Further investigation showed that the issue is in Python 2.7’s `email` module.
Although this is out of support, I’d expect some to be lying around and thought
it worth mentioning to this group. Specifically, `email.Message.__str__()`. It
seems ok in python3
> On 2 May 2024, at 12:53,
useful for some
time.
What would have helped - and I’ve no idea how feasible this is - would be some
tooling to pull out different versions of the message as they flow through the
queues.
Interesting how long latent bugs can lie around, isn’t it?
Tim
ent in a browser does have
an extra , but no .
I clearly need to do several more experiments to work out what is going on.
It’s non-trivial when you control so little of the whole chain.
Tim
> On 29 Apr 2024, at 17:48, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> Tim Coote via Postfix-
I mostly agree - I’ve been using Postfix for a long while now. But something is
folding headers in my domain and failing DKIM that don’t get folded by gmail
and which, if I manually unfold and remove the extra space do get signature
agreement.
Here’s an example:
List-Unsubscribe:
for)
- is there a pragmatic fix in Postfix configuration (e.g. to increase ths
maximum size of a header line?)
- is it legitimate to fold without according to rfc 5322
- if there’s an issue of incompatibility between folding/unfolding of headers,
how will this be addressed in the longer term
Tim
but this was just bad timing and caused unnecessary stress for
the Postfix maintainers and admins.
Thanks again, and best regards
Tim.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
reciate you taking the time to reply even though you're clearly
unhappy about the timing of the whole issue. Feel free to stop replying at any
time, I don't want to be an additional burden.
Thanks
Tim.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-use
ady been
contacted in August, and if you were, whether the impact was clear? (I assume
it wasn't, because otherwise we wouldn't be in this situation.)
Thanks in advance, and I wish you calm and relaxing holidays, despite all of
this.
Tim.
___
Post
>>
>> Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this a
>> known/expected/ever seen behaviour?
>
> SRS rewriting should not operate on ANY header addresses. It is designed,
> like SPF, to operate on the SMTP envelope sender.
>
> It is normal for automated messages such as
to me like the issue is that postsrsd is being handed
“Message-id” fields, rather than “From:”, or “Reply-To:”, and for these
specific emails, there is no “Message-id:”.
Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this a
known/expected/ever seen behaviour?
I’m using postfix-3.4.10-1.fc30.x86_64
tia
Tim
he next release" and thus consider this case closed.
Thank you.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
if (xsasl_dovecot_parse_reply(server, ) == 0) {
> + if (line == NULL) {
> + msg_warn("SASL: Protocol error");
> + continue;
> + }
> vstring_strcpy(reply, line);
> return XSASL_AUTH_MORE;
>
> Alternately, you can use a check_recipient_access table to reject
> the recipient, or you can just not create that user in the first
> place and let postfix reject it as an unknown recipient... seems
> like that was where we started this conversation.
>
Sorry for the confusion, perhaps I had
>
> If someone less computer-savvy takes the time to reply to your
> confirmation, why would you throw away his response?
Well, ok, if you really *must* know ;-)
This is for an internal application, forwarding notifications from
"something" to a group of people. Thus there is no need for
Sorry, one more question !
Is it possible to issue a 554 to the sending server using discard: ?
>>
>
> The relay_recipient_maps table is for listing valid recipients in
> relay_domains.
>
> Discard that recipient's mail with a transport map entry
> # transport
> nob...@example.com discard:
>
> You may also need to add that user to your virtual mailbox table so
> it will be accepted as a
nstead ? Bear in mind that as mentioned
above, this is a mail gateway, mails are not stored locally on these
machines but forwarded on to internal ones.
Thanks
Tim
Just for anyone who reads this thread in the future...
A **BIG** thank you to the awesome Benny !
A little bit of off-list help lead me to discovering two missing config lines :
#master.cf
-o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
# opendkim.conf
MTA
Hi,
I am trying to get OpenDKIM 2.11.0 running with Postfix 3.1.4.
When a SASL authenticated client sends an email via Postfix, the
following is logged :
Jan 25 15:15:59 bob opendkim[1016]: DDD1F400A1B2: [192.0.2.43]
[192.0.2.43] not internal
Jan 25 15:15:59 bob opendkim[1016]: DDD1F400A1B2:
Viktor,
I'm sorry I'm obviously not as perfect as you.
Obviously, given your level of godly perfection, you've never suffered
from "config file blindness" you know after starting a whole bunch of
them for a while suddenly the obvious gets hidden.
Thanks a bunch
Hi,
I need a second pair of eyes on this.
