Transient non-fatal delivery errors

Hi,   When sending the mail through MDAEMON I get the following error message. What is this? and how to solve this ? Is it a problem with qmail or with MDaemon   The attached message had transient non-fatal delivery errorsTHIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY - YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR ME

Re: can't send mail to aol

On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 12:28:42PM +0200, kailash oswal wrote: > hi there, > > I have a problem with aol domain...My customers cannot send mail to aol.com > (american on line)domain.Is there any seetings to be amde at our end > ...please tell if somebody has come accross with such problem > >

How- Alias in default domain with Vpopmail

Hi,   How do I create an alias for a user  in the default domain. As it is easy to use qmailadmin to create alias for the virtual domains.   But I don't know how to create alias for the default domain in Vpopmail.   Regards John

can't send mail to aol

hi there, I have a problem with aol domain...My customers cannot send mail to aol.com (american on line)domain.Is there any seetings to be amde at our end ...please tell if somebody has come accross with such problem kailash __ Get Your Priva

Lots of mails bouncing & Problem creating an account with an & symbol

Hi,   I see that there are lots of mails that are getting bounced and are sitting in the postmaster account. How can I resend these mails.   Next I have a problem with the & symbol in qmail. One person posted to do it in someway and I did it but still that does not seem to work.   Can anyone

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Sam writes: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote: > > 1. In my benchmark, I ganged 1,390 runs using actual, distinct email > > If you can't be bothered to properly interpret the results of the write() > system call, He *is* properly interpreting the results. He's just making the interpretati

RE: mail-abuse.org test fail at step 6

Hear hear! Andy > -Original Message- > From: Rogerio Brito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 4:05 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: mail-abuse.org test fail at step 6 > > > On Feb 24 2000, John R Levine wrote: > > Someday I'll fiddle the test to no

Re: No Qmail after changing IP addresses

- Original Message - From: "Derrick Hopkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 11:18 PM Subject: No Qmail after changing IP addresses > I had Qmail working fine at home and tommorrow the system goes to it's final > resting place. But after I c

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

You've been worked over pretty thoroughly already, but anyway... Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote: > > > However, they have about the similar wall-clock runtime as each other > > and as /bin/cat. The best expectable speedup would be a factor of > > about 2,

No Qmail after changing IP addresses

I had Qmail working fine at home and tommorrow the system goes to it's final resting place. But after I changed the IP address to the new one, now qmail doesnt work at all. I'm using Qmail+vpopmail and starting everything with tcpserver. I know that qmail and it's daemons are running since they

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Len Budney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Yes, but 5-6 orders of magnitude less expensive than physical > > writes. If I had incurred, but discounted, physical latencies, I would > > be a jackass. Instead I simply made a decision you don't care for, >

Re: qmail-pop3d slowness

>At 10:40 PM -0500 2/24/00, Juan E Suris wrote: >>Hello All, >> >>Like a good qmail user, I changed qmail-pop3d from inetd to >>tcpserver, but now it's really slow. It takes about 10 secs to >>respond. Is this usual. >>Following are my start scripts. >> >>Thanks, >>JES >> >>here's what my run scri

Re: qmail-pop3d slowness

At 10:40 PM -0500 2/24/00, Juan E Suris wrote: >Hello All, > >Like a good qmail user, I changed qmail-pop3d from inetd to >tcpserver, but now it's really slow. It takes about 10 secs to >respond. Is this usual. >Following are my start scripts. > >Thanks, >JES > >here's what my run script look li

qmail-pop3d slowness

Hello All,   Like a good qmail user, I changed qmail-pop3d from inetd to tcpserver, but now it's really slow. It takes about 10 secs to respond. Is this usual. Following are my start scripts.   Thanks, JES    here's what my run script look like:/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run#!/bin/shVU

Re: qmail/tcpserver total confusion

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Robert Holder wrote: > OK. I downloaded and installed qmail, ucspi-tcp and daemontools. I've read > through about 70% of the documentation, and search the web for tips and > help. qmail appears to be running, and it appears to be queuing messages > but it won't deliver the

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Sam writes: > The reason that I had the redundant buffer clear in the "one write" > version is so that both benchmarks had the same setup overhead. But that's not the way it happens in reality. The fill-buffer, single-write way *doesn't* have that overhead, and so neither should the test version

RE: Strange error

I believe this is possible (never done it) but its unsecure, anyone can fake a domain name.. Goto the qmail website for links to such a patch.(I think one is there) Your much better off using IP addresses. --Stephen -Original Message- From: Jon Newman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:

