mean.
Or the massive influence of WalMart purchasing power by the latest
info technology.
No one could look at art now and have a clue from Benjamin about what
is going on. In that light what LP says about movies is equally not
engaging in what information that is interactive does.
thanks,
Doyle
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 18, 2008, at 8:20 PM, ravi wrote:
I believe they are geniuses of
nothing, even if they tend to offer the polemical, unless of course we
consider success a sole measure of genius. i.e., Fox News is
successful at riling up the obvious suspects and the cheapest
to take advantage of
skilled political thinking to build something besides argumentation.
After that one will look back on this as a wonder. A wonder why
people tolerated the limitations when they wanted to build socialist
community.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:38 AM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
I'm as paranoid as anyone, but moreover, the MP had an objective
that few patriots could object to, in contrast to some scheme to
murder thousands of innocent citizens.
Doyle;
Are we talking about Hiroshima?
Doyle
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 13, 2008, at 9:17 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
is the perfect instrument for a
homegrown structural adjustment program.
Doyle;
A structural adjustment is coming whoever wins the presidency.
Michael speaks to that;
MP writes,
Isn't this a common pattern, that the left
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 10, 2008, at 8:39 AM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
even though the stuff coming out of the tap is
periodically found to have uncomfortable levels of doo-doo.
Doyle;
My friend Ellen is a water quality engineer with a local water
district. She says you are wrong. Give an
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 10, 2008, at 10:39 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
do we really grow rice in California?
Doyle;
http://www.calrice.org/
Oh Yes Indeedy.
Doyle
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 10, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Leigh Meyers wrote:
I was being sarcastadonic.
I was playing the opportunistic raptor consumer of the lumbering
sarcastadonic. Yummy tender free range sarcastdonics. How satisfying
to kill them, grind them up and spread their remains back
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 10, 2008, at 4:48 PM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
Don't read this until after dinner.
Doyle;
:-)
I grew up in Texas where fluoride was a perennial question mark about
safe to drink water. You found one reference which is a dandy,
questioning New York drinking water,
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 7, 2008, at 3:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By 1972, weren't most of its members _employed_ by the FBI?
Doyle;
I'd like to second Michael's gentle call here to be nice. At best
this 'rehashes' nothing very interesting about economics, and perhaps
more to the
bigger and more powerful as we once
again see what is to be done.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 6, 2008, at 11:19 AM, Jayson Funke wrote:
Any thoughts on the following article?
Doyle;
Strikes me as rather glib with jargon. P2P has generated a lot of
press around how to distribute movies hence the sign in the window of
a Blockbuster outlet. P2P comes
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 8:08 AM, ravi wrote:
I really, really, really hope you are joking... (no way I am voting
for Obama!)
Doyle;
Where to next for the U.S.? To give my context, DLC candidates Obama
and Clinton won't seriously challenge the status quo. What can the
left
gives the hard right much
to fall back on around a strong military.
Hence a debate about the stability of the U.S. and what that looks
like. What is there for a the left to work upon?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:25 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
in any event, to have any president do anything decent or
progressive, we need a mass movement to keep him or her honest.
Doyle;
How?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
This is the most amazing case of mass wishful thinking I've ever
seen.
Doyle;
The U.S. is moving left unlike Kerry's election. Who one votes for
seems to me the wrong place to ask questions. Nor do I think this is
about
. can't control. Dragging their feet pushes the public toward left
stances about energy unfairness. Going toward energy reform asks for
global frameworks to be built upon new basis.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
All this
Kennedy aura around Obama is really creepy.
Doyle;
The Kennedys represent the left wing of the democrats. That is easy
to understand. John ushered in the sixties in most peoples mind.
That is all this is about.
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Charles Brown wrote:
CB: Don't you think McCain will win ?
Doyle;
:-)
I don't think that would be so bad. It would destroy Hillary and
Bill. It would stir up a lot of anti-racist sentiments. He is as
likely to lead the country over the
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:00 PM, Leigh Meyers wrote:
WTF?
Doyle;
Popular perceptions, not reality. What would most people say if asked
if T Kennedy was on the right or left of the democrats? Left.
