Loved it!
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/bulentcelasun
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml
Worth the wait.
That is a stunning photo!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Kevin Thornsberry
Sent: November 4, 2012 11/4/12
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: My First PESO - 30 years late
To the best of my knowledge, I've never submitted a PESO. But today, I was
testing a new sc
Thanks for sharing a great memory, Kevin. Keep it up! :-)
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Kevin Thornsberry
wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, I've never submitted a PESO. But today, I was
> testing a new scanner and pulled out an old notebook of slide sleeves from
> pictures I took in Brasi
Very dramatic color! Keep posting. Cheers, Christine
On Nov 4, 2012, at 3:25 AM, "Bob W" wrote:
> Jesus of the Pylons. A very nice shot, well worth the wait.
>
> B
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Kevin
>> Thornsberry
>>
>> To the be
Jesus of the Pylons. A very nice shot, well worth the wait.
B
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Kevin
> Thornsberry
>
> To the best of my knowledge, I've never submitted a PESO. But today, I
> was testing a new scanner and pulled out an old no
To the best of my knowledge, I've never submitted a PESO. But today, I was
testing a new scanner and pulled out an old notebook of slide sleeves from
pictures I took in Brasil almost 30 years ago and came across this picture
of Rio de Janeiro. It's not a great picture and I just happened to be at
David,
Consider this suggestion. Why wouldn't you make a regular shot of the
same scene (or similar one) so that the trees would be solid black? Then
you could compare the HDR variety with silhouette variety. Personally,
I'd prefer the silhouette type of shot, but it would be my vision, not
yo
Hard to comment on the success of your attempt without seeing the original
scene, but for me I'd expect to see more detail in the trees.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David Bliss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My First PESO (tm)
> ...and my very
Too large for a PESO. You should size it so that it can be viewed
without scrolling. Technically, it's quite good in terms of rendering
both shadow and highlight. Aesthetically, I find it uninspiring. But
thanks for sharing it.
Paul
On Jan 7, 2007, at 2:11 AM, David Bliss wrote:
> ...and my ver
...and my very first attempt at an HDR-alike (done by hand in Photoshop 6).
Shadows 1/3s at f/11, highlights 1/10s at f/11, K10D at 400ASA, FA 28-105.
Comments or criticisms appreciated. (As well as advice on noise-reduction
software for the shadows... I meant to shoot it at 100ASA)
http://keat
)
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 3. mai 2006 06:20
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: PESO - My First PESO
>
> This is partly an experiment in B&W post-processing, part "trying to
> rescue a low-light shot".
>
Hi!
I'm quite happy with the tips that Godfrey provided me. Here is my
second edition of my B&W post-processing.
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=106
Thoughts? Comments? Critiques?
Are the eyes too "front and center" now?
Much better, Michael... Now, for some reason (whereas I may be
a
Much better. Good work.
Paul
On May 3, 2006, at 11:45 PM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
I'm quite happy with the tips that Godfrey provided me. Here is my
second edition of my B&W post-processing.
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=106
Thoughts? Comments? Critiques?
Are the eyes too "front and ce
On May 3, 2006, at 8:45 PM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=106
Thoughts? Comments? Critiques?
Nice. It's a softer, warmer rendering than I did with it, probably a
bit more flattering. The eyes look fine to me, a little darker than I
might prefer but it's your pi
I'm quite happy with the tips that Godfrey provided me. Here is my
second edition of my B&W post-processing.
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=106
Thoughts? Comments? Critiques?
Are the eyes too "front and center" now?
Michael Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca
On 3
I'm quite happy with the tips that Godfrey provided me. Here is my
second edition of my B&W post-processing.
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/?p=106
Thoughts? Comments? Critiques?
Are the eyes too "front and center" now?
Michael Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca
On 3
On May 3, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
.. It is customary to have at least one eye of a portrayed person
to be in focus. You seem to have both out of focus.
Yes, that's an ongoing problem. Low-light focusing with a manual
focus lens. I recently purchased a homemade split scr
On May 3, 2006, at 4:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/joc/
I like that *more* than what I did, but I think you may have gone a
bit
too far. It appears to be oversharpened, but I'll work with the
psd file
and see if I can find a happy medium!
