I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an updated copy of the cvs archive,
so I'm sure I have a *very* recent copy of the ports. I wanted a couple of
ports installed before I began my main work on this new system, and that was (1)
cvsup (this worked fine) and (2) a browser. I picked www/seamo
r if maybe
I have to build a current system to get things to work. For the record, I'm NOT
actually seeing any "all kinds of crazy errors", just that one port won't build.
>
> -Nick
>
> Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an up
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/05/12 12:53, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> I have a new OpenBSD-4.5 system. I've got an updated copy of the cvs
>> archive,
>> so I'm sure I have a *very* recent copy of the ports. I wanted a couple of
>> ports installed before I
I've been trying to get seamonkey to build for myself for several days now, I
can't seem to find out how to fix it. I've made really sure it can't possibly
have anything whatever to do with versions of OpenBSD, because I moved both my
kernel, the userland, and the ports files all to their current
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009/05/15 17:20, Chuck Robey wrote:
> Please post a log of the failing build, or put it on a webserver
> and post the URL. The output from pkg_info might be useful too.
> Also details of anything you've set in mk.conf. If you've set
> SUDO=s
I'm having problems figuring out things, in producing the editors/vim
port. The DESCR file gives me a good list of the flavors I can use, but
I've got a problem, because I need two of these flavors (gtk2 and
python). I have 2 problems here: (1), I don't know how to format the
FLAVORS variable
Stuart Henderson wrote:
Hi Chuck,
On 2009/05/16 14:21, Chuck Robey wrote:
I notice some warnings in a normal seamonkey build along these lines,
but they aren't errors, and the build continues. If you can get a log
somewhere I can diff that against a good build and maybe that'll
Cezary Morga wrote:
> Dnia poniedziałek, 18 maja 2009 o 17:13:31 Chuck Robey napisał(a):
>> I'm having problems figuring out things, in producing the editors/vim
>> port. The DESCR file gives me a good list of the flavors I can use, but
>> I've got a problem, beca
Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 04:26:40PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> I see that bias towards only supporting packages, now.
>
> yeah, you were only told that the first post, and almost every post
> since. and it says so in the FAQ, which you werre directe
I'm having my problems with the ports tree. I just got the network up
and running on my Zaurus, and decided to try to get kismet up via
ports. I had previously hand-installed two packages (gettext and
libiconv). In trying to get kismet up, the system has decided it needed
to reinstall gmake,
I just got a nicely worded letter from someone, who's prodded me into
trying once more to ask a ports-philosphy question. It's a question of
how much control to allow a user, for ports. The person I was chatting
with seemed to be of the opinion that the system ought to hage sole
control of al
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
[ a rant ]
You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do)You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do). The pkgconfig approach is flawed,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
[Let me emphasize that above a little more: un my mind, you're making
a system that's hostile to progammers, unless they are willing to
program for OpenBSD itself.
I assume you never used OpenBSD for serious development of software t
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 01:51:22PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
[ a rant ]
You're completely wrong. Programmers can very well use our system (and
they do). The pkgconfig approach is flawed, it doesn't allow for some
things we would do. The gnu configure approach is wor
Marc Espie wrote:
Marc, I began to reply, because you've begun insulting me here, but if
you'll let it go, I will let it go here. Can you do that? Just stop
reading here.
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 04:15:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
I had put in my own gettext, which
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 08:13:25PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
Auto-detecting piles of shit without any user control, or with very poor
user control, like GNU configure allows, is a receipe for disaster.
It does NOT help the user, contrarily to what you might think.
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc, I began to reply, because you've begun insulting me here, but
if you'll let it go, I will let it go here. Can you do that? Just
stop reading here.
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Mayb
Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:14:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
You're not a serious developer, you just tinker with stuff...
You know, I'be been as careful as I could be, never to insult any of
you. You know me very littl
Ray Lai wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:14:59PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Marc Espie wrote:
- Installing stuff into the same directories the basic ports install
stuff in is a nice recipe for disaster.
OK, then how about a have "local-1"? I would like, if I in
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time has come to end this thread if you feel
insulted by good advice.
would you be wiling ot meet me on a irc channel, say, on freenode?
I will be on channel
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
You are not being insulted. We just try to direct you in the right
direction. Maybe the time has come to end this thread if you feel
insulted by good advice.
would you be wiling ot meet me on a irc channel, say, on freenode?
I will be on channel
Marc Balmer wrote:
Chuck Robey wrote:
I want to be able to put in my own items, and have them be able to:
1) be found by the pkg tools, the *DEPENDS stuff
2) not have files that I've installed be overwritten by installed
files from ports. If I installed a modified gmake, not to hav
I was trying to find the writeup on the ports mechanism, and I finally
found it, but the path that I had to take, to find it, was
embarrassingly long. SDomething that key really ought to have a place
of importance, right up there on the main web page, not even one step
away. Instead, to find
I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
(Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
that seems to block, one way or another, all of the other browsers
... anyone know of a browser I could build?
Thanks
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2007/01/13 17:39, Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
>> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
>> that seems to block, one way or anoth
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the Zaurus
>> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
>> that seems to block
>>
>
> gecko* things currently won't run; i'm working on this. (should minimo &
> friends be unm
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> I don't care too much for the textual browsers, so I;m going after
>> konq-e now.
>>
>
> Oh; then be clear when you're asking.
>
> Anyway,
>
> $ cd /usr/ports/www/links+ && make show=COMMENT
> "graphics and text browser with javascript support"
>
>
Well, if I know
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> A LONG time back, when FreeBSD oirts were new, I'd played about with a
>> method of
>> allowing ports to have a set of attached KEYWORDS, which would allow you
>> to
>> be a lot more sophisticated about smart searching. No one was really
>> interested, so the
>> idea die
Well. I have to make really certain I don't get off onto my personal hot
button (ports with gigantic lists of very questionable dependencies). Well,
one of the dependencies of konqueror-embedded is libgpg-error-1.1p0
... it's not clicking, and the broken part is a missing file, "de.gmo",
and I do
Martynas Venckus wrote:
>> Anyone got any ideas on this?
>>
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#NoFun
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#PkgVsPorts
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#Problems
>
> Try:
>
> PKG_PATH=ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.0/packages/arm/ pkg_add
Jesse Scott wrote:
> Martynas Venckus wrote:
>>> I'm trying to see if any of the browsers in ports will build on the
>>> Zaurus
>>> (Arm processor)? I know that mozilla is marked as bot buiilding, and
>>> that seems to block
>>>
>>
>> gecko* things currently won't run; i'm working on this. (s
I finally have a browser working on a Zaurus palmtop: dillo. it's got,
from what I see, really only one drawback: it can't handle frames (it
knows enough so, like many text browsers, it lets you decide which
frame to show). As far as useability goes, this is pretty darn good!
BuSab wrote:
> Le 14/01/07 à 20:43, Chuck Robey a écrit :
>
>> I finally have a browser working on a Zaurus palmtop: dillo. it's
>> got, from what I see, really only one drawback: it can't handle frames
>> (it knows enough so, like many text browsers, it lets
BuSab wrote:
> Le 15/01/07 à 17:41, Chuck Robey a écrit :
>
>> 2) for the dillo stuff you gave me, it didn't want to use the libintl
>> and libiconv shared libs, and even got the static libs screwed up, so
>> I had to walk thru the Makefiles adding -L/usr/lo
34 matches
Mail list logo
