On 6/27/2015 4:57 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015, at 13:27, Terry Reedy wrote:
Unicode 8.0 was just released. Can we have unicodedata updated to match
in 3.5?
3.5 now has Unicode 8.0.0.
Great. Does the release PEP or something else have instructions on how
to do
On 6/19/2015 11:21 AM, triccare triccare wrote:
Will this PEP be implemented in Python 2?
Version: 3.3
Enhancements are not backported
And, more generally, is there a way to know the extent of implementation
of any particular PEP?
When a PEP is accepted, the version field should be
Unicode 8.0 was just released. Can we have unicodedata updated to match
in 3.5?
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On 5/31/2015 10:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
The education community started switching a while back - if you watch
Carrie-Anne Philbin's PyCon UK 2014 keynote, one of her requests for
the broader Python community was for everyone else to just catch up
already in order to reduce student's
On 5/31/2015 6:59 AM, Alexander Walters wrote:
A better course of action would be to deprecate the non-portable
version. Other than setting the PATH envvar, why do we need to continue
even touching the system on install? It is highly annoying for those of
us that maintain several installs of
On 5/28/2015 4:29 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 28 May 2015 at 20:47, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
I think it's to have a single tool to do it for any platform, not to have
the technical nuts and bolts be the same necessarily. I think it's also to
figure out if there is anything the
On 5/28/2015 12:44 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
I do think single-file executables are an important piece to Python's
long-term competitiveness.
I completely agree. I talk to a lot of people about packaging of things, and
while
I think there are some serious problems with huge parts of Go’s
On 5/28/2015 10:55 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
And it would look like a 20MB+ file just for a simple 1KB Python
script...
For Windows at least, I'd prefer to have some app-style installer
generation (e.g. http://pynsist.readthedocs.org/en/latest/) which,
combined with the embeddable Python distro
On 5/27/2015 4:16 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
I second that sentiment. But it strikes me that we're doing this
because our release frequency is completely inadapted. If we had
feature releases, say, every 6 or 9 months, the problem wouldn't really
exist in the first place.
How about a feature
On 5/27/2015 9:31 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
+1 from me, for basically the same reasons Guido gives: Python 2.7 is
going to be with us for a long time, and this particular change
shouldn't have any externally visible impacts at either an ABI or API level.
Immediately after a release, giving the
On 5/25/2015 3:40 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:14:56 -0700
Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
Yeah, I'm willing to grant the feature freeze exception, assuming he can
find general approval from the
Please post your idea to the python-ideas list.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
35\Doc\whatsnew\3.5.rst:686: ERROR: Unknown interpreted text role module.
35\Doc\library\typing.rst:: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree
from building html docs just now
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
On 5/20/2015 3:44 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
This was intended to add status for bugs.python.org, but the work on
Roundup had stalled due to uncertainty and despair on how to handle
utf-8 (internal to Roundup) vs unicode (internal to Jinja2) in this issue:
On 5/19/2015 11:02 AM, Kushal Das wrote:
Hi,
With the help of CentOS project I am happy to announce an automated
system [1] to test patches from bugs.python.org. This can be fully automated
to test the patches whenever someone uploads a patch in the roundup, but
for now it accepts IRC commands
On 5/18/2015 4:18 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
It's unlikely that anyone on this list can help you with this. It's a
question you should ask of the ReplicatorG people, not the Python people...
If that does not work, try stackoverflow, or possibly even python-list.
This list is focused only
On 5/17/2015 1:57 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
On 17.05.15 02:44, Ned Deily wrote:
In article 20150516183940.21146.77...@psf.io,
serhiy.storchaka python-check...@python.org wrote:
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/7b350f712c0e
changeset: 96099:7b350f712c0e
parent: 96096:f0c94892ac31
Python 2.7.8+ (default, May 13 2015, 16:46:29) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
(Intel)] on win32
Shouldn't this be 2.7.9+ or 2.7.10rc1?
