Ok, so how obvious is this - I just receive three separate emails from this
guy which say:
Dear eBay Member,
I am sorry to disturb you but i have seen the item you are interested
(TECRA8100 P3-700 Laptop Notebook DVD 256Mb) and i want to make you a great
offer.
If you are intersted in this
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: Down off my high-horse... with a thump.
This one time, at band camp, Tanya Mayer Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like a dash of water with my red cordial though...
Just a note, 'Red Cordial
Christian asked: What DO you like about larger cameras?
In true, fairygirl fashion, Christian, I have no bloody idea! I just know
that I DO like them. Not huge like a MF camera or such, but at least
something that feels as though I am working when I use it. I don't know
why it is, I just
Bucky noted:
I recall Doug Brewer recently telling Tanya that, although she was
talented, many of her shots looked like recycled versions of other people's
ideas.
Bucky, actually, I totally agreed with Doug on that one, and I constantly
toy with and struggle to attempt to come up with original
This is an interesting discussion, and brings up another of my issues with
dropping film for digital. I am interested to know *how* it is that you
guys approach the mindset of shooting a shot for bw/colour with digital.
I know that usually when I am shooting with film, I will shoot a shot in
hehe!
*tanya hums famous Aussie song can i have another, piece of chocolate
cake...?
Actually, my boys are licking the bowl of left over cake mixture right now
(and fighting over it, of course)! We have just made a white chocolate mud
cake and it is baking away, smells yummmyy...
tan.
In
Amita said:
I think most brides are just ignorant, and they're getting hit with so
much marketing and they have so many details to deal with that their
heads are spinning. They're mostly concerned about how they'll look and
with making sure everything and everyone matches. VBG So something
Bill said:
On the heels of the AF revolution came the PJ style of wedding
photography, which to me requires as much skill as squishing a wounded
bug.
Jeez Bill, hope tv doesn't read that...
I totally disagree with you on that point. I am hopeless at PJ photography
and I don't really like it
Yeah, so wouldn't you think it would be a priority to hire one that they
KNOW will make their Shoes, gowns, cakes, limos, reception, doves, flowers,
red carpets, horse and carriage and everything else! look good? And if so,
then why haggle over price when it is the only thing that they will have
Doug said:
When I wrote that, I was not writing specifically about wedding
photography. It crossed my mind that I should write something to
indicate I meant Tanya's work on the whole, but as I'm easily
distracted, the thought didn't stay in my head too long.
Actually, I suspected that you
Jeez, George, I think I might print that out and include it in my
information pack that I send to my potential clients...
;-)
tan.
- Original Message -
From: George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Down off my
Mark, I TOTALLY agree - cheese, cheese, cheesy... That's all I can say
about them...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: wedding photography...ugh!
Len Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Trevor! I might get out and see if I can shoot that full moon too! Oh,
wait, no I have a wedding in Airlie Beach tomorrow night...
Hot shoe feet thingies - CR Kennedy stocks them Trevor. Mine have always
been for the Sigma flashes though CR Kennedy are the only official Pentax
importer in
mapson just pointed this out to me:
http://news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8347260%255E2,00.html
This is talking about the area that I live in - anyone wanna assist at my
wedding tomorrow? It is a formal wedding, suits required, and it is at 2pm
(hottest time of the day here), and get
GORGEOUS SHOT ROB!! Love it, love it!
tan.
Shot the moon though the clouds last night with my *ist D in combo with
my
A*300/2.8 + 1.4X-L + AF Adapter 1.7X on a monster Manfrotto tripod. Even
with
the stack of TCs the moon covers only 26.5% of the full width of the
frame. At
EI200 the one
See, NOW you guys might *understand* a little more where I am coming from
re: the pricing thingy...!
BTW, I love living here. Our is on a 1/4 acre block, and our neighbours are
ages away. I think the closest one is around 35 metres...
It's great, and will be even better for privacy when we get
LOL @ Robert!
BTW, forgot to mention that there will be at least some sort of breeze as
the wedding is near the beach, but it really doesn't make much difference in
this kind of weather...
tan.
Cheaper than all the emergency room bills. Or the mothers-in-law passed
out on the turf. . .
I have a question regarding blue skies... I have a shoot coming up where
the client has requested deep blue skies, and high contrast, white clouds as
backdrops. Colouring and saturation to look very much like the shots that
on this site link that Peter Weimann posted... (beautiful photography
Yep, Shel, done that before myself, and it worked great. Just wanted to ask
though - exactly how does the cloud filter work? I have never been able to
get anything near what I wanted with it...
tan.
