You are such a dumb cunt that I actually feel sorry for you. You and your
retarded opinions are ready for some MirBSD usage. Haven't you figured
out yet
that the reason that no one likes you might be because of you?
It is time for you to move on, really. Just fuck off, don't return and
On 10/27/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seams some OpenBSD scum simply don`t know when to quit.
you're really hard trying to be offensive, aren't you?
Peoples died already for less so simply stop it you poor vatican wipping boy.
afaik the vatican is responsible for a lot of
What about ignoring him and removing his mails before reading them?!
Please stop this thread NOW! If someone wants to discuss it more, do
it in private.
On 25/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
--
viq
On 26/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 25/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
If you are going to have any luck with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are
not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
I downloaded OO.o sources few moments ago just fine. Though I had
problems with screen on the other hand...
If you are going to have any luck with
Well right me if I`m wrong but OpenOffice IS in the Ports for OpenBSD 4.0
(i386 only). So shouldn`t I exspect a working port then?!
No, but it's a bit out of the ordinary. In 4.0 the port was in the ports
tree but NOT connected to the build. That is, in 4.0 the
ports/editors/Makefile did
Well right me if I`m wrong but OpenOffice IS in the Ports for OpenBSD
4.0
(i386 only). So shouldn`t I exspect a working port then?!
No, but it's a bit out of the ordinary. In 4.0 the port was in the ports
tree but NOT connected to the build. That is, in 4.0 the
ports/editors/Makefile did
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk.
What did I do? I tried a Port of
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk.
No, Damien is tell the
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:12:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So who`s ignorant here?
You.
It could have been done better...
It was not hooked up to the build for a reason. It does build and work,
I built a package from the port at the time and it did work.
EOF
Shut the hell up. You
You are the ignorant asshole, that's clear to everyone.
I wonde rhow people do think about you then... ;]
Why don't you just PLEASE LEAVE and find a project that will listen
to you. NOONE here will ever do anything that you want, because there
is a fundamental LACK OF RESPECT for ANYTHING
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 11:33:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| And as I`ve said EOF I`ve ment it.
Hahahahahaha .. Youssa funny ;)
Please please *PLEASE* respond some more to show us how bad you 'ment'
it ;)))
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
(I thought all the fun was back over at misc@ ;)
--
On Thursday 26 October 2006 17:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then it`s sad that the port was marked for 4.0...
Your ignorance continues to astound, *it isn't* marked for 4.0.
Sometimes it is easier to work on something in-tree.
-d
You are such a dumb cunt that I actually feel sorry for you. You and your
retarded opinions are ready for some MirBSD usage. Haven't you figured out yet
that the reason that no one likes you might be because of you?
It is time for you to move on, really. Just fuck off, don't return and have a
On Friday 27 October 2006 05:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damien, briefly.. you`re talking junk.
What did I do? I tried a Port of OpenBSD 4.0 on the only avaiable
architecture. So what are you talking about?
If you love to have it in tree even if it`s brocken the Port itself could
get marked
I tried to build the Openoffice Port (oBSD 4.0) but the Sources are not
avaiable (not even a mirror works here).
It would be neat if that could get fixed.
Btw: What about other update slike Firefox for 4.0??
Kind regards,
Sebastian
--
Don't buy anything from YeongYang.
Their Computercases are
19 matches
Mail list logo
