getting my
ist*D - does anyone have any experience/information about it?
It's 'K' mount - but I assume that it will be manual focus only? (sorry if
that appears to be a typical 'noobie' question - but I am, at the moment,
just a noob
How much does the Tokina 90mm macro goes on eBay (with 1:1 adapter) these days?
Andre
I just picked up a used Tokina 80-200 f2.8 zoom. (Big tank of a thing.
Now I know why so few complain about Tokina build quality. I still
want the Pentax one, however.) Anyway, it has everything except
instructions, so:
1. The focus ring seems to pull back (between AF and MF) only when the
for this lens was $160.00 US so $35
is probably a fair price.
Henri Toivonen wrote:
Okey, new question about a lens. :)
I found a K-mount Tokina 135mm f/2.8 lens for a pretty small amount of
money, in near-mint condition.
But I can't really find much info about this lens.
Here's a pic o
I can't read most of what is on this page, but apparently Tokina will
offer this lens at some point.
http://www.photosharp.com.tw/article/news.asp?Code=20040216000149
It would be nice if Tokina would start to play in the digital lens
arena, especially for APS-sized sensors. They have i
I just looked at the line of Tokina AF lenses and was surprised:
they removed many good lenses from there:
http://thkphoto.com/products/tokina/index.html
I am not sure if this is a sign that they are soon to introduce "digital"
versions of the older lenses (28-70 and 19-35), o
Walter Hamler wrote:
>Now that Tokina and Pentax are cooperating in the fisheye lens and
probably
>others as well, I see the potential for lots more of the same. I also
see
>lots of good coming from the Hoya deal as well.
Between the influx of cash from Hoya and the conti
> >From reading the articles, they're claiming that Hoya mentioned this
>deal over a year ago and Pentax turned them down. My suspicion is that
>Hoya wasn't that eager until they saw the success of the K100D and K10D.
>
>I think both companies stand to benefit enormously from this deal :)
>
>
>
>Ma
t;From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: pdml@pdml.net
>Subject: Re: Pentax/Hoya/Tokina
>Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:17:41 -0700
>
> > >From reading the articles, they're claiming that Hoya mentioned this
> >deal over a
On Dec 21, 2006, at 5:38 PM, Tom C wrote:
> Also this would indicate that Hoya was not THAT interested in the
> camera-side of Pentax...
> -
> ''To reveal the secret, we had a dinner together about two years
> ago and discussed possible synergies on our medical operations,''
> Urano s
Tom C wrote:
>> >From reading the articles, they're claiming that Hoya mentioned this
>>deal over a year ago and Pentax turned them down. My suspicion is that
>>Hoya wasn't that eager until they saw the success of the K100D and K10D.
>>
>>I think both companies stand to benefit enormously from thi
ch is what it
does for Tokina). And Tokina did have their versions of the DA*'s out
much earlier.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
There is a wonderful test of this lens in the April Popular Photography.
The results are very good. Very, very good. Pentax has designed another
great lens. It is sharp across the board, even sharp wide open at all
focal lengths. You can't ask for more.
I guess the DA* 50-135 F2.8 will have to
this: Should I save the money for the Pentax, or get the
Tokina. I have always steered clear of third-party lenses, but I have heard good
things about this one, and the price is right. Any thoughts? Thanks, Pete.
Wow, Shawn, great photos! I'm impressed. I think I'll put that lens on my
wish list.
Kathy L
- Original Message -
From: "Shaun Canning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:17 PM
To: "Pentax-Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:17 PM
> Subject: Tokina 300mm f2.8
>
> > Here are a couple of images that I shot with my new 300mm f2.8 MF. They
> are
> > a bit soft being scanned at very low res, and shot wide op
Hi folks,
I'm looking to expand the wide angle for my LX and I'm curious to find out
if anyone's tried this Tokina brand lens and if so, what are the results ?
I've been hunting for off-brand 24mm lenses as I know it'll be hard to find
the Pentax one.
Thanks,
Dave
> I think Tokina lenses are at the top of the class. My only three
> non-pentax lenses are Tokina 100-300ATX/f4, 90/2.5ATX macro and
> a 24mm.
