Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
Hello mouss,
Thanks for your kind help. I am now in a position to give you some
really good news. When I was looking close to my logs and got the error
can not connect to port 25 then your mail arrived and enlighten me.
I have modified
J. Bakshi wrote:
Brian Evans - Postfix List wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
Hello mouss,
Thanks for your kind help. I am now in a position to give you some
really good news. When I was looking close to my logs and got the error
can not connect to port 25 then your mail arrived and
- Originálna Správa -
Od: mouss
Komu: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Poslaná: 23.09.2008 09:56
Predmet: Re: header_checks
Meno wrote:
Dear list,
I am trying to fetch mails wit h empty Return-Path: mail header
with header_checks, but unsucessfully...
what do you mean by
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
My milter is quiet simple. It just does a bsearch on a in-memory array ,
to find if the recipient has blacklisted / whitelisted the sender and
takes action accordingly
The array now has approx 200k elements, which should be
Karl O. Pinc:
This exchange has been like pulling teeth. Is there
something wrong with the way I'm interacting with
the list or something I can do differently to make
things easier in the future?
The approach was like going to a doctor with your diagnosis already
done, and without allowing
J. Bakshi wrote:
mouss wrote:
J. Bakshi wrote:
[snip]
yes, after flipping through the logs I have discovered an error
fatal: unexpected command-line argument: smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
This is what Brain told you. you have the wrong syntax in master.cf.
s/Brain/Brian/
I need a new
ram:
On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 13:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
ram:
My milter is quiet simple. It just does a bsearch on a in-memory array ,
to find if the recipient has blacklisted / whitelisted the sender and
takes action accordingly
The array now has approx 200k elements,
- Originálna Správa -
Od: mouss
Komu: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Poslaná: 23.09.2008 14:00
Predmet: Re: header_checks
Meno wrote:
The Return-Path is empty in cases when I get a fake mailer-daemon
notification
from the internet as spam.
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep
i want to restrict a user to send mails only on specific addresses which are
outside my domain.
how i can make this possible ??
_
Want to do more with Windows Live? Learn “10 hidden secrets” from Jamie.
Mumtaz Ali wrote:
i want to restrict a user to send mails only on specific addresses
which are outside my domain.
how i can make this possible ??
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/jamiethomson.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns%21550F681DAD532637%215295.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_domore_092008
You need
Peter Rabbitson:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Peter Rabbitson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I need to protect a specific local address by defining a very low
message_size_limit applicable only to this particular address.
Not possible in general.
Peter Rabbitson:
Hi,
I encountered a weird behavior with Postfix when specifying
smtp:localhost as a transport destination. After long debugging, tcpdump
revealed that postfix directly asks for 'localhost.local dns suffix',
as specified in /etc/hosts:search without first asking for
Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Rabbitson:
[ Charset UTF-8 unsupported, converting... ]
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Peter Rabbitson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I need to protect a specific local address by defining a very low
message_size_limit applicable only to this particular address.
Not possible
Peter Rabbitson:
Wietse Venema wrote:
Peter Rabbitson:
Hi,
I encountered a weird behavior with Postfix when specifying
smtp:localhost as a transport destination. After long debugging, tcpdump
revealed that postfix directly asks for 'localhost.local dns suffix',
as specified in
Well... this might very well work. A descriptive reject message will
take care of the fact that all recipients are affected, as the sender
will know it. I looked at http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html,
but it is not clear to me how can I say 'IF message size x'. Can
someone
Reinaldo de Carvalho:
Well... this might very well work. A descriptive reject message will
take care of the fact that all recipients are affected, as the sender
will know it. I looked at http://www.postfix.org/header_checks.5.html,
but it is not clear to me how can I say 'IF
Meno wrote:
- Originálna Správa -
Od: mouss
Komu: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Poslaná: 23.09.2008 14:00
Predmet: Re: header_checks
Meno wrote:
The Return-Path is empty in cases when I get a fake mailer-daemon notification
from the internet as spam.
From MAILER-DAEMON Tue Sep
David Ballano wrote:
[snip]
Sep 22 15:15:32 orion postfix/smtpd[25753]: maps_find:
virtual_alias_maps: hash:/etc/postfix/virtual(0,lock|fold_fix):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = david
Sep 22 15:15:32 orion postfix/smtpd[25753]: mail_addr_find:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - david
so you have a virtual alias
David Ballano wrote:
David Ballano wrote:
[snip]
Sep 22 15:15:32 orion postfix/smtpd[25753]: maps_find:
virtual_alias_maps: hash:/etc/postfix/virtual(0,lock|fold_fix):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = david
Sep 22 15:15:32 orion postfix/smtpd[25753]: mail_addr_find:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - david
so you have a
Is there an easy way to tell how postfix was compiled?
