I think it was back in November that on impulse I ordered one of the new Heipi
travel tripods off of kickstarter, it was supposed to show up in January. It
showed up last week.
https://heipivision.com/products/heipi-3-in-1-travel-tripod
A few months earlier I had bought a Lefoto LX-255CT
I ended up buying an “open box” Leofoto LX255CT for my “travel tripod”. It
arrived yesterday, here is a photo of it next to my regular tripod:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/uZq9hfxAd8bb55x17
I was checking the rankings of tripods on https://thecentercolumn.com/ and a
similar leofoto had
ertical axis and watch how the
> legs bend around.
>
> This holds true for many tripods with tube-stye legs but seems to be
> worst with Manfrotto.
>
> I'm using a Berlebach wood tripod. Admitedly nothing you'd want to take
> along for air travel (although I've done just th
> On May 20, 2022, at 3:37 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
> This should be of interest to you: https://thecentercolumn.com
> Independent tripod testing, looking at all manner of attributes.
Excellent, thank you, I’ve been wanting to find something like that for ages.
-
tandard head is a bit limited in its
> movements and precision, but is satisfactory for most of what I do when I'm
> using a travel tripod. The option to fit a flat mount plate and a more
> standard head for those occasions when it's preferable is great. (In fact,
> you can keep the fl
with Manfrotto.
I'm using a Berlebach wood tripod. Admitedly nothing you'd want to take
along for air travel (although I've done just that) but it's the only
tripod I know that doesn't weight a ton and can be used with long lenses
even in gale-force winds.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne
On 5/19/2022 4:19 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
I changed from a tripod with a twist lock to one with a flip lock. It may
be worse with dirt, but is so more convenient to quickly set up.
And it won't slide down when fixed, as happened so often with twist lock..
Henk
I did exactly the opposite. I
Collapsed it's the smallest of all full size tripods. If you don't like the
PD concept of capture plates connected on their bags and the camera straps
(which connect to their plates) the tripod on itself is a strange beast
with a very annoying head if you don't have pd plates on everything. I got
> On May 19, 2022, at 11:22 PM, Toine wrote:
>
> Carbon is less weight. The rest is identical its both so light weight the
> bag hook is really needed in windy conditions. I have the carbon version
> and to my surprise the center column is solid metal, its so small carbon
> wouldnt work
OK,
> On May 17, 2022, at 11:27 PM, Toine wrote:
> >
> > If I use a tripod its PD. You probably need some additional pd plates. L
> > brackets etc. Dont fit without removing the protection pins on the head.
> > They also have pd plates which fit on both arca and manfrotto.
&
> On May 17, 2022, at 11:27 PM, Toine wrote:
>
> If I use a tripod its PD. You probably need some additional pd plates. L
> brackets etc. Dont fit without removing the protection pins on the head.
> They also have pd plates which fit on both arca and manfrotto.
> And pd
Larry, for what it is worth, here a recent article on best travel tripods.
https://digital-photography-school.com/best-travel-tripods/
Henk
Op wo 18 mei 2022 om 02:33 schreef Larry Colen :
> While there are a lot of things that I love about my tripod, it is a bit
> large to conveniently
I changed from a tripod with a twist lock to one with a flip lock. It may
be worse with dirt, but is so more convenient to quickly set up.
And it won't slide down when fixed, as happened so often with twist lock..
Henk
Op wo 18 mei 2022 om 02:33 schreef Larry Colen :
> While there are a
my tripod, it is a bit
> large to conveniently carry. Unfortunately my old benro travelflat tripod
> has disappeared. Since I haven’t been able to find it for a couple of years
> the only solution is to buy a new tripod for hiking etc. What are people’s
> experiences with smaller &a
t;>>>
>>>> Peak Design is an option. For a tripod it's very light, compact and sturdy.
>>>> It's head is an annoyance if you don't have PD plates on all your gear.
>>>> Some generic arca plates (the square ones) also fit without trouble. If you
>>>> re
If I use a tripod its PD. You probably need some additional pd plates. L
brackets etc. Dont fit without removing the protection pins on the head.
They also have pd plates which fit on both arca and manfrotto.
