Relay management in Qmail with AtDot webmail.

We have qmail running with AtDot webmail and have recive working fine but when it comes to sending email out of the local domain it has an error. I also have the same trouble with external mail programs like Outlook not being able to send email. Can someone help. Thanks in advance. System is Free

Qmail & AtDot

more on last post to lists. I am running Qmail on a FreeBSD 3.3 server and have qpopper setup. Qmail is using ~/Mailbox and all is running fine. I have no external SMTP access but would like to have AtDot be able to send. The problem is that it comes back with the error of: An error was

Re: qmail-remote

Hello again, - Original Message - From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:00 AM Subject: Re: qmail-remote > > > Post an exact copy of the script you use to start qmail -- the one that > > > actually calls qmail-start. We need

Re: qmail-remote

- Original Message - From: "Charles Cazabon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 4:00 AM Subject: Re: qmail-remote > > > Post an exact copy of the script you use to start qmail -- the one that > > > actually calls qmail-start. We need to see what yo

Qmail tries to deliver to /home/usr/Maildir

Hello, My saga continues... I'm having a problem where qmail is attempting to deliver mail to/home/usr/Maildir instead of/usr/local/vpopmail/domain/mydomain/user/Maildir.Most of the users are vpopmail users and therefore do not have a /home/usrdirectory, so I get the dreaded 'Unable_to_chdir

Re: Error deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/

I am having the same problem... (I send an email to the list earlier with the contents of all files I thought might be relevant, but I haven't seen that mail come up. Can anyone confirm that it was sent to the list? Perhaps I made a mistake in sending...) Shawn

Forwarding Nightmare

Hi,   Last evening I tried to set up a .qmail file to forward messages to a remote address. I created a user testuser, and in his directory put a .qmail file with &[EMAIL PROTECTED]   I then sent a test message to the user. qmail has continually been sending messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] all

qmailr processes

Hi,   I have stopped qmail, cleared the queue with:     and restarted qmail, but I still get these processes sending me mail:   qmailr  1071  0.0  0.5   888  568  ??  S    12:27PM   0:00.01 qmail-remote graycastle.com query-return-28234-qmailr  1080  0.0  0.5   888  568  ??  S    12:27PM  

Re: Forwarding Nightmare

ad. Shawn - Original Message - From: "Adrian Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Qmail Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:32 PM Subject: Re: Forwarding Nightmare > On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:37:10AM +0900, lists wrote: > >

Re: qmailr processes

Shawn - Original Message - From: "Daniel Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Qmail Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 12:47 PM Subject: Re: qmailr processes > > > and restarted

39,696 emails later...

Well, my flood of mails has stopped at 39,696.   My boss and people at the office were also getting the mails at the office domain. I took the office mail server offline when they were at about 9,000 mails to prevent them from getting flooded. After I stopped getting mails at my home address,

Re: 39,696 emails later...

- From: James Stevens To: lists ; Qmail Mailing List Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:43 PM Subject: Re: 39,696 emails later... man, if it were me I'd kill all mail services and wipe the queue clean .. Check the qmail home page there are a few queue repair an

Re: 39,696 emails later...

From: James Stevens To: lists Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:06 PM Subject: Re: 39,696 emails later... Ok, in that case kill everything again.. Leave it off for a few minutes..   Add a filter in to block the zombie.. BTW the only thing that could br

Doc Wars (was: keyserver)

Forgive me plunging into the fray, but... Mr. Yelich, I doubt a sould would disagree with you if you said, "Golly, wouldn't a nice comprehensive O'Reilly book be great? Something like the great classics--the expect book and the Perl camel book." BTW, such a book is in progress. You set up a stra

Re: keyserver

"Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How many [rock solid, secure, fast, small, multi-use] programs does > qmail have? I've lost count... I have qmail, ezmlm, dotforward, > accustamp, cyclog, tcp-env, tcpserver, setuser... As a side note, I use accustamp, setuser, cyclog and tcpserv

