PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Wicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Plight of a Software House
I
- Original Message -
From: Roy Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Plight of a Software House
I have always given PEK (Pointer Environment Kit) away for free with
Easyptr. I do not think I have ever sold a copy of QPTR.
--
Indeed it all comes back. That's how I started
QLib/EasyPTR allows you to make some professional looking
programs. It's
just a pity that the latter is such a b*gg*r to learn.
Have you seen the (excellent) tutorial that was published in Quanta
and I
think is available on Dilwyn's web site, on using EasyPTR ?
I thoroughly recommend it
Morning Geoff,
You wrote :
QLib/EasyPTR allows you to make some professional looking programs. It's
just a pity that the latter is such a b*gg*r to learn.
Have you seen the (excellent) tutorial that was published in Quanta and I
think is available on Dilwyn's web site, on using EasyPTR ?
I
George Gwilt writes:
TurboPTR, available from the SQLUG website and from Dilwyn's, is intended
to
allow programmers to use SuperBASIC to write PE programs. This system also
allows these programs to be compiled by Turbo, which considerably speeds
them
up.
I have had some useful feedback
- Original Message -
From: P Witte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Plight of a Software House
George Gwilt writes:
I have had some useful feedback from Geoff Wicks but from few others (if
any!). Anyone who has suggestions that can be implemented will probably
find
In a message dated 11/06/02 09:58:45 GMT Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that to start the ball rolling, we need someone to take on the reins of easyptr - bring this up to date and possibly enhance it to create the bare bones of a SuperBASIC procedures to call the menus at
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 at 18:30:50, Timothy Swenson wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I kind of jumped in the middle of this thread before I really read any
of the messages, so I'm sort of guessing a bit about the on going
conversation. I'm assuming that part of the discussion is about the
lack
Software in the QL community has a much longer life than the
Windows
world, where using a program 2 years out-of-date is considered a
sin.
In my experience, the PC scene changes so radically in 2 years (not
always for the better) that software stands little chance of still
working 2 years on.
I kind of jumped in the middle of this thread before I really read any of
the messages, so I'm sort of guessing a bit about the on going
conversation. I'm assuming that part of the discussion is about the lack
of new programs coming out for the QL, esp. commercial ones.
One thing that I
10 matches
Mail list logo