My own non-Pentax lenses tend to be either Tokina AT-X or Vivitar
Series 1, and (when the choices are essentially identical, as with
the AT
> [snip] I must say the little Tokina performed really well. [snip]
> I shot an all Tokina kit on this trip, other than an FA 100mm f2.8
> macro (which as anyone who has one knows is a stunning lens). I am
> really impressed with the Tokina glass I took along (28-80 ATX-Pro
> f2.8
Recently bought a screwmount Tokina RMC 400mm F5.6
lens even though I already had the Pentax
Tele-Takumar 400 F5.6. The main attraction for me
was for the auto aperture ( The Pentax is
manual aperture). To my surprise it's very compact
and doesnt get longer as you focus close.
I guess the
It's an awful lens! They had to give them away for $99-$149 here in the US.
Don't bother. The British mags called it "a bit of a stinker".
Robert James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
vi
> The wide-angle zoom race continues, with Pentax trailing -- at least in
> length.
Actually, Contax has only a 24-85 so *they're* trailing. Not that that means
anything. More isn't necessarily better.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
Mark Roberts writes:
> > The wide-angle zoom race continues, with Pentax trailing -- at least in
> > length.
>
> Actually, Contax has only a 24-85 so *they're* trailing. Not that that means
> anything. More isn't necessarily better.
Well if it's pure length you're after Pentax *does* have both
"David A. Mann" wrote:
>
> Mark Roberts writes:
>
> > > The wide-angle zoom race continues, with Pentax trailing -- at least in
> > > length.
> >
> > Actually, Contax has only a 24-85 so *they're* trailing. Not that that means
> > anything. More isn't necessarily better.
>
> Well if it's pure
Anyone have this lens yet? www.photographyreview.com has some very glowing
endorsements for it and it sure is an attractive focal length.
Just curious,
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
Many, many Pentax lenses use 52mm filters.
Reg Wiest wrote:
>
> Only negative I can think of is it
> takes 52mm filters instead of the
> 49mm that many Pentax lenses take.
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discus
you're interested. It
>is very well built and produces good images. Speed is 3.5-4.5.
>
>
>Bruce
>
>
>
>Sunday, June 09, 2002, 7:45:26 AM, you wrote:
>
>c> Hey Gang,
>
>c> I recently read some online reviews of a Tokina
>c> 28-105 AF lens to fit
Only Tokina like it on B&H I could find was a 28-105
Manual Focus (not AF). Maybe I'm jes' not
searching right?
Mark Roberts wrote:
> B&H has these on their web site (assuming it's the current version you seek).
> www.bhphotovideo.com
>
> Bruce Dayton &l
ck left if you're interested. It
> is very well built and produces good images. Speed is 3.5-4.5.
>
> Bruce
>
> Sunday, June 09, 2002, 7:45:26 AM, you wrote:
>
> c> Hey Gang,
>
> c> I recently read some online reviews of a Tokina
> c> 28-105 AF lens to fit Pent
It went out of production a couple of years ago. It was pretty well
regarded - sharp images, well built. You might still find a new one
somewhere, or check KEH. I had one, but sold it for the following
reasons:
1. Lack of close focus.
2. Not as contrasty as Pentax lenses.
3. Images seemed actuall
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:07:46 +1000, you wrote:
>Hi Gang,
>
>Has any ever used or actually own a manual focus Tokina 300mm F2.8 SD lens?
>I am interested in some comments on these thingy's.
It is an excellent lens in every respect - build quality and optical
quality an
Thanks John, that is precisely the combination I am looking at using on my
z-1. I also have a 1.7x that I am busting to try.
Cheers
Shaun
-Original Message-
From: John Mustarde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 28 August 2002 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tokina
John Mustarde wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:07:46 +1000, you wrote:
>
> >Hi Gang,
> >
> >Has any ever used or actually own a manual focus Tokina 300mm F2.8 SD
> >lens? I am interested in some comments on these thingy's.
>
>
> It is an excelle
I've seen them with both screw-on and snap-in hoods.
The snap-in mounts in reverse for storage.