Re: Strange error

Is there any way to specify the domains a user is allowed to come from and to have qmail lookup the addresses to ensure they are telling the truth about where they are comming from? Like sendmail does it? Jon. - Original Message - From: Stephen Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Jon Newman'

Dates and timezones

Hello, everyone: Okay -- I know that this question has been asked before, and I know it's been answered before, but I've sifted through all the the FAQs I could find, heeded some of the advice, looked through the archives, and I'm no closer to a clear answer or a solution. The question: How do

Puzzling mail forwarding delay

Hi there; I'm setting up qmail on a machine to forward mail for my kcsu.org.uk domain. It's intended to provide vanity addresses / mailing lists / other email facilities to members of my college. The people hosting the domain forward all the mail for the domain to a single POP3 mailbox which ge

RE: Strange error

This is very normal operation - by default qmail installs without the ability to relay through it. Visit http://www.palomine.net/qmail/relaying.html on instructions/information how to allow selective relaying through your server. Cheers, Stephen -Original Message- From: Jon Newman [mai

Re: Strange error

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 09:12:39PM -0800, Jon Newman wrote: > I am trying to test qmail thouroughly before I start it up but when I try and >transfer email through it (relaying through it), I get this error: > > The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the >se

qmail/tcpserver total confusion

OK. I downloaded and installed qmail, ucspi-tcp and daemontools. I've read through about 70% of the documentation, and search the web for tips and help. qmail appears to be running, and it appears to be queuing messages but it won't deliver them. I've tried to figure it out, but I'm stuck. I

Strange error

I am trying to test qmail thouroughly before I start it up but when I try and transfer email through it (relaying through it), I get this error:   The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by the server. The rejected e-mail address was '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. Subje

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Len Budney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, but 5-6 orders of magnitude less expensive than physical writes. If > I had incurred, but discounted, physical latencies, I would be a > jackass. Instead I simply made a decision you don't care for, which I > would reverse in the face of actual perfor

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Paul Jarc writes: > Sam writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On Solaris an empty program issues some 19 system calls including > > > 2 opens. A write() of 1 byte surely gets lost in the noise. > > > > After I cleaned up the typos, I averaged .11 seconds in ten sample runs > > (versus .14

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 01:45:59AM +, Sam wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > Perhaps you haven't noticed the time() output, right there in the middle > > > of my post. > > > > I did. It's way too small to indicate anything but noise. > > > > On Solaris an empty program issues so

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Sam writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > On Solaris an empty program issues some 19 system calls including > > 2 opens. A write() of 1 byte surely gets lost in the noise. > > After I cleaned up the typos, I averaged .11 seconds in ten sample runs > (versus .14). But with what kind of distribu

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > [mrsam@ny mrsam]$ cat t.c > > > > #include > > > > > > > > charbuf[8192]; > > > > > > > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > > > > { > > > > int i; > > > > char*p; > > > > > > > > memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); > > > > > > > > p=buf

Re: Problem with ~/alias

On Feb 24 2000, Dave Sill wrote: > The "Unable to find alias user!" message means getpwent("alias") > failed, which means it's either not there, or the process checking > couldn't access the file. It might also help to see the output of qmail-showctl (it shows what it thinks is th

Re: mail-abuse.org test fail at step 6

On Feb 24 2000, John R Levine wrote: > Someday I'll fiddle the test to notice what MTA it's testing and > skip the ones likely to give false alarms. But a qmail book would be nicer (hint, hint)... :-) []s, Roger... -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: Maildir and procmail

Manfred Bartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 25 Feb 2000: > I am using procmail v3.13.1 and it will deliver individual messages > into a directory, but it has no concept of qmail-type Maildirs or of > atomic writing as done by qmail. That's not the latest version of procmail. I was talking ab

Re: Maildir and procmail

Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Or, 3) you use the latest version of procmail which supports maildirs > natively. (I've yet to hear this confirmed working, but the version > announcement said it supports them, so...) Yes it works, sort of... I am using procmail v3.13.1 and it will

fastforward

Hi, I have in ~alias/.qmail-default lines | fastforward -d /etc/aliases.cdb me@mydomain but it doesn't catch all mail such as nonexist@localhost. I want to catch, because I'm afraid that somebody can do something like this: telnet mydomain 25 helo xy mail from: goodguy@somewhere rcpt to: nonexi

Latest news on snuffle?

http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-1556935.html?tag=st.ne.1002.bgif.1005-200-1556935 Hmm. Does http://cr.yp.to/crypto.html need updating :> Regards.