Shel wrote:
Hmmm magic wand might work, but select color or selecting similar may
work
niiice...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: More moon shots
Taking the lead from Rob, here are two shots of the moon from just an hour
or so ago. One was made with the
JC,JC,JC Ann was feeling triumphant that there was somebody else who
didn't know of the man, and therefore one less person in the world that
thought the sun shone out of his you know what...
;-)
For the record, Ann, I'd never heard of him either!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: J.
Now, guys, this is an exclusive, just for you, as don't forget, this stuff
will be for sale very soon. I will only have this link up for a day or
two, and then it will be torn down to try and protect it a bit... (no need
to post that this is a public forum etc, I'll take my chances...)
Ok, so
this one did! ;-)
- Original Message -
From: Sylwek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 6:53 PM
Subject: test
My posts don't reach PDML :-(
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
hehe, new the title of this thread would lead to some raised eyebrows.
Just a quick note to let you all know that I am leaving at 5am (*eek, that
is only 3 hours away, I'd better get some sleep!), to shoot a wedding 4
hours away. I won't be back for a day or two and then have a pretty heavy
Well, guys! Thankyou SO much! It surely WAS that bloody Blaster WORM!!!
Downloaded the fix tool, and the patch, did a live update and whammo - all
fixed! I don't think that it actually came with the virus though as I have
been surfing the internet for the past two days, downloading service
Some really good deals going on Ebay at the moment guys and gals, check out
the Buy It Now prices on these!!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2979292414category=30020
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2979317359category=30020
erm Ryan, what IS that in his pants?!?!? It looks mighty unnatural to have
a butt shaped like that! lol...
cool shot btw...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 19 January 2004 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Re: Another Bike Photo
Jim said:
My standard equipment for a wedding are two Leica M2's, a Pentax LX (or
PZ1-p) and a 645 Pentax (for formal poses)
Lenses are a 35mm Summicron f2 for the Leicas, a 40mm and 105 for the
Pentax LX, and the 75 or 55 Pentax 645 lenses.
Strobes are the Sunpak 444, 280T (backup), and the
Hey guys, is that page available in English anywhere?
tan.
- Original Message -
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: OT - Opposition Notching up a gear...
Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
did I
I haven't been bit by it as such, as I have managed to detect them all as
they arrived, even before Norton's did, but Jeez are they coming thick and
fast. I am getting at least two or three everytime my email downloads
(which is every 5 minutes...)...
A BIG PITA!!
tan.
- Original
Hey all!
Warning BIG post to follow...
Ok, so I have been pretty quiet of late (not that any of you probably
noticed! lol)... And here is why...
Firstly, my email packed it in and stopped delivering messages to my Inbox.
So I went to my webmail thinking that there may have been a really big
Paul, do you have another CF card that you can try with it?
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 1:11 PM
Subject: flash card problems
My *ist D arrived today, but I've been unable to get it to work. It
Congrats Joseph! I think I might be buying one next week some time too!
Can't wait to see some of the results of your initial shooting with it
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 1:45 PM
Ok, so you all know that I'm not shooting digital with Pentax, but this is
particularly relevant to all digital users.
Just wanted to show you something that I have just worked on from the
wedding I did on Monday.
This was a GROSSLY underexposed image. Definitely one for the reject pile,
but
WOOHOO! How relieved am I that I haven't bought mine yet - AND I will
be purchasing mine with the 16-45 lens. Anyone know how this will affect
Australian sales?
If I purchased from the US (eg B and H), would I still be eligible for the
$200 cash back for the lens?
tan.
- Original
Graywolf noted:
Why supplies last? Does that mean they have stopped production already?
If I was to try and guess, I would guess that they are trying to clear out
of
the supply line the bodies that do not have the firmware upgrade from the
factory. However, it does leave one speculating
Thanks so much Adelheid! All of your hard work is very appreciated!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Adelheid v. K. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 11:12 PM
Subject: February PUG is open
Hi *,
the February PUG is ready to go.
Another
Wasn't there a discussion about this some weeks ago - I think that the
underexposure related to the ISO settings? Can't remember exactly but would
be very grateful if someone would enlighten me so that I don't have to face
the same problems when mine arrives!
TIA,
tan.
Oh, man. Am I glad you
Cotty said:
What a fabulous gallery. All are of a very high standard. The ones that
jump out and slap me in the face are:
Wet n Wild, FairyGirl.
Thanks Cotty!
Red Leaves, Dag Thrane
Me too, I LOVE this shot - highly saturated but still with great detail,
just gorgeous! Love the composition
OMG HOT NEWS! I can't BELIEVE that I am the one to reveal this!!