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
On 5/13/2015 6:22 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2015 18:15:10 -0400
Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
On 5/13/2015 5:45 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Python 2.7.8+ (default, May 13 2015, 16:46:29) [MSC v.1500 32 bit
On 5/13/2015 5:45 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
Python 2.7.8+ (default, May 13 2015, 16:46:29) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on win32
Shouldn't this be 2.7.9+ or 2.7.10rc1?
Make sure your repository is up to date, the patchlevel
Gmail dumps patch review email in my junk box. The problem seems to be
the spoofed From: header.
Received: from psf.upfronthosting.co.za ([2a01:4f8:131:2480::3])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id
m1si26039166wjy.52.2015.05.12.00.20.38
for tjre...@udel.edu;
Tue, 12 May
On 5/11/2015 3:40 AM, Florian Bruhin wrote:
[snip]
This trollish thread was cross-posted to python-list, where it was
semi-ok, at least in the beginning, and pydev, where it is not. It has
continued on python-list with pydev removed. Please do not continue it
here (on pydev).
--
Terry Jan
to consider using an elaboration
of examples/subprocess_shell.py to replace subprocess socket
communication with pipe comminication?
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
My specific use case is to be able to run a program
On 5/6/2015 5:39 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Sorry to send you on such a wild goose chase! I did mean the issue you
found #21). I just updated it with a link to a thread that has more
news:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/python-tulip/tkinter/python-tulip/TaSVW-pjWro/hCP6qS4eRnAJ
On 5/5/2015 6:25 PM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
Yes, there is no other popular event loop for 3.4 other
than asyncio,
There is the tk(inter) event loop which also ships with CPython, and
which is commonly used.
that uses coroutines based on generators
Oh ;-) Tkinter event loop is callback
On 4/22/2015 8:45 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Chris Barker chris.bar...@noaa.gov
mailto:chris.bar...@noaa.gov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I was just thinking today
On 4/21/2015 6:41 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
Well, it'll catch passing in a string instead of a sequence of strings
-- one of teh common and semi-insidious type errors I see a lot (at
least with newbies).
Oh wait, maybe it won't -- a string IS a sequence of strings. That's why
this is an
On 4/21/2015 6:50 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Paul Sokolovsky pmis...@gmail.com
mailto:pmis...@gmail.com wrote:
It does, and hope people won't be caught in static typechecking
loop and consider other usages too.
I an interested is using type hints for
On 4/20/2015 9:07 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Jack is not complaining only about *writing* code. He's complaining
about the effect this will have on code that we all are expected to
*read*.
For reading, good
On 4/3/2015 5:51 AM, Narsu wrote:
Hi Python
I'm working on a game project,using c++ as main
language, and using python as script.I've built
the Python from the source code on Windows, and when I
invoked method Py_Initialize my program exited. After some tests
I realized as long as I move the
On 3/24/2015 11:53 AM, π wrote:
Hello PythonDevvers,
I apologise in advance. This is slightly off topic. This will be my only
post on the subject.
pydev is about development *of* Python the language and CPython the
implementation. python-list is about development *with* Python. This
post
On 3/20/2015 9:31 AM, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Just a pointer for possible regression http://bugs.python.org/issue23058
I just added the argparse maintainer to the nosy list
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On 3/8/2015 8:17 PM, nha pham wrote:
We can optimize the TimSort algorithm by optimizing its binary insertion
sort.
The current version of binary insertion sort use this idea:
Use binary search to find a final position in sorted list for a new
element X. Then insert X to that location.
I
On 2/24/2015 1:14 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
And I'd weigh the needs of users who know what they are doing somewhat
higher than educating newbies through error messages. While newbies are
most likely to try out open() with a string literal, in real programs
that is rare, and filenames are
On 2/24/2015 8:56 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
inspect.getargspec(method) and inspect.signature(method) both include
the 'self' parameter but how are we to figure out from method itself
that it is actually bound and that its first parameter is expected to be
a bound instance?
