depending on the lens mounted on the camera
>>>> doing
>>>> it.(I currently 7 Pentax fK mount, (Film) and 4 Pentax screw
>>>> mount
>>>> bodies floating around that I don't use enough as it is, not to
>>>> mention
>>>>
Toralf Lund wrote:
> Adam Maas wrote:
>> Frankly, the AF is so primitive on the 5n that I consider it a MF body.
>> When I had mine, I tried AF a couple times, turned it off and never used
>> it again. It was dog-slow in comparison to every other AF body I've
>> owned (even the circa-1988 Nikon
- Original Message -
From: "Glen Tortorella" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: Flash on ZX-5N
> why have a rather useless (and perhaps inoperable) flash atop my
> body?
I knew
anual, i.e. a body without a motor drive,
>> and possibly with a mechanical shutter - but you have already covered at
>> least on of those, haven't you?
>>
>>> While I have not
>>> made a final decision, I am presently leaning toward getting a seco
I'd vote for the 5n, if only for the selectable metering over mode-based
metering selection. It's a nice little camera.
-Adam
Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Thanks, PJ. If I end up going for the M, would this be a "wrong"
> decision? I am weighing your comments seriously, and I am also
> consid
ention
>>> the other cameras, I've accumulated over the years, otherwise I
>>> might
>>> have kept both).
>>>
>>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thank you, PJ. This is an interesting point. I have just posted
>>>>
and possibly with a mechanical shutter - but you have already
> covered at
> least on of those, haven't you?
>> While I have not
>> made a final decision, I am presently leaning toward getting a second
>> ZX-M body rather than the ZX-5N. The only differences between
ng around that I don't use enough as it is, not to
>> mention
>> the other cameras, I've accumulated over the years, otherwise I might
>> have kept both).
>>
>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you, PJ. This is an interesting point. I
ently leaning toward getting a second
>> ZX-M body rather than the ZX-5N. The only differences between the
>> two are the meter and lens mount. With regard to the meter, I gather
>> I will become less dependent on it as my skill (and experience)
>> develop.
> T
I say: if it is prone to failure or unreliable, then do
>> not include it.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Glen
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2007, at 12:09 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yes, they're a week point, they break...
>>>
rsonally, I'd be more likely
to go for something even more manual, i.e. a body without a motor drive,
and possibly with a mechanical shutter - but you have already covered at
least on of those, haven't you?
> While I have not
> made a final decision, I am presently leaning
is an interesting point. I have just posted
>> some further thoughts regarding my ZX-M vs. ZX-5N decision. What do
>> you think?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Glen
>>
>> On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:28 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That said, I seld
have kept both).
Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Thank you, PJ. This is an interesting point. I have just posted
> some further thoughts regarding my ZX-M vs. ZX-5N decision. What do
> you think?
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
> On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:28 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
On 9/7/07, Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, PJ. This is an interesting point. I have just posted
> some further thoughts regarding my ZX-M vs. ZX-5N decision. What do
> you think?
>
> Regards,
> Glen
>
For a long time I worked with a ZX-M/ZX-5N
gt; >
> > Regards,
> > Glen
> >
> > On Sep 6, 2007, at 12:09 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, they're a week point, they break...
> >>
> >> Glen Tortorella wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Has any
P. J. Alling wrote:
>That said, I seldom use the built in flash, which means that it has
very
>few opportunities to break, and when you need just a little bit of
extra
>light, it's there.
yes it is. Here's an example of when I was glad to have the pop-up
flash available:
http://www.robertste
Thank you, PJ. This is an interesting point. I have just posted
some further thoughts regarding my ZX-M vs. ZX-5N decision. What do
you think?
Regards,
Glen
On Sep 6, 2007, at 1:28 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> That said, I seldom use the built in flash, which means that it has
>
than the ZX-5N. The only differences between the
two are the meter and lens mount. With regard to the meter, I gather
I will become less dependent on it as my skill (and experience)
develop. With regard to the plastic vs. metal lens mount ring: I
tend to be extremely careful with the things
a week point, they break...