I'm going to re compile on a mac mini. So of the paths aren't it common
places. Last time I did this I messed up SASL big time.
I'd like to use the same paths as the original compile for compatibility.
Thanks...
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell how postfix was compiled?
I'm going to re compile on a mac mini. So of the paths aren't it common
places. Last time I did this I messed up SASL big time.
I'd like to use the same paths as the original compile for compatibility.
2008/9/23 mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David Ballano wrote:
David Ballano wrote:
[snip]
Sep 22 15:15:32 orion postfix/smtpd[25753]: maps_find:
virtual_alias_maps: hash:/etc/postfix/virtual(0,lock|fold_fix):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] = david
Sep 22 15:15:32 orion postfix/smtpd[25753]: mail_addr_find:
Unfortunately, they do not include the original compile directory when
they ship the system.
Noel Jones wrote:
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell how postfix was compiled?
I'm going to re compile on a mac mini. So of the paths aren't it
common places. Last time I
Noel Jones:
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Is there an easy way to tell how postfix was compiled?
I'm going to re compile on a mac mini. So of the paths aren't it common
places. Last time I did this I messed up SASL big time.
I'd like to use the same paths as the original compile for
Jeffrey Shawn Klotz wrote:
Unfortunately, they do not include the original compile directory when
they ship the system.
I said config_directory, which is where the default main.cf
resides, not the compile directory.
However, if yours is a vendor-supplied build, they may not
have
David Ballano wrote:
yes, I have virtual alias because maybe some day my server owns more
domains, for now ballano.net
I don't understand this.
what I mean is that maybe I use my postfix for more domains,
ballano.net another.net etc..
but what does this have to do with a virtual alias?
,
David Ballano wrote:
whow I don't understant too much,
I want that all the mail that arrive to [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to
david unix account. that is what I think /etc/postfix/virtual does,
and is what I read in the docs
virtual can redirect mail to wherever you want. to redirect to a
I'm trying to figure out how to have certain messages not get relayed on one
of my servers.
Right now I have a server setup as a gateway, and another server setup that
is going to handle mailman mailing lists. When mail comes in to the gateway
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using virtual_alias_maps
On 9/23/08 3:28 PM, mouss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sterling J. Anderson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to have certain messages not get relayed on one
of my servers.
Right now I have a server setup as a gateway, and another server setup that
is going to handle mailman mailing
We use postfix as a relay and Antispam filter in front of an Exchange
Server.
Management want to log the sender and recipient of emails both inbound
and outbound and the totals for a given period e.g. 24 hours and have it
easily viewable in a web browser etc.
They don't require what the
I've just set up DKIM on my mail system (via Astaro Security Gateway).
If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to comes back
saying:
DKIM check details:
Result: fail (signature doesn't verify)
The same thing happens sending from my iPhone.
But it works fine sending from the same computer
James Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use postfix as a relay and Antispam filter in front of an Exchange
Server.
Management want to log the sender and recipient of emails both inbound and
outbound and the totals for a given period e.g. 24 hours and have it easily
viewable in a web
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:05:21AM +1000, James Brown wrote:
I've just set up DKIM on my mail system (via Astaro Security Gateway).
If I send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to comes back
saying:
DKIM check details:
Result: fail (signature doesn't verify)
The same thing happens
After a recent server failure, I reinstalled the OS (NetBSD) which
came with a slightly newer version of Postfix than I had been
running. Now some of my procmail delivery rules no longer work
because they relied on the Delivered-To field in the header to know
which subaddress had been delivered
I have what (I hope) is a reasonably simple question.
I am using virtual aliases in /etc/postfix/virtual in the following
format.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]user1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]user 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]webmaster
etc...
I also have a catchall address setup as follows
Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know there's a simple solution and it's right in front of me, I just
can't see it...
Any help with this is sincerely appreciated.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
... especially the section about 'postconf -n' output.
--
Sahil Tandon [EMAIL
Michael A. Patton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a recent server failure, I reinstalled the OS (NetBSD) which
came with a slightly newer version of Postfix than I had been
running. Now some of my procmail delivery rules no longer work
because they relied on the Delivered-To field in the
This is probably a faq, but still... I've been playing with virtual
delivery:
main.cf:
virtual_mailbox_domains = bar.com
virtual_mailbox_base = /home/massmail
virtual_mailbox_maps = regexp:/usr/local/etc/postfix/home.map
virtual_minimum_uid = 1002
virtual_uid_maps = static:1002
virtual_gid_maps
38 matches
Mail list logo