Thanks, God
>>
>> On May 3, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
>> Michael,
>> I took your original color image and did a little adjustment to it in
>> Photoshop, produced a color and B&W version. If you use Photoshop
>> CS2, you can get the .PSD file to see what I did specifically.
>>http://homepag
>
> On May 3, 2006, at 6:37 AM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
>
>>> .. It is customary to have at least one eye of a portrayed person
>>> to be in focus. You seem to have both out of focus.
>>
>> Yes, that's an ongoing problem. Low-light focusing with a manual
>> focus lens. I recently purchased a home
On May 2, 2006, at 9:20 PM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
Technical:
*ist DS, A-50mm/1.7, 1/25s, f/2.0, ISO 400.
Orig:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/joc.jpg
The shot is a bit dark. A little bit of adjustment to levels,
contrast and color correction brings it right up nicely. If you want
Hi!
Yes, that's an ongoing problem. Low-light focusing with a manual focus
lens. I recently purchased a homemade split screen, but it doesn't seem
to work well with my FA or DA lenses and autofocus. Any suggestions?
No real help there... I had to move completely to AF lenses...
Boris
On 3-May-06, at 4:05 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The color version can be improved greatly with some curves
adjustment and saturation reduction.
Okay, i'll try that out!
I also think you should remove the wart on the nose and the pimples
on the chin, since this is obviously a portrait, not a
On 3-May-06, at 12:30 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Michael, the b/w version is less unsuccessful than the original
color one. Yet both seem (at least to me) to lack the evident point
of focus. It is customary to have at least one eye of a portrayed
person to be in focus. You seem to have
and lets see
how much better it gets :)
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 12:20 AM
Subject: PESO - My First PESO
This is partly an experiment in B&W post-processing, part
The color version can be improved greatly with some curves adjustment
and saturation reduction. I also think you should remove the wart on
the nose and the pimples on the chin, since this is obviously a
portrait, not a news photograph. The BW version shows way too much
contrast with no shadow d
Hi!
This is partly an experiment in B&W post-processing, part "trying to
rescue a low-light shot".
Orig:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/joc.jpg
B&W:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocb&w.jpg
Technical:
*ist DS, A-50mm/1.7, 1/25s, f/2.0, ISO 400.
I de-saturated, then adjusted the
This is partly an experiment in B&W post-processing, part "trying to
rescue a low-light shot".
Orig:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/joc.jpg
B&W:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/jocb&w.jpg
Technical:
*ist DS, A-50mm/1.7, 1/25s, f/2.0, ISO 400.
I de-saturated, then adjusted the ligh
Works for me now. Not sure it was worth the effort.
Bob
On Nov 30, 2005, at 10:08 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.uandimag.com
No ads. One issue so far. Pretty good
-Adam
Who knows the editor/publisher.
I get an error m
Bob Shell wrote:
On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.uandimag.com
No ads. One issue so far. Pretty good
-Adam
Who knows the editor/publisher.
I get an error message that the URL can't be found.
Bob
Just checked it, and it's working.
-Adam
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On 11/29/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I probably should get a life..
> >
> >Why start now?
>
> "I'll get a life when someone demonstrates it would be superior to what
> I have now."
>
>
> --
> Mark
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 11/29/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I probably should get a life..
>
>Why start now?
"I'll get a life when someone demonstrates it would be superior to what
I have now."
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.
On 11/29/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I probably should get a life..
Why start now?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: My first PESO
I'm flattered that you read my posts.
I probably should get a life..
WW
On Nov 29, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
You guys need to be objective.
kenneth Waller
I keep my objective on my microscope.
Bob
On 11/28/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My bullshit meter just pinned.
> Sorry Frank, but that is pompous crap.
I'm flattered that you read my posts.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 11/29/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I gather Norm does some modelling now and again.
I've witnessed it personally. It's not pretty.
That tree will never be the same...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Sorry, but I've had very little exposure to a Holga. ;>)
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: My first PESO
On 29 Nov 2005 at 0:00, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> You guys need to be objective.
Apparently the only objective
On 29 Nov 2005 at 0:00, Kenneth Waller wrote:
> You guys need to be objective.
Apparently the only objective needed to produce a great photograph objectifying
the subject or not is that from a Holga :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>In a message dated 11/28/2005 7:47:29 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Tact has never been one of my strong suits.
>People seem to like me ayway.
>
>William Robb
>==
>Of course, you could just be fooling yourself.
