On 2015-09-29 05:05, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-09-02 16:14, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:16 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
track_commit_timestamp t
Is someone updating the patch?
Sorry, missed your reply.
The "sesssion" is typo and it actually affects several variables around
the replication origin, so I attached separate patch (which should be
applied first) which fixes the typo everywhere.
I reworded the comment, hopeful
mvalidate* functions that the am defines.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postg
this the documentation has to be updated.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql
sed function called amvalidate
which will call all those C interfaces that are supported by current
version (I agree that those interfaces like amvalidateopclass should
accept just Oid).
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Trainin
On 2015-09-20 16:17, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com
Hmm, we might want these functons in any case (although I think just
one function which would return all am params would be better).
But why is it not evident? We
On 2015-09-18 04:52, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-09-17 17:31, Jeff Janes wrote:
If I fail to specify CASCADE and get an ERROR, I think there should be a
HINT which suggests the use of CASCADE.
create extension earthdistance ;
ERROR: required extension "cube" is not installed
rd CASCADE.
Hmm, it already does?
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/
On 2015-09-16 13:21, Thom Brown wrote:
On 28 July 2015 at 19:51, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com
<mailto:p...@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
On 2015-07-28 20:11, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Petr, is this enough feedback on this patch for thi
additional info saying if tuples are being partitioned or duplicated.
In any case, let's not name any of the nodes as "Replicate".
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers maili
l free to discard them if you think they are not
adapted, the patch attached applies on top of Petr's patch.
And /log/ is missing in src/test/modules/extensions/.gitignore.
Ah sorry, I based it on my branch which didn't contain your changes. Merged.
--
Petr Jelinek http
is, so here it is. It just removes
the on start check for track_commit_timestamp being same in config and
control file.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From 49533f556d8120564ed81dc67acfcc03d2894166 Mon Se
.
The next AM type will need to add code for different AM types but that's
mostly it.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
n issues that need solving in this area for FDWs, sharding and
parallel query.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make chan
methods need to be schema qualified?
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql
don't like the naming differences between validate_opclass and
amvalidate. If you expect that the current amvalidate will only be used
for opclass validation then it should be renamed accordingly.
Also GetIndexAmRoutine should check the return type of the amhandler.
--
Petr Jelinek
On 2015-09-07 21:28, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-09-07 21:09, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-09-07 20:56:50 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Yes that sounds cleaner. Just as a side note, List is a Node and
does have
copy support (and we pass List as DefElem->arg from gra
aint there
was that it changes order of errors you get in situation when the schema
is not the same as the one in control file and it also does not exist.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-
On 2015-09-07 20:56, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com
However I don't like the naming differences between validate_opclass
and amvalidate. If you expect that the current amvalidate will only
be used for opclass validat
On 2015-09-07 21:09, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-09-07 20:56:50 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Yes that sounds cleaner. Just as a side note, List is a Node and does have
copy support (and we pass List as DefElem->arg from gram.y in several
places).
I know - but the l
the struct typedefs at the top of the C
file and don't mix them with function definitions (I am talking about
the TableSpaceCheckpointStatus and TableSpaceCountEntry).
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent
It includes advancement of replication origin as
well. I didn't feel like doing refactor of commit code this late in 9.5
cycle though, so I went with the code duplication + note in xact.c.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Suppo
On 2015-09-04 02:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 11:37:09PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
I don't understand. I'm just proposing that the source code for the
extension to live in src/extensions/, and have the shared library
installed by toplevel make install; I'm not suggesting
ension is installed automatically. For that, you still need a
superuser to run CREATE EXTENSION.
+! for this
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@post
On 2015-09-02 19:57, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 09/01/2015 04:14 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 2015-09-02 00:09, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Not really, the mechanism is different and the behavior is different.
>>> One critical deficiency in using binary syncrep is that y
rk bandwidth.
>
> In what way is the total network bandwitdh used in the system different
> for shard copying than for sync replication?
>
Again, when shards are distributed over multiple DCs (or actually even
multiple racks) the bandwidth and latency of local copy will be much
better t
g this new method. This function can be used in regression tests.
Should I try to implement such new access method function, say 'amvalidate'?
Makes sense to me to do that, should be probably optional though.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development,
commutator
for operator ( example build output
https://travis-ci.org/decibel/postgres/jobs/75692377 ). I didn't yet
investigate what's causing this.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
, but that would make this patch more invasive.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
On 2015-08-10 17:47, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2015-08-10 16:58, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
That should work, thanks! Also we can have SQL-visible functions to get
amsupport and amstrategies and use them in the regression tests.
SQL-visible functions would
some additional SQL).
However I am not sure if using catalog as some sort of cache for
function output is a good idea in general. IMHO it would be better to
just have those options as part of CREATE and ALTER DDL for INDEX ACCESS
METHODS if we store them in pg_am.
--
Petr Jelinek
On 2015-08-10 16:58, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us
mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alexander Korotkov a.korot...@postgrespro.ru
mailto:a.korot...@postgrespro.ru writes:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Petr Jelinek p
, it appears not so easy
to hide amsupport into AmRoutine, because it's needed for relcache. As a
temporary solution it's duplicated in RelationData.