Little 'ole me in my sleepy 'ole one horse town! lol...
I just got an email from CR Kennedy - they are the equivalent of Pentax USA
in Australia. It is a little cryptic, but check out the second sentence!!
I have included my
Has anyone had any experience with these? As seen here on Ebay - check out
the price!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2983212274category=50519
TIA,
tan.
Hey Bruce!
It's cool - I thought as much, which is why I asked! As they say, when
things look too good to be true, they usually are!
Thanks for the advice!
tan.
Hello Tanya,
I've already done some research on this particular one. Seems that
the early models had lots of problems and the
Dave said: a variety of stuff about a very cute sounding baby and her
drunken sailor walk lol! and then
I suppose the time will be better worked out closer to shoot time as her
daily schedule may change by then
absolutely, without a doubt!
Once again thanks for the tips folks and the
Cotty noted: Interesting but this does not preclude a Baby D.
or a papa D for that matter...
I was actually thinking this myself - they could still be planning to
release something low end, AND high end with the *istD smack in the middle,
although, the price drop has me wondering about the low
Thanks Chris, I have already approached them about it, I've known about this
for some time now (thanks for taking the time to offer the info though!).
Ryan - it is on their website, but it isn't exactly true. I sent them that
site that was advertising it for US$1100 a few weeks back and the best
Shel - just wanted to say - although I have been too busy these past few
days to comment separately - all of the images you have been posting are
fantastic!
I love the old fashion feel of them and their spontaneity (sic)...
Please continue to post them for our enjoyment!
tan.
Rough edit:
Boris, your daughter is stunning and those images are fantastic! You must
be so proud!
tan.
Dave, I have experience shooting only one particular child - my
daughter.
Here are two links for samples grin:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/29654
Kevin, as you know, all along I have been extremely excited by your offer,
and I still am. April is completely out for me too, unfortunately, the
entire month is completely booked out for weddings, and I would also need
much more notice to work in our schedule. Was wondering exactly where you
Thanks Bruce, that would be fantastic!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: more *ist D pricing news...
Hello Tanya,
Guess I'll have to call my local shop
to wouldn't it? You'd only have like
a
couple of weeks max to experiment before the real thing!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 5:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: more *ist D pricing news...
Last
Chris,
The US site was $1146.00 for body only...
CR Kennedy said I could have it for $2075 - BODY ONLY.
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 7:01 PM
Subject: *ist pricing news
Hi Tanya,did the U.S
Anyone got any suggestions? I keep changing it back to the correct date and
when I come back it has changed again!
Battery on the motherboard? But the time is fine, so it can't be that...
My new 'puter still isn't here...*sigh*...
tan.
All over the news here too! I mean I don't blame the parents who are upset
over what is traditionally family viewing - there truly are enough boobs
shoved in their faces via media as it is without adding to football! lol...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for normal
colour to return to my face. Never forgot that one. Was reminded by
some from time-to-time. They had a lot of fun with this Yank and I
thoroughly enjoyed my stay in 'Oz. A bit later, she turned out to be
one of the finest solictors I ever worked with.
Tanya Mayer
I totall agree Rob...
Rob Studdert noted:Isn't the first advice that any photographer gets is to
shoot then shoot some more? The way I see it is that digital makes this easy
given that there is no film costs plus it records all the technical shooting
data for review after the fact.
tan.
Eric wrote:
snip Hey dudes, I just hooked myself up with one of these little Pentax
*ist slrs. It's pretty rad, I used to have a ZX-M./snip
snip I hope you guys will help me P.S. I've noticed while reading the
list using the word 'enabled' makes you sound like a dork. No offense
I do think that their is merit in what Shel is saying. I think that for the
likes of Ansel Adams etc, if you are shooting with glass plates, medium
format etc, and you only have one or two frames left, you are really FORCED
to THINK about what you are going to put into the photograph. You would
...
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Photography
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
... may allow you in certain circumstances to get that grab shot
that could have
Photography
I certainly hope that you don't hope that the general rules
of probability would allow you to get 'the' shot at some
time... IMO, a photographer should know what he or she is
doing, and know how and where and when to press the button.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
With digital you
.
shel
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
I think that for the
likes of Ansel Adams etc, if you are shooting with glass plates, medium
format etc, and you only have one or two frames left, you are really
FORCED
to THINK about what you are going to put into the photograph. You would
to be one very interesting couple of
days, and I fear that I will bear the brunt of many jokes at my expense...