Re: Maildir and procmail

Len Budney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 24 Feb 2000: > > Mail to me with a subject of test goes to the specified maildir. Is it > > really necessary to append /new to the name of the Maildir? > > Yes, unless you 1) use a patched procmail, or 2) use an external > delivery program. Or, 3) you

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

> > > [mrsam@ny mrsam]$ cat t.c > > > #include > > > > > > charbuf[8192]; > > > > > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > > > { > > > int i; > > > char*p; > > > > > > memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); > > > > > > p=buf; > > > for (i=0; i > > *p++=0

Re: Ok...just about to fire it up...a few questions

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 05:18:18PM -0800, Jon Newman wrote: > Thanks for those who replied to my last email, I got it working. > > Before I fire up qmail and replace sendmail (ew, sendmail sucks so I want to rid my >life of it) I have a few more questions. > > 1) We have several domains which h

Re: Managing the Queue

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote: > "Peter Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 24 Feb 2000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > > > > > Peter Samuel writes: > > > > Under certain conditions it can leave the queue in a corrupt state. > > > > > > No, it can't. See INTERNALS in the qmail package f

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Sam writes: > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > charbuf[8192]; ... > } > > [mrsam@ny mrsam]$ time ./a.out >/dev/null > Command exited with non-zero status 255 If you'll notice, this one bombed, so its timing results are useless. You probably hit stack overflow with that 8192-byte array.

Ok...just about to fire it up...a few questions

Thanks for those who replied to my last email, I got it working.   Before I fire up qmail and replace sendmail (ew, sendmail sucks so I want to rid my life of it) I have a few more questions.   1) We have several domains which have addresses I would like to be forwarded to more than one loca

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

> $ cat t.c > #include > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > { > charbuf[8192]; > int i; > > memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); > for (i=0; i write(1, buf, 1); > return (0); > } So this program is writing the first byte of buf, 8192 times. Let's call t

Re: antirbl question

On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:49:11 -0500 (EST) , [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 1003 -g 1002 0 25 \ > > > /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -rdul.maps.vix.com \ > > > /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd

Re: EXT

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 04:18:05PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > just wanting to verify... > > when the EXT environmental variable is set, that corresponds to > the 'user-whatever' part of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', is that > correct? No. It corresponds to the 'whatever-1-2-3-4-n' part of the '[E

EXT

just wanting to verify... when the EXT environmental variable is set, that corresponds to the 'user-whatever' part of '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', is that correct? tia! jacob

Re: How to know how to display a email...

Michael Boman wrote: > Problem with the solution: > How the heck can I in a email see if I need to display it as english, > chinese or japanise text? This question has ZERO to do with the operation of the MTA (beyond if it is passing 8-bit unicodes cleanly or suchlike.) I'd ask comp.lang.perl.

Re: Re: bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No such file or directory

thank you very much - it worked :-0 :-) Begin Original Message From: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:36:03 -0500 (EST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No such file or directory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >configured and installe

Re: qmail problem quitting

Miguel Sarmiento writes: > If [...] qmail does not start or gets kill for some reason, then if > I login su and start the script manually (i.e. scriptqmail start) > qmail does start but if I logout puff! qmail exits. ... > the faq mentions that if upon rebooting qmail exits to use the NOHUP to > s

Semi - Newbie Question

HELO I have a kinda odd situation (I know so does everybody else) I have smtp and pop3 working fine from a workstation that is accessing the email server thru a MASQ'd firewall connection. The install is standard LWQ using tcpserver for everything including qmail-pop3d - which seems to work jus

Looking for a patch to bind outgoing IP address depending on sender domain

Hi, I'm new to qmail and I want to use it for virtual domain mailing on a host who has an IP address per domain (doing accounting per IP address): Example: Host serves DomainA on IpA (MX entry in DNS) DomainB on IpB (MX entry in DNS) Local bind for outgoing e-mail depending on sender domain Unl

Patch for smtpdgreeting is virtual host name

Hi, hope that is the right list for that, if not, please hit me not to strong :-) perhaps someone need it for virtual SMTP hosting on one machine. If applied, the greeting hostname will be changed to the name of the connected local IP address virtual-greeting-patch.diff --- qmail-smtpd.c.orig

qmail behaving weird with virtualdomain

Hello, today when I rebooted my computer for the first time since I had added a virtualdomain on my qmail-machine, it didn't work. It wanted to transport the mail's that should, and had been before the reboot, be handled locally away to a remote server. So I began looking into the thing, and I

qmail-smtpd password & log

I am trying to set up qmail-smtpd so that it requires a password. This is supported by many e-mail clients. I have already successfully setup tcprules so that only specific IPs are allowed in, but I would rather have it let any IP in and be password based so that when I travel I can use my own sm

qmail problem quitting

Hello, I have qmail running on a SUN solaris 2.6 sparc U450. No problem, it starts fine, etc... If there is a problem in the startup script (I don't use supervise and please I know it may be good to use but that's irrelevant for my problem) and qmail does not start or gets kill for some reason,