This seems like a
On 2/24/2015 9:02 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
I'm not sure if it's correct, but deep in a library of mine I have:
elif type(fn) == types.MethodType:
# bound method?
if fn.im_self is None:
# no 'self'
nskip = 0
else:
# need to supply 'self'
nskip =
On 2/9/2015 7:29 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:
For some reason I can't seem to reply using Google groups, which is is
telling this is a read-only mirror (anyone know why?)
I presume spam prevention. Most spam on python-list comes from the
read-write GG mirror.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
On 1/23/2015 7:15 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 15:55:29 -0800, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
This adds entries to the index of the document -- similar to the index at
the end of a book. I think single vs. double refers to different types of
entries. Check out this
On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
More context:
2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121
The link mentions the following changeset:
---
changeset: 93122:1a3143752db2
branch: 2.7
parent:
On 12/18/2014 4:19 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com
Hi,
Yes, the link is dead. It looks like the following link contains the same
info:
On 12/12/2014 1:24 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
However, my point was that just because the core libraries by usage are
*starting* to roll out Python 3 support doesn't mean that things are
easy or convenient yet.
...
I suppose what I'm saying is that the long tail of libraries is far more
valuable
On 12/6/2014 10:26 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 7 December 2014 at 01:07, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
A likely solution is to use a pre-merge test runner for the systems that we
can isolate which will give a decent indication if the tests are going to
pass across the entire supported
On 12/5/2014 3:04 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
1. Contributor clones a repository from hg.python.org http://hg.python.org
2. Contributor makes desired changes
3. Contributor generates a patch
4. Contributor creates account on bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org and signs the
[contributor
On 12/2/2014 7:07 PM, Chris Rebert wrote:
Hi all,
I'm seeking to move http://bugs.python.org/issue16329 towards conclusion.
Since the discussion on the issue itself seems to have petered out, I
thought I'd bring it up here.
To summarize the issue, it proposes adding an entry for WebM (
On 12/1/2014 11:42 AM, Wes Turner wrote:
Here's a roundup of tools links, to make sure we're all on the same page:
Git HG Rosetta Stone
===
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Git-hg-rosetta-stone#rosetta-stone
BugWarrior
===
BugWarrior works with many issue tracker
On 11/30/2014 2:33 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
So a goal of mine here is to sort of use these as a bit of a test bed.
Moving CPython itself is a big and drastic change with a lot of
implications, but moving the “support” repositories is not nearly as
much, especially with a read only mirror on
On 11/30/2014 1:05 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I don't feel it's my job to accept or reject this PEP, but I do have an
opinion.
...
- I am basically the only remaining active PEP editor, so I see most PEP
contributions by non-core-committers. Almost all of these uses github.
Not bitbucket, not
On 11/30/2014 3:07 AM, balaji marisetti wrote:
Hi,
When I try to iterate through the lines of a
file(openssl-1.0.1j/crypto/bn/asm/x86_64-gcc.c), I get a
UnicodeDecodeError (in python 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 14.04). But there is no
such error with python 2.7.6. What could be the problem?
Questions
On 11/30/2014 2:27 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 11/30/2014 11:15 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014, 21:55 Guido van Rossum wrote:
All the use cases seem to be about adding some kind of getattr hook
to modules. They all seem to
On 11/30/2014 4:45 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
I think you are stimulating more heated discussion than is necessary by
trying to do too much, both in terms of physical changes and in terms of
opinion persuasion.
I am reminded of the integer division change. The initial discussion
was
On 11/30/2014 8:19 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
Mercurial have robust Windows support for a long time. This support is
native (not using cygwin) and handle properly all kind of strange corner
case. We have large scale ecosystem (http://unity3d.com/) using
Mercurial on windows.