>>
>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
>>> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
>>> about th
;
>> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
>>> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
>>> about the longevity of these little flashes.
>>>
. Alling wrote:
> Yes, they're a week point, they break...
>
> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
>> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
>> about the lon
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:49:00PM -0400, Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Thanks, Bong. You are at least the second person who has conveyed
> such to me.
>
> This is what I had suspected. I wonder if the lil' flash on that
> expensive MZ-S is the same...or has the same operational tendency? I
>
n mine gave up (or disappeared...). I have to hold
> it up to use it...but it works.
>
> Bong
>
> On 9/6/07, Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
>> ZX-5N (malfunction
Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)?
It works just find on mine, but I hardly ever use it. Then again, I'm
not very careful when it comes to packing the camera
That should be "weak point".
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Yes, they're a week point, they break...
>
> Glen Tortorella wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
>> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails t
Yes, they're a week point, they break...
Glen Tortorella wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
> about the longevity of these little flashes
Yup. The spring in mine gave up (or disappeared...). I have to hold
it up to use it...but it works.
Bong
On 9/6/07, Glen Tortorella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
> ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to
Hi all,
Has anyone had of heard of any problems with the pop-up flash on the
ZX-5N (malfunctions, fails to pop up, etc.)? I tend to be skeptical
about the longevity of these little flashes.
Thanks,
Glen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo
> I have a Pentax ZX-5n that won't fire the shutter at all times. It seems
> to
> auto focus and the metering works but the shutter doesn't fire. The
> batteries
> are new. Any ideas what could be going wrong?
>
> Any pointers appreciated. Is it worth talking to
e somewhere, I doubt it'd be much to fix.
On 3/2/07, Gaurav Aggarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Pentax ZX-5n that won't fire the shutter at all times. It seems to
> auto focus and the metering works but the shutter doesn't fire. The batteries
&g
Hi,
I have a Pentax ZX-5n that won't fire the shutter at all times. It seems to
auto focus and the metering works but the shutter doesn't fire. The batteries
are new. Any ideas what could be going wrong?
Any pointers appreciated. Is it worth talking to Pentax for a repair?
Than
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > a few months and it worked just fine. A couple of weeks ago the mirror
> > locked up just as I was about to sell it. So, there you have it - the
> > mirror is still stuck. If interested, make an offer. Off list please.
> > Thanks!
>
> Mine did th
Oh well, it was a thought.
gfen wrote:
>On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>
>>I know this is stupid but did you try replacing the batteries?
>>
>>
>
>Yes, and no. It had a set of the CR2 or whatever the little buggers are in
>it, which don't register as low on the LCD. I didn't re
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I know this is stupid but did you try replacing the batteries?
Yes, and no. It had a set of the CR2 or whatever the little buggers are in
it, which don't register as low on the LCD. I didn't replae those because
I don't have another set. I did, however,
I know this is stupid but did you try replacing the batteries?
gfen wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
>
>>a few months and it worked just fine. A couple of weeks ago the mirror
>>locked up just as I was about to sell it. So, there you have it - the
>>mirror is still stuck.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> a few months and it worked just fine. A couple of weeks ago the mirror
> locked up just as I was about to sell it. So, there you have it - the
> mirror is still stuck. If interested, make an offer. Off list please.
> Thanks!
Mine did this last week
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 7:56 AM
Subject: FS - ZX-5n
> I'm offering this for a friend and sometimes list participant. The camera
> has seen little use and is in very good cosmetic condition. It has the
> date back and comes with the battery thing attached.
I'm offering this for a friend and sometimes list participant. The camera
has seen little use and is in very good cosmetic condition. It has the
date back and comes with the battery thing attached. I used the camera for
a few months and it worked just fine. A couple of weeks ago the mirror
lock
Thanks for the offer, John ... it's not my camera so I'll have to ask Patsy
what she wants to do.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Celio
> Shel, bring it to me at Reed's any time tues-sat and I'll see if there's
> anything I (or our technicians) can do for it here.