Collin
At 08:10 PM 8/28/02 +1200, you wrote:
>John Mustarde wrote:
>
>
> If thats the one Cotty has, its a great lens. The focusing is really
>nice. The hood is a bit of a pain to get on & off at f
Based on the underwhelming response to my offering of the FA 135, I'm
guessing that the 135mm focal length has fallen from popularity. I am
considering putting up for sale my Tokina ATX 20-35 f:2.8 and Tokina
ATX 80-200 f:2.8. Both are in mint condition and have seen little
use. Both come
First inspect if anything is wrong with aperture lever and then clean carefully
bayonet portion of lens and everything should work OK!
Andreas Wirtz
Emilio Puga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, I think I have to change my name, for
the trouble boy. I´ve got a
tokina 80-400 for 3 year
> << Does anyone else have the Tokina 150-500mm f5.6 ATX ? If so,
> what do you think of it? >>
> A wee beastie. I am waiting to hear about your results.
I used a Tokina AT-X 150-500/5.6 for a PUG shot one time, using an A
2X-L TC (zoomed out to 500mm, for a 1000/1
In a message dated 17/04/02 23:10:35 GMT Daylight Time, Fred writes:
<< A wee beastie. I am waiting to hear about your results.
I used a Tokina AT-X 150-500/5.6 for a PUG shot one time, using an A
2X-L TC (zoomed out to 500mm, for a 1000/11 combination).
http://pug.komkon.org/
> I used a Tokina AT-X 150-500/5.6 for a PUG shot one time, using
> an A 2X-L TC (zoomed out to 500mm, for a 1000/11 combination).
> http://pug.komkon.org/00marc/turtle1.htm >>
> Not too shabby at all. Why did you have to be so far away, though?
> Are they timid creatur
In a message dated 18/04/02 14:50:07 GMT Daylight Time, Fred writes:
<< And, I didn't want to get my tripod's
feet wet (not to mention my own - ). >>
Here comes a prospective Benbo owner..
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdm
> << And, I didn't want to get my tripod's feet wet (not to mention
> my own - ). >>
> Here comes a prospective Benbo owner..
Hrrumph... You must be a photo gear retailer or something... ;-)
Fred
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http
In a message dated 18/04/02 18:03:01 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< << And, I didn't want to get my tripod's feet wet (not to mention
> my own - ). >>
> Here comes a prospective Benbo owner..
Hrrumph... You must be a photo gear retailer or something...
Does the focusing turn in the same direction as pentax lenses? Is it a
rectilinear design? Is it available new? Are there any photos around
that were made using this lens?
K is good
Thanks!
Bob Rapp wrote:
> Further comment. The Tokina manual focus is
> Metal and very well const
Tokina versions of Pentax lenses are not available in K mount. The
only way to get the Tokina is to switch to Nikon or Canon.
Also the lens is small enough that there is no advantage to a tripod
mount. It's really a very compact lens for its range.
-Adam
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM
I would second that. I like tripod mounts on lenses that need them.
I have this lens and can't think of any need for one. It is small
and light enough that it would only get in the way.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, October 6, 2008, 5:16:03 PM, you wrote:
AM> Tokina versions o
Does anybody know what happened with Tokina lenses for Pentax?
I very much like my Tokina ATX Pro 28-70/2.6-2.8.
This was my first lens for Pentax cameras that I bought with Zx5n.
When Hoya bought Pentax, Tokina stopped producing any lenses in Pentax
mount, and as far as I understood, started
Not a DA*, but might be an indication.
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/09/29/4734.html
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mail-Archive.com (where I read PDML) always goes off to la-la
land at critical moments. It hasn't updated in the past 24
hours, so I don't know what follow-up there was to the important
questions about Pentax and Tokina.
Ken, I posted the following yesterday, just before Mail-Arch
I had a similar deal a while back with a whole camera
bag full of goodies. I may sell some of it to fund
further gear aquisition. :)
--- Don Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I received, in the mail today (8:00am), a lens
> that was posted in the UK on Monday afternoon. Its
&
I saw that one go on ebay... I think a lot of people underestimate the
quality of Tokina lenses. I would go out on a limb and say Tokina
lenses for the most part are as good and in many cases, better than
Pentax lenses when everything is taken into consideration and that
includes build quality
I picked up this lens in the Fall. With film it's really pretty mediocre.
But with the DS it's a really outstanding performer. Surprizing.
They show up as e-fodder for about $100 on occasion.
Recommended.
