Can you cut down the script to like 10 lines and say what your result is
and what you'd expect?
At 05:37 PM 3/17/2003 +0100, Fabrice Le Coz wrote:
Hi,
I'm playing with PHP5 and have some trouble wtith access control, here's the
code I run with last php5 from snaps.php.net under windows XP :
ere the bug
is and how to fix it. Secondly, not meaning to insult anyone here, but I
think people who write such code without using parentheses should improve
their coding style :)
Andi
At 12:01 PM 3/14/2003 +, Ford, Mike [LSS] wrote:
> -Original Message-
> F
explanation of the post ethics.
I wouldn't call this drastic at all.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
welcome. I'm not sure where the best place would be.
Maybe on the web site?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
esponse
system. We have all of the necessary infra-structure ready.
Hopefully we can reach an agreement ASAP because I can't handle all of
these emails anymore :)
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
this runs fine for me with no errors.
1. What is the difference between the following:
interface Foo {
}
class Boo extends Foo {
}
This shouldn't work. I guess there's a bug someplace. It's new code so I'm
sure there will be some small things which need to be
why those checks on state->cwd_length are being
made. This will help ppl understand this weirdness later on...
Andi
At 04:38 PM 3/10/2003 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
Andi, what's the status with this?
--Jani
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Wez Furlong wrote:
>Hi Andi (and James)
>
>
At 01:29 PM 3/5/2003 +0800, James Devenish wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 07:24:20AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> It might be less confusing to just have one.
Hasn't worked so far ;)
Well we're talking about changing the name from OnUpdateInt t
e change OnUpdateInt to work with ints and fix the
whole code.
It might be less confusing to just have one.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
The patch look OK. Go ahead and commit it.
Andi
At 08:20 PM 2/28/2003 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
Hi Zeev,
according to the plans the following test file should PASS:
--TEST--
The new constructor/destructor is called
--SKIPIF--
--FILE--
class early {
function early
At 08:00 PM 2/28/2003 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
Hello Andi,
The problem is that script can fetch very large number of objects
and all of them doesn't fit in the memory. Lets say we have very
large list of objects (several millions objects or more). And our
script traverse the lis
i with the same question :)
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ted Andi's
message.
That's also an option but I think OnUpdateInt() is confusing and how do we
stop ppl from using it in new extensions which who's commit messages aren't
followed via php-cvs?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
t not all extension code is under our direct
control.
I don't think there's much choice. Do you have a better idea? If so, please
explain it.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
remember this incorrectly?
No, you are correct but misunderstood me. We should introduce
OnUpdateLong() for ppl using longs and use OnUpdateInt() for ppl who want
to use ints.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
nt them to
be destroyed during the request?
Andi
At 02:39 PM 2/28/2003 +0300, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
To be able to implmenet interface of object-oriented database to PHP I need
to
have object cache which will map persistent object identifier (OPID) to
loaded instance of the object. This cache
Have you submitted a CVS account request?
At 09:41 PM 2/27/2003 +, J Smith wrote:
A few weeks ago, I kind of volunteered to maintain testing scripts for ZE2
on the ZE2 mailing list. (See the thread beginning at
http://www.zend.com/lists/engine2/200302/msg3.html )
Just to make good on my
d make the zend_parse_parameters() function a macro and
make sure that people are passing long's and not ints. I'm not really sure
it's worth it though.
Andi
At 06:19 PM 2/28/2003 +0800, James Devenish wrote:
Hi,
Preface: This e-mail uses the distribution list (To and CC addresses)
that the ori
set it to false when we know we're not interactive. It
shouldn't be a problem.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I think xdebug might do it (http://xdebug.derickrethans.nl/) although I've
never used it.
Andi
At 03:56 PM 2/22/2003 +0100, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
I need to get the because i doing a simple debugger, and i get the type
of variable and his information , and i would like to get his name
You can't get the name of the variable. For what purpose do you need it?
