i configured qmail succesfully but my problem is whenever i sent an email
to one of the users where my qmail was install i cant find the mail. in
sendmail i know it was var/spool/mail where can i check that in qmail?
What does your /var/qmail/control/defaultdelivery file say?
The most probable location is /home/username/Mailbox or
/home/username/Maildir/cur, new, tmp
At 15:30 00/06/16 +0800, you wrote:
i configured qmail succesfully but my problem is whenever i sent an email
to one of the users
You may try a 'ps -ef|grep qmail` and see if the appropriate qmail programs are
running. Looking also at your log files may help in case there are errors. It is also
important to note how you configured your qmail to deliver messages.
This is what Vince said:
i configured qmail
i have this message in my log file when i send a mail
Jun 16 17:15:51 procmail qmail: 961146951.320518 delivery 25: deferral:
Uh-oh:_home_directory_is_writable._(#4.7.0)/
Jun 16 17:15:51 procmail qmail: 961146951.323302 status: local 0/10 remote
0/20
At 04:17 PM 6/16/00 +0800, you wrote:
Remove the write permissions for group and others from the directory. Qmail is pretty
strict on permissions.
This is what Vince said:
i have this message in my log file when i send a mail
Jun 16 17:15:51 procmail qmail: 961146951.320518 delivery 25: deferral:
Peter,
Thank you for your response. This will come in handy.
The reason I was hoping there was a Perl way to do
this, i.e. qmqpc messages into the qmail queue is for
testing purposes for another app I am working on.
Mike.
--- Peter Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, mwangu
Make sure you have this:
% groupadd -g 110 qmgr ( A group id above 100)
% useradd -u 120 -g 110 mailuser (A group id above 100)
% chgrp qmgr /home
% chmod 775 /home
Goodluck,
Kristina
At 17:09 00/06/16 +0800, you wrote:
Remove the write permissions for group and others from the directory.
qmail Digest 16 Jun 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1034
Topics (messages 43130 through 43202):
Re: big-* patches and FD_SET()
43130 by: clemensF
43132 by: Petr Novotny
Re: Help on qmail-qstat
43131 by: clemensF
43142 by: Dave Kelly
qmail and pop3
43133 by:
Hi dave
thanks for your help.
but i have a problem now. i.e. there is no file with that name in the
control directory. just by creating that file, help ?
please let me know as soon as possible.
regards,
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Dave Kelly wrote:
If you have messages in the queue that are 4-5
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:02:55PM +0530, System Administrator wrote:
Hi dave
thanks for your help.
but i have a problem now. i.e. there is no file with that name in the
control directory. just by creating that file, help ?
please let me know as soon as possible.
If the file isn't
Hi steffan
thanks for your prompt reply. i will do the necessary.
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Steffan Hoeke wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:02:55PM +0530, System Administrator wrote:
please let me know as soon as possible.
If the file isn't there it defaults to the mentioned 604800, i.e. one
Hi there
What is the best way to setup qmail as a secondary mail server for a domain name, ie
something.com has 2 MX records, second MX points to a mail server running qmail.
I need qmail to act as a fallback server, if the first (also qmail :) goes down or si
busy. Whats the best way of doing
I'm going to try using a mini-qmail install as per the 'what about
firewalls' section of that page.
I'm wondering what facilities exist for distributing some of the Qmail
work across two machines in the following way:
'mx.ourdomain' accepts connections from the outside world and handles
This would probably be most useful on machines with more CPU than drive
space. Mind you, drive space does tend to be cheaper these days than CPU
time.
I'd be interested in stats on storage difference of 1000 E-mails with and
without the patch, as well as CPU time used with and without. I doubt
Michael T. Babcock écrit:
This would probably be most useful on machines with more CPU than drive
space. Mind you, drive space does tend to be cheaper these days than CPU
time.
It depends on your email traffic. A small company usually has a single
box for web/ftp/mail/fax/dns and no more
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 02:55:56PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
Michael T. Babcock écrit:
This would probably be most useful on machines with more CPU than drive
space. Mind you, drive space does tend to be cheaper these days than CPU
time.
It depends on your email traffic. A
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:10:52AM -0700, mandarine wrote:
What is the best way to setup qmail as a secondary mail server for a domain
name, ie something.com has 2 MX records, second MX points to a mail server
running qmail. I need qmail to act as a fallback server, if the first (also
For those who know the SMTP protocol better than I:
If I limit my incoming SMTP connections on a box to something small, say
5, what does happens to further incomings; are they simply ignored, or
NAK'd, or what? And on what % of servers out there will this mean that
the message bounces entirely
Does anyone have a quick script to check if a given tcprules file is
newer than the .cdb version and generate the new one if it is? I'm not
a big shell-script person.
In other words, I'll write it in C if I have to ...
--
_/~-=##=-~\_
-=+0+=- Michael T. Babcock
the MTA connecting will fail and retry in which ever way it is configured, after
having tried other IN MX on the domain.
nicholas
--
On Fri, 16 Jun 2000 11:19:27 Michael T. Babcock wrote:
For those who know the SMTP protocol better than I:
If I limit my incoming SMTP connections on a box
I need to quit answering myself ...
http://www.linuxsupportline.com/~pgp/linux/newer-0.1.tar.gz
Returns 1 if first file is newer, 2 if second is newer, 0 if neither is.
(I don't know if anyone else wanted this, but ...)