Collin
mail2web - Che
Tamron SP AF 24-135mm f/3.5-5.6 autofocus lens for
Pentax in excellent condition. It comes with case,
box, manual, hood, front and rear caps. Asking $200
plus shipping.
Tokina AT-X 270 AF Pro II 28-70mm f/2.6-2.8 autofocus
lens for Pentax in excellent condition. It comes with
case, hood, front
Some of you may remember (and/or care) that I had problems with the AF on my
Tokina 80-200 f/2.8 AT-X Pro on the PZ1p. I thought I had fixed the problem
with a little Cramolyn on the lens contacts, but it wasn't gone. I
subsequently bought a second PZ1p, so I could go on jobs with 2 iden
as well as the
SMC-A 70-210 f4.0 (not bad...but not extraordinary). If ya still need'em
let me know!
Darren
PS. hope your lens comes in for ya though.
-Original Message-
From: Bucky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Pentax Peepl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 31, 2001 5:37 PM
S
Oops...should've gone to Bucky direct...sorry folks
Darren
-Original Message-
From: Darren & Tara Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: January 31, 2001 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: Tokina Service Dept Response
>Mike, I hav
Wow, impressive zoom range 7mm - 210mm. Seriously there are lots of
different Tokina 70-210's we'll probably need more information than that.
New Concepts wrote:
Hi, I've just picked the above lens for a small sum, prior to getting
my ist*D - does anyone have any experience/in
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2005 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Tokina 7--210mm lens
Wow, impressive zoom range 7mm - 210mm. Seriously there are lots of
different Tokina 70-210's we'll probably need more inf
I recently sold a Tokina 80-200mm which was excellent:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3879991116
I guess yours is different.
You must give us exact name, focal length, and lagest aperture(s) to enable
exact identification.
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> It's says 'Tokina SD 70-210mm 1:4-5.6 Japan
It's a very compact 70-210 zoom, manual focus only (as far as I know, at
least the one I'm referring to is manual only). It's supposedly a decent
enough zoom, although the larger Tokina 70-210/3.5 (optically identic
I believe that it was also sold as a Vivitar, I think a friend has a
copy in K mount. Maybe I'll try
to borrow it and shoot some comparisons with my SMCP F70-210. It would
probably be best
to try it on film but I'll get feedback faster in digital.
Fred wrote:
It's says 'To
> It would probably be best to try it on film but I'll get feedback faster
> in digital.
Cheaper, too - .
Fred
;-)
thanks
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 2:45 AM
>>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>>Subject: Re: Tokina 7--210mm lens
>>
>>
>>I believe that it was also sold as a V
me
to see the results
at 420mm.
I would prefer to see something more beautiful and less meaningful than a
brick wall ;-)
thanks
Markus
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 2:45 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Tokina 7
Hi,
I have one question about this lens, the first version (ATX
2.6-2.8/28-70, not the later 2.8/28-70 or the last more plasticky
2.8/28-70 ATX SV). I have borrowed it for a while from a friend,
and after shooting some with it, it seems this sample is very best
corrected for close fo
> How much does the Tokina 90mm macro goes on eBay (with 1:1 adapter) these
> days?
I'm assuming that you mean the AT-X 90/2.5 Macro. It's not overly common,
and is a desirable manual focus lens, as the (newer) optical twin of the
VS1 90/2.5 Macro (although these twins are se
For those curious about the RMC Tokina 400mm F5.6
lens, here's a sample image I shot a coupla days ago:
http://jcoconnell.com/temp/bird012703.jpg
Looks pretty good to my eye. Not bad
for a lens which cost me only $125
This lens has one big advantage over
the also excellent SMCT 400,
I have a Tokina SD (means low density glass is used)
3.5-4.5 28-70 zoom with K-A mount. The lens has not
been used much and has always been kept in the original
tempex case and it looks and feels like new. If you're
interested mail me offline and I can mail you foto's.
I'm as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:02 PM
Subject: FS: Tokina SD 28-70
>
> I have a Tokina SD (means low density glass is used)
> 3.5-4.5 28-70 zoom with K-A mount. The lens has not
> been used much and has always been kept in the original
> tempex case and it lo
1 - 100 of 863 matches
Mail list logo