My postmulti instance as configured below is not listening and I can't
figure out why !
As you can see below, "postfix-authrelay" is active :
$ sudo postmulti -l
- - y /etc/postfix
postfix-authrelay mta y
then end up
calling on the 1st filter.
Hope that sheds some light.
Tim
On 15/01/16 09:17, Dennis Steinkamp wrote:
what anti spam tools can you recommend for my own (private) mailserver.
Is greylisting still something worth considering for general setups?
Its probably a huge debate but the information i gathered on this
matter is pretty controversial.
Isn`t the
* Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> [151125 02:21]:
> Tim Johnson:
> > Could it be as simple as configuring postfix to use /etc/resolv.conf
> > instead of /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf ?
> >
> > If so, what would be the configuration setting
* Viktor Dukhovni <postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> [151125 09:35]:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 07:15:31AM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
>
> > * Wietse Venema <wie...@porcupine.org> [151125 02:21]:
> > > Tim Johnson:
> > > > Could it be as simple a
etc/resolv.conf /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf
sudo service postfix restart
Which fixes the problem, but needs to be done after every reboot when
/var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf is empty
(I determined that ubuntu in graphic mode is using runlevel 2)
by
tim@linus:~$ runlevel
N 2
So I
an artifact of their
implementation.
Turns out to be imported from BoringSSL, but it doesn't seem significant.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=143258732106517w=2
-Tim
-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/0 bits). I'm wondering
what the 0 part in 256/0 bits mean. I've read it's the number of bits
actually used vs. the number of bits the algorithm is based on, but
this sounds confusing to me. Can someone maybe clarify?
Thanks,
Tim
[52.4.204.96]: 450 4.2.0
nag...@jokefire.com: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see
http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/jokefire.com.html; from=
bluethu...@monitor1.jokefire.com to=nag...@jokefire.com proto=ESMTP
helo=monitor1.jokefire.com
How can I fix this problem?
Thanks,
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg
* Tim Johnson t...@akwebsoft.com [150416 16:55]:
Using postfix on on Mac OS X 10.7, preparing to use postfix on
ubuntu 14.04.
I've used postfix for many years, but since I only configure once in
a couple years and am on a single-user desktop, plus occassional
netbook usage, I'm really just
* Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org [150417 10:02]:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:54:24AM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote:
Any and all critiques are invited and welcome.
Absent requirements of what this MTA is supposed to do, it is
impossible to comment. It seems it is an outbound-only
email addresses
from two different domains: tj49.com and akwebsoft.com. My wife
might have a different setup on a different computer with a return
address at johnsons-web.com.
Any and all critiques are invited and welcome.
thanks
--
Tim
tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com
http
.
Thanks!
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
.
Thank you,
Tim
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote:
Tim Dunphy skrev den 2015-04-05 18:27:
Apr 5 12:23:08 web1 postfix/smtpd[32140]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from
centos-7-x64[127.0.0.1]: 554 5.7.1 bluethu...@gmail.com: Relay
access denied; from=bluethu...@web1
.
Is there some kind of fix I can employ here for this particular server?
Would entries in the /etc/hosts file work? I assume that if I have
multi on, I can put an entry in for each A record?
On 22/04/14 17:09, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tim Smith:
Cheers for that.
The output I get is:
*./getaddrinfo
I'm looking through the docs of sendmail, seeing how I can get it to
send to a specific port. But not seeing it.
Am I looking in the wrong place?
-tim
On 3/19/14, Lewin Bormann der.mess...@yahoo.com wrote:
It seems that the local delivery (pickup?) uses the content filter which
it shouldn't
with this scenario?
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
-tim
On 3/19/14, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
as lonf you are talking about pickup there is no port
involved at all and no smtp/smtpd setting is relevant
because it's just not SMTP
Am 19.03.2014 20:49, schrieb Tim
to the queue, etc.
-tim
On 3/19/14, li...@rhsoft.net li...@rhsoft.net wrote:
Am 19.03.2014 20:59, schrieb Tim Prepscius:
so let's say I wanted to do what Lewin said,
have normal mail on 25, and then special non filtered mail (mail that
has already gone through the filter) on some other port, let's
Thanks for the suggestion. The client in question is not too tech savvy
so explaining the POP thing will probably not help. I have used that
method before on a previous mail server with a different client and it
worked perfectly.
At the moment, all the spam is being directed to me by way of a
$EX_UNAVAILABLE; }
cat in.$$ mailz-what-is-going-on
$SENDMAIL $@ in.$$
exit $?
---
End snippets..