>
> If we can't fix
Shel, bring it to me at Reed's any time tues-sat and I'll see if there's
anything I (or our technicians) can do for it here.
If we can't fix it, I think your best bet would be Apex Camera Repair here in
Walnut Creek. They do good work there and have fixed my 6x7 and Auto110
cameras in the past
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 03:21:55 +0200, Shel Belinkoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've a ZX-5n which worked great the last time I used it. I tried it
> today
> and the mirror is now locked up. The bats are good, but I may try even
> fresher bats later - the camera ha
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I didn't look thru the finder before firing the first shot, so I don't
> know. I don't believe there's a mirror lock ...
There isn't one. Sorry for your mishap, Shel. I can't remember what
you have said in the past about competent repairers in your ar
I didn't look thru the finder before firing the first shot, so I don't
know. I don't believe there's a mirror lock ... sad thing is, it's not my
camera. It was loaned to me by a local list member and I took it from the
equipment drawer to sell it for her to another local Pentaxian. Oh, well
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I've a ZX-5n which worked great the last time I used it. I tried it today
> and the mirror is now locked up. The bats are good, but I may try even
> fresher bats later - the camera has the battery grip that takes four AA
> cells. The camera whirs, film
It's a repair situation. Probably just a CLA. But that would cost
more than the camera is worth. Put it on the shelf and admire it. Or
download a repair manual and try a DIY fix.
Paul
On Sep 8, 2006, at 9:59 PM, David Savage wrote:
> My next suggestion would have been to hit it harder, but you
Yep - and not so gently as well ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: David Savage
> Did you try gently tapping the base plate on a counter to or something?
>
> Dave
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I've a ZX-5n which worked great the last time I used it. I tried
My next suggestion would have been to hit it harder, but you've
already tried that. :-)
As I've never handled that camera I'm out of ideas.
Dave
On 9/9/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep - and not so gently as well ;-))
>
> Shel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
h
Did you try gently tapping the base plate on a counter to or something?
Dave
On 9/9/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've a ZX-5n which worked great the last time I used it. I tried it today
> and the mirror is now locked up. The bats are good, but I may try ev
On 9/9/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have one.
I don't. Sorry.
> Bill Lawlor wrote:
>
> >I'm looking for a reliable ZX-5n camera body.
> >Thanks, Bill Lawlor
> >
> >www.wvlphotography.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
I've a ZX-5n which worked great the last time I used it. I tried it today
and the mirror is now locked up. The bats are good, but I may try even
fresher bats later - the camera has the battery grip that takes four AA
cells. The camera whirs, film rewinds and loads, but mirror remains up.
P. J. Alling wrote:
> I have one.
And not parting with it? Me too :))
> Bill Lawlor wrote:
>> I'm looking for a reliable ZX-5n camera body.
>> Thanks, Bill Lawlor
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED], /bin/zsh. C|N>K
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
I have one.
Bill Lawlor wrote:
>I'm looking for a reliable ZX-5n camera body.
>Thanks, Bill Lawlor
>
>www.wvlphotography.com
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Einstein
--
PDML
I have one that may be for sale.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bill Lawlor
> I'm looking for a reliable ZX-5n camera body.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm looking for a reliable ZX-5n camera body.
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
www.wvlphotography.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts"
>>
>> Oh no, it's a scream of udder delight!
>
>You scream,
>I scream,
Until we're put out to Pasteur.
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
>Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensive. An average
digital
>camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
>
More with shake reduction.
>>>
>>>I scream every time you post something like this, you know.
>>>
>>Something about milk shake reduction causes you to ch
On 22/7/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I scream every time you post something like this, you know.
Hey with your voice Roberts, I heard you.
(I'm trying to get my one-liner's down to Robb-precision ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: ZX-5n
>
>
> Oh no, it's a scream of udder delight!