Andi
At 03:45 PM 2/22/2003 +0100, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
Hello, i need to get the name of the variables who passed in one
function, for example:
switch ((*struc)->type) {
case
It'd be nice to see an example of the XML. I liked the simplicity of
today's prototype file, I'm not sure XML isn't an overkill.
Andi
At 11:24 AM 2/19/2003 +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
i've just added the first working results of a replacement for the good
o
is the
main problem in this loop? Does it add / or c:\ in the beginning of the
string?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
We'll review it. I think we'll use it almost as-is except that we won't do
the old check variable_ptr_ptr != value_ptr_ptr
If you don't see anything on this front in the next couple of days please
remind me.
Andi
At 03:58 AM 2/16/2003 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Hi,
Cou
Hey,
The fchdir() part of the patch looks fine but I didn't quite understand the
rest. PHP only uses realpath() if it doesn't fail, so what is the exact
problem? What does that other code do?
Andi
At 03:29 PM 2/12/2003 -0500, James E. Flemer wrote:
Well all the fancy new streams cod
At 02:37 PM 2/7/2003 +0200, moshe doron wrote:
well, what about sun_set(), sun_rise()?
I hope you're kidding.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 12:47 PM 2/7/2003 +0200, moshe doron wrote:
"Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I haven't been following this whole discussion.
> However, the function names should follow the coding stand
I haven't been following this whole discussion.
However, the function names should follow the coding standards and be named
something like date_sunrise(), date_sunset() (or whatever other prefix
makes sense).
Andi
At 05:02 PM 2/6/2003 +0200, Moshe Doron wrote:
"Zeev Suraski" &l
tation then I'd leave it.
IMO, just go ahead and commit.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
right scale.
In any case, it probably makes sense for you to go ahead and commit it.
BTW, is php_str2num() only supposed to work on whole or decimal values?
What about exponents? I think you're probably right but I just want to make
sure you thought about it.
Thanks,
Andi
At 01:51 PM 2/3/
er's
community (i.e. php-dev, php-qa) to be part it. The last thing we need is
to have the whole PHP users community on it. We won't get anything done and
that was the whole reason to keep things small.
Andi
P.S.-I don't think your negative tone was called for.
--
PHP Developme
keep the functional support for all
extensions like PHP 4. The only question is, if and how we support an OO
paradigm.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
why his answer was in english)
Anyway, what he talked about was why that code didn't work for him.
Sounded strange to me since it was noted in ZEND_CHANGES.txt.
The file isn't up-to-date. I'll make sure it's correct once namespaces are
finalized.
Andi
--
PHP Developmen
.
Andi
P.S.-Theoretically the only time it could cause problems is if someone,
while the server is running, changes a symlink in one of the cached paths.
This is highly unlikely.
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
to have a mode which uses fstat() then we should probably
just document what we believe could break and with a "use this with care!"
warning.
I'm going to try and think if there are other options which won't break
functionality.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
This list is only for people who develop PHP and not _with_ PHP.
Please contact a PHP users mailing list such as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Good luck,
Andi
At 10:24 AM 1/25/2003 +0100, Frank Keessen wrote:
Hi all,
Please can you help me with the following:
If got a little sample code:
This one is
e fstat() to get some
device information on the open file. I am worried about functionality
though. I'm not sure it's worth breaking.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 02:42 AM 1/25/2003 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 04:32 PM 1/24/2003 -0800, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> I can't really think of any way of getting around this. include_once() and
> require_once() are basic language constructs and they require this.
Well, they require us to be able
require us to know the canonical filename. This could be done
in a single stat where we grab the device number and inode.
Yeah but on broken systems single stat's also stat each directory (AFAIK).
I don't think it's any faster or at least not noticably.
Andi
--
PHP Deve
a direct effect.
What OS are you running on? Are you running over NFS?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
think of all the things which could effect it and use those as part of a
hash key but frankly, smart OS's like Linux don't take too long and the
file system cache usually works pretty well.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
7;ni', which will eventually be used as the the length argument for
the copyin operation.
I might be misunderstanding the problem and I didn't have time to read the
phrack article, but doesn't this mean that leaving it unsigned is better?