And pd has real lifetime warranty! I was very impressed when a zipper
failed on a bag
> On May 17, 2022, at 10:09 AM, Toine wrote:
>
> Peak Design is an option. For a tripod it's very light, compact and sturdy.
> It's head is an annoyance if you don't have PD plates on all your gear.
> Some generic arca plates (the square ones) also fit without trouble.
Buy any old tripod you want. Because you know then that the missing
one will reappear. :-)
Seriously, I have a Manfrotto Befree carbon fibre with the 494 head
that I bought a couple of years ago. It is compact, lightweight but
surprisingly sturdy. That said, I have mixed feelings about
Peak Design is an option. For a tripod it's very light, compact and sturdy.
It's head is an annoyance if you don't have PD plates on all your gear.
Some generic arca plates (the square ones) also fit without trouble. If you
remove the protection stops all arca plates fit.
On Tue, 17 May 2022
While there are a lot of things that I love about my tripod, it is a bit large
to conveniently carry. Unfortunately my old benro travelflat tripod has
disappeared. Since I haven’t been able to find it for a couple of years the
only solution is to buy a new tripod for hiking etc. What
> On Sep 19, 2021, at 9:11 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
>
> I seem to have lost my Velbon Maxi343-E tripod (the model Herbert Keppler
> recommended a few decades ago).
>
> It is no longer made. What lightweight travel tripod would people recommend
> in the (say) $150 ra
Gorillapod.
Sorry about your HD issues.
On 9/19/21 9:11 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
I seem to have lost my Velbon Maxi343-E tripod (the model Herbert Keppler
recommended a few decades ago).
It is no longer made. What lightweight travel tripod would people recommend in
the (say) $150 range
I had a Sirui T-025x that was, if I remember correctly, about $175. It was a
good light tripod, I recommended it to several folks who’ve been very happy
with it.
(I sold mine when I realized I wanted something that I could also use with the
Hasselblad. The Sirui was too light for that. I
Load calls for a (9) Kg Load bearing
Tripod with Ball Head. So Sir 3-times the Gear weight.
Both my Tripods were converted to Ball Heads, one
Heavy Duty - to 15 Kg Load, and the other light duty - 5 Kg. The
collapsed Height of the Heavy duty one is some 16 inches and the other
13
I seem to have lost my Velbon Maxi343-E tripod (the model Herbert Keppler
recommended a few decades ago).
It is no longer made. What lightweight travel tripod would people recommend in
the (say) $150 range?
Meanwhile, I have been dealting with a massive hard drive failure, and learing
The little Sirui head that came with my T-025x is actually quite good for its
price, fine for light to medium weight equipment given the capabilities of the
tripod. Not for big DSLR and long lenses, however, but I’ve used it with my
Fuji GS645S Wide 60 and Leica CL using a 75mm M lens
Markins Q-Ball Q3i and Acratech Ultimate
Ball Head, I like the latter one better - just from the looks of it, but
it is also some $100 higher in price.
I might buy just the tripod and use it with the simple head it has, and
see how much I'd need the upgrade.
Re: screw.
I used to carry a keyring
The PD Travel Tripod takes A-S style plates: PD plates are all A-S compatible.
I mentioned Manfrotto RC2 because that was the example the video review pointed
to for his complaint about no "auto lock" feature on the clamp. Personally,
that think that comment is bollocks. NONE o
Godfrey,
I wasn't sure: so, you are saying this tripod takes both A-S and RC2
plates natively (i.e. without any adapters), right? That's nice!
As for L-plates or other heads, - that's all possible, but that
adds wait and complexity, so, that would negate the big advantage of this
tripod
My Feisol tripods allow the legs to be folded backwards so that the
normally wasted space below the head is filled with the head.
It’s a great feature and takes several inches off the length of the folded
tripod.
The peak design looks cool, and will surely appeal to a number of people
I have a first generation benro travel flat tripod that I really quite
like, this is the current product.
http://www.benrousa.com/travel-series/travel-flat.aspx
Since it folds flat, rather than into the cylindrical shape, it is much
easier to pack in many situations. It is not an ideal daily
Oh yes: you don’t have to use PD plates. Any good A-S plate will do. There are
plenty with safeties. The RC2 plates are never as stable or secure. Also, you
can use any other head by getting the universal mount plate.
