Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:52 PM Kilbride, James P. said the following:
>> I admit I have not expressed myself clearly. What I meant is
>> not that people should be disallowed to implement alternative
>> APIs, but rather that they should not feel the need to do it.
>>
>> In the Java world, JDBC is
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 02:53 PM Robert Cummings said the following:
>>> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
>>> place was :
>>>
>>> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
>>> we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction
t using my own
> >> solutions for my own purposes.
> >
> > Aaaah, so you are trully a genius to be able to at a glance of
> > documentation and source code fully deduce the usefulness of something.
> > I bow before you.
>
> Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any fram
> documentation and source code fully deduce the usefulness of something.
> I bow before you.
Be seriuos. Nobody needs to actually use any framework to see that it is
not suitable for your needs, when you can just browse the source code
and documentation. It would be insane to try all PHP fram
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Matt Todd wrote:
Because of this, I determined to build my own framework. This was a
few months ago, and Canvas[1] was the result of my labor. I produced
this framework while working on numerous projects at the university I
work at. This allowed me to
Matt Todd wrote:
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(m
In my experience with the other frameworks (primarily Wasp, CakePHP,
Symfony, eZ Components, and Zend Framework), I've found that I was not
satisfied with the quantity of low-quality code they advocate. I have
a high standard for code quality, readability, maintainability, and
(more generally) sem
2006/8/3, Manuel Lemos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, a
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there, but
I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed, secure, etc
etc.
Thoughts?
I echo others in th
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 1:43 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the follo
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 14:42 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
> > The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> > place was :
> >
> > "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
> >
mework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
> >>> you haven't even actually tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
> >>> frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
> >>> called "Recommended PHP Fram
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:25 AM Paul Scott said the following:
> The main thing in Manual's post that got me writing this in the first
> place was :
>
> "Imagine if there would be only one PDBC (JDBC for PHP). Instead of that
> we have a never ending choice of PHP database abstraction layers that
>
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 09:17 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
> Arno Kuhl wrote:
>> I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
>> he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
>> in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in
Hello,
on 08/03/2006 07:37 AM Jochem Maas said the following:
> PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
>
> :-)
Erm
Paul Scott is a good contributor of the PHPClasses site:
http://www.phpclasses.org/browse/author/145758.html
Several of his classes have been nominated to the PHP Programming
Innovation A
tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
>>> frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
>>> called "Recommended PHP Frameworks" in which you don't even recommend a
>>> framework. Additionally somehow while pimping phpclasse
On Wed, August 2, 2006 9:50 am, Gabe wrote:
> Gabe wrote:
>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out
>> there,
>> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively
>> developed,
>> secure, etc et
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:43 +0200, Arno Kuhl wrote:
> I'm not so sure if the botanist wasn't saying in a rather confused way that
> he was playing on the same side as PHPClasses, even if he did profess to be
> in the other team. Did he say he was rolling his own (in a way only
> botanists can do)
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
> To: Paul Scott
> Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
>
> PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
>
> :-)
>
> Paul Scott wrote:
>>> You mean we should all be happy that
ochem Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 August 2006 12:37
To: Paul Scott
Cc: Robert Cummings; Manuel Lemos; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP Frameworks - Opinion
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> You mean we should all be happy that so much
PHPClasses 0 - Botanist 1
:-)
Paul Scott wrote:
>
>> You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
>>
>
> I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
> Science, as far as "industry" is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
> on a PC. Fortunately
> You mean we should all be happy that so much choice is available!
>
I agree with Rob! I am a botanist. I have never been trained in Computer
Science, as far as "industry" is concerned, I am not qualified to turn
on a PC. Fortunately for me, I am also a geek. My PHP experiences
started when ru
gt; >>
> >> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
> >
> > I've read it before... it was crud. You provide no recommendation for
> > any framework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
> > you have
o recommendation for
> any framework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
> you haven't even actually tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
> frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
> called "Recommended PHP Frameworks
dation for
any framework but instead try to pimp phpclasses. From what I gathered
you haven't even actually tried anywhere in the vicinity of 10% of the
frameworks in existence and yet you feel obliged to write a commenatary
called "Recommended PHP Frameworks" in which you don't eve
Hello,
on 08/01/2006 01:35 PM Gabe said the following:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
> Thou
Kilbride, James P. wrote:
> I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
> is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
> do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
> leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought
I'm not going to comment on the rest of the stuff that was said, which
is why I snipped it. I'm not a purist when it comes to OO at all. But I
do have to say that while iterators in ruby are amazingly powerful that
leave me going wow.. that is so cool.. The thought of how they could be
abused and t
> I see that there are a few different Universities in Africa supporting
> that framework. How active is the developer community? How long has
> KINKY/Chisimba been around?