>
You scream,
I scream,
ww
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
P. J. Alling wrote:
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>>Cotty wrote:
>>
>>>On 22/7/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>>
Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensive. An average digital
camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
>>>More with shake reduction.
>>
>>I screa
Something about milk shake reduction causes you to churn?
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Cotty wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 22/7/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensive. An average digital
>>>camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt"
Subject: RE: ZX-5n
> Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensive. An average digital
> camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
> In Europe this is equal to perhaps a week's wages or 2% of a persons
&
Cotty wrote:
>On 22/7/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensive. An average digital
>>camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
>
>More with shake reduction.
I scream every time you post something like this, you know.
--
Mark R
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Cotty
> Sent: 22 July 2006 08:02
> To: pentax list
> Subject: Re: ZX-5n
>
> On 22/7/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Not everybody want one. T
On 22/7/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensive. An average digital
>camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
More with shake reduction.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http:/
ced 3 years ago.
Regards
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 22. juli 2006 08:19
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: ZX-5n
Not everybody want one. They are still quite expensiv
On 22/7/06, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
> An average digital
>camera is perhaps worth 500-1000 liter of milk.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
camera is more expensive than a film camera.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af jim
kerslake
Sendt: 22. juli 2006 08:57
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
t, then. Sorry squire, I've had a look 'round the
>back of the shop, and uh, we're right out of Fuji Velvia."
>
>"I see. I see, I get the picture."
>
>"I got a CF card"
>
> (pause)
>
>"Pray, does it render the plumage of a Norwe
uh, we're right out of Fuji Velvia."
"I see. I see, I get the picture."
"I got a CF card"
(pause)
"Pray, does it render the plumage of a Norwegian parrot onto beautifully
saturated transparencies at ISO 50? "
"Nnn...not really."
"WELL IT'
On 7/21/06, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Officailly from whom?
> I just oredered some super 8 film for underwater photography. Kodak
> discontinued Kodakchrome 40 last summer, but 60 ASA Ektachrome super 8 and
> 16mm is alledgedly alive and well.
Dwayne's Photo still has "Regular" 8 and
, paint and brushes are dead as well, are they ?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty
Sendt: 19. juli 2006 00:47
Til: pentax list
Emne: Re: ZX-5n
jim kerslake wrote:
>> It's official: film is dead.
>
>It's not dead - it's resting...
>
>Pining for the fjords :-)
With $1k 10-megapixel bodies popping up like daisies, it's likely to
be a long rest.
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
412-687-2835
--
PDML Pentax-
> It's official: film is dead.
It's not dead - it's resting...
Pining for the fjords :-)
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: Z
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Walter Hamler wrote:
>
>> I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy with
>> digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
>
> Is film dead?
> I dunno, but my MZ-S on eBay has had 7 bids and met the $500.00
> reser
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/07/18 Tue PM 10:47:01 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: ZX-5n
>
> On 18/7/06, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so hap
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:05 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> It puts me in mind of this probably apocryphal graffiti...
>
> God is Dead!
> --Nietzsche
> Nietzsche is dead.
> -- God.
Life is an illusion.
-- Siddhartha
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://
In a message dated 7/18/2006 4:40:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is film dead?
I dunno, but my MZ-S on eBay has had 7 bids and met the $500.00
reserve price in only two days.
--
Mark Roberts Photography & Multimedia
===
Cool.
See? You should have reserved it higher.
It puts me in mind of this probably apocryphal graffiti...
God is Dead!
--Nietzsche
Nietzsche is dead.
-- God.
Replace Nietzsche and God as appropriate.
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Walter Hamler wrote:
>
>
>
>>I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy with
Ni, ni. ni. ni. ni!!!
From: "Cotty"
> On 18/7/06, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy with
>>digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
>
> It's official: film is dead.
> ||=|http://www.cot
At 4:41 PM -0700 7/18/06, Jack Davis wrote:
>Woo Hoo!
>
>Jack
>
>--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Walter Hamler wrote:
>>
>> >I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy
>> with
>> >digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
>>
> > Is
Hi, Walt,
How's the condition, and what kind of price were you thinking of?