G
> On May 22, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> All ball
All ball heads have some limitations on movement to portrait position. That’s
why they make L-plates ... and to keep the camera centered over the legs for
best stability. Some of my other heads have even larger motion issues.
Of course, you can always just rotate the camera and plate 180
I also thought that it is a clever design.
But I agree with the reviewer (link posted by Henk), that Manfrotto's
Befree seems to have a better (more secure) QR-plate design.
And the inability to go vertical on one of the sides is a bit annoying...
But everything else seems to be
, it's quite handy I think.
G
> On May 22, 2019, at 9:13 AM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
>
> As a Design Engineer I think one does not need a
> fund of US $ 500,000 to re-design one. A tripod is NO Space Age gizmo. It
> is Lo-tech stuff.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Looks like a good Tripod. As a Design Engineer I think one does not need a
fund of US $ 500,000 to re-design one. A tripod is NO Space Age gizmo. It
is Lo-tech stuff.
In fact I have a trapezoidal - almost triangular - leg design Tripod I
bought in Dubai some 27 Years back - eliminates dead space
This is reviewed by Tony Northrup:
https://youtu.be/EAbytL3almE
Henk
Op 2019-05-21 om 18:45 schreef Eric Weir:
I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago,
and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty.
With two months to go
It's a $350 travel tripod, $700 if you want carbon fiber. That's more
than twice as expensive as an equivalent Manfrotto BeFree and the carbon
fiber BeFree is on sale for $150 less than the Aluminum model. I never
thought that Manfrotto products were inexpensive before.
On 5/21/2019 2:23 PM
> On May 21, 2019, at 12:48 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Which one?
Mefoto tripod? Backpacker S with their least expensive smartphone adapter
--
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
eew...@bellsouth.
I see I forgot to include the link to the Kickstarter video about the Peak
Designs tripod:
<https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/peak-design/1289129165?mc_cid=10e06c5e27_eid=ea9e84e746=loistj_campaign=10e06c5e27-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_03_06_COPY_01_medium=email_source=Peak+Design+Newsletter_t
Which one?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:46 PM Eric Weir wrote:
>
> I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months
> ago, and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a
> beau
I just bought a Mefoto travel tripod similar to this one a couple months ago,
and I probably wouldn’t be able to afford this one, but it sure is a beauty.
With two months to go they’re already almost 300 percent to their goal
The style of the feet suggests Slik to me.
regards, Anthony
On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 08:48, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Brand X?
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:57 PM Collin Brendemuehl
> wrote:
>
> >
Brand X?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 5:57 PM Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/55001392@N08/albums/72157706725437421
>
> I can't find any markings on it.
>
>
>
> Collin Brendemuehl
>
> 614-354-6686 (texting ok)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/55001392@N08/albums/72157706725437421
I can't find any markings on it.
Collin Brendemuehl
614-354-6686 (texting ok)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Dan, you say
> I used to bring a tripod with me, but with the tighter baggage regulations,
> I gave it up a few years back,
Not sure what baggage regulations you refer to.
I used to remove the head from the legs, put my tripod inside my large
suitcase. Larger suitcase than I needed, but an
=CjwKEAjwltC9BRDRvMfD2N66nlISJACq8591RS__bySrynHcQlhs89cr47iWvHmRKkyw0HAOoEWdWhoCNxbw_wcB=aw.ds
It cost me $20 in the store and was the most expensive part of the big
dumb tripod.
On 8/17/2016 4:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
A few years back I decided that I needed an ultra sturdy tripod, and
decided
A few years back I decided that I needed an ultra sturdy tripod, and
>> decided that I could make one for far less than the cost of buying one.
>> Mind you, this barely qualifies as "luggable", and what little
>> adjustability it has is from swapping out the "
Geez Larry where did you find that three to one fitting?
On 8/17/2016 4:31 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
A few years back I decided that I needed an ultra sturdy tripod, and
decided that I could make one for far less than the cost of buying one.
Mind you, this barely qualifies as "luggable"
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 1:31 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
>
> A few years back I decided that I needed an ultra sturdy tripod, and decided
> that I could make one for far less than the cost of buying one.