-tim
that we are
just forwarding the message and that we are not the originator of the spam?
Cheers,
Tim
this is an amazon EC2 instance, but I have opened up port 25
on the security groups and made sure that ufw (the ubuntu firewall) was not
running on the instance.
I'd definitely appreciate your esteemed advice on this!
Thanks,
Tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys
Attached is the postconf -n
I've also been reading the link that Dr. Venema sent me. Could it be that the
mydestination is incorrect? Could it be:
mydestination = timothy.com, localhost.localdomain, localhost
myhostname = timothylegg.com
I haven't tried that yet, but I'm willing to try
just want my own incoming mail to be delivered. I
don't get why this has to be so hard.
Tim Legg
/mailiverse
the relevant existing code is probably:
https://github.com/timprepscius/mailiverse/blob/master/install/setup-postfix.remote
and
https://github.com/timprepscius/mailiverse/tree/master/deploy/postfix-user
-tim
On 10/20/13, Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com wrote:
On 10/20/2013 3:28
or weaknesses? I'm not sure of myself that I have done
all that I need to. If I am clear here, I'll mo
ve on towards Dovecot so I can get Squirrelmail working. I welcome your
thoughts and appreciate your effort. Tim Legg
I am so sorry, mail.com seems to have stripped out every one of my carriage
returns! Never seen that before. You'd think they'd have that figured out...
I switched to text from HTML formatting. I'll reformat the message below.
Tim Legg
- Original Message -
Hello friends,
I used
:39 PM, Tim Legg wrote: I have a username on this machine
that I log in with, but choose to not have that username be an e-mail address.
Hopefully this user is not called root. I recommend to disable root login. And
I also recommend to disable any other user how has an e-mail address. Actually
I
Ok I have two questions.
1. Does always_bcc modify the original message?
2. Could I somehow plug in to whatever is queueing the message to disk?
-tim
On 9/24/13, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 9/23/2013 11:08 PM, Tim Prepscius wrote:
I need to save the original, of all
Ah..
I think the
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
is what I need -- perhaps -- I'll find out.
Thank you for all the pointers so far,
-tim
On 9/24/13, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Tim Prepscius:
Ok I have two questions.
1. Does always_bcc modify the original message
problem..
1. I definitely want one file with the domains in it.
2. Should I be approaching this problem differently?
Thanks a lot in advance,
-tim
Thank you for this.
1 configuration down! ;-)
-tim
On 9/23/13, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:58:07PM -0400, Tim Prepscius wrote:
I'm having some problems with virtual domains. The goal of the
virtual domains is to enumerate the domains which
-jar
/home/postfix-user/PostfixMailReceiver.jar -args $recipient
/home/postfix-user/run.log
I can always go and change the java -- or perhaps wrap it in a bash script?
But just wondering if there was a best way.
-tim
Ok, I will do as you suggest.
I have one more question for today, I'll start another thread.
-tim
On 9/23/13, Viktor Dukhovni postfix-us...@dukhovni.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:37:27PM -0400, Tim Prepscius wrote:
I'd like to pipe the stdout to a log file.
Can I do this?
javapipe
doing a filter though. Any hints?
-tim
I *do* want the mail to be sent. I just want to record exactly what
it looks like before it gets sent out.
-tim
On 9/23/13, Tim Prepscius timprepsc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
Again, thank you very much for the previous configuration questions.
So, at the moment, when a mail is received
Umm, I'm looking for something more canonical.
I want to get exactly what will be sent over the network, right before
it is sent, or when it is queued.
-tim
On 9/23/13, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Tim Prepscius:
Hey,
Again, thank you very much for the previous configuration
-Id: 3ckn624d0mzj...@spike.porcupine.org
From: wie...@porcupine.org (Wietse Venema)
Sender: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
Is there a way?
-tim
On 9/23/13, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Tim Prepscius:
Umm, I'm looking for something more canonical.
I want to get exactly what
Does always_bcc modify the original message?
Reading
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_bcc
it suggests to me that it does. But perhaps I'm mistaken.
If it doesn't I could use it.
Are there any hooks along the message send path which I can get the
full mime message?
-tim
On 9/23
logging would most likely be a kludge.
On a side note, are you encrypting the queue files?
-tim
On 9/23/13, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
On 9/23/2013 9:18 PM, Tim Prepscius wrote:
No, I don't mean network dump.
I mean the full mime-message.
With all the headers that have been
to write them down.
2. I don't want to register the *real* domain name anywhere. (in any
file or account, etc)
Is this possible?
To reiterate:
Postfix would only do the protocol of receiving mail, mail would then
be sent to a handler program I have written.