We also have
On 11/22/2014 5:23 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Ron Adam ron3...@gmail.com wrote:
Making comprehensions work more like generator expressions
would, IMO, imply making the same change to all for loops: having a
StopIteration raised by the body of the loop quietly
On 11/22/2014 2:49 PM, Ron Adam wrote:
On 11/22/2014 08:31 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I'm definitely coming around to the point of view that, even if we
wouldn't
design it the way it currently works given a blank slate, the alternative
design doesn't provide sufficient benefit to justify the
On 11/20/2014 5:04 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
mailto:storch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20.11.14 21:58, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
To me generator_return sounds like the addition to generator
syntax
On 11/20/2014 2:36 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
There's still a lively discussion on python-ideas; Steven D'Aprano has
dug up quite a bit of evidence that StopIteration is used quite a bit in
ways that will break under the new behavior, and there also seems to be
quite a bit of third-party
On 11/17/2014 9:49 AM, Stefan Bucur wrote:
I'm developing a Python static analysis tool that flags common
programming errors in Python programs. The tool is meant to complement
other tools like Pylint (which perform checks at lexical and syntactic
level) by going deeper with the code analysis
On 11/16/2014 11:49 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:23:41 +0100, Stefano Borini
stefano.bor...@ferrara.linux.it wrote:
I report a finding (bug?) about the warning unicode symbol, as reported here
On 11/15/2014 3:01 AM, Shorya Raj wrote:
Fair enough. Like I said, I wanted to see what the consensus was, and it
seems to be shifting towards not making another list.
Agreed. The traffic here is not high enough to need a split. Most OS
specific issues that need a patch end up as a specific
On 11/14/2014 7:12 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote:
If anyone has questions about OneGet generally, you should probably
ask them directly (see https://github.com/OneGet/oneget), as I am not
a definitive source of information on the project.
No subscription needed to follow a thread. Python-dev is
On 11/1/2014 11:03 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Nov 1, 2014, at 10:37 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
abort: data/Doc/howto/webservers.rst.i@5f4ad429ae9f: unknown parent!
remote: Unable to write to standard output: The pipe is being closed.
The internet suggests trying hg verify
My normally dependable pull.bat script has 3 times given me this.
F:\Python\devhg --repository F:\Python\dev\5\py35 pull --verbose
--config ui.merge=internal:merge ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython
pulling from ssh://h...@hg.python.org/cpython
searching for changes
all local heads known
On 10/30/2014 8:59 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 23:33:06 -0400, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
The devguide needs to be kept up to date. If you open a tracker issue,
put me as nosy to review and commit.
The devguide is about building python itself. Paul is talking
On 10/29/2014 4:05 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 29 October 2014 15:31, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
You can use Express editions of Visual Studio.
IIUC, the express edition compilers are 32-bit only, and what you actually
want are the SDK compilers:
On 10/29/2014 11:37 AM, Steve Dower wrote:
My ideal target (Utopia refined to be achievable) is for python-dev
to handle the Python binaries themselves (already done) and to make
them easy to bundle with applications/etc (I'm working on this for
3.5), and for PyPI to include pre-built wheels
On 10/27/2014 12:23 PM, Stefan Richthofer wrote:
You mean Jython deletes instance attributes before calling __del__ ?
No. I think the term of object resurrection usually does not mean
bringing
back a deleted object in the sense that memory was already freed.
I think it rather means that
On 10/25/2014 5:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
It might fragment the community to have multiple different binary
distributions. But it ought to be possible for any person/organization
to say We're going to make our own build of Python, with these
extension modules, built with this compiler,
If I go to https://docs.python.org/3/using/index.html and click on any
of the TOC entries, I get 'connecting' indefinitely. This problem seems
unique to this file. I tried several other index files and clicking am
entry brings up the corresponding page almost immediately.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
On 10/20/2014 7:29 PM, MRAB wrote:
On 2014-10-21 00:09, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu
mailto:tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
If I go to https://docs.python.org/3/using/index.html and click on
any of the TOC entries, I get 'connecting
4 offline, 2 not compiling, 1 not compiling completely (no _ctypes ==
venv fail)
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
On 10/14/2014 8:24 PM, Saimadhav Heblikar wrote:
Hi,
We were working on IDLE related issue [1] , when I noticed that the
review tool does not detect all affected files for the
cfg-ext-34-2.diff patch uploaded by Terry Reedy. Version 1 of the same
patch does not have this issue - the only
On 10/5/2014 11:13 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote:
I can access every page I have tried except for the tkinter and idle pages,
which either give interminable 'Connecting...' or in one try, 404.