Re: qmail speed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That's the one problem when mathematicans start to program. > Usually very little attention is being paid to performance > optimizations. Cough. I take exception to that! Though I'm no DJB, the PhD after my name means I can claim to be a mathematician. The performan

Re: qmail speed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > If neither gets over 100K deliveries per hour then I'll have to > write my own "gattling gun" SMTP delivery thingy and just feed > messages to qmail that have problems. Are you sure you're not a spammer? You're performance needs seem to be mind-boggling, yet you refus

Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"

Marc Slemko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Timothy L. Mayo wrote: > > > If you cannot limit the number of connections you will accept to > > something your system can handle, you need to re-think your setup. > > Erm... you just described a classic DoS attack. You put a limi

Re: .qmail-

Andy Walden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm also the kind of guy that keeps the bat book on top of the > toliet for regular study. Push it in! Push it in! -- I'm criticizing one program. That program is disgustingly insecure. It shouldn't just be ridiculed---it should be taken out and shot.

Re: .qmail-

"Petr Novotny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why not [set conf-break to] a \0 > > :-) I was not sure if it doesn't break the sources in some place - > like strcpy() and stuff. You think DJB would use strcpy()? Or indeed anything in libc? Qmail should do just fine with \0 as a conf-break.

Re: Procmail and Maildir?

Chris Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 09:23:47AM -0500, Andy Walden wrote: > > > > Is there anyway to fudge procmail into writing things to a > > Maildir? > > There are some patches available to make procmail deliver to > maildirs. If you like procmail, and don't

Re: mail filtering

at.html>. It can be used under an unpatched procmail, using a recipe like the following: :0w |safecat $HOME/Maildir/tmp $HOME/Maildir/new Your example, filtering mailing lists, is also pretty easy--especially if you use qmail extensions. For example, I'm subscribed under the addres

Re: procmail->~/Maildir

John Conover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a way of executing procmail do ~/.procmailrc, and if email > is not rejected for a user, it is delivered into a ~/Maildir? > > BTW, eg., use my standard spam filter for users that want it, but > want to fetch mail via POP3 in a Maildir. If I u

Re: Qmail to procmail and back again?

Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If all you want is to deliver mail to a maildir, you can > use procmail to do this. Use the procmail maildir patch... Or, if you'd rather not patch procmail, you can use safecat in recipes under procmail without any patches. You can get safeca

Re: Mass migration off of qmail because of lack of DSNs?

ack from each such list, we need to keep > our lists as clean as possible. Nothing else other than DSNs will > allow us to be 100% successful. Forgive the (possibly ignorant) question, but why won't VERPs allow you to be 100% successful? There are exactly two things that MTA's can

Re: dialup w/ qmail

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, since I don't have a real domain, I can't seem to receive > anything. People should not be addressing mail directly to your server, unless it has a sufficiently stable presence on the Internet (static IP, DDNS, etc.). They should be sending mail to you c/o

Q: getting a virtual domain

Please pardon this off-topic question! I'm about to lose my static IP--then it's back to dialup from home. The problem is that I'm hosting an ezmlm mailing list, and want to keep doing so. Where should I look for a service which will rent me an MX record, and spool my incoming mail for delivery

Re: Perhaps I missed it the first time ...

"Scott D. Yelich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Adam D. McKenna wrote: > > I wonder what you could have done to piss someone off this badly. > [blah blah blah] Let's see, now. You post a question. DJB answers it. You post again, whining that nobody had answered you. Then yo

Re: New qmail list et al

"Alex Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But, currently, it IS permissible on this list to post messages that > say things like "your an idiot" or "this is off topic", "this has > nothing to do with qmail". Here's just $.02, since I think I was the latest one to say "You're an idiot" on this

UNSUBSCRIBE budney-lists-qmail@peregrine.maya.com

UNSUBSCRIBE BBDB-INFO

Re: Open Today.

Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Len, you've sent me mail directly; no problem. Yet I block on the DUL. > I think the reason you haven't had any problems is because your ISP > hasn't listed its dialups with the DUL. Ah, that explains it! Well, bully for my ISP! They're cool for rea

Re: 3 quickies!

