[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

Further investigation showed that the issue is in Python 2.7’s `email` module. Although this is out of support, I’d expect some to be lying around and thought it worth mentioning to this group. Specifically, `email.Message.__str__()`. It seems ok in python3 > On 2 May 2024, at 12:53,

[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

useful for some time. What would have helped - and I’ve no idea how feasible this is - would be some tooling to pull out different versions of the message as they flow through the queues. Interesting how long latent bugs can lie around, isn’t it? Tim

[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

ent in a browser does have an extra , but no . I clearly need to do several more experiments to work out what is going on. It’s non-trivial when you control so little of the whole chain. Tim > On 29 Apr 2024, at 17:48, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users > wrote: > > Tim Coote via Pos

[pfx] Re: long header folding and DKIM fails

I mostly agree - I’ve been using Postfix for a long while now. But something is folding headers in my domain and failing DKIM that don’t get folded by gmail and which, if I manually unfold and remove the extra space do get signature agreement. Here’s an example: List-Unsubscribe:

[pfx] long header folding and DKIM fails

for) - is there a pragmatic fix in Postfix configuration (e.g. to increase ths maximum size of a header line?) - is it legitimate to fold without according to rfc 5322 - if there’s an issue of incompatibility between folding/unfolding of headers, how will this be addressed in the longer

[pfx] Re: SMTP Smuggling disclosure process & VINCE

ault configuration, but this was just bad timing and caused unnecessary stress for the Postfix maintainers and admins. Thanks again, and best regards Tim. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: SMTP Smuggling disclosure process & VINCE

g to you misjudging the impact? I really appreciate you taking the time to reply even though you're clearly unhappy about the timing of the whole issue. Feel free to stop replying at any time, I don't want to be an additional burden. Thanks Tim. __

[pfx] SMTP Smuggling disclosure process & VINCE

not you've already been contacted in August, and if you were, whether the impact was clear? (I assume it wasn't, because otherwise we wouldn't be in this situation.) Thanks in advance, and I wish you calm and relaxing holidays, despite all of this. Tim. _

Re: srs rewrite

>> >> Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this a >> known/expected/ever seen behaviour? > > SRS rewriting should not operate on ANY header addresses. It is designed, > like SPF, to operate on the SMTP envelope sender. > > It is normal for automated messages such as

srs rewrite

ike the issue is that postsrsd is being handed “Message-id” fields, rather than “From:”, or “Reply-To:”, and for these specific emails, there is no “Message-id:”. Before I pollute the mailing list with all the gory details. Is this a known/expected/ever seen behaviour? I’m using postfix-3.4.10-1.fc30.x86_64 tia Tim

Re: Segmentation fault in xsasl_dovecot_server.c

s included in the next release" and thus consider this case closed. Thank you. Best regards Tim Düsterhus

Segmentation fault in xsasl_dovecot_server.c

t; if (xsasl_dovecot_parse_reply(server, &line) == 0) { > + if (line == NULL) { > + msg_warn("SASL: Protocol error"); > + continue; > + } > vstring_strcpy(reply, line); > return XSA

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

> Alternately, you can use a check_recipient_access table to reject > the recipient, or you can just not create that user in the first > place and let postfix reject it as an unknown recipient... seems > like that was where we started this conversation. > Sorry for the confusion, perhaps I had bet

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

> > If someone less computer-savvy takes the time to reply to your > confirmation, why would you throw away his response? Well, ok, if you really *must* know ;-) This is for an internal application, forwarding notifications from "something" to a group of people. Thus there is no need for a

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

Sorry, one more question ! Is it possible to issue a 554 to the sending server using discard: ?

Re: Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

>> > > The relay_recipient_maps table is for listing valid recipients in > relay_domains. > > Discard that recipient's mail with a transport map entry > # transport > nob...@example.com discard: > > You may also need to add that user to your virtual mailbox table so > it will be accepted as a val

Difficulty creating a "nobody@" address

as mentioned above, this is a mail gateway, mails are not stored locally on these machines but forwarded on to internal ones. Thanks Tim

Re: OpenDKIM, Milters and Postfix .... config pointer needed

Just for anyone who reads this thread in the future... A **BIG** thank you to the awesome Benny ! A little bit of off-list help lead me to discovering two missing config lines : #master.cf -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING # opendkim.conf MTA ORIGINATING