LOL!!!
tan. *who mutters under her breath... Bloody men!* hehehe
On 4/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Bill, despite your cynicism the grab shots
Yousef, why are you selling it?
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Yousef Lasi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 5:36 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D for sale...Minor Correction
That should read Pentax FA 50 1.4 lens not 1.8,
thanks again
Hi,
I'm not
Just a quick note - in regards to viruses - I have, last week, taken out an
option from my ISP to have all viruses removed from my emails before they
hit my inbox. The messages still come through but say Telstra has removed
a virus from this email...etc. Due to this, I don't know which virus it
hehehe, you're forgiven Bill, now that I am officially corrupted from my
naivety... vbg
;-)
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: Digital Photography
Tanya wrote:
Ok, so
Chris, here's the link...
They do ship to Aus, but you have to pay via wire transfer of cash - you
could always use Paymate though and get around it easily...
http://www.willoughbys.com/shop/Product.asp?sku=2050PENISTD
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
OMG!!!
Hmmm, I think I'll just turn up empty handed (IF I make it at all...)
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 7:34 AM
Subject: RE: GFM plans
Since Cotty started it... blame him.
645n
Actually, in regards to this, owing to the huge travel involved and excess
baggage etc. If I do make it to GFM, I think I'll only be bringing with me:
MZ-6 (ZX-L) (which I hardly EVER use and would benefit from spending the
weekend playing with it)
*istD (I WILL have one by then! lol)
FA50mm
Ok, so now I truly have NO IDEA what you are talking about...
*eek* and I'm not exactly sure if I really want to know?!?!
tan.
Cotty said:
That simply isn't true. I've never been into toilet slavery.
LOL
Oh - my - freaking - GAWD
Cesar, did you rob a bank, man??!!! That pic shows almost as many
cameras as years that I have been alive!!
I don't see any snakeskin in that pic, btw...
Cotty - I think he has more gear than a mobile Adorama
tan.
Bill Owens posted this link:
Yep, nice shot Boris!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 5:17 AM
Subject: RE: More wedding shots
Best of the bunch IMO.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check this out... (all prices AUD)...
http://svc003.bne012i.server-web.com/catalogue/dirtcheap/cache/header-770public__0-0.html?cache=no
See the first and third kits? The body only is AUD$2516.80, and the body
with two lenses (DG 18-50 f3.5-5.6 and DG 55-200 f4-5.6) is also
AUD$2516.80! THEN
Hey Ryan, I haven't dealt with Centre.net.au at all, I just remember them
from the link that you sent me a while back...
I am flying in on Friday 27 Feb, and will arrive at 11-ish - was planning on
hiring a car at the airport, checking into my motel in the city (maybe
Riverside Hotel on
Omigosh! That is hilarious Steve! You are, as Cotty made note of, one
CRAZY fellow! lol...
I LOVE this bit performing a black-body radiation analysis: we are within
accepted norms for the commencement of thermal de-creasing !
How funny you are! Seeing that you love it so much, wanna come and
Shel, I really enjoyed the article - it was most helpful to me and also a
kick in the butt to stick to my guns and not get carried away in the river
of Flashdom. I used to shoot exclusively with available light for
weddings, and whilst I know now that it isn't always possible, this article
was
Wow! Gorgeous Josetein!
How on earth do you guys do these things?
Maybe I should start photographing specs of red dirt? lol You know, on
an aside, I have never seen snow in my entire life!
tan.
Gang,
Inspired by Mark Cassino's work, I have finally charged myself up to try
some snow
Ok, so with my Starkist about to be couriered to me - I have one final thing
that I may want to add to my order. CR Kennedy have told me that the DA
16-45mm is absolutely, positively not available in Australia for at least a
month. And so, I am stuck now for what I should do for a wide angle
John, Thanks so much for the offer, but I really want something that I can
order today and have in my hand tomorrow. What have your experiences been
thus far with this lens? Do you think it would tide me over until I am
able to obtain the DA 16-45?
BTW, I didn't even know that Sigma had an
And while we are on the subject - what is the rule in regards to auctions?
I see some people say we aren't supposed to link to unfinished auctions
(which, oops, I have done heaps of times!), and then others that seem to
post them quite frequently - anyone know what the go is? I don't want to
get
frank, i tried to send you an off-list email last week and it bounced -
maybe a similar thing happened then?
tan.
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:05 AM
Subject: test
Some jerk filled my inbox with
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 12:48 PM
Subject: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtländer 125mm F2.5 SL
Hi team,
A
Frits wrote:
Tanya, Do you have any suggestions as to where I can get a piece of carton
suitable for this? Also tips for the anaesthetic are most welcome.