I don't understand this, there is already AmRoutine in RelationData, why
the need for additional field for just amsupport?
--
Petr Jelinek
.
There is a blog post on 2ndQ blog page which tries to describe the
sampling methods visually, not sure if it's more obvious from that or
not. It's somewhat broken on planet though (only title there).
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support
page, the rest is API docs.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
property, they provide namespacing so not
everything has to be in pg_catalog which already has about gazilion
functions. It's nice to have stuff you don't need for day to day
operations separate but still available (which is why src/extensions is
better than contrib).
--
Petr Jelinek
the the SQL interface will complain if called
on the slave
So +0.5 from me towards following master and removing the error message
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql
On 2015-07-31 03:03, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-07-27 15:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
Something also has not been discussed yet: what to do with new_version
and old_version (the options of CreateExtensionStmt)? As of now if
those options
On 2015-07-27 15:18, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 1:01 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Yes that's what I meant by the change of checking order in the explanation
above. I did that because I thought code would be more complicated
otherwise, but apparently I was stupid
will have free space that can't be used by new tuples
since the system is now in different epoch.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
on this in the current CF.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2015-07-25 14:37, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2015-07-22 07:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
... My main
On 2015-07-22 07:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
... My main question is if we are
ok with SCHEMA having different behavior with CASCADE vs without
CASCADE. I went originally
On 2015-07-25 00:36, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
The only major difference that I see so far and I'd like you to
incorporate that into your patch is that I renamed the SampleScanCost to
SampleScanGetRelSize because that reflects much better the use
because that reflects much better the use of it, it
isn't really used for costing, but for getting the pages and tuples of
the baserel.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On 2015-07-24 01:26, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-07-24 00:39, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
OK, so InitSampleScan for a function called at ExecInitSampleScan time
(which we might as well make optional), and then we'll use
BeginSampleScan
for the function that gets the parameters. The restart
that BeginSampleScan() needs can be obtained directly
from ss_currentRelation I guess, but it's somewhat strange to pass
semi-initialized SampleScanState to the BeginSampleScan().
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent
will go to their own schema no matter what
user specifies in the command so I guess it's ok to just document that
this is the behavior of CASCADE. As you say if somebody wants control
over each individual extension they can't use CASCADE anyway.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www
be enabled for it.
Umm, we were actually doing syncscan as well before.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
On 2015-07-20 12:18, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-07-19 22:56, Tom Lane wrote:
* You might have expected me to move the tsmseqscan and tsmpagemode flags
into the TsmRoutine struct, but instead this API puts equivalent flags
into the SampleScanState struct. The reason for that is that it lets
On 2015-07-19 17:16, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2015-07-15 06:07, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Andres Freund and...@anarazel.de writes:
On July 10, 2015
On 2015-07-18 02:29, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 6/14/15 11:29 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
0002 - Adds pg_resetsysid utility which changes the system id to newly
generated one.
0003 - Adds -s option to pg_resetxlog to change the system id to the one
specified - this is separate from the other one
On 2015-07-16 17:08, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2015-07-16 15:59, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not clear on whether sequence AMs would need explicit catalog
representation, or could be folded down to just a single SQL function
with special signature as I suggested
much at
the moment, but if we ever get serious about supporting index AM
extensions, I think we ought to consider doing that.
+1
I think this is very relevant to the proposed sequence am patch as well.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7
an issue. That is unless you'd like to combine the linear probing
and bernoulli of course, but I don't see any benefit in doing that.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
that usable values are fractional or integral, they'll get
sane behavior with different supplied seeds almost always producing
different samples.
Sounds reasonable.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent
On 2015-07-16 15:59, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-07-13 00:36, Tom Lane wrote:
PS: now that I've written this rant, I wonder why we don't redesign the
index AM API along the same lines. It probably doesn't matter much
On 2015-07-16 16:22, Tom Lane wrote:
Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 2015-07-12 18:02, Tom Lane wrote:
A possible way around this problem is to redefine the sampling rule so
that it is not history-dependent but depends only on the tuple TIDs.
For instance, one could hash the TID
On 2015-07-07 15:41, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-07-07 22:36:29 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
I am getting tired installing manually required extensions manually. I was
wondering if we might want to add option
On 2015-07-04 13:45, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Well for indexes you don't really need to add the new AT command, as
IndexStmt has char *idxcomment which it will automatically uses as comment
if not NULL. While I am not huge fan
On 2015-07-03 15:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I was going through the code and have few comments:
- Why do you change the return value of TryReuseIndex? Can't we use reuse
the same OidIsValid(stmt-oldNode) check
that except for moving some of the nesting out to another function.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription
the above I would just remove the if statement here - it's not
present in any other code that does ExecInitExpr/ExecEvalExpr either.
It's most likely relic of the code that didn't treat the repeatable
separately and just put it into args List.
Patch attached.
--
Petr Jelinek http
On 2015-06-19 09:08, Brendan Jurd wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2015 at 20:44 Petr Jelinek p...@2ndquadrant.com
mailto:p...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
looks like I omitted psql tab completion from the TABLESAMPLE patch. The
attached patch adds it.