OpenDKIM, Milters and Postfix .... config pointer needed

Hi, I am trying to get OpenDKIM 2.11.0 running with Postfix 3.1.4. When a SASL authenticated client sends an email via Postfix, the following is logged : Jan 25 15:15:59 bob opendkim[1016]: DDD1F400A1B2: [192.0.2.43] [192.0.2.43] not internal Jan 25 15:15:59 bob opendkim[1016]: DDD1F400A1B2: not

Re: Postfix instance not listening

Viktor, I'm sorry I'm obviously not as perfect as you. Obviously, given your level of godly perfection, you've never suffered from "config file blindness" you know after starting a whole bunch of them for a while suddenly the obvious gets hidden. Thanks a bunch

Postfix instance not listening

Hi, I need a second pair of eyes on this. My postmulti instance as configured below is not listening and I can't figure out why ! As you can see below, "postfix-authrelay" is active : $ sudo postmulti -l - - y /etc/postfix postfix-authrelay mta y

Re: Security: How to limit authentication attempts?

time then end up calling on the 1st filter. Hope that sheds some light. Tim

Re: HowTo AntiSpam for "Beginners"

On 15/01/16 09:17, Dennis Steinkamp wrote: what anti spam tools can you recommend for my own (private) mailserver. Is greylisting still something worth considering for general setups? Its probably a huge debate but the information i gathered on this matter is pretty controversial. Isn`t the an

Re: /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.con empty on random reboots

* Viktor Dukhovni [151125 09:35]: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 07:15:31AM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote: > > > * Wietse Venema [151125 02:21]: > > > Tim Johnson: > > > > Could it be as simple as configuring postfix to use /etc/resolv.conf > > > >

Re: /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.con empty on random reboots

* Wietse Venema [151125 02:21]: > Tim Johnson: > > Could it be as simple as configuring postfix to use /etc/resolv.conf > > instead of /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf ? > > > > If so, what would be the configuration setting? > > Disable chroot as per http://

/var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.con empty on random reboots

cp /etc/resolv.conf /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf sudo service postfix restart Which fixes the problem, but needs to be done after every reboot when /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf is empty (I determined that ubuntu in graphic mode is using runlevel 2) by tim@linus:~$ runlevel N 2

Re: chacha20 cipher_algbits is 0

#x27;s an artifact of their implementation. Turns out to be imported from BoringSSL, but it doesn't seem significant. http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=143258732106517&w=2 -Tim

chacha20 cipher_algbits is 0

.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/0 bits)". I'm wondering what the 0 part in 256/0 bits mean. I've read it's "the number of bits actually used" vs. "the number of bits the algorithm is based on", but this sounds confusing to me. Can someone maybe clarify? Thanks, Tim

mail rejected from amazon ec2 host

s.com[52.4.204.96]: 450 4.2.0 < nag...@jokefire.com>: Recipient address rejected: Greylisted, see http://postgrey.schweikert.ch/help/jokefire.com.html; from=< bluethu...@monitor1.jokefire.com> to= proto=ESMTP helo= How can I fix this problem? Thanks, Tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.s

Re: Configuration and header checkup

* Viktor Dukhovni [150417 10:02]: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:54:24AM -0800, Tim Johnson wrote: > > > > Any and all critiques are invited and welcome. > > Absent requirements of what this MTA is supposed to do, it is > impossible to comment. It seems it is an outbound-

Re: Configuration and header checkup

* Tim Johnson [150416 16:55]: > Using postfix on on Mac OS X 10.7, preparing to use postfix on > ubuntu 14.04. > > I've used postfix for many years, but since I only configure once in > a couple years and am on a single-user desktop, plus occassional > netbook usage, I

Configuration and header checkup

ail with return email addresses from two different domains: tj49.com and akwebsoft.com. My wife might have a different setup on a different computer with a return address at johnsons-web.com. Any and all critiques are invited and welcome. thanks -- Tim tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebso

Re: relay access denied

'll give that a try. Thank you, Tim On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > Tim Dunphy skrev den 2015-04-05 18:27: > > Apr 5 12:23:08 web1 postfix/smtpd[32140]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from >> centos-7-x64[127.0.0.1]: 554 5.7.1 : Relay >> ac

relay access denied

1 anvil scacheunix - - n - 1 scache Does anyone have any thoughts on how I can correct this problem? The mail server needs to send more than it does to receive. Thanks! Tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