https://docs.python.org/3/library
I can access every page I have tried except for the tkinter and idle
pages, which either give interminable 'Connecting...' or in one try, 404.
https://docs.python.org/3/library/tkinter.html
https://docs.python.org/3/library/idle.html
This is true from the index, previous/next from adjacent
On 9/26/2014 1:03 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io
mailto:don...@stufft.io wrote:
2) Switch to —user based on if the user has permission to
write to the
site-packages or not.
ouch -- no. Why not a clear
On 9/2/2014 1:49 AM, Oleg Broytman wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 08:32:27PM -0500, Skip Montanaro
skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
I got the same in Chrome on my Mac.
Skip
On Sep 1, 2014 8:00 PM, John Wong gokoproj...@gmail.com wrote:
As of today I still am getting untrusted cert
On 9/2/2014 7:47 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
On Sep 2, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
mailto:ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 Sep 2014 09:08, David Reid dr...@dreid.org
mailto:dr...@dreid.org wrote:
Clearly this change should be backported to Python2.
Proposing to break
On 8/31/2014 6:00 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Earlier versions of PEP 453 proposed bootstrapping pip into a Python 2.7
maintenance release in addition to including it with Python 3.4.
That part of the proposal proved to be controversial, so we dropped it
from the original PEP in order to focus on
On 8/26/2014 9:11 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:27:55 +1000, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
As some examples of where bilingual computing breaks down:
* My NFS client and server may have different locale settings
* My FTP client and server may have different locale
On 8/20/2014 8:27 PM, Joseph Martinot-Lagarde wrote:
The pain was even bigger because in addition to the change in underlying
types, the names of the types were not compatible between the python
versions. I often try to write compatible code between python2 and 3,
and I can't use str because it
On 8/21/2014 10:41 AM, Armin Rigo wrote:
Hi,
On 18 August 2014 22:30, Oleg Broytman p...@phdru.name wrote:
Aha, I see now -- the signing certificate is CAcert, which I've
installed manually.
I don't suppose anyone is particularly annoyed by this fact?
I noticed the issue, and started
On 8/21/2014 7:25 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 22 Aug 2014 04:45, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org
mailto:benja...@python.org wrote:
Perhaps some board members could comment, but I hope the PSF could just
pay a few hundred a year for a proper certificate.
That's exactly what we're
On 8/20/2014 9:01 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 20/08/2014 07:08, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
It's not just the JVM that says text and binary APIs should be separate
- it's every widely used operating system services layer except POSIX.
The POSIX way works well *if* everyone reliably encodes things
On 8/18/2014 12:04 PM, Chris Barker wrote:
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org
mailto:ba...@python.org wrote:
I think the biggest API problem is that default iteration returns
integers
instead of bytes. That's a real pain.
what is really needed for this
Firefox does not want to connect to https:bugs.python.org. Plain
bugs.python.org works fine. Has the certificate expired?
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
On 8/13/2014 12:19 PM, matsjoyce wrote:
Unless you remove all the things labelled keep away from children. I wrote
this sandbox to allow python to be used as a mods/add-ons language for a
game I'm writing, hence the perhaps too strict nature.
About the crashers: as this is for games, its fine
On 8/11/2014 5:10 AM, Schmitt Uwe (ID SIS) wrote:
Python usage questions should be directed to python-list, for instance.
I discovered a problem using cPickle.loads from CPython 2.7.6.