Joe
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:06 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy
> with
> digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
>
> Walt
>
>
> --
>
Woo Hoo!
Jack
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Walter Hamler wrote:
>
> >I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy
> with
> >digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
>
> Is film dead?
> I dunno, but my MZ-S on eBay has had 7 bids and
Walter Hamler wrote:
>I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy with
>digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
Is film dead?
I dunno, but my MZ-S on eBay has had 7 bids and met the $500.00
reserve price in only two days.
--
Mark Roberts Photograp
Some of my friends disagree, but they own Nikons and Canons!
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 18/7/06, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy with
>digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
It's official: film is dead.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
I am considering selling my only film camera body as I am so happy with
digital. If anyone is interested I will give you a good price.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
ll have it.
Check out Stan's site for comments on the various zooms.
http://stans-photography.info/
Mark Stringer
- Original Message -
From: "chuck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 3:11 PM
Subject: New Lens for ZX-5n ?
The Pentax 28-105 on m
Find another 28-105. I love mine on the PZ-1 and istD
Dave
> The Pentax 28-105 on my ZX-5n got banged by an
> errant child. Seems to work OK, except the results
> have gotten darker, less bright, then they used to be.
> Could this be a
chuck wrote:
The Pentax 28-105 on my ZX-5n got banged by an
errant child. Seems to work OK, except the results
have gotten darker, less bright, then they used to be.
Could this be a damaged lens?
In any case I am up for an upgrade. What are suggested
lenses for this camera? Either Pentax brand
chuck wrote:
The Pentax 28-105 on my ZX-5n got banged by an
errant child. Seems to work OK, except the results
have gotten darker, less bright, then they used to be.
Could this be a damaged lens?
In any case I am up for an upgrade. What are suggested
lenses for this camera? Either Pentax brand
The Pentax 28-105 on my ZX-5n got banged by an
errant child. Seems to work OK, except the results
have gotten darker, less bright, then they used to be.
Could this be a damaged lens?
In any case I am up for an upgrade. What are suggested
lenses for this camera? Either Pentax brand or other
Hi,
I had recently changed the screen of my newly acquired ZX-5n with a split
image focusing screen (a ZX-M part ordered from Pentax Colorado). Thanks
to Don for helping me with precise instructions.
I developed my first roll after that and I tend to feel that I didn't get sharp
focus on a
Hi,
Gaurav Aggarwal a écrit :
Is there a possibility of changing the focusing screen on the ZX-5n
and using a split-image screen instead?
The best solution seems to replace the 5n focusing screen by a MZ-M /
ZX-M, as they are the same size.
The operation is very easy. Unfortunately, this easy
Glad to help, it's what this list is all about. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Gaurav Aggarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 2:39 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: how to change focusing screen on a ZX-5n?
>
&g
the link: ;-(
> http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/5nClip.jpg
>
> Here is a rather large photo of the screen retaining
> clip in the ZX-5n.
> Also pictured is the tool I use to release it.
> It's just a cheap "dental pick" with just a tiny
> hook formed on the end
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/5nClip.jpg
(Bad Brain Day!)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Gaurav Aggarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2006 11:26 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: how to change focusing screen on a ZX
In the original "how to change focusing screen on a ZX-5n?" thread
Here's Don's response with link:
Again, with the link: ;-(
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/5nClip.jpg
Here is a rather large photo of the screen retaining
clip in the ZX-5n.
Also pictured is the tool I use
> Here is a rather large photo of the screen retaining
> > > clip in the ZX-5n.
> >
> > Photo?
> >
> > Dave
> >
>
>
Whoops! Never mind. Found it elsewhere.
Dave
On 2/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/11/06, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is a rather large photo of the screen retaining
> > clip in the ZX-5n.
>
> Photo?
>
> Dave
>
On 2/11/06, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a rather large photo of the screen retaining
> clip in the ZX-5n.
Photo?
Dave
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