Re: strangeness with qmail-smtpd

I did read the web page, but I don't understand if the packet itself has to end with a \r\n ... what if the next packet actually has the \r\n in it, but qmail didn't read it because it already sent the error message? If you've telnetted to port 25 and are typing in commands directly, each charact

Re: Queue-Sitters Anonymous

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:15:41 -0800, Micah Cowan wrote: >instantaneous delivery - at least within our own company! I'm trying to aim >for 1- or 2-minute delays at most (since that's what is configured as their >mailbox-checking interval in their Outlooks). [see previous msg for answer] IMHO, 1-

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Len Budney wrote: > > I've assumed that most filesystems are block-buffered anyway, > > and safecat > > They are, however switching to/from kernel mode is extremely expensive. Yes, but 5-6 orders of magnitude less expensive than physical writ

Re: mail-abuse.org test fail at step 6

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > I'm new to qmail so I guess I'll put some stupid question but please help >me... I put qmail last days on one of my servers and I make the test from >mail-abuse.org... > >What I have to do to pass the test ? ><<< 250 ok >RCPT TO:<[EMAIL

Re: bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No such file or directory

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >configured and installed my qmail as it is recomended in >"Life with qmail", but when I'm starting qmail: > ># /usr/local/sbin/qmail start > >bash reports: > >bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No such file or directory >From http://www.faqts.com/knowledge-base/view.phtml/aid

bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No such file or directory

configured and installed my qmail as it is recomended in "Life with qmail", but when I'm starting qmail: # /usr/local/sbin/qmail start bash reports: bash: /usr/local/sbin/qmail: No such file or directory The same problem when I'm starting linux: /etc/init.d/rc: /etc/rc2.d/S20qmail: No such

Re: Problem with ~/alias

Daniel Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >donald# grep alias /etc/passwd >alias:*:1002:1001:User &:/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent > >donald# ls -ld / /var /var/qmail /var/qmail/alias >drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel 512 Jan 17 11:01 / >drwxr-xr-x 21 root wheel 512 Feb 15 19:36 /var >drwxr-xr-x 1

Re: mail-abuse.org test fail at step 6

"Bufnea Darius" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm new to qmail so I guess I'll put some stupid question but please help >me... I put qmail last days on one of my servers and I make the test from >mail-abuse.org... > >What I have to do to pass the test ? The test is broken. See: http://www.

Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail?

Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote: >> Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail >> as their MTA? > I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing > list archives: > On

mail-abuse.org test fail at step 6

I'm new to qmail so I guess I'll put some stupid question but please help me... I put qmail last days on one of my servers and I make the test from mail-abuse.org... What I have to do to pass the test ? I have got the folowing output at relay test6: Relay test 6 RSET <<< 250

Re: Any tool for mbox to Maildir conversion?

FYI I just used this script on two different mbox's and it put everything in new. On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:36:25AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > Speaking of that mbox2maildir tool - I notice that it doesn't attempt to > retain read status of messages - i.e. they all go into "new" instead of into

Re: Maildir and procmail

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 01:34:27AM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote: > Mail to me with a subect of test goes to the specified maildir. Is it really > necessary to append /new to the name of the Maildir? If I don't the mail gets Nevermind, I'm an idiot. I've solved both of the problems I just mentioned.

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

Curtis Generous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm trying to use safecat on a very busy email server, and noticed > while looking at the output of truss(1) that all writes to the file > are being done a single character at the time... That may be excessively draconian on my part! Back when I wro

Re: Maildir and procmail and safecat

According to Len Budney: > > I recommend safecat, which you can find at > . Using the > embedded script `maildir', your rule would be rewritten as: I'm trying to use safecat on a very busy email server, and noticed while lookin at the ou

Re: Any tool for mbox to Maildir conversion?