"Marc-Adrian Napoli" spake unto me and said: > > What i'm after is a solution that falls into place at the > qmail-send/qmail-local stage that will quickly check the > headers of the message to be delivered locally first for > any particular strings. (Silly email addresses or anything > with the

Re: 3 quickies!

Paul Schinder spake unto me and said: > At 10:24 AM -0500 12/23/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >Check out for a good example of spam > >filtering which is _customer_ approved. > > ...the example is poor, IMHO. I have a pobox account for non-work > related mail, and I

Mail abuse

"David L. Nicol" spake unto me and said: > > what keeps spammers from faking envelope-from and using > include-in-bounce features to relay spam content? Nothing; see for this and other more heinous possibilities. > Is it possible that a subject of "failu

Re: Server cluster

Michael Boman spake unto me and said: > Let me see if I get this right, it is OK to share the /home/vpopmail > directory, but not the others? Anyone have ideas how to keep the qmail > controlfiles etc up-to-date on each computer, or can I just share that > directory (/var/qmail/control and maybe

Re: big rcpthosts file

Peter Gradwell spake unto me and said: > > - searching a fairly empty (5 lines) rcpthosts file and then > searching morercpthosts, or Um, that should be '(50 lines)', meaning 'your 50 most commonly used domains' (man qmail-smtpd). When a domain is found in rcpthosts, then morercpthosts is not

Re: big rcpthosts file

Frank Greven spake unto me and said: > > Should I only use rcptshosts or not? You should use morercpthosts, because Dan knows what he's doing. > If it's a question of memory - because of what you called in-memory > cdb - what is the needed size of RAM? I can't answer that; this is a case of 'p

Re: Anal-ness

Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > An OSI-approved Open Source license...And RMS (Richard M. Stallman) Note that many things are good and right, though unblessed by OSI and Richard "Source code for the workers or we shoot you" Stalin. Qmail's restrictions may be a "moral" downer for

Re: Anal-ness

Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Richard "Source code for the workers or we shoot you" Stalin. > > ...what RMS actually says these days. Granted; he's doing much better. As an ethic, his ideas are wonderful; as potential laws, they would amount to soci

Re: compile error

"Chris L. Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Technically it's a bug. main() should always return int... Dan always calls _exit(stat), so main() _does_ return an integer, regardless of the declaration. > I always just assumed Dan was trying to make a statement of some > kind as he certainly

Re: svscan help

+ PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/kerberos/sbin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/u sr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/X 11R6/bin:/root/bin:/usr/local/bin:/var/qmail/bin + echo -n 'Starting djb services: svscan' Starting djb services: svscan+ cd /service + env - PATH=/usr/l

Re: svscan help

Redhat 7.1 Kevin - Original Message - From: "Adam McKenna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 3:07 PM Subject: Re: svscan help > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:32:53PM -0700, Lists Servers Email wrote: > > + > >

tcpserver: end xxxx status 256

Does any know what causes this error: Server: tcpserver: end status 256 Client: user xxx +OK pass xx -ERR unable to write pipe Connection to host lost. Kevin

Re: tcpserver: end xxxx status 256

nt: Saturday, July 07, 2001 12:43 AM Subject: Re: tcpserver: end status 256 > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 10:07:11PM -0700, Lists Servers Email wrote: > > Does any know what causes this error: > > > Server: > > tcpserver: end status 256 > > A program that was

Re: Local Deliveries Slow

In article <001001c09bc6$2f6434a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > Hi, > I am having a tough time migrating to qmail. I have applied the concurrency > patch and set the concurrency limit to 250. Inspite of that I do not see the > qmail-lspawn forking more than 2 or 3 processes at any given point

Re: url of sqwebmail too long!!!!

A Meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0;url=http://mail.somewhere.com/cgi-bin/somewhere"; tag in the index of a virtual host would do the trick. Also, An alias would work in only this case: UseCanonicalName On #is specified in your httpd.conf file for the master host with aliases to all other