Ovid wrote:
--- Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I think there's some truth to this view.
For support I submit this bug ticket -
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=27208
Sorry Dave, but I understand Imacat's point of view. I think part of
the issue is that English is not
On 21 Dec 2007, at 03:04, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Thanks. It'd be good to keep TAP::Harness::Archive in sync with
whatever changes you make.
Which makes sense if you happen to know that T::H::A is in the T::H svn:
http://svn.hexten.net/tapx/TAP-Harness-Archive/
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
On 21 Dec 2007, at 03:01, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Well there you go.
Though might I suggest that...
A) This be documented in Test::Harness, I note it's only in
Test::Harness.
B) The TAP::Harness version be changed to
PERL_TAP_HARNESS_DUMP_TAP. Don't
want Test::Harness features leak
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2007, at 00:11, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> This could be accomplished silently with some environment variables.
>> TAP_PARSER_ARCHIVE_DIR=/path/to/somewhere
>
> It's called PERL_TEST_HARNESS_DUMP_TAP and it already exists.
Well there you go.
Though might I sugg
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> # from Michael Peters
> # on Thursday 20 December 2007 15:07:
>
>> What would be ideal (and it's something that RJBS has
>> poked me about before) would be to receive a TAP Archive (prove
>> --archive) that could get attached to the email. Of course this needs
>> to be opt-in
Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2007, at 00:11, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> This could be accomplished silently with some environment variables.
>> TAP_PARSER_ARCHIVE_DIR=/path/to/somewhere
>
> It's called PERL_TEST_HARNESS_DUMP_TAP and it already exists.
Yeah, that's how T::P::Archive works.
# from Michael Peters
# on Thursday 20 December 2007 15:07:
>What would be ideal (and it's something that RJBS has
>poked me about before) would be to receive a TAP Archive (prove
> --archive) that could get attached to the email. Of course this needs
> to be opt-in (META.yml?).
Hmm, perhaps this
On 21 Dec 2007, at 00:11, Michael G Schwern wrote:
This could be accomplished silently with some environment variables.
TAP_PARSER_ARCHIVE_DIR=/path/to/somewhere
It's called PERL_TEST_HARNESS_DUMP_TAP and it already exists.
There is the problem of getting TAP::Parser to recognize that the
ar
Michael Peters wrote:
> David Golden wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 2007 1:19 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It's generally
>>> pretty rare that the failure report includes enough information for me to
>>> do anything about it, so without an engaged party on the other end, it
>>> really is ju
David Golden wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 1:19 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's generally
>> pretty rare that the failure report includes enough information for me to
>> do anything about it, so without an engaged party on the other end, it
>> really is just noise.
>
> With CPAN::Rep
On Dec 20, 2007 1:19 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's generally
> pretty rare that the failure report includes enough information for me to
> do anything about it, so without an engaged party on the other end, it
> really is just noise.
With CPAN::Reporter, I've been trying to add
--- Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Andy Armstrong wrote:
>
> > His view: cpan-testers are incompetent, ego tripping,
> quasi-religious
> > nuisances.
>
> I think there's some truth to this view.
>
> For support I submit this bug ticket -
> http://rt.cpan.org/Tick
On Thursday 20 December 2007 10:22:11 Andy Armstrong wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2007, at 18:19, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > My other big annoyance with smoke testers/reporters is that a lot of
> > folks simply do not respond to requests for more information. It's
> > generally pretty rare that the failure rep
On 20 Dec 2007, at 18:19, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Andy Armstrong wrote:
His view: cpan-testers are incompetent, ego tripping, quasi-
religious nuisances.
I think there's some truth to this view.
For support I submit this bug ticket -
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Andy Armstrong wrote:
His view: cpan-testers are incompetent, ego tripping, quasi-religious
nuisances.
I think there's some truth to this view.
For support I submit this bug ticket -
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=27208
On the other hand, that was an exceptio
15 matches
Mail list logo