>
>Marnie aka Doe ;-)
Oh he
You guys need to be objective.
kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: My first PESO
I object to your objection...
David Mann wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:04 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
>> Seems to me that an
Key word - "seem"...
>Tact has never been one of my strong suits
Actually, one of my stronger suits is a nice 2 piece, dark blue with narrow
grey stripes.
Kenneth Waller
(who just couldn't resist)
-Original Message-
From: William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su
In a message dated 11/28/2005 7:47:29 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tact has never been one of my strong suits.
People seem to like me ayway.
William Robb
==
Of course, you could just be fooling yourself.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
In a message dated 11/28/2005 10:19:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> A bowl of fruit is already an object. You can't objectify it, you can
> merely portray it as an object.
>
> People are more than their physical selves. If you choose to
> photograph or otherwise portray
On 29/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>GFM, June 2-4, 2006.
>
>Continue discussion. Bring subjects.
>
>Partial nudes, if model agrees, what the F.
I gather Norm does some modelling now and again.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastich
- Original Message -
From: "E.R.N. Reed"
Subject: Re: My first PESO
William Robb wrote:
Tact has never been one of my strong suits.
People seem to like me ayway.
Lead us not into temptation ...
Awww, you know you don't mean that.
William Robb wrote:
Tact has never been one of my strong suits.
People seem to like me ayway.
Lead us not into temptation ...
I object to your objection...
David Mann wrote:
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:04 AM, William Robb wrote:
Seems to me that any portrayal of someone/thing is an objectification.
I object to being objectified.
- Dave
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
On Nov 29, 2005, at 11:04 AM, William Robb wrote:
Seems to me that any portrayal of someone/thing is an
objectification.
I object to being objectified.
- Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shell"
Subject: Re: My first PESO
I was getting ready to write a response, and then saw yours. I was
going to be more polite in my note, but I think you said it better.
Tact has never been one of my strong suits.
People seem to lik
]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: My first PESO
Filters don't know nothin' but they block everything. I remember a
rumor from about 5 years ago that Jpegs could carry
viruses, (no explanation of how they could operate or spread), the
administrators of the CS
lling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: My first PESO
Filters don't know nothin' but they block everything. I remember a rumor
from about 5 years ago that Jpegs could carry
viruses, (no explanation of how they cou
GFM, June 2-4, 2006.
Continue discussion. Bring subjects.
Partial nudes, if model agrees, what the F.
Sir Dave, (The really over weight) Brooks
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "frank theriault"
> Subject: Re: My first PESO
>
>
On Nov 28, 2005, at 6:11 PM, William Robb wrote:
I don't see every portrayal as objectification. Far from it. I
think
what I'm talking about is the difference between illustration and
art,
the difference between a mere likeness and a portrait.
My bullshit meter just pinned.
Sorry Frank,
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: My first PESO
Even the portrayal of a deviant sexual act says a lot about a person --
perhaps a lot more than we want to know.
You talkin about me again??
You *really* should meet my wife..
WW
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: My first PESO
I don't see every portrayal as objectification. Far from it. I think
what I'm talking about is the difference between illustration and art,
the difference between a mere likeness
On 11/28/05, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That was my point, which somehow seems to have zoomed right past
> Frank. It doesn't matter a whit if the subject is an object in the
> first place.
>
> As for objectifying people, that goes back at least as far as the
> "Venus of Willendorf",
You been bad again...
Cotty wrote:
On 28/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Even the portrayal of a deviant sexual act says a lot about a person --
perhaps a lot more than we want to know.
You talkin about me again??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
On 28/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Even the portrayal of a deviant sexual act says a lot about a person --
>perhaps a lot more than we want to know.
You talkin about me again??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://ww
On Nov 28, 2005, at 5:04 PM, William Robb wrote:
Seems to me that any portrayal of someone/thing is an
objectification.
That was my point, which somehow seems to have zoomed right past
Frank. It doesn't matter a whit if the subject is an object in the
first place.
As for objectifyin
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: My first PESO
A bowl of fruit is already an object. You can't objectify it, you can
merely portray it as an object.
People are more than their physical selves. If you choose to
photograph or otherwise
Yes, Frank makes a good point. And because people are not objects, it's
actually somewhat difficult to "objectify" them. The very act of photographing
them is almost certain to reveal something about their personality or
situation. Clothing can say a lot. The lack of clothing can sometimes say e
Well said, Frank, and I pretty much agree with you 100%.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault
Bob Shell said:
> > You know, I hear this comment a lot, and I just don't understand it.