> Mind you, this barely qualifies as "luggable"
A few years back I decided that I needed an ultra sturdy tripod, and
decided that I could make one for far less than the cost of buying one.
Mind you, this barely qualifies as "luggable", and what little
adjustability it has is from swapping out the "legs". However, it
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>>
>> It would be interesting to find out what someone with a collection of Leicas
>> considers hideously expensive.
>
> That right there's a MARK!
Actually, I'd rate it a LARRY. ;-)
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Godfrey
--
Godfrey DiGiorgi - godfreydigio...@me.com - 408.431.4601 cell
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> For versatility and strength with precision and light weight, the Acratech
>> GP is just amazing .. And not hideously
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> It would be interesting to find out what someone with a collection of Leicas
> considers hideously expensive.
That right there's a MARK!
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For versatility and strength with precision and light weight, the Acratech GP
is just amazing .. And not hideously expensive.
It would be interesting to find out what someone with a collection of
Leicas considers hideously expensive.
As far as I'm aware, Induro and Benro are the same product branded for
different markets. They are mostly based on the Gitzo designs. Good legs at
reasonable prices.
G
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:42 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>> Thanks for this info,
I ordered this not too long ago:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/864571-REG/oben_ct_3581_be_126t_5_section_foldable_carbon.html
And I love it. Nice and lightweight, strong and sturdy. Plus it lets
me get down low for macro work, etc.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Larry Colen
For versatility and strength with precision and light weight, the Acratech GP
is just amazing .. And not hideously expensive.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/gdgphoto/7Gw5Vu
G
> On Aug 17, 2016, at 11:07 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> My plan so far is to get a head -- likely
Bruce Walker wrote:
Thanks for this info, Jostein. I was hoping someone would mention
Induro as that one and Benro are available here retail.
I also recommended Induro/Benro. They are a very good deal for the money.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jostein wrote:
I
.
(Though that's probably overly optimistic, as Godfrey suggests.)
Thanks, again!
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Bruce Walker <bruce.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I must finally give in. It's clear even to me that my trusty Manfrotto
> 190XPROB tripod with the 486RC2 ballhead simply ca
Thanks for this info, Jostein. I was hoping someone would mention
Induro as that one and Benro are available here retail.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:19 AM, Jostein wrote:
> I believe Feisol, Benro, Sirui and Induro all come out about the same. I'm
> not positively certain that
get into initial position & also
looks like it takes the 200PL (RC2) plate.
On 8/11/2016 7:19 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I must finally give in. It's clear even to me that my trusty Manfrotto
190XPROB tripod with the 486RC2 ballhead simply cannot support a 645Z
+ 90mm lens -- total weight 5.7 lb
I believe Feisol, Benro, Sirui and Induro all come out about the same.
I'm not positively certain that they all come out of the same factory,
but I certainly have my suspicions... :-)
I have two different carbon Induros. They're both a little fiddly with
the locking mechanism, but not
My Feisol CT3442 Tournament legs are about ten years old and show no signs of
wear or age as yet. They've been used a lot.
I looked up the latest version and note that they've been uprated to 55lbs load
and have the new "rapid anti-leg-rotation" technology in the leg locks. The
anti-rotation
head for precise
composition control. I've converted it to a Arca Swiss QR system.
I currently use a Gitzo Mountaineer tripod for all my lenses/bodies including
my 600mm. It's carbon fiber, under 5 lbs with positive leg locks - not cheap
but it's probably the last tripod I'll ever need. Its
frotto Tripods.
Have a look at the Feisol carbon fiber tripods. I have two of them, and am
majorly happy with them.
They give good head as well.
bill
On 8/11/2016 5:19 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I must finally give in. It's clear even to me that my trusty Manfrotto
190XPROB tripod with the 486RC2 ba
On 8/11/2016 7:24 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Also, check out the custom-slr plates, they will work with both
arca-swiss and most manfrotto RC2 tripod heads:
https://smile.amazon.com/Custom-SLR-M-Plate-Tripod-Plate/dp/B008B1RDIC/ref=sr_1_50?ie=UTF8=1457943254=8-50=arca+swiss+plate
The advantage
I have nothing against Manfrotto legs.. I own two sets of them.