So?
Doyle
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Max B. Sawicky wrote:
It's as if the only way people can think is in terms of alternative
myths.
Doyle;
Creepy huh? I look at your use of the state of feeling, revulsion, as
being mythic as well. Literally if you say on a very large scale
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:21 PM, Leigh Meyers wrote:
Those popular perceptions need to die,
Doyle;
Sure. They would die over time as a left resurges in the U.S. They
are a flimsy tissue of lies that a mass movement would sweep away.
Like Jim Devine wrote earlier in this
Greetings Economists,
On Feb 5, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Charles Brown wrote:
Of course, there's a small possibility otherwise, but the
Rep will probably win.
Doyle;
I think it unlikely. Still there are many months ahead. I am
inclined right now to see the demos winning by wide margins. That win
. as much as a broad
sort of shift in the U.S. as the center of neoliberalism falters which
in turn gives a space for the left to grow as well. The more fuel,
the more likely something will emerge for the left to get hold of and
build something. That seems to me predictable though slow.
thanks,
Doyle
This appears to be down right now. Not available, giving a server
error.
On Feb 3, 2008, at 1:24 PM, Gar Lipow wrote:
Cooling It: No Hair Shirt Solutions to Global Warming an optimistic
book about a gloomy subject - the need to reduce fossil fuel use to
fight global warming - is now available
LP.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
some insights.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
mutter about because there is no
resource feasible to provide this simple look see? If a left movement
crystalized would it suggest answers?
How? What is an international regime going to look like?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
people
around a common position matched to our times. That's how I would re-
phrase your point anyway.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
hard not
to include for example, literacy, as a part of the on-going human
system, how do we deal with imbalances?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
fuels as
policy can neglect such issues. However, I would strongly advocate
hazards waste be part of the solution. With CFLs there is nothing
being done about mercury clean up.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
a model?
It has definite limits of what we know by seeing the photograph. So
is writing with images model like, or only writing mathematical script?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Jan 23, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Shane Mage wrote:
I understand that one can photograph the boundaries or the contents of
a space. But how does one photograph a space?
Doyle,
Hmmm, I think because I shoot a lot of photos, under a lot of
conditions I don't make the
Greetings Economists,
On Jan 16, 2008, at 9:57 AM, ravi wrote:
What, no comments on my Krugman cartoon? ;-)
Doyle;
What cartoon? I have not seen anything from Ravi with a cartoon.
thanks,
Doyle
which puts value on huge piles of images rather than small
singlets is asking how to 'datamine' meaning in many rather than one.
To connect huge amounts instead of a page.
That's the economics of a new aesthetic. Bravo Ravi MORE MORE!
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
of producing new data layers upon the
original file. If reuse is not done the server farms fill up with
data and knowledge work grinds to a halt.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
. How do we form ties strong enough to stand up against the
machine? We do that by sharing information and working together to
form human social ties. The vast over production of information on
global networks offers cheaper means to build social ties on levels
never before possible.
thanks,
Doyle
;
How many times do I have to bring up one-to-many before you get it
about that information structure?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
the increase in information production
opens the door to more information in location.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
The costs of empires is high. One asks why Britain came down?
Projecting military power around the world is costly. Community based
resistance which arms itself with current weapons can't be militarily
defeated unless the empire adopts scorched earth techniques. Which
are
that disturbs their peace in which case Michael Perelman is
forced to act on their behalf.
Doyle,
I disagree. This is specious.
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
because oil can't be replaced. Which seemingly this proposal
meets handily replacing oil. H?
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Jan 11, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Leigh Meyers wrote:
It's EXACTLY what listservs are for...
Doyle,
I'm not sure what you mean by exactly here, but what a listserv
doesn't do is provide an environment for working on a topic in the
sense that wikis offer organized means of
cells theoretically reaching 30% efficiency
converting energy to electricity.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Jan 11, 2008, at 10:01 AM, Shane Mage wrote:
This, of course, requires a huge dose of government enterprise and
economic planning.
Doyle;
I assume the pressure to move would come from people seeing global
warming encroaches. I don't think this is especially useful as
Greetings Economists,
On Jan 11, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Gar Lipow wrote:
It is a very hopeful thing, but not
something you can put an ETA on.