> > The main definition of objectify is "exteriorize: make external or
> > objective, or give
On 11/28/05, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm..(?)
You'll find out soon enough.
Mark has been compiling his favourite quotes from PDML, and each year
he graces us with his pix of the year. Of course many of us are more
than happy to tell him how to do his job.
-frank
--
"Sharpness
Hmm..(?)
Jack
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/27/05, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When a magazine's "whale advertisers" become their source of
> survival,
> > "Marketing" becomes their pimp and neutrality, their
> > whore.
>
>
> Mark!!
>
> -frank
>
> --
>
On 11/26/05, Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 26, 2005, at 12:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > OTOH, objectifying women does annoy me.
>
>
> You know, I hear this comment a lot, and I just don't understand it.
> The main definition of objectify is "exteriorize: make external or
On 11/27/05, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When a magazine's "whale advertisers" become their source of survival,
> "Marketing" becomes their pimp and neutrality, their
> whore.
Mark!!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
In a message dated 11/27/2005 7:23:52 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also, how many realize that the Post Office dictates editorial/
advertising percentage. You have to have the right percentages or
you can't get reduced postal rates. I think the current ratio is
70/30
My flare for the obvious.
Jack
--- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> > When a magazine's "whale advertisers" become their source of
> survival,
> > "Marketing" becomes their pimp and neutrality, their
> > whore.
> >
> > Forgive me?
>
>
On Nov 27, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Bob W wrote:
My main interest in photography is in photojournalism, documentary and
reportage, which are not particularly well served by the magazine
market,
for reasons that are perhaps obvious. The few that are around (like
'ei8ht')
fit this description exactl
On Nov 27, 2005, at 9:38 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
When a magazine's "whale advertisers" become their source of survival,
"Marketing" becomes their pimp and neutrality, their
whore.
Forgive me?
For what?
Bob
When a magazine's "whale advertisers" become their source of survival,
"Marketing" becomes their pimp and neutrality, their
whore.
Forgive me?
Jack
--- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>
> > http://www.uandimag.com
> >
> > No ads. One issu
[...]
> Now if you look at those magazines with very few or no ads you'll find one
thing in common, much higher cover price (and much
> higher subscription price if they offer subscriptions).
>
My main interest in photography is in photojournalism, documentary and
reportage, which are not partic
On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.uandimag.com
No ads. One issue so far. Pretty good
-Adam
Who knows the editor/publisher.
The subject of ads in photo magazines comes up frequently, and often
people commenting don't have a clue about the economics of magazine
pub
> Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
We are to hard to find, especially in winter(October to September)
On Nov 26, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.uandimag.com
No ads. One issue so far. Pretty good
-Adam
Who knows the editor/publisher.
I get an error message that the URL can't be found.
Bob
On Nov 26, 2005, at 10:19 PM, David Mann wrote:
The reason why digital was adopted so quickly by press
photographers is that politicians don't leave an image on film.
Nor reflections in mirrors. But you can always track them by the
slime trails they leave.
Bob
On Nov 27, 2005, at 1:57 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
This explains why I refuse to photograph politicians.
The reason why digital was adopted so quickly by press photographers
is that politicians don't leave an image on film.
- Dave
On 26 Nov 2005 at 20:55, Bob W wrote:
> 'Three years ago, David Bailey put out the word that he wanted naked people -
> lots of them. Not nudes: nudes he was bored of. "All that worrying about poncy
> lighting, making people look like landscapes or rocks," he says. "If I wanted
> to
> photograph
I have not seen all those magazines that have been mentioned. But the
one I have has no advertising in it at all.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Jostein wrote:
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Men are tool or
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Men are tool orietated. Most photography literature are tool
orientated. Ever seen a photography magazine that did not have
camera ads in it?
www.cameranatura.se
Hi Glen
very interesting reading for me and I begin to wonder whether "ugliness" has
been or could be a PUG theme.
greetings
Markus
>>
>>Once upon a time, my local camera club was trying to come up with monthly
>>themes for their upcoming photo competitions. I suggested having an "ugly
>>subject"
http://www.uandimag.com
No ads. One issue so far. Pretty good
-Adam
Who knows the editor/publisher.