The problem is your code having infinite recursion. You only discovered
it with pickle.
The last line
On 8/11/2014 8:26 AM, Ben Hoyt wrote:
It seems to me this is something of a pointless discussion -- I highly
doubt the current situation is going to change, and it works very well.
Even if not perfect, sum() is for numbers, sep.join() for strings.
However, I will add one comment:
I'm
On 8/9/2014 2:44 PM, John Yeuk Hon Wong wrote:
Hi.
Referring to my discussion on [1] and then on #python this afternoon.
A little background would help people to understand where this was
coming from.
1. I write Python 2 code and have done zero Python-3 specific code.
2. I have always been
On 8/2/2014 1:57 AM, Allen Li wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 02:51:54PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
No. We just can't put all possible use cases in the docstring. :-)
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Andrea Griffini agr...@tin.it wrote:
help(sum) tells clearly that it should be used
On 7/14/2014 9:57 AM, Tim Tisdall wrote:
2 questions not answered yet.
Also, is there a method to test changes against all the different *nix
variations?
We have a set of buildbots.
https://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/
Is Bluez the standard across the different *nix variations?
No idea.
On 7/6/2014 7:54 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
As of the moment, buildbot.python.org seems to be down again.
Several hours later, back up.
Where is the best place to report problems like this?
We should have, if not already, an automatic system to detect down
servers and report (email) to
On 7/7/2014 7:22 AM, Andreas Maier wrote:
While discussing Python issue #12067
(http://bugs.python.org/issue12067#msg222442), I learned that Python 3.4
implements '==' and '!=' on the object type such that if no special
equality test operations are implemented in derived classes, there is a
On 6/30/2014 9:44 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 06/30/2014 06:28 PM, Ben Hoyt wrote:
I suppose the exact behavior is still under discussion, as there are
only
two or three fields one gets for free on Windows (I think...),
where as an
os.stat call would get everything available for the platform.
On 6/24/2014 4:22 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
I submitted a number of patches which fixes currently broken
Unicode-disabled build of Python 2.7 (built with --disable-unicode
configure option). I suppose this was broken in 2.7 when C
implementation of the io module was introduced.
On 6/11/2014 9:27 AM, Ben Hoyt wrote:
What would be the next steps to get this to happen? Open an issue on
bugs.python.org and submit a patch with tests?
Yep!
Okay, I've done step one (opened an issue on bugs.python.org), and
hope to provide a patch in the next few weeks if no-one else does
On 6/10/2014 2:51 PM, Hasan Diwan wrote:
From the csv module pydoc:
The optional dialect parameter is discussed below
The discussion is actually above the method. Present in 2.7.6.
Bug reports should be posted on the tracker rather than sent here. Short
doc reports like this can be sent to
On 6/9/2014 12:26 PM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Paul Sokolovsky pmis...@gmail.com
mailto:pmis...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:01:18 +
Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com mailto:bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat Jun 07 2014 at
On 6/9/2014 11:03 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 05:23:12AM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
execfile() builtin function was removed in 3.0.
Because it was hardly ever used. For short bits of code, it is usually
inferior to exec with a string in the file. For substantial
On 6/6/2014 4:53 AM, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
On 06/04/2014 05:52 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Out of idle curiosity is there anything that stops MicroPython, or any
other implementation for that matter, from providing views of a string
rather than copying every time? IIRC memoryviews in CPython
On 6/6/2014 12:37 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
After Glyph and Alex's email about their asks for assisting in writing
Python 2/3 code, it got me thinking about where in the toolchain various
warnings and such should go in order to help direct energy to help
develop whatever future toolchain to assist
On 6/6/2014 6:47 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Sturla Molden sturla.mol...@gmail.com wrote:
Brett Cannon bcan...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope. A new minor release of Python is a massive undertaking which is why
we have saved ourselves the hassle of doing a Python 2.8 or
601 - 700 of 2415 matches
Mail list logo