Thank you very much for your time,
-tim
think. This has
to be standard config.
2. I do in fact want to only accept mail for people in my database,
but I was hoping to as well provide an external program to return
0/1 for accept/deny for a recipient.
If you have suggestions on #2, I'll take them!!! ;-)
-tim
On 9/15/13, Wietse Venema
= pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual_domains.pcre
...
this postfix is great lol. the man pages are really intimidating
though. lol.
I really appreciate the advice,
-tim
On 9/15/13, Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org wrote:
Tim Prepscius:
oh wow, this worked, first time too. jeeze.. that's awesome
I would like to send emails, with a subject that matches a regular
expression (or wildcard), at the end of the day (e.g. 11pm) instead of
immediately.
Is this possible and how do I do it?
I'm guessing that queue would survive the postfix service being
restarted or offline for a while?
Tim.
Had a quick look around on Google for this but no definitive answer. I
am looking to incorporate some Out Of Office functionality with my
dovecot/postfix set up. I need this to work with a variety of email
clients if those clients support that functionality. Ideally, it would
work out of teh
are invariably MS
compatible) across to my servers so need to offer this in a seamless
fashion. Is this do-able?
Thanks,
Tim
On 29/12/12 13:55, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tim Smith:
I notice that postfix comes with a program called vacation. Is this
something that can be configured by the client
This is very similar to a thread I posted on Ubuntu Forums a week ago that
hasn't been resolved:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2001283
This is my configuration as of today, but this particular e-mail system is
not enabled by my router yet; no port traffic is directed to this machine
. Is there an
optimal way to set up logging so that messages are duplicated?
Hopefully I'm making sense!
Cheers,
--
Tim Smith
Tel: 01423 564 078
Mob: 07984 398 299
Email: t...@titan21.co.uk
Web: www.titan21.co.uk
Hi Wietse,
You're quite correct. My logs are rotated and destroyed on a regular
basis so the suggestion of collating all logging in one file and
using .err and .warn to flag specific errors seems sensible.
Thanks for the help.
Tim
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 08:44 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Tim
/dunphy] root% uname -a
SunOS sysmail01 5.10 Generic_141415-07 i86pc i386 i86pc
Thank you
tim
--
GPG me!!
gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
was
able to get this postfix configuration working.
Best regards!
tim
- Original Message -
From: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
To: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@jokefire.com, postfix users
postfix-users@postfix.org
Cc: bluethundr bluethu...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 7:22:07 AM
Hello,
I have setup a new postfix sertver and when I send mail to the domain
(crispycode.com) the mail will bounce. If I send to the mail host name
(mail.crispycode.com) the mail is shown as delivered in the logs. However if
you inspect the cur directory on the command line in the user's
.
virtual_overquota_bounce = yes
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
Thanks again!
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:33:17 PM
Subject: Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted
Am 27.11.2011 22:23, schrieb
postfix]# ls -l /home/vmail/crispycode.com/
total 4
drwxr-xr-x 10 vmail vmail 4096 Nov 27 14:22 bluethundr
[root@mail postfix]# ls -l /home/vmail/crispycode.com/bluethundr/cur/
total 0
Thanks
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: postfix-users@postfix.org
to be delivered. If this table is the problem I would love to understand
why...
Thanks again!
tim
- Original Message -
From: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
To: bluethundr bluethu...@gmail.com, postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 12:04:44 AM
Subject: Re: mail to domain
thank you again Wietse. It's an honor to hear from the creator of postfix. This
problem is now solved and I have learned a lesson about how to deal with this
situation.
best!
tim
- Original Message -
From: Tim Dunphy bluethu...@jokefire.com
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
of correcting a
configuration error in postfix, but rather it seems that port 25 outbound is
blocked on this network.
Thanks,
TIm
- Original Message -
From: Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org
To: Postfix users postfix-users@postfix.org
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 8:33:29 AM
Subject: Re
would need to be altered between the two environments.
Thanks in advance!
Tim
.
Thanks!
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Beverley [mailto:a...@andybev.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 6:07 PM
To: Tim Tyler
Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject: Re: Some email from list not getting sent?
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 13:24 -0500, Tim Tyler wrote:
I have
much too
quickly?
5. Could The recipient smtp serve(smtp.gmail.com) be causing this
problem by any chance?
Any thoughts are much appreciated.
Tim Tyler
Network Engineer
Beloit College
hoster.