Derby Chang wrote:
Bob W wrote:
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 November 2005
20:17
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My first PESO
That's essentially why I don't read most mags. Too much measurebating
and '10 steps to instant success' articles.
At this point, I read Black & White Photography (Tons of meaty process
stuff, never more than 1 review, no idiots guides), B&W Magazine and
Lenswork. That's about it, unless I want
On Nov 26, 2005, at 1:24 PM, Derby Chang wrote:
Men are tool orietated. Most photography literature are tool
orientated. Ever seen a photography magazine that did not have
camera ads in it?
www.foto8.com
and (not only)Black+White Magazine. No camera ads, and lots of
nekkid people.
Le
Bob W wrote:
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 November 2005 20:17
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My first PESO
Men are tool orietated. Most photography literature are tool
orientated.
Ever seen a photography magazine that did not have
On Nov 26, 2005, at 4:14 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
"If I
wanted to photograph a fucking rock, I'd photograph a fucking rock."'
Easier said than done. Tried it once and when the stupid rock was at
last in the right mood the light was gone. ;-)
Oh no, not litho-porno!!
Bob
Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "If I
> wanted to photograph a fucking rock, I'd photograph a fucking rock."'
Easier said than done. Tried it once and when the stupid rock was at
last in the right mood the light was gone. ;-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
On Nov 26, 2005, at 3:55 PM, Bob W wrote:
'Three years ago, David Bailey put out the word that he wanted
naked people
- lots of them. Not nudes: nudes he was bored of. "All that
worrying about
poncy lighting, making people look like landscapes or rocks," he
says. "If I
wanted to photograp
I like this guy.
Godfrey
On Nov 26, 2005, at 12:55 PM, Bob W wrote:
'Three years ago, David Bailey put out the word that he wanted
naked people
- lots of them. Not nudes: nudes he was bored of. "All that
worrying about
poncy lighting, making people look like landscapes or rocks," he
says.
> >You realize that inference is, by definition, entirely on
> the part of
> >the observer, not the photographer.
>
> I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
>
> What bugs me, is when an "outside" party (not the
> photographer, not the model, not even the current viewer of
> the photo
On Nov 26, 2005, at 3:20 PM, Glen wrote:
What bugs me, is when an "outside" party (not the photographer, not
the model, not even the current viewer of the photo in question)
make remarks that suggest there must be sexual stimulation, lust,
etc, involved in taking or looking at photographs
> -Original Message-
> From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 November 2005 20:17
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: My first PESO
>
> Men are tool orietated. Most photography literature are tool
> orientated.
> Ever seen a photography
On Nov 26, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
And this said, I still like looking at female nudes, even
provocative
ones. Me and Jimmy Carter occasionally have a little lust in our
hearts.
Okay, this is what bothers me about photography involving nudes.
It's not
the photographs, and i
At 03:13 PM 11/26/2005, Mark Roberts wrote:
Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 10:37 AM 11/26/2005, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>>And this said, I still like looking at female nudes, even provocative
>>ones. Me and Jimmy Carter occasionally have a little lust in our
>>hearts.
>
>Okay, this is what
Men are tool orietated. Most photography literature are tool orientated.
Ever seen a photography magazine that did not have camera ads in it?
Men talk about things, women talk about feelings. All you have to do is
thumb through a womans magazine and you will see the difference. If you
made you
Glen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>At 10:37 AM 11/26/2005, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
>>And this said, I still like looking at female nudes, even provocative
>>ones. Me and Jimmy Carter occasionally have a little lust in our
>>hearts.
>
>Okay, this is what bothers me about photography involving nudes. I
"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Filters don't know nothin' but they block everything. I remember a
>rumor from about 5 years ago that Jpegs could carry
>viruses, (no explanation of how they could operate or spread),
That's because it *couldn't* operate or spread. I remember this viru
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have no problems with biblical allusions (or illusions). I'm a
Pastafarian: http://www.venganza.org/
;-)
They probably hold the most rational explanation what's inside flying
saucers...:-)
Jostein
We did something like this one time at Shutterbug. We did an article
in which we got some of the top photographers to agree to photograph
differently than usual. For example, Pete Turner is famous for his
wonderful color photography, so we had him shoot black and white.
Jack Reznicki is
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