Hi Petr,
I'm doing an initial review
On 2015-06-18 22:04, Tom Lane wrote:
By the by, the tablesample additions to range_table_mutator are obviously
broken.
Bah, typos. Attached patch corrects them.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
diff
On 2015-06-19 00:38, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-06-18 22:04, Tom Lane wrote:
By the by, the tablesample additions to range_table_mutator are obviously
broken.
Bah, typos. Attached patch corrects them.
Actually it should probably look more like this, sorry.
--
Petr Jelinek
On 2015-06-19 01:04, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-06-19 00:38, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 2015-06-18 22:04, Tom Lane wrote:
By the by, the tablesample additions to range_table_mutator are
obviously
broken.
Bah, typos. Attached patch corrects them.
Actually it should probably look more like
issue here.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 2015-06-14 03:02, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 05:47:59AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Petr Jelinek wrote:
Hi,
+ listitem
+ para
+Add typeJSONB/ functions functionjsonb_set()/ and
+functionjsonb_pretty/ (Dmitry Dolgov, Andrew Dunstan
Hi,
looks like I omitted psql tab completion from the TABLESAMPLE patch. The
attached patch adds it.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c b/src/bin/psql/tab-complete.c
.anarazel.de
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
From f587fd47c9e43f5c08cf840978ff21b64f39d24d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Jelinek pjmo...@pjmodos.net
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 16:23:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 4
purpose (see indexes).
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
that implements this.
I call it prototype mainly because the syntax (CREATE EXTENSION ...
RECURSIVE) could be improved, I originally wanted to do something like
INCLUDING DEPENDENCIES but that need news (unreserved) keyword and I
don't think it's worth it, plus it's wordy.
--
Petr Jelinek
of the review.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
...
Proceeding from that, I'm rather inclined to say that the answer is
to rename the operator rather than remove it, and that's what I'm
going to do unless there's a groundswell that says no.
+1 for renaming
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development
it over to other machines,
etc. We should be lowering the barrier to user based testing as much as
possible and doing alpha with packages is exactly how we do that.
IMHO the only real discussion here is if current 9.5 is ready for user
testing and FWIW I thin it is.
--
Petr Jelinek
: {a: 2}}' - '/c/a'; and we
will again silently do nothing. That's going to cause bugs in
applications using this.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
the tuple again).
If this was the case, changing column order would lead to performance
increase, not decrease as reported.
My guess would be same as Amits, it's most likely the additional
projection step.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7
with the .partial suffix but the code should still be
fixed which is what attached one-line patch does.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
xlog-overflow-fix.diff
Description: binary/octet-stream
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
);
jsonb_set
--
{baz: 1, foo: bar}
(1 row)
If I use empty jsonb object it does not work anymore:
# select jsonb_set('{}', '{foo}', 'bar', true);
jsonb_set
---
{}
(1 row)
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development
for precedents.
Given the above I would vote to just provide the function and leave out
the || operator for now.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
that idea is quite sound.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
described by Peter. So there is
definitely point for both, at this time we just support only one of
them, that's all.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
at
later time.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
is
something that we agreed on several months ago so there was plenty of
time to revisit that decision.)
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make
said he won't have time for this one before freeze so I guess it
can be pushed to 9.6.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes
but other than that the
infrastructure part is definitely committable. The current approach is
really good.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers
towards what Robert says.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql
On 01/05/15 15:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 05:25:53AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
It is done
Uh, I am not sure why you say that as I don't see any commit related to
this. Can you show me the commit?
865f14a2d31af23a05bbf2df04c274629c5d5c4d
--
Petr Jelinek
On 01/05/15 15:17, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 03:13:28PM +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 01/05/15 15:01, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 05:25:53AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
It is done
Uh, I am not sure why you say that as I don't see any commit related
in the origin.h rather than in the origin.c as the
DoNotReplicateId macro uses UINT16_MAX and is also used in xact.c.
I think correct fix is using PG_UINT16_MAX.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql
the pglz_decompress is still called every time.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
On 27/04/15 18:46, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 18/04/15 20:35, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
Sorry for late reply. Here is a slightly improved version of the patch
with the new `h_atoi` function, I hope this implementation will be more
appropriate.
It's better, but a) I don't like the name of the function
On 28/04/15 16:44, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-04-28 10:40:10 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote:
On 2015-04-28 16:36:28 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
I am also very sure that every time I'll write this statement I will have to
look into manual for the names
.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
) or ON CONFLICT [WITH] (foo) both seem acceptable.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
only be called if a origin was setup with
+ * replident_session_setup().
I also think the replident_checkpoint file should be renamed to
replorigin_checkpoint.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via
(and potentially other info) inline for each
tuple but have some info in header only for tuples that need it. That
might have bad performance side effects of course, but there are
definitely some potential ways of doing things differently which we
could explore.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www
it.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
that
contained update in an unusual context would get slapped heavily.
Postgres currently has UPDATE as unreserved keyword and more importantly
IGNORE is not keyword at all so making it a new reserved keyword is not
nice at all.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL
701 - 800 of 1148 matches
Mail list logo