The Feisols I mentioned are simply lighter, stronger, pack down smaller, taller
when extended, and support more weight.
The head and QR system make much more of a difference.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Also, check out the custom-slr plates, they will work with both
arca-swiss and most manfrotto RC2 tripod heads:
https://smile.amazon.com/Custom-SLR-M-Plate-Tripod-Plate/dp/B008B1RDIC/ref=sr_1_50?ie=UTF8=1457943254=8-50=arca+swiss+plate
The advantage of this is that it makes it a lot easier
Stenquist wrote:
> My Manfrotto 055CXPRO3 is a superb carbon fiber tripod: sturdy,
> light, easily expandable and rugged as one could hope for. The cool
> kids don't buy Manfrotto because it's not the trendy brand, but when
> I worked in ad agencies I found plenty of pro's used them
Bruce Walker wrote:
I must finally give in. It's clear even to me that my trusty Manfrotto
190XPROB tripod with the 486RC2 ballhead simply cannot support a 645Z
+ 90mm lens -- total weight 5.7 lbs / 2.59 kg. I'm trying to do macro
shots and the damned thing has to be torqued well above
... :)
I got an 055 that way. Worst tripod evah.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
My Manfrotto 055CXPRO3 is a superb carbon fiber tripod: sturdy, light, easily
expandable and rugged as one could hope for. The cool kids don't buy Manfrotto
because it's not the trendy brand, but when I worked in ad agencies I found
plenty of pro's used them. I've tried similarly sized Gitzos
ds.
>
> Have a look at the Feisol carbon fiber tripods. I have two of them, and am
> majorly happy with them.
> They give good head as well.
>
> bill
>
>
> On 8/11/2016 5:19 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> I must finally give in. It's clear even to me that my
give in. It's clear even to me that my trusty Manfrotto
190XPROB tripod with the 486RC2 ballhead simply cannot support a 645Z
+ 90mm lens -- total weight 5.7 lbs / 2.59 kg. I'm trying to do macro
shots and the damned thing has to be torqued well above the target
framing then allowed to slip down
setup.
>
> I used to have Manfrotto heads with the RC2 plate system. It's simply not
> strong or sturdy enough for serious work where stability and positioning is
> critical. Since I moved to this tripod nearly a decade ago and Arca Swiss
> type heads and plates, no problems at all.
diopters for close up work ...
Again, rock steady, no creep, probably quite similar to your 645Z setup.
I used to have Manfrotto heads with the RC2 plate system. It's simply not
strong or sturdy enough for serious work where stability and positioning is
critical. Since I moved to this tripod
I must finally give in. It's clear even to me that my trusty Manfrotto
190XPROB tripod with the 486RC2 ballhead simply cannot support a 645Z
+ 90mm lens -- total weight 5.7 lbs / 2.59 kg. I'm trying to do macro
shots and the damned thing has to be torqued well above the target
framing then allowed
steve harley wrote:
On 2016-07-13 19:52 , Larry Colen wrote:
It also seems that I might be able to make a fairly sturdy adapter to
mount
my big Induro ball head to the tiltall, and I'd be able to use the
tilt-pan
of the tiltall to easily level the base of the ballhead.
any standard ballhead
On 2016-07-13 16:25 , Larry Colen wrote:
I've got an adapter for mounting a green laser to my hot shoe. I'd love to
have something similar for holding my smartphone. Does anyone know of
something existing?
there seem to be dozens of options; this is just the first i clicked on:
On 2016-07-13 19:52 , Larry Colen wrote:
It also seems that I might be able to make a fairly sturdy adapter to mount
my big Induro ball head to the tiltall, and I'd be able to use the tilt-pan
of the tiltall to easily level the base of the ballhead.
any standard ballhead should screw right
Regarding Arca-Swiss, you can look for the tripod head and the QR-coupler
separately. Maybe you can recycle a coupler from an old ballhead.