Proper location for content_filter?

question is; What did I miss? Shouldn't the blank content_filter line int eh master.cf have over-ridden the setting in the main.cf? Regards, Tim

Re: Reverse DNS Lookup

name. Is there some kind of fix I can employ here for this particular server? Would entries in the /etc/hosts file work? I assume that if I have "multi on", I can put an entry in for each A record? On 22/04/14 17:09, Wietse Venema wrote: Tim Smith: Cheers for that. The output I get

Re: Reverse DNS Lookup

this gives me the right info - why does Postfix say it can't reslove? On 22/04/14 15:45, Wietse Venema wrote: Tim Smith: Hi Wietse, Actually this is one of the first things I checked and it's already in there. My distro is Ubuntu 12.04.4. FYI, Postfix does not do these lookups. These l

Re: Reverse DNS Lookup

Hi Wietse, Actually this is one of the first things I checked and it's already in there. My distro is Ubuntu 12.04.4. On 22/04/14 15:19, Wietse Venema wrote: Tim Smith: Hello all, A client of mine informed me that they did not receive some mail from someone in particular. When I exa

Re: Reverse DNS Lookup

Thought it was probably that. Is Postfix just looking at the first one it comes across and then determines that it's failed assuming we haven't been lucky and hit the right IP? On 22/04/14 14:57, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: Am 22.04.2014 15:53, schrieb Tim Smith: A client of mine i

Reverse DNS Lookup

? Thanks in advance, Tim

Re: postfix after queue content filter

queue, etc. -tim On 3/19/14, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > Am 19.03.2014 20:59, schrieb Tim Prepscius: >> so let's say I wanted to do what Lewin said, >> >> have normal mail on 25, and then special non filtered mail (mail that >> has already gone through the filte

Re: postfix after queue content filter

work with this scenario? http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html -tim On 3/19/14, li...@rhsoft.net wrote: > as lonf you are talking about pickup there is no port > involved at all and no smtp/smtpd setting is relevant > because it's just not SMTP > > Am 19.03.2014 20:49,

Re: postfix after queue content filter

I'm looking through the docs of sendmail, seeing how I can get it to send to a specific port. But not seeing it. Am I looking in the wrong place? -tim On 3/19/14, Lewin Bormann wrote: > It seems that the local delivery (pickup?) uses the content filter which > it shouldn't,

postfix after queue content filter

Greetings, I'm having troubles setting up the postfix after queue content filter. http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html In a nutshell, the filter works correctly, however the sendmail command re-inserts the mail into the queue, and it hits the content filter again. (which in turn re-inserts i

Re: Mail Server Accused of Spam!

Thanks for the suggestion. The client in question is not too tech savvy so explaining the POP thing will probably not help. I have used that method before on a previous mail server with a different client and it worked perfectly. At the moment, all the spam is being directed to me by way of a

relay denied in postfix

was not running on the instance. I'd definitely appreciate your esteemed advice on this! Thanks, Tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

Mail Server Accused of Spam!

tands that we are just forwarding the message and that we are not the originator of the spam? Cheers, Tim

Re: Relay Access Denied

Attached is the postconf -n I've also been reading the link that Dr. Venema sent me. Could it be that the mydestination is incorrect? Could it be: mydestination = timothy.com, localhost.localdomain, localhost myhostname = timothylegg.com I haven't tried that yet, but I'm willing to try anyt

Relay Access Denied

don't get why this has to be so hard. Tim Legg

Re: Save mails into custom DB

om/timprepscius/mailiverse the relevant existing code is probably: https://github.com/timprepscius/mailiverse/blob/master/install/setup-postfix.remote and https://github.com/timprepscius/mailiverse/tree/master/deploy/postfix-user -tim On 10/20/13, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > On 10/20/2013 3:

Re: Does my configuration reflect the current best practices?

13 10:39 PM, Tim Legg wrote: > I have a username on this machine that I log in with, but choose to not have that username be an e-mail address. Hopefully this user is not called root. I recommend to disable root login. And I also recommend to disable any other user how has an e-mail address. Act

Re: Does my configuration reflect the current best practices?