Frits, your average, run of the mill, refrigerator box should work (of
course, you'd need to buy a new refrigerator first, but it is little
Chris asked: P.S.Tan,are you seriously trying to get the rest of us to
believe life is anything but quiet in Northern Banana Benders Land?(Northern
Queensland for the unititiated).
QUIET?!?! In a house with 4 and 5 yo boys, and a 15 month old terror toddler
of a girl who has to make ALOT of noise
Hmmm, right you are Rob - the glass is half full! lol...
Now where can I get my hands on one of those Voightlander lenses... vbg
tan.
Hi Tan,
It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the
P is
infinitely better at f1.8 too :-)
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
, and
bright yellow sunflowers... Beautiful stuff!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: *istD Manufacture
On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
I am
Shel wrote: I think your living in a fairy world, John, if you don't
believe a flash may startle an unsuspecting driver.
erm, I'll have you know that there is simply *nothing* wrong with living in
a fairy world!?! I'm quite happy here thankyou very much, and I seem to
think the more the merrier,
Subject: Re: *istD Manufacture
On Feb 9, 2004, at 9:49 PM, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
I am in
Central, hot, dry, western QLD, no where near a beach or ocean
(unless
you
count the cattle troughs...), and closer to Brisbane than I am to
Cairns! I
am located about 3 hours west
lol! Don't hold back on my account Chris! You may have missed the post, but
just last week, one of the other southern Aussie guys was posting about me
being in Far North QLD and I corrected him - I was just kind of carrying
on the joke with you! lol...
BTW, I am nowhere near Quilpie either, lol!
Jostein, I've been offline for a few days - is it too late for me?!?!?!
tan.
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 8:17 AM
Subject: Re: PUG deadline - when?
Your shot made it, Lon.
Looks like nice beer...:-)
Hi everyone - in regards to this thread, I haven't been following it too
closely, as I thought it was a discussion about film grain. However, I just
brushed over this and realised that it is relevant to digital too.
I am having a horror of a time with noise using my *istD, at ISO 400, with
all
Shaun, I promise you that (unfortunately!), it DOESN'T work with PS 7.0, but
works perfectly when I am using PS CS. Not sure about Elements though, and
haven't tried it with Image Ready either. In PS 7.0 it does load the
plug-in, but when you try to open a RAW image it can't do it and gives an
Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 20 February 2004 5:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: *ist D software update
Shaun, I promise you
Hey everyone!
Well, I have been very quiet this past week and thought I'd give you an
update...
I took delivery of my *istD on Thursday 12 Feb - just over a week ago. It
took me that afternoon of shooting with it before I felt totally comfortable
with it. My initial misgiving with the camera
John said: I don't think it is significant whether pros are using the *ist.
What is significant is whether they are using cameras with similar-sized
pixel
counts, and they are.
I TOTALLY agree with you John!!
tan.
Christian asked: BTW, did you get the D-BG1 grip? It should be your first
accessory if only for the vertical shutter release.
I have it on order with the cable release Christian but it was out of stock
at the time and I wanted the body YESTERDAY, so to speak!
Hopefully, it will arrive in a
Shel, I love this shot!! So very cute!
One thing though - did you try converting it to BW? I think it would look
great as it is quite a high contrast pic...
tan.
Interesting that you should as Chris, cause when I was talking to CR Kennedy
the other day and asking them about an ideal lens to go on my *istD, I said
that I wanted one that produces nice bokeh and they too had no idea what I
was talking about (must a genetic thing with the Kennedy name, lol!)!!
LOVE it! LOVE it!
VERY cool shot Albano, just the sort of thing that I love! High saturation,
high contrast, great composition...
Very commercial..
Thanks for sharing!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Albano Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 22 February 2004 3:54 PM
To:
Simon said:
Hi Tanya, Can't help with any of the istD questions (I don't have one) but
thought write and congratulate you on the photos.
You could have been using anything from a Zenit to a 10mp top-of-the wozza
camera, that's just craft - the art of the photos is wonderful.
Congratulations!
hehe, naive little fairygirl thought it was OJ! lol - you know like OJ and
scrambled eggs for brekky...?
hmmm, I should've known it wouldn't be anything so innocent! lol...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 23 February 2004 4:13 PM
OMG - that is friggin' hilarious...!!!
I just forwarded it to all of my ebay addicted friends! It is
so true! lol...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 23 February 2004 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: The ebay
601 - 700 of 731 matches
Mail list logo