It wouldn't pass the length che
ects, then I think nuking it is OK.
What do others think? (I'm interested in hearing from Windows users)
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
This has been discussed in the past and won't be done.
PHP behaves like C where the result of the boolean "or" operation is true
or false.
Andi
At 12:38 AM 1/11/2003 -0500, Nyk Cowham wrote:
As a convert from Perl one of the 'features' I miss from Perl is the
short-c
At 12:25 PM 1/10/2003 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote:
> From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:14 PM
>
> At 06:36 PM 1/9/2003 +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> > For as long as I can remember, the bcmath, calendar, ftp and wddx
> >
is harder and it's probably easiest
for Windows users to have stuff in by default.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
reply that they should please mail
php-general without giving them the answers.
Andi
At 04:26 AM 1/8/2003 -0700, Rick Widmer wrote:
At 10:52 AM 1/8/03 +0100, Hannes Smit wrote:
Does anyone know how much space can be stored in a session?
How much free space do you have on the drive that
romix, ext/interbase and sapi/pi3web.
I actually think the more complete we can make the win32build.zip the better.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
You are probably best off using zend_eval_string() and eval "include
"$myfile.inc;".
Andi
At 04:51 PM 1/7/2003 +, Stefano Corsi wrote:
Hello,
does someone understand if this is the right procedure to include a filename
from inside a C extension?
MAKE_STD_ZVAL(filename_
ig.m4 and so on
is OK for development.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
If you haven't received any approval you should assume that it's disapproval.
Andi
At 10:16 AM 1/5/2003 +0200, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi
GSL(GNU Scientific Library) has a part about statistics. It has 27
functions.
I think not to copy the names of all functions.
At the moment or b
ate some kind of abstraction in TSRM and use that
everywhere. These fixes might achieve your goal for making PHP work on
netware but they are making our code butt ugly and hard to maintain.
Andi
At 03:59 PM 1/3/2003 +, Anantha Kesari H Y wrote:
hyanantha Fri Jan 3 10:5
tt ugly. They are just hacking at our
code instead of fixing it nicely.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Happy New Year to everyone! It's already 2003 here in Israel.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed. The way things look, 2003 will be a
very fruitful year for PHP with hopefully a new major version!
A special thanks to Derick for the cool Look Back of 2002!
Andi
--
PHP Development Ma
At 01:45 AM 12/28/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
At 22:40 27.12.2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't think it's beneficial to PHP to have two modes especially as the
cli more you're talking about would support ?> followed by a
Let's keep things similar across the board.
I think you're right. I also see some weird language :)
Andi
At 12:18 AM 12/28/2002 +0100, Niels Leenheer wrote:
[snip]
> What this means for users is that any I/O function that works with
> streams (and that is almost all of them) can access built-in protocols,
> such as HTTP
I don't think it's beneficial to PHP to have two modes especially as the
cli more you're talking about would support ?> followed by a
Let's keep things similar across the board.
Andi
At 02:11 PM 12/27/2002 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
We've talked about this in the
is prone to error. Can't you cast
the right side?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Actually I think we should keep it as simple as it is today. I'd just
change what the function prints out :)
Andi
At 12:43 PM 12/23/2002 -0800, David Gillies wrote:
OK, how about a much-expanded version for 4.3.1, say?
I'm a big fan of self-documenting code (use the
source, Luke).
To: David Gillies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ext_skel
Yeah but then it might make sense to print something like "Argument passed
= ", no?
Andi
At 08:56 AM 12/23/2002 -0800, David Gillies wrote:
Well, if nothin
I meant a big warning should be in place :)
Andi
At 08:18 PM 12/21/2002 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 07:13 PM 12/21/2002 +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 18:24 21-12-2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Yes I object. Think of references as a "symbolic link" to the same
place. Now you h
At 07:13 PM 12/21/2002 +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
At 18:24 21-12-2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Yes I object. Think of references as a "symbolic link" to the same place.
