On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany wrote:
> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view
> to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFSH256 class) in the
> System-Hashing package (in where there's already SHA1 and MD5) ?
Can Cloudfork HMAC-S
I want to have a look, if you tell me where to look...
On 19 Jun 2014, at 18:03, Max Leske wrote:
>
> On 19.06.2014, at 17:59, François Stephany wrote:
>
>> Does it make sense from a license point of view and practical point of view
>> to include the CloudFork HMAC-SHA256 implementation (CFS
Max,
Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm
no expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation".
Someone with more knowledge can probably tell ;)
Sven,
The bare minimum to load it is:
Gofer it
smalltalkhubUser: 'JanVanDeSandt' project: 'C
OK, thanks, I will have a look.
On 20 Jun 2014, at 10:56, François Stephany wrote:
> Max,
>
> Yes, it's usable as the SHA1 package already there (without HMAC so). I'm no
> expert in those stuff but I don't get "SHA256 base implementation". Someone
> with more knowledge can probably tell ;)
>
Hello,
I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was mostly
copied from the Cryptography [1] project.
Cheers,
Jan.
[1] http://www.squeaksource.com/Cryptography/
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, François Stephany <
tulipe.mouta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Max,
>
> Yes, it's
And I think it's a good idea to make SHA2 hash functions part of the
System-Hashing
package!
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jan van de Sandt
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few years ago. The class was
> mostly copied from the Cryptography [1] project.
>
> Cheers,
> Am 20.06.2014 um 17:06 schrieb Jan van de Sandt :
>
> And I think it's a good idea to make SHA2 hash functions part of the
> System-Hashing package!
>
+1
Norbert
>
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Jan van de Sandt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I added the SHA256 class to Cloudfork a few year
Hi Jan,
I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked perfectly (I didn't expect
anything else).
I tried some examples from Wikipedia
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sha256#Examples_of_SHA-2_variants):
(CFSHA256 hashMessage: 'The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog') hex.
'd7a8fbb307d78094
https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction
cleaned up, documented, properly packaged.
Passes some test vectors.
I changed the handling of the empty stream.
On 24 Jun 2014, at 23:03, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> I loaded just the class CFSHA256 and it worked
thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there!
Norbert
> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>
> https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/13395/Add-SHA256-HashFunction
>
> cleaned up, documented, properly packaged.
>
> Passes some test vectors.
>
> I changed
I only did it in 3.0
The file out is attached to the slice - it is 100% standalone
On 25 Jun 2014, at 00:45, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> thank you, Sven. Did you try this in 3.0, too. I would need it there!
>
> Norbert
>
>> Am 25.06.2014 um 00:11 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
>>
>> https://pharo
Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in the
image? Something like
- get 3.0 image
- fix from issue 12345 and issue 45678 and...
- install own own packages
- deploy
It would be so well documented :)
Norbert
Am 25.06.2014 um 08:47 schrieb Sven Van Caekenberghe :
A patch mechanism ?
That would be cool indeed, although probably not doable in all cases.
On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:23, Norbert Hartl wrote:
> Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a ticket in the
> image? Something like
>
> - get 3.0 image
> - fix from issue 12345 and issue
Thanks Sven!
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe
wrote:
> A patch mechanism ?
>
> That would be cool indeed, although probably not doable in all cases.
>
> On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:23, Norbert Hartl wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be wonderful if we could install packages from a tick
14 matches
Mail list logo