>
The AVOIR Project has been going for about 2 years now. KINKY and
KEWL.NextGen were the first products of that projec
Paul Scott wrote:
Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
just plug in the modules that you want/need to "flesh" it out. Then
you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing e
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
>> Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
>> framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
>> "Inversion of Control", "Dependency Injection" etc.
>
> So
Robert Cummings wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
>> Robert Cummings wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
framework in Java called Spring which has
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 18:08 +0200, Jochem Maas wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
> >> Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
> >> framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
> Too bad there isn't a skeleton sort-of system that you essentially then
> just plug in the modules that you want/need to "flesh" it out. Then
> you'd have your own customized framework for each app that is developed
> and keeps *all* of the modules relevant to that app. Nothing extra
> wou
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 10:50 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> Gabe wrote:
> > What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> > application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> > but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> > secure, et
Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Thoughts?
Sounds like it's just personal preference.
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 15:51 +0300, karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
>
> Speaking about framework. Anybody is aware there is a very popular
> framework in Java called Spring which has pretty cool features like
> "Inversion of Control", "Dependency Injection" etc.
Sounds similar to the service sy
Stut wrote:
> Jochem Maas wrote:
>> I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
>>
>
> One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice during my lunch break?
>
> -Stut
--
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
-Stut
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Jochem Maas wrote:
Stut wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
I'll have it ready for you next week, what kind of license do you want?
One license to kill to go please.
006.5 your lic is in the post. and while I'm at it can I port an obscure
OS to the hardware of your choice during
karthikeyan balasubramanian wrote:
> Tony Marston wrote:
>> "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
>>> application development? There seems to be a number of them out
>>> there, but I'm not sure w
Tony Marston wrote:
"Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
--=neXtPaRt_1154507404
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Personally, I think that the community at the Zend Framework is doing a
> pretty good job. Everything is coded very well, with a lot of
> possibilities to extend things to your personal needs (if nessecary).
"Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, et
Hidayet Dogan schreef:
What about CakePHP and Code Igniter?
I know working with Code Igniter easier than CakePHP, but CakePHP is
more capable than Code Igniter.
Hi,
Lately frameworks have become a real *hype*. Currently, there are more
than 40 frameworks out there, and new ones are being re
What about CakePHP and Code Igniter?
I know working with Code Igniter easier than CakePHP, but CakePHP is more
capable than Code Igniter.
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Robert Cummings wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:15 +0200, rich gray wrote:
Robert Cummings wrote:
[chop]
An IDE is not a framework,
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 04:15 +0200, rich gray wrote:
> Robert Cummings wrote:
> > [chop]
> > An IDE is not a framework, it's an IDE :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob.
> >
> I think Rob is being unduly modest - correct me if I am wrong but he is
> the core developer of the InterJinn php framework ->
>
Robert Cummings wrote:
[chop]
An IDE is not a framework, it's an IDE :)
Cheers,
Rob.
I think Rob is being unduly modest - correct me if I am wrong but he is
the core developer of the InterJinn php framework ->
http://interjinn.com - it's been out there for a while now (read:
robust, fully
Colin Guthrie wrote:
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots
and lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
near
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
snip.
I own Zend Professional, but don't use it (not good or bad).
snip.
An IDE is not a framework. it's an
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 18:17 -0400, tedd wrote:
> At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
> >
> >I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
> >the near future and would like to think Zend would be a goo
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:40 +0100, Steve Turnbull wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> > What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> > application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> > but I'm not sure which one's are the mos
Steve Turnbull wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
> Thoughts?
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:44:28 +0200
"Satyam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
> lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I would be very skeptical of any "suggestions" because only someone
who tried multiple frameworks would b
At 10:46 PM +0100 8/1/06, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in
the near future and would like to think Zend would be a good horse
to back, but the fact no-one here has mentioned it
Satyam wrote:
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
I'm surprised no-one has mentioned the Zend Framework yet.
I'm looking to do a bit of a rewrite of a large PHP application in the
near future and would like t
There is no 'common consensus' but I am sure you'll be getting lots and
lots, I would even say LOTS, of sugestions.