Doyle;
They demonstrated it could be fabricated using chip techniques. That
aside, what I see is not so much lab work might happen as that it
could develop
in the economy. They
are edging toward offering reforms to assuage the pain rising. For
what that is worth. Probably not much.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
beneficiary
understands how human beings connect or think. At any rate I'd like
to see more capable disabled thinkers be showed cased and let that be
the standard to judge such movies.
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
(shared) information. No small file can stand long in the
face of massive libraries when the cost must fall to create massive
networked information. No small file can demand more than it is worth
in a networked Information culture.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
be shared.
Doyle Saylor
clashes over intellectual property. A
socialist can use massive server farms to provide community
information in a way that capitalist can't. It's the international
global community part of file sharing that needs to be developed.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Dec 22, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
Of course,
the crises of the 1930s led to fascism and the New Deal, not
revolution, so the empirical record isn't impressive.
Doyle;
Russia and China during this period were in the throws of revolution.
This comment is a
of international crisis for the great global powers of 1914,
or the U.S. 2007 I am aiming at. Russia attempted to internationalize
and failed. We might see in a new crisis for the U.S. the opportunity
to extend again an internationalist structure.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
they succeed in righting the
U.S. ship to continue course as the great global super power? I say
this is systemic crisis in the U.S. already, and we can put the start
at the beginning of the Gulf war, but fomented not so much by the war
as by bubble economics.
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
are in the midst of the growth of opposition to neoliberalism
which is their crisis of legitimacy. Not capitalism's.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
the capitalist to the
bargaining table. They won't let it rip because they know that would
permanently put the U.S. down. It would generate sufficient political
forces in the U.S. to re-align political forces meaning end the neo-
liberals. End the global empire dream.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
can
attribute the quote.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
of a Grizzly
bear male that eats young Grizzly bears makes no sense in the social
unit. Because storage of the cultural social being is not
particularly important for large predators that can do as they wish,
feel impelled to do.
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
toward that which
can be. We avoid the vagaries, the traps of starvation, lack of
oxygen because then things continue. And that continuance is
threatened by each step toward more universal social structures by new
unforeseen consequences which we continue to build upon.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
the world.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
. But the base in
single countries, and Cuba really offers a lot of experience, are
resources Marx didn't have. Development in the face of global
catastrophes in the environment comes to mind.
take care,
Doyle Saylor
, but the connection provided by language and
feeling.
I don't think people need a whip (terror) to work. I think it is a
barbaric practice in relation to understanding how emotions build
connection.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
certain limits to ideas. Nuclear war forecloses world
war. One system, not one nation at a time. That is where the
conversation seems to me headed.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Dec 1, 2007, at 7:43 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
of course, he would never join a club that would have him as a member.
So he wouldn't care about insults.
Doyle,
I don't agree with the point about not calling one self a Marxist. We
name groups because human brains use
'Christian style unchanging words' to
dynamical media objects build by the hundreds, thousands, millions at
once.
thanks
Doyle Saylor
production is material connection
between people. So if we say it is irrational we commit an error
about understanding materiality and connection. We fail to understand
connection and we fail to understand knowledge production.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
.
What are public monuments? They are grand scale information about
space and how to use it. But we might see public knowledge as the
storehouse of all human space and what to do with the space. As a
work process tied to community connection.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
that international nascent global
system. Surely the U.S. can't stop that, because the collapse of neo-
liberalism in the heartland leaves the U.S. with no alternative.
Global crisis begats global solutions.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
rot. People 'buying' homes that are then taken away
because the huge profits dream is based upon extracting gold from
their empty pockets. Of course that is my experiences in life
speaking. Perhaps Jim Devine can elucidate?
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
and offer my
two bits as a helpful response to your observation.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
on the way to solving this problem.
Doyle,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E8_(mathematics) see the graph which
Garret Lisi asserts represents particle families in predictable ways.