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:36:25AM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > Here's my cut on this script. And I'll throw in mine as well. It handles all three states of the "read" flags -- new, unread, and read. -- Bruce Guenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://em.ca/~bruceg/ #! /usr/bin/pe

Re: Problem with ~/alias

Output: donald# grep alias /etc/passwd alias:*:1002:1001:User &:/var/qmail/alias:/nonexistent donald# ls -ld / /var /var/qmail /var/qmail/alias drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel 512 Jan 17 11:01 / drwxr-xr-x 21 root wheel 512 Feb 15 19:36 /var drwxr-xr-x 10 root qmail 512 Jan 18 09:50 /var/q

Re: QMail and mail relays

Stephen Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I installed tcpserver so that I can run qmail under it. I start it with > >/usr/local/bin/tcpserver -R -u 505 -g 504 0 smtp \ >/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd 2>&1 \ > | /var/qmail/bin/splogger smtpd & > >When running under inetd I could send mail using the

Re: forwarding mail

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >How do I forward mail from a maildir to another mailbox - the mail is >already there I just need to forwrd it to another mailbox on another >system?? maildir2smtp from serialmail might do the trick. -Dave

Re: having problem with new qmail install and fastforward

"Jon Newman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >1) I would like to keep using /var/spool/mail as the directory to hold mail. >How can I get this to work? I read the docs but they are unclear to me. What's your current configuration? >2) When I try and do a local-local test I get this error, what i

Re: Problem with ~/alias

Daniel Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I know that the qmail isan't finding the path for the directory ~/alias. >Some sugestion ?? Show us the output of: grep alias /etc/passwd ls -ld / /var /var/qmail /var/qmail/alias -Dave

Re: Managing the Queue

"Peter Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 24 Feb 2000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > > > Peter Samuel writes: > > > Under certain conditions it can leave the queue in a corrupt state. > > > > No, it can't. See INTERNALS in the qmail package for the complete story. > > I _know_ what INTERNALS sa

Re: Maildir and procmail

Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > :0 > * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] > * ^Subject: test > test.`/bin/date +%m%y`/new > > Mail to me with a subject of test goes to the specified maildir. Is it > really necessary to append /new to the name of the Maildir? Yes, unless you 1) use a patched procmai

Problem with ~/alias

Hi, I'm using Qmail(maildir) with Mysql, but the ~/alias isan't functions. I know that the qmail isan't finding the path for the directory ~/alias. Some sugestion ?? donald# cat /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-asdf [EMAIL PROTECTED] donald# cat /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-root [EMAIL PROTECTED] 94869285

Re: forwarding mail

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 03:25:40PM +0200, TAG wrote: > How do I forward mail from a maildir to another mailbox - the mail is > already there I just need to forwrd it to another mailbox on another > system?? Use pine/elm/mutt to 'bounce' the mail to another address. -- See complete headers for

Re: Mailserver quotas

On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 02:34:25PM +0200, TAG wrote: > Hi ALL, > > I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question - but is > there a add-on program for qmail that allows you to limit the mailbox > sizes?? Look at http://www.qmail.org. There are some scripts there. -- See complet

forwarding mail

Hi, Sorry to be such a pain all the time - I have another question (suprise :)) How do I forward mail from a maildir to another mailbox - the mail is already there I just need to forwrd it to another mailbox on another system?? Thanks Tonino

Re: antirbl question

On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:49:11 -0500 (EST) , [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -x/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 1003 -g 1002 0 25 \ > > /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -rdul.maps.vix.com \ > > /usr/local/bin/rblsmtpd -b -rrelays.mail-abuse.org \ > > /var/qmail/bin/qmai

qmail Digest 24 Feb 2000 11:00:01 -0000 Issue 921

qmail Digest 24 Feb 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 921 Topics (messages 37599 through 37647): TZ for qmail 37599 by: Aled Treharne 37600 by: Brian Johnson 37601 by: Soffen, Matthew 37602 by: Anand Buddhdev 37603 by: Dave Sill 37606 by: Mikko Hänninen

Mailserver quotas

Hi ALL, I don't know if this is the right place to ask this question - but is there a add-on program for qmail that allows you to limit the mailbox sizes?? Thanks Tonino

Maildir and procmail

I have finally decided to start experimenting with Maildirs. I rely heavily on procmail to do my mail sorting for me. I set up a test rule: :0 * ^[EMAIL PROTECTED] * ^Subject: test test.`/bin/date +%m%y`/new Mail to me with a subect of test goes to the specified maildir. Is it really necessary t

Re: qmail-inject / env_get("USER")

There wouldn't be any security problem... since qmail-inject is not setuid, users would have the same privileges and could do the same thing themselves if they so desired. That was not my point. qmail-inject is called by the sendmail wrapper. Using XMIT, qpopper calls sendmail, or in this case,