Satyam
- Original Message -
From: "Gabe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 6:35 PM
Subject: [PHP] PHP Framework
-
> From: Gabe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 12:36 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP] PHP Frameworks - Opinion
>
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to
> use for application development? There seems t
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:35 -0400, Gabe wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
>
OK, from m
This one time, at band camp, Gabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
> application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
> but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
> secure, etc etc.
What's the common consensus as to a solid PHP framework to use for
application development? There seems to be a number of them out there,
but I'm not sure which one's are the most robust, actively developed,
secure, etc etc.
Thoughts?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsu
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 18:54 -0300, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> The truth is that good PHP developers are often not good Web (page)
> designers, and good Web designers are not good developers.
Yes, I agree with this completely! I am a relatively decent developer,
but ask me to design an interface and y
Hello,
on 07/03/2006 05:22 PM Jay Paulson said the following:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does
anyone
have any recommendations for
Hello,
on 07/03/2006 03:38 AM Lester Caine said the following:
>>> I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
>>> engine other than smarty.
>>>
>>> I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does
>>> anyone
>>> have any recommendations for one th
Jay Paulson wrote:
Thinking about this paragraph above makes me wonder if with that way of
looking at it would one need a template engine? For example, why not just
separate the business logic and the HTML as much as possible and then only
imbed PHP in HTML to display the variables ()?? Then at
>>> I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
>>> engine other than smarty.
>>>
>>> I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
>>> have any recommendations for one that is easy to pick up and run with?
>>>
>>> Finally, does anyone h
Robert Cummings wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 08:37, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
Jay Paulson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I like ezTemplate. (E_STRICT)
YOU DO?? I hope it's changed then from the one used on a site I'm now
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 08:37, Jens Kleikamp wrote:
> Jay Paulson wrote:
> > I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
> > engine other than smarty.
> >
>
> I like ezTemplate. (E_STRICT)
YOU DO?? I hope it's changed then from the one used on a site I'm now
maintainin
Jay Paulson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I like ezTemplate. (E_STRICT)
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recommendations for one that is easy to pick up and run wi
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
PDO is being pushed as a DB Abstraction library, but it only 'abstracts'
the calls to PHP, it does nothing to abstract the SQL if you want a
truly generic solution, if you need one, but if you don't the
This one time, at band camp, Lester Caine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PDO is being pushed as a DB Abstraction library, but it only 'abstracts'
> the calls to PHP, it does nothing to abstract the SQL if you want a
> truly generic solution, if you need one, but if you don't then why
> bother w
Manuel Lemos wrote:
on 06/30/2006 11:38 AM Jay Paulson said the following:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recommendations for one that is e
Hello,
on 06/30/2006 11:38 AM Jay Paulson said the following:
> I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
> engine other than smarty.
>
> I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
> have any recommendations for one that is easy to
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, KermodeBear wrote:
http://pear.php.net/package/DB/
This one has no more development, besides bug fixes. It was merged to
create the one below.
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB2/
--
21:50:04 up 2 days, 9:07, 0 users, load average: 0.92, 0.37, 0.18
-
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Jay Paulson wrote:
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
PEARs HTML_Template_IT... or mix it with other HTML_Template*
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recom
> Finally, does anyone have any suggestions for a good PHP database
> abstraction library?
PHP5 has PDO for database abstraction; check the manual for information on
that one. If you're stuck with PHP4 then PEAR has several offerings:
http://pear.php.net/package/DB/
http://pear.php.net/package/MDB
I'd like to get some feedback on what the list thinks is a good template
engine other than smarty.
I'd also like to do some quick prototyping using a PHP framework does anyone
have any recommendations for one that is easy to pick up and run with?
Finally, does anyone have any suggestions for a go
Robert Cummings wrote:
A funny PHPClasses article...
http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
I find it telling that the guy who runs the PHP Classes site only uses
his own code *lol*. Oh btw, the article says virtually nothing useful
about frameworks, but it
2006/4/27, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> A funny PHPClasses article...
>
>
> http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
One thing I understood after hitting my head many times to a wall is that "a
good idea can be, and should be, explained in just three line
A funny PHPClasses article...
http://www.phpclasses.org/blog/post/52-Recommended-PHP-frameworks.html
I find it telling that the guy who runs the PHP Classes site only uses
his own code *lol*. Oh btw, the article says virtually nothing useful
about frameworks, but it does go a long way to pimp
I haven't used them, but our local user group recently had a meeting
on PHP frameworks[1]. The feeling of the people that have used them
was that Symfony was a good project, and that CakePHP was a
particularly large installation. No one mentioned having used Prado,
WACT or WASP.