"Michael T. Babcock" wrote:
Does anyone have a quick script to check if
I have to grow the system from a capability of 250K
msg/day up to as much as 2.5M/day. I have to add
virus detection, spam filters, and seperation for
an encryption trunk. I'm assuming as many as five boxes
in the cluster - I will have the baseline system
online while I do this and then use the
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 04:13:18PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to grow the system from a capability of 250K
msg/day up to as much as 2.5M/day. I have to add
virus detection, spam filters, and seperation for
an encryption trunk. I'm assuming as many as five boxes
in the cluster -
I know, I know, posting to both lists? But, tinydns made this
easy and qmail is the list in question, so...
I was just watching the tinydns logs when I mailed a message to
the qmail mailing list.
All of a sudden the query rate on my reply-address domain shot up as
the log tail slid across the
The message below went to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yesterday. A number of
people I expected to see it evidently did not. Please pardon the
scattershot approach.
W.
The ucspi-ipc-0.50 package is now available. Please see the ucspi-ipc
home page:
http://www.superscript.com/ucspi-ipc/intro.html
I have to grow the system from a capability of 250K
msg/day up to as much as 2.5M/day. I have to add
virus detection, spam filters, and seperation for
an encryption trunk. I'm assuming as many as five boxes
in the cluster - I will have the baseline system
online while I do this and then use
I just recently setup a qmail server with vpopmail as the virtual
domain / pop manager. I'm encountering a problem though.
Users with "large" messages 10K are having problems retrieving their
messages. The clients start pulling the messages but get stuck and
eventually timeout on these
The original estimate was that this would be evenly
split 50/50 in/out. But I don't believe this. Our
marketing/sales guys are really pushing the volume up on the outbound side. And new
services will be added...
I don't think I'll get real numbers
until it's too late. I'm looking for a scalable
Currently, we receive our incoming mail via NT Exchange server. We do not
currently use our IBM RS6000 for any internet email purposes (ie, I am in
unfamiliar territory with this project).
Since our core business applications exist on the IBM system, I would like
to develop the application that
test also works with the newer than parm
if test file1 -nt file2; then
do something
fi
man test for all the options
-Original Message-
From: mbabcock [mailto:mbabcock]On Behalf Of Michael T. Babcock
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 11:04 AM
To: qmail list
Subject: Re: tcprules script
This is pretty trivial to do. All you need is a standard qmail
install with a single entry in /var/qmail/control/smtproutes which
points to your exchange server.
That way all mail submitted to qmail will be forward via smtp to
your exchange server.
You may want to set concurrencyremote
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:07:51PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The original estimate was that this would be evenly
split 50/50 in/out. But I don't believe this. Our
marketing/sales guys are really pushing the volume up on the outbound side. And new
services will be added...
I don't think
well, what i decided to do was switch to qpopper and use the
--enable-home-dir-mail=Mailbox and it worked fine.
now one thing that i don't understand is the rcpthosts file.
it seems like it would be a file that would decide who gets to use
qmail as the SMTP server, but when i try to send a
Hi everyone,
first I am new to qmail and I am using qmail with vpopmail and mysql
support. I have several questions: Using the startup-scripts from
www.inter7.com plus the startup scripts from My Life with qmail (of course I
have adjusted the scripts from life with qmail to the needs of vpopmail
I am new to this list having just about set up qmail on a home network
linux server for the first time. I spent hours over a number of days
pouring through the documentation and the qmail.org web site looking
for help - and whilst I think I now have a picture NOWHERE could I
find a summary of
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 11:04:59PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote:
NOTE: you must restart qmail whenever one of 'control files' are
changed.
That's only true for some of them. Lots of them are read for every invocation
of qmail-smtpd or qmail-remote, for example, and qmail-send can be told of new
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 03:33:20PM -0500, Z wrote:
well, what i decided to do was switch to qpopper and use the
--enable-home-dir-mail=Mailbox and it worked fine.
now one thing that i don't understand is the rcpthosts file.
it seems like it would be a file that would decide who gets to
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 06:52:49PM +0900, Kristina wrote:
Make sure you have this:
% groupadd -g 110 qmgr ( A group id above 100)
% useradd -u 120 -g 110 mailuser (A group id above 100)
% chgrp qmgr /home
% chmod 775 /home
The user "mailuser" is allowed to create file/directories in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] deleted from recipients.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 09:34:43AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, I know, posting to both lists? But, tinydns made this
easy and qmail is the list in question, so...
The reason I'm pointing this out is that I find it interesting
that it
One of my clients does not like to receive e-mail from
exposed.freewebsites.com, how do I block this server? it is ot in the
mail-abuse or orbs.org database
Bolivar,
Search the FAQ for an explanation of the 'badmailfrom' file.
#
At 07:00 AM 6/16/00 , Bolivar Diaz Galarza wrote:
One of my clients does not like to receive e-mail from
exposed.freewebsites.com, how do I block this server? it is ot in the
mail-abuse or orbs.org database
Bolivar,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:00:26AM -0500, Bolivar Diaz Galarza wrote:
One of my clients does not like to receive e-mail from
exposed.freewebsites.com, how do I block this server? it is ot in the
mail-abuse or orbs.org database
There is a patch for qmail-smtpd.c floating around (sorry, I
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:07:19PM -0500, Troy Frericks wrote:
Search the FAQ for an explanation of the 'badmailfrom' file.
This is useless if you try to block a whole server - unless all messages
have a sender address *@domain of course.
\Maex
--
SpaceNet GmbH |
Thanks for the tip, I will try that monday and post the results.
Bolivar,
- Original Message -
From: Markus Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bolivar Diaz Galarza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: Blocking a specific address
On Fri,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 08:14:50AM -0500, Bolivar Diaz Galarza wrote:
Thanks for the tip, I will try that monday and post the results.
Another way to go is to put the offending host into your smtp.rules or
what it's called in your setup with
10.0.1.1:deny
so they can't even connect. Be sure
45 matches
Mail list logo