To solve all your challenges in one go, you could buy a telescope mount with a
built-in goto function. :-)
Jostein
Den 14. juli 2016 00.25.17 CEST
I mainly use the 'mini gear' head for landscape and macro photography
-Original Message-
>From: Zos Xavius <zosxav...@gmail.com
>Subject: Re: Mounting a phone or tablet to a camera? Also tripod heads
>
>I love ballheads but fine adjustments are near impossible. I find
>
Zos Xavius wrote:
where is the edit button? :)
I dunno, but I could use an edit button for my mouth too.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
what you meant. I could attach one of those to one of my
>>> tiltall tripods.
>>>
>>> It also seems that I might be able to make a fairly sturdy adapter to mount
>>> my big Induro ball head to the tiltall, and I'd be able to use the tilt-pan
>>> of the
g Induro ball head to the tiltall, and I'd be able to use the tilt-pan
>> of the tiltall to easily level the base of the ballhead.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>>>
>>>> From: Larry Colen<l...@red4est.com&
make a fairly sturdy adapter to mount
> my big Induro ball head to the tiltall, and I'd be able to use the tilt-pan
> of the tiltall to easily level the base of the ballhead.
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>>
>>> From: Larry Colen<l..
com>
Subject: Mounting a phone or tablet to a camera? Also tripod heads
A lot of times when playing with astrotracer, I can't exactly see what
I'm aiming at with my bare eye, and particularly not through the
viewfinder. I've gotten close by using the google skymap app on my
phone, holding it up to th
I have a Bogen 'mini gear' head that I adapted to arca swiss with the addition
of an arca swiss clamp to the Bogen.
-Original Message-
>From: Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com>
>Subject: Mounting a phone or tablet to a camera? Also tripod heads
>
>A lot of
A lot of times when playing with astrotracer, I can't exactly see what
I'm aiming at with my bare eye, and particularly not through the
viewfinder. I've gotten close by using the google skymap app on my
phone, holding it up to the back of my camera and using that to aim
close enough to see
Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Addy" <pixelsmi...@gmail.com>
Subject: How to fly with a tripod
No this isn't an April Fools post on how to accomplish the Wright
Brother's achievement, using nothing but a tripod; It
kpack, I could state with absolute certainty that I had been there,
done that, and (a) would not gate check my valuable camera gear, but (b)
knew without question that the LowePro would fit under the seat in front
of me. So the small suitcase gets gate checked, the tripod gets unstrappe
the seat in front of me. So the small suitcase gets
gate checked, the tripod gets unstrapped and goes overhead, and the backpack
goes under the seat.
The only time I had any issue was on a regional flight in Argentina. The
luggage screener had never seen a tripod before. He had to call over
A few experiences:
Oslo - Newark 2004: a Sachtler 75 with a large Foba ballhead. Collapsed legs 80
cm long. SAS allowed it as carryon from Oslo, but not on the return flight.
Wrapped the legs together with plastic tape, and it arrived safely in Oslo.
Oslo - Forth Worth, Tx, 2007, same tripod
Godfrey DiGiorgi Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:07:13 -0700 wrote:
My best legs for travel are <...>
MARK!
:-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
to the camera bag
without any issues from the inspectors.
G
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 6:06 AM, Darren Addy <pixelsmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It is a request for
> information on the best way to transport a tripod via commercial
> airlines.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
of the tripod.
But maybe I am underestimating those...
Also, I would be concerned about various plastic knobs on the head.
For those, I'd consider wrapping a large-bubble bubble wrap around the
head (with a clear packing tape on top and/or rubber bands below the
head).
This is unrelated
On 4/1/2016 9:06 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
No this isn't an April Fools post on how to accomplish the Wright
Brother's achievement, using nothing but a tripod; It is a request for
information on the best way to transport a tripod via commercial
airlines.
I should have thought about this long
t; Brother's achievement, using nothing but a tripod; It is a request for
> information on the best way to transport a tripod via commercial
> airlines.
>
> I should have thought about this long before now, but... I've got a
> "normal" Manfrotto (good sized) tripod. I'm going to
I’ve sent a tripod as baggage many times in a zippered case. No problems.
Tripods are pretty tough, even if they get tossed. I’ve also shipped cameras as
baggage, although those were in Pelican hard cases, with airline legal
combination locks. Again, everything arrived safely. Pro photogs do
1 - 100 of 1289 matches
Mail list logo