The theory is not a string theory, and string theory critique Lee
Smolin has jumped to extol Lisi's work.
thanks,
Doyle
,
Doyle Saylor
and salient.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Nov 13, 2007, at 12:49 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
So it's politically not too bright to throw fascist around in u.s.
politics.
Doyle;
It's clear to me that 'fascist' is long since lost it's roots in
militaristic mass movements and become in the U.S. synonymous with
foreign
,
Doyle Saylor
. Nothing about escalation to
global war which using nuclear weapons implies would get the U.S.
control. It is perfectly obvious.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
'
in the world, that is literally the whole body mentally conscious in
the world rather than an abstract called written language handed down
to us from generations past.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
, they see a technique of
business arising in various businesses using systemic methods based
upon biological research as the results of reductionist methods can't
systemize what is known about biology.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
new 'stuff'. True
there are philosophers who call themselves reductionists. I just don't
think that has much influence one way of the other.
So summing up I agree with your remarks toward the value of 'systems'
biology.
:-)
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
This link
http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10018596
has a story on a shift in biological work away from finding the
smallest units. To quote
,,,Actually, the beating heart was no simple video. It was, instead,
the output of a stupendously
these days to see information that becomes 'ideology'
as 'interactive' content.
Thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Oct 28, 2007, at 9:10 PM, raghu wrote:
It is a bit more complex than that. Sabri, for instance, considered it
noteworthy that a black Ethiopian man was one of the best
mathematicians he knows.
Doyle;
Agreed, but then what are the grounds for making distinctions? I
to develop ever more deeply as we better understand the
brain.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
cognition.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
in disability rights struggles we (again in the U.S.) do not
use 'super crips' as the tool to get across rights for all disabled
people.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
democracy in Iraq.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
research into a concordance with
the tools we use to know the brain chemically, and via fMRI and other
non-invasive means of seeing brain activity in a live human.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Close say himself.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
to be in the world is
being 'advanced' or made more explicit culturally.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Oct 27, 2007, at 9:16 AM, Michael Smith wrote:
Not to be too contrarian, but the notion of a learning disability
seems a little suspect to me too. In fact a lot of these ideas seem
like conceptual reflections back onto the student of problems that
the educational
your assumption this question is
about human judgment limits.
On a large scale then how does one determine what is the correct line?
I would say that I would rely upon a neural network training system to
build the necessary sense of agreement upon.
Doyle Saylor
. deserts. That and energy constraints on extravagant use of land.
The main question with these destructive fires is if this is
influencing people to stop uncontrolled development down there?
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Oct 25, 2007, at 10:20 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
A scientist on my college class listserv heard him speak not that
long ago and said he seemed to be going senile.
Doyle;
Watson was always saying something like this. Besides being senile
doesn't make one say such trash.
Greetings Economists,
Technology Review has an article here:
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/19620/?a=f
About an emotion 'reading' software package being test marketed for
public use. Reported as a mental health fixing application by the way.
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Oct 8, 2007, at 7:51 AM, Jim Devine wrote:
or is this theory part of the process of normal science, in which
theories (or variants of the dominant theory) compete to try to fit
the data?
Doyle;
Competing theory. On a tangent, what this brings up is how agreement
on
Greetings Economists,
On Oct 8, 2007, at 8:18 AM, Michael Perelman wrote:
I wonder if someone who works in string theory would be seen as some
combination of
stupid or immoral as would be the case for a radical economists in
an elite
economics department.
Doyle;
Well there is a certain degree
. So I think this will come as our technical means develop
further.
In the spirit of Jim Devine I retract my pissy attitude to your serious
efforts to make yourself heard.
Thank you,
Doyle Saylor
Greetings Economists,
On Sep 29, 2007, at 8:28 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
Time to dust
off Stuart Hall's old essay on how Thatcherism became the common
sense of the British masses.
Doyle;
Har har, common sense of the masses is not what I see. The masses
don't like things as they are. And the
Greetings Economists,
On Sep 29, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Doug Henwood wrote:
I always appreciate a commentary on a text someone hasn't read.
Doyle;'
What has reading the book have anything to do with my comment? Really
Thatcherism is not the common sense of the masses I live in. Do you
mean the
1 - 100 of 538 matches
Mail list logo