Now you have such a reference in an array which you assign to an
additional variable. Now two variables contain co
nsion/config.m4. Module myextension is now
compiled into PHP.".
The second appearance of myextension is the parameter passed to the function.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
ill change the
other. In many ways it makes sense, and even in cases where it's a bit
weird and where it seems wrong, I think we should live with it because I
don't like having to check the whole array each time. If you have deeply
nested arrays it's really slow and doesn't make
Again, as it is undefined in PHP the question "Why" in itself is wrong :)
Andi
At 04:43 PM 12/21/2002 +0200, Andrey Hristov wrote:
- Original Message -----
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrey Hristov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[
It doesn't matter because the behavior here is undefined just like in C.
You can't use a variable and it's post/pre increment value in the same
expression.
Andi
At 03:26 PM 12/21/2002 +0200, Andrey Hristov wrote:
Hi,
i got an interesting case :
Result
int(2)
int(3)
Can someb
This is a known limitation. I will try and address this probably with some
kind of special syntax.
Andi
At 04:49 PM 12/20/2002 +0100, Mickael Bailly wrote:
Hello,
One line to say this is my first post here, I thought about posting in
php-general, but ZE2 is in development, so...
I
At 11:57 PM 12/20/2002 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 01:28 PM 12/19/2002 +, Wez Furlong wrote:
> >Actually, it does seem valid to me; streams based on FILE* are not
> >registered in the persistent list, so does it m
shutdown?
If these are per-request constants then you are correct and the patch was
OK. I thought these were constants which survive requests.
Andi
--Wez.
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I don't like these voodoo patches. I think if the stream is destroyed twice
> tha
wn.
> >If you think my patch is bogus, feel free to revert it unless I can give
> >more reasonable explanation.
I comitted tha patch and I'll revert it. Just to clarify one thing:
constanst throuout PHP should be created as CONST_PERSISTENT?
Yeah in almost all cases.
now was php for CGI and php-cli for CLI
or am I a bit behind things? :)
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 11:17 AM 12/17/2002 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I didn't understand the explanation. Why do you mind if the resources are
> destroyed before the constants? That's good, no?
Sorry, I'm still unsure if my patch is the co
ot; is a special support to make working with array
offsets and strings easier.
The "{...}" support should allow you to put any PHP expression in there.
Basically echo $arr[a] and "{$arr[a]}" should behave exactly the same.
There's a difference between $arr[a] and &
ys been considered a bug and not a feature.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It won't be supported but you can use eval() if you really need to.
Andi
At 08:47 PM 12/16/2002 +0100, Bertrand Mansion wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Bertrand Mansion wrote:
>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>>
>>>
At 12:49 AM 12/17/2002 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what you're doing here. Are you actually separating on
> every assignment and doing a deep copy?
What I'm trying to do in my patch can be divided int
I don't understand what you're doing here. Are you actually separating on
every assignment and doing a deep copy?
Andi
At 04:09 PM 12/15/2002 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Oops, the patch was wrong as the runtime occationally segfaults
in a case like:
$a = 0;
$a = &$
ze of each process but also at how
much is shared.
Andi
At 08:03 PM 12/11/2002 -0800, Gustavo A. Baratto wrote:
Greetings,
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask, but here it goes...
We have a multihosted environment for apache/php and we try to accept all
requests to add new php e
ll the next revision (4.4 or 5.0 -- whichever it winds up being)
I'd go for #1 now as this should be done anyway.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I think this is one of those exceptions where we should probably not go by
our standard and call the function bcpowmod(). It looks a bit funny that
all of the BC functions don't have underscores but only one does. It'll
probably confuse people more than it helps.
What do you guys t
It's not as if we're breaking BC for the
sake of adding very much needed functionality.
Anyway, I'm -0 for the change and +0 to find a more suitable name for the
CLI :)
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Any idea how many more bugs are waiting to be addressed?
Andi
At 12:36 PM 12/9/2002 +, Wez Furlong wrote:
Because we are still finding and fixing bugs in the RCs.