I am so sorry, mail.com seems to have stripped out every one of my carriage returns!  Never seen that before.  You'd think they'd have that figured out... I switched to text from HTML formatting.  I'll reformat the message below. Tim Legg - Original Message - Hello f

Does my configuration reflect the current best practices?

n, does anybody see any exploits or weaknesses? I'm not sure of myself that I have done all that I need to. If I am clear here, I'll mo ve on towards Dovecot so I can get Squirrelmail working. I welcome your thoughts and appreciate your effort. Tim Legg

Re: on send call command

Ah.. I think the http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html is what I need -- perhaps -- I'll find out. Thank you for all the pointers so far, -tim On 9/24/13, Wietse Venema wrote: > Tim Prepscius: >> Ok I have two questions. >> >> >> 1. Does always

Re: on send call command

Ok I have two questions. 1. Does always_bcc modify the original message? 2. Could I somehow plug in to whatever is queueing the message to disk? -tim On 9/24/13, Noel Jones wrote: > On 9/23/2013 11:08 PM, Tim Prepscius wrote: >> I need to save the original, of all messages le

Re: on send call command

logging would most likely be a kludge. On a side note, are you encrypting the queue files? -tim On 9/23/13, Noel Jones wrote: > On 9/23/2013 9:18 PM, Tim Prepscius wrote: >> No, I don't mean network dump. >> >> I mean the full mime-message. >> With all the

Re: on send call command

Does always_bcc modify the original message? Reading http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#always_bcc it suggests to me that it does. But perhaps I'm mistaken. If it doesn't I could use it. Are there any hooks along the message send path which I can get the full mime message? -tim

Re: on send call command

der: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org Is there a way? -tim On 9/23/13, Wietse Venema wrote: > Tim Prepscius: >> Umm, I'm looking for something more canonical. >> >> I want to get exactly what will be sent over the network, right before >> it is sent, or when it is

Re: on send call command

Umm, I'm looking for something more canonical. I want to get exactly what will be sent over the network, right before it is sent, or when it is queued. -tim On 9/23/13, Wietse Venema wrote: > Tim Prepscius: >> Hey, >> >> Again, thank you very much for the previo

Re: on send call command

I *do* want the mail to be sent. I just want to record exactly what it looks like before it gets sent out. -tim On 9/23/13, Tim Prepscius wrote: > Hey, > > Again, thank you very much for the previous configuration questions. > > > So, at the moment, when a mail is received i

on send call command

think I'm doing a filter though. Any hints? -tim

Re: piping command stdout to disk

Ok, I will do as you suggest. I have one more question for today, I'll start another thread. -tim On 9/23/13, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 05:37:27PM -0400, Tim Prepscius wrote: > >> I'd like to pipe the stdout to a log file. >> Can I d

piping command stdout to disk

argv=java -jar /home/postfix-user/PostfixMailReceiver.jar -args $recipient >> /home/postfix-user/run.log I can always go and change the java -- or perhaps wrap it in a bash script? But just wondering if there was a best way. -tim

Re: configuration of virtual_domains

Thank you for this. 1 configuration down! ;-) -tim On 9/23/13, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 04:58:07PM -0400, Tim Prepscius wrote: > >> I'm having some problems with virtual domains. The goal of the >> virtual domains is to enumerate the do

configuration of virtual_domains

ys there is some sort of table problem.. 1. I definitely want one file with the domains in it. 2. Should I be approaching this problem differently? Thanks a lot in advance, -tim

Re: postfix configuration to a generic handler

ox_domains = pcre:/etc/postfix/virtual_domains.pcre ... this postfix is great lol. the man pages are really intimidating though. lol. I really appreciate the advice, -tim On 9/15/13, Wietse Venema wrote: > Tim Prepscius: >> oh wow, this worked, first time too. jeeze.. that's

Re: postfix configuration to a generic handler

out I think. This has to be standard config. 2. I do in fact want to only accept mail for people in my database, but I was hoping to as well provide an "external program" to return 0/1 for accept/deny for a recipient. If you have suggestions on #2, I'll take them!!! ;-) -tim

postfix configuration to a generic handler

I don't want to write them down. 2. I don't want to register the *real* domain name anywhere. (in any file or account, etc) Is this possible? To reiterate: Postfix would only do the protocol of receiving mail, mail would then be sent to a handler program I have written. Thank you very much for your time, -tim

Send Some Emails at The End of The Delay

I would like to send emails, with a subject that matches a regular expression (or wildcard), at the end of the day (e.g. 11pm) instead of immediately. Is this possible and how do I do it? I'm guessing that queue would survive the postfix service being restarted or offline for a while? Tim.

Re: Out Of Office Responders

ices (which are invariably MS compatible) across to my servers so need to offer this in a seamless fashion. Is this do-able? Thanks, Tim On 29/12/12 13:55, Wietse Venema wrote: Tim Smith: I notice that postfix comes with a program called "vacation". Is this something that can

Out Of Office Responders

Had a quick look around on Google for this but no definitive answer. I am looking to incorporate some "Out Of Office" functionality with my dovecot/postfix set up. I need this to work with a variety of email clients if those clients support that functionality. Ideally, it would work "out of teh

postfix_2.9.1-4_amd64, Ubunto 12.04, maildir setup

This is very similar to a thread I posted on Ubuntu Forums a week ago that hasn't been resolved: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2001283 This is my configuration as of today, but this particular e-mail system is not enabled by my router yet; no port traffic is directed to this machine so

Re: Logging Help

Hi Wietse, You're quite correct. My logs are rotated and destroyed on a regular basis so the suggestion of collating all logging in one file and using .err and .warn to flag specific errors seems sensible. Thanks for the help. Tim On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 08:44 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:

Logging Help

optimal way to set up logging so that messages are duplicated? Hopefully I'm making sense! Cheers, -- Tim Smith Tel: 01423 564 078 Mob: 07984 398 299 Email: t...@titan21.co.uk Web: www.titan21.co.uk

virtual user rejected

_141415-07 i86pc i386 i86pc Thank you tim -- GPG me!! gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B

Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted

ransport table, I was able to get this postfix configuration working. Best regards! tim - Original Message - From: "Noel Jones" To: "Tim Dunphy" , "postfix users" Cc: "bluethundr" Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 7:22:07 AM Subject: Re: mail to

Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted

he problem I would love to understand why... Thanks again! tim - Original Message - From: "Noel Jones" To: "bluethundr" , postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Monday, November 28, 2011 12:04:44 AM Subject: Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted Gmail suppresses d

Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted

6 Nov 27 14:22 bluethundr [root@mail postfix]# ls -l /home/vmail/crispycode.com/bluethundr/cur/ total 0 Thanks Tim - Original Message - From: "Reindl Harald" To: postfix-users@postfix.org Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 5:13:27 PM Subject: Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostn

Re: mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted

-virtual_mailboxes.cf virtual_maildir_extended = yes virtual_maildir_limit_message = "The user you are trying to reach is over quota." virtual_overquota_bounce = yes virtual_uid_maps = static:5000 Thanks again! Tim - Original Message - From: "Reindl Harald" To: postfix-users@

mail to domain bounced, to hostname accepted

Hello, I have setup a new postfix sertver and when I send mail to the domain (crispycode.com) the mail will bounce. If I send to the mail host name (mail.crispycode.com) the mail is shown as delivered in the logs. However if you inspect the cur directory on the command line in the user's virtua

Re: mail defered on local network

thank you again Wietse. It's an honor to hear from the creator of postfix. This problem is now solved and I have learned a lesson about how to deal with this situation. best! tim - Original Message - From: "Tim Dunphy" To: "Postfix users" Sent: Friday, Nove

Re: mail defered on local network

s is not a matter of correcting a configuration error in postfix, but rather it seems that port 25 outbound is blocked on this network. Thanks, TIm - Original Message - From: "Wietse Venema" To: "Postfix users" Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 8:33:29 AM Subject: Re: m

mail defered on local network

that needs to be customized for this network. However I would greatly appreciate a suggestion as to which setting would need to be altered between the two environments. Thanks in advance! Tim

RE: Some email from list not getting sent?

. Thanks! Tim -Original Message- From: Andrew Beverley [mailto:a...@andybev.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 6:07 PM To: Tim Tyler Cc: postfix-users@postfix.org Subject: Re: Some email from list not getting sent? On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 13:24 -0500, Tim Tyler wrote: >I hav

Some email from list not getting sent?

much too quickly? 5. Could The recipient smtp serve(smtp.gmail.com) be causing this problem by any chance? Any thoughts are much appreciated. Tim Tyler Network Engineer Beloit College

Re: Mail is delivered locally rather than remotely

* Noel Jones [111014 11:06]: > On 10/14/2011 1:51 PM, Tim Johnson wrote: > > Messages are being sent to my machine rather than to my domain > > hoster's mail server. > > I.E. If I send a message to myself, it goes directly to > > /var/mail/, rather than to

Re: Mail is delivered locally rather than remotely

* Tim Johnson [111014 11:06]: > FYI: Experienced with linux (ubuntu). New to Mac Lion. > Configuring Lion to send mail via postfix. > > Messages are being sent to my machine rather than to my domain > hoster's mail server. > I.E. If I send a message to myself, it goes

Mail is delivered locally rather than remotely

oster. The following are available to review main.cf as http://www.akwebsoft.com/transfers/main.cf.txt postconf output as http://www.akwebsoft.com/transfers/postconf.txt copy of /var/mail/tim as http://www.akwebsoft.com/transfers/tim.mailbox.txt NOTE: Same issue whether I use sendmail from the co

Re: setgid_group value?

* Wietse Venema [111011 03:08]: > Tim Johnson: > > I see the following in `man' : > > setgid_group (postdrop) > > The group ownership of set-gid Postfix commands and > > of group-writable Postfix directories > > but am unclear o

setgid_group value?

s and of group-writable Postfix directories but am unclear on which to use. NOTE: This is for a single-use workstation, not a server. Thanks -- Tim tim at tee jay forty nine dot com or akwebsoft dot com http://www.akwebsoft.com

Re: Postfix mailbox_size_limit var overflow?

Am Dienstag, 30. August 2011, 16:08:35 schrieb Brian Evans - Postfix List: > According to the sources (2.8.4 as a reference), > mailbox_size_limit is a signed 32-bit integer. (On x86(_64) arch) > > global/mail_params.h > 580:extern int var_mailbox_limit; > > > This limits the integer to 2,147,48

Postfix mailbox_size_limit var overflow?

sys-kernel/linux-headers: 2.6.39 (virtual/os-headers) sys-libs/glibc: 2.12.2 CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" MAKEOPTS="-j3" Best regards, Tim

Re: Limiting outgoing SMTP connections when relaying message

Victor Duchovni wrote: On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:18:25PM +, Tim wrote: So the idea of this is to restrict SMTP conversations to 1Mbps? Won't that actually make the problem far worse? That depends on whether the problem description is correct. If 100 parallel deliveries of a

Re: Limiting outgoing SMTP connections when relaying message

Reinaldo de Carvalho wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Tim wrote: What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers simultaneously and starts sending the message to them. This completely saturates

Re: Limiting outgoing SMTP connections when relaying message

Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:21:44PM +, Tim wrote: Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote: What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers

Re: Limiting outgoing SMTP connections when relaying message

Victor Duchovni wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:40:26PM +, Tim wrote: What happens is that Postfix receives the message from the sender, queues it, then immediately connects to *all* of the destination servers simultaneously and starts sending the message to them. This completely

Limiting outgoing SMTP connections when relaying message

Sorry if this is a silly question, but I'm something of a Postfix (and mail servers in general) newbie. My Postfix server is all working fine, and is happily acting as a relay for my local network. However, I'm having problems when a user tries to send a single, large message to a large numb

554 5.7.1 Relay access denied

Hello, I recently had to rebuild my mail server. Unfortunately I am running into a little problem. I seem to be able to DELIVER mail to my mail user account But when I try to _send_ mail I run into this error: [r...@cloud3:~ ]

Re: lost my Delivered-To: header

that someone can help. Tim On 4 Aug 2009, at 01:41, Sahil Tandon wrote: On Mon, 03 Aug 2009, Tim Coote wrote: You've been using Postfix long enough to include 'postconf -n' and the other information as outlined in DEBUG_README. :-) Fair point. I'd hoped it was easier than

lost my Delivered-To: header

bayes unix - n n - - pipe flags=O user=tim argv=/usr/local/bin/sbwrapper.sh ${sender} $ {recipient} I've added the following to main.cf as recommended: spambayes_destination_recipient_limit = 1 Although it doesn't seem to make much difference. The flags=O

  1   2   >