The following are available to review
main.cf as
http://www.akwebsoft.com/transfers/main.cf.txt
postconf output as
http://www.akwebsoft.com/transfers/postconf.txt
copy of /var/mail/tim as
http://www.akwebsoft.com/transfers/tim.mailbox.txt
NOTE: Same issue whether I use sendmail from
* Tim Johnson t...@akwebsoft.com [111014 11:06]:
FYI: Experienced with linux (ubuntu). New to Mac Lion.
Configuring Lion to send mail via postfix.
Messages are being sent to my machine rather than to my domain
hoster's mail server.
I.E. If I send a message to myself, it goes directly
* Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org [111014 11:06]:
On 10/14/2011 1:51 PM, Tim Johnson wrote:
Messages are being sent to my machine rather than to my domain
hoster's mail server.
I.E. If I send a message to myself, it goes directly to
/var/mail/user, rather than to the mailbox at my
* Wietse Venema wie...@porcupine.org [111011 03:08]:
Tim Johnson:
I see the following in `man' :
setgid_group (postdrop)
The group ownership of set-gid Postfix commands and
of group-writable Postfix directories
but am unclear on which to use.
1) Create
and
of group-writable Postfix directories
but am unclear on which to use.
NOTE: This is for a single-use workstation, not a server.
Thanks
--
Tim
tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com
http://www.akwebsoft.com
/linux-headers: 2.6.39 (virtual/os-headers)
sys-libs/glibc: 2.12.2
CBUILD=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
CFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe
CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
CXXFLAGS=-march=native -O2 -pipe
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
MAKEOPTS=-j3
Best regards,
Tim
Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 16:08:35 schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List:
According to the sources (2.8.4 as a reference),
mailbox_size_limit is a signed 32-bit integer. (On x86(_64) arch)
code
global/mail_params.h
580:extern int var_mailbox_limit;
/code
This limits the integer to
Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Tim t...@woodlouse.co.uk wrote:
What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
simultaneously and starts sending the message to them
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:18:25PM +, Tim wrote:
So the idea of this is to restrict SMTP conversations to 1Mbps? Won't that
actually make the problem far worse?
That depends on whether the problem description is correct. If 100
parallel deliveries of a given
Sorry if this is a silly question, but I'm something of a Postfix (and
mail servers in general) newbie.
My Postfix server is all working fine, and is happily acting as a
relay for my local network.
However, I'm having problems when a user tries to send a single, large
message to a large
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote:
What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
simultaneously and starts sending the message to them. This completely
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:21:44PM +, Tim wrote:
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote:
What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues
it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers
Hello,
I recently had to rebuild my mail server. Unfortunately I am running
into a little problem.
I seem to be able to DELIVER mail to my mail user account
But when I try to _send_ mail I run into this error:
[r...@cloud3:~ ]
that someone can help.
Tim
On 4 Aug 2009, at 01:41, Sahil Tandon wrote:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009, Tim Coote wrote:
You've been using Postfix long enough to include 'postconf -n' and
the other
information as outlined in DEBUG_README. :-)
Fair point. I'd hoped it was easier than that. See below
be configured to back off from relaying messages, for example
for 1 or 2 seconds when it receives deferrals from the receiving smtp server
side?
Thanks!
Tim Tyler
Network Engineer
Beloit College
know if this something that I should have corrected or
if is it standard as it is?
Below is a the untrimmed output of the dig output.
Thanks, Tim Legg
# dig timothylegg.com MX
; DiG 9.5.1-P1 timothylegg.com MX
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; -HEADER- opcode: QUERY, status
relayhost =
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [:::127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128
mailbox_command = procmail -a $EXTENSION
mailbox_size_limit = 0
recipient_delimiter = +
inet_interfaces = all
#added by Tim Legg on May 10, 2009
#http://www.debianadmin.com/debian-mail-server-setup-with-postfix-dovecot-sasl-squirrel
Okay, here is the 'postconf -n' Of course, once again, I am using example1.com
and example2.org to protect my innocent friends from my ignorance ;)
My test e-mails still don't work in this configuration.
It is true, I did make a typo when I cited /etc/virtual as a path. Good eyes
for
16 17:54:40 genex postfix/smtpd[1665]: disconnect from
web38701.mail.mud.yahoo.com[209.191.125.77]
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org wrote:
From: Noel Jones njo...@megan.vbhcs.org
Subject: Re: Limitations of setting mydestination with virtual domains
To: Tim Legg kc0
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Barney Desmond barneydesm...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Limitations of setting mydestination with virtual domains
To: postfix users list postfix-users@postfix.org
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 7:32 PM
2009/6/17 Tim Legg
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