--Wez.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Now that still leave my original question about 4.3. Why the hell aren&#
At 02:24 PM 12/9/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>At 02:13 PM 12/9/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>>On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I'd like to start working towards a beta of Z
At 02:13 PM 12/9/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'd like to start working towards a beta of ZE2 but it seems that 4.3 is
>still lingering and I'd like to wait until after 4.3.
>What's happening with that? Shouldn&#x
lent 2-3
weeks following Christmas to fix them.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Tom,
This should be fixed now. Please update your Zend CVS and let me know if it
works for you.
Andi
At 08:06 PM 12/8/2002 -0800, Tom Fishwick wrote:
I was reading an email from stdin. But regardless of bad coding style
:-), the script is using _way_ more memory than it should.
$s
I'll try and see what I can do about this.
Andi
At 11:56 AM 12/8/2002 -0800, Tom Fishwick wrote:
I was reading an email from stdin. But regardless of bad coding style
:-), the script is using _way_ more memory than it should.
$s = '';
while(strlen($s) < 266768) {
e times where the
malloc()/memcpy() will be necessary.
So what are you doing? Is it something you have to do?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Are you sure you should be using malloc()/free() and not emalloc()/efree()?
Also please use strlcpy() instead of strncpy(). (Weird I mentioned it twice
in one day :)
http://www.courtesan.com/todd/papers/strlcpy.html
Andi
At 04:54 PM 12/7/2002 +0100, Daniel Lorch wrote:
--- php-4.2.3/ext
At 06:59 PM 12/2/2002 +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I still haven't understood from your answer if this is a problem which was
> in 4.2.x.
This problem has existed for a long time. There is not
much which can break, because it h
I still haven't understood from your answer if this is a problem which was
in 4.2.x.
Andi
At 09:45 PM 12/1/2002 -0800, Shane Caraveo wrote:
It's not a matter of php cgi just having a couple bugs, it was completely
broken. If we don't put it in 4.3, pull the cgi module out en
Are you sure we should have this stuff in the branch of 4.3? Are these bugs
which didn't exist in 4.2.3?
If they did exist I'm -1. If they didn't exist then that's life and the
patch should stay in but people familiar with CGI should review it carefully.
Andi
At 02:21 AM 12
ze? Or perhaps we should just malloc()
after a
certain size is reached (ok, 16k of prealloc'd stuff, if we don't have a
free
slot, just do uncached mallocs).
We'd recreate the cache ever request. It wouldn't cost very much. By the
way, I think you did misunderstand me.
tructure itself, i.e., when the bucket isn't
used we can use its memory for the pointer to the next element. So
allocation just takes the bucket out of the free list. So basically the
bucket is a union between sizeof(zval) and sizeof(*) (or sizeof(int)).
If it's still not clear I can
At 02:59 PM 11/30/2002 -0500, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Hey,
I was checking the CVS logs, and I read ::
revision 1.13
date: 2001/11/26 17:27:59; author: andi; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1
- Turn off fast cache until we make sure it performs well.
- The best solution is probably to limit its size
asses but
I'm not sure it'd be too bad in PHP.
If I were to implement this I'd probably use a counter to *remember* how
many abstract methods a class has.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List <http://www.php.net/>
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 04:30 PM 11/28/2002 +, James Cox wrote:
it means double colon in hebrew... i think Zeev and Andi must not have known
what to call it in english when they put it in... but hey, it was the first
i18n'ized error message :)
We are very attached to this token because it was put in wh
Applied.
Andi
At 05:31 PM 11/28/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
In ZE2 zend.c there is a structure member not initialized for. See patch
below.
marcus
Index: Zend/zend.c
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend.c,v
retrieving
At 03:18 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Ok... but that looks nasty when you are passed an array or an object.
Yeah but backtraces tend to look nasty :)
Andi
Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 03:13 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Hmmm any hints on how to get
the name of the variable. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
Andi
George
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd probably go for class::function($arg1, $arg2).
Also take into consideration that the args aren't always available.
Andi
At 02:58 PM 11/27/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Is there a con
1 - 100 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo
