Heh,
I will admit that I submitted an advanced topic at my first PuppetCamp and
the result was that I lost 95% of the audience, 2 people actively went to
sleep, and 6 folks in the back were absolutely thrilled that I had
presented the content.
So...yeah, I'm not sure what the right answer is.
1)
; From: "Thomas Gelf" < <mailto:tho...@gelf.net>tho...@gelf.net
>>>> > <mailto:tho...@gelf.net>>
>>>> > To: "puppet-dev" >>> > <mailto:puppet-dev@googlegroups.com>>
>>>> > Sent: Monday, 11 April, 201
On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Dean Wilson wrote:
>
> On 11 April 2016 at 12:08, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>> Eric asked so here it is, this is my feedback with a open source user hat
>> on. Echoing much what was said. I hope others send in their story.
>
> Since you asked so politely.
>
> I have
On 13 April 2016 at 14:49, 'Tim Meusel' via Puppet Developers
wrote:
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 02:15:57 UTC+2 schrieb Rob Nelson:
>>
>>
>>> I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have
>>> advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open.
>>> http://20
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:49 AM, 'Tim Meusel' via Puppet Developers <
puppet-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> That would be really cool. Most other conferences here handle it like
> this: 45 or 60min talk -> 15min Q&A -> 15min break to change room (if there
> are several parallel tracks). The spea
Am Mittwoch, 13. April 2016 02:15:57 UTC+2 schrieb Rob Nelson:
>
>
> I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have
>> advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open.
>> http://2016.puppetconf.com/cfp-registration/
>>
>
> Speaking to the advanced realm, is
> There was one comment in this thread from puppet(labs) which hinted at
> that there isn't a lot of contribution to the open source puppet from
> the community and that puppet(labs) has to do all the work. Well maybe,
Actually I said that and I don't work at Puppet (Labs). It's also still
true.
I've been staying out of this thread for various reasons, but Rob's
statement on "Puppet for CM and Ansible to Orchestrate it" resonates well
with me.
One of the big benefits that I see with the Puppet DSL is the
understandability of the language.
I can show the DSL statements to most people and,
Hmm, fair enough.
I think for the Advanced materials, you would want to have an up-front
review and possibly have it run by a local representative (PUG owners?).
That way, you can focus on the usual event and let the splinter run
semi-independently.
I've just been looking at some of the recent th
On 12 April 2016 at 20:04, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "dean"
>> To: "puppet-dev"
>> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April, 2016 20:56:09
>> Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]
&
quot; mailto:tho...@gelf.net>>
> To: "puppet-dev" <mailto:puppet-dev@googlegroups.com>>
> Sent: Monday, 11 April, 2016 03:30:58
> Subject: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]
> Am 11.04.2016 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Nelson:
>>
> I'd also be remiss not to point out we've got way more scope to have
> advanced talks at PuppetConf in the US and the CFP is open.
> http://2016.puppetconf.com/cfp-registration/
>
Speaking to the advanced realm, is there any possibility of slots longer
than 45 minutes? Even an extra 10 minut
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Trevor Vaughan
wrote:
> Hi Nigel,
>
> This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced content at
> the Puppet Camps.
>
> Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp?
>
> Beginner/Intermediate + Business and Advanced + Hackathon?
>
> Trevor
>
Hi Nigel,
This is a tangent, but I would also like to see more advanced content at
the Puppet Camps.
Would anyone be open to a dual tracked Puppet Camp?
Beginner/Intermediate + Business and Advanced + Hackathon?
Trevor
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:41 PM, Nigel Kersten wrote:
> For those who don
For those who don't know, I'm responsible for the Community team now at
Puppet, and can answer some of this.
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Dean Wilson wrote:
>
> Next up European/London presence: Where is PuppetConf Europe?
This is absolutely something we've talked about and would love to
- Original Message -
> From: "dean"
> To: "puppet-dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, 12 April, 2016 20:56:09
> Subject: Re: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]
> On 12 April 2016 at 19:16, Ryan Whitehurst wrote:
>
>> The
On 12 April 2016 at 19:16, Ryan Whitehurst wrote:
> The puppetlabs-aws module [1] is pretty powerful these days -- we on
> the operations team here at Puppet use it for managing a large portion
> of our AWS infrastructure.
If you remove the Route53 DNS record resource types then that module
clai
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Dean Wilson wrote:
> AWS: Over the last 5 years I've deployed a -lot- of AWS and spoke to a
> lot of people about it and unless they are a large enterprise
> forklifting their current environment over or looking to run a few
> bits of code at instance time, and ju
On 11 April 2016 at 12:08, R.I.Pienaar wrote:
> Eric asked so here it is, this is my feedback with a open source user hat
> on. Echoing much what was said. I hope others send in their story.
Since you asked so politely.
I have a few main areas of concern, and oddly they are not so much
with th
gt; Sent: Monday, 11 April, 2016 03:30:58
>> > Subject: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]
>>
>> > Am 11.04.2016 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Nelson:
>> >> Of course there's lock in. You can't click a button and go from Puppet
>
>
> I think it's a great big programming anti-pattern, it's ugly as all hell,
> certainly nothing Apple would be seen dead near, and yet it's taking over.
> How?
>
Everyone wants one tool to do everything. If you need Ansible because your
non-Nexus Cisco gear has no chef/puppet agent, why not just
On April 11, 2016 at 4:08:51 AM, R.I.Pienaar (r...@devco.net) wrote:
- Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Gelf"
> To: "puppet-dev"
> Sent: Monday, 11 April, 2016 03:30:58
> Subject: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Thomas Gelf"
> To: "puppet-dev"
> Sent: Monday, 11 April, 2016 03:30:58
> Subject: [Puppet-dev] Re: The Future of Puppet [Was: Deprecation logs]
> Am 11.04.2016 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Nelson:
>> Of course there&#
Am 11.04.2016 um 03:01 schrieb Rob Nelson:
> Of course there's lock in. You can't click a button and go from Puppet
> OSS to Chef OSS; [...]
> Is their concern about being able to contribute to it or even fork? I
> suspect that's what most lock in concerns are really based on.
It's about going f
Lots of great discussion this weekend! I've changed the subject, since
we've changed our subject and this may help with future searches on the ML
archives.
No doubt. I had above conversation with a customer who I convinced to by
> PE the very same day. I explained it's advantages, they decided to
25 matches
Mail list logo