Has anyone used any of the following frameworks? What is the general
opinion of using frameworks etc?
WASP - http://wasp.sourceforge.net/content/
Symfony - http://www.symfony-project.com/
Prado - http://www.xisc.com/
WACT - http://www.phpwact.org/
CakePHP - http://www.cakephp.org/
--
PHP Genera
Script Head wrote:
Nobody has mentioned Fusebox (www.fusebox.org). I have been using it to
develop PHP applications for about 2 years. It has proven to be extremely
flexible when a large number of developers collaborate on one project.
jedit :)
Love macros and plugins!
http://www.jedit.org/
On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 17:49 +0100, Petr Smith wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone point me to a good php MVC framework?
> What about http://www.symfony-project.com/ ?? Anyone using it?
>
There is also a relatively new application framework, out of Africa,
called KINKY. http://avoir.uwc.ac.za/projects/nex
Simon Reye wrote:
I'm moving away from Cold Fusion and am considering java or php. I've
mucked around with Struts and Coccoon on the java side and think they
are great. There does not however seem to be any well backed projects
similar to these for php.
Can anyone point me to a good php MVC
just find plans and objectives and
no usable "framework".
Thanks!
-Shawn
Zareef Ahmed wrote:
Hi,
There are a lot of PHP frameworks like Mojavi, Phrame,
php.MVC,
phpwebtk, Horde.
My choice is Mojavi.
BTW Zend is also doing some great work on it.
Zareef Ahmed
- Origi
Nobody has mentioned Fusebox (www.fusebox.org). I have been using it to
develop PHP applications for about 2 years. It has proven to be extremely
flexible when a large number of developers collaborate on one project.
ry clear and easy to use.
> Developers are very active in this work and documentation is very good. I
> have chosen ZNF Framework because is fast and modular.
>
> bye
>
> On Friday 23 December 2005 20:57, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
>
>>Is there a good recent article on PH
December 2005 20:57, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Is there a good recent article on PHP Frameworks, or do people here has
> a predominant one that outshines the others?
>
> I'm looking for something that is easy to use, fast and stable.
>
> Thanks!
> -Shawn
--
Fabiano Ric
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:57, Shawn McKenzie wrote:
> Is there a good recent article on PHP Frameworks, or do people here has
> a predominant one that outshines the others?
There are a lot of PHP frameworks available, some more mature than others but
not yet a predominant one. Any
I haven't tried them yet, but I've been tagging all the PHP
frameworks I come across:
http://del.icio.us/rkm28/php+framework
The first one I want to try is PHP on Trax (http://
www.phpontrax.com/). It was used to build the KatrinaHousing.org
site that was used to provide h
Shawn McKenzie wrote:
I searched on "Zend PHP Framework" because I had seen it
referenced somewhere, however I can just find plans and
objectives and no usable "framework".
It hasn't been released yet. However, there are many components that are
finished, and I think Zend hopes to release a be
Thanks. I searched on "Zend PHP Framework" because I had seen it
referenced somewhere, however I can just find plans and objectives and
no usable "framework".
Thanks!
-Shawn
Zareef Ahmed wrote:
> Hi,
> There are a lot of PHP frameworks like Mojavi, Phrame,
Hi,
There are a lot of PHP frameworks like Mojavi, Phrame, php.MVC,
phpwebtk, Horde.
My choice is Mojavi.
BTW Zend is also doing some great work on it.
Zareef Ahmed
- Original Message -
From: "Shawn McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December
Is there a good recent article on PHP Frameworks, or do people here has
a predominant one that outshines the others?
I'm looking for something that is easy to use, fast and stable.
Thanks!
-Shawn
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.ph
Simon Reye wrote:
I'm moving away from Cold Fusion and am considering java or php. I've
mucked around with Struts and Coccoon on the java side and think they
are great. There does not however seem to be any well backed projects
similar to these for php.
Can anyone point me to a good php MVC f
Jeffery Fernandez wrote:
Simon Reye wrote:
I'm moving away from Cold Fusion and am considering java or php. I've
mucked around with Struts and Coccoon on the java side and think they
are great. There does not however seem to be any well backed projects
similar to these for php.
Can anyone poi
Simon Reye wrote:
I'm moving away from Cold Fusion and am considering java or php. I've
mucked around with Struts and Coccoon on the java side and think they
are great. There does not however seem to be any well backed projects
similar to these for php.
Can anyone point me to a good php MVC f
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
