tc lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i never cared for mutt either, although i never spent a huge amount of
time trying to figure it out. my main issue with it is that i could never
get it to sort my inbox properly (just normal sorting - by arrival time -
how the files in the maildir are
Great notes on getting the newest pine working with Maildir.
One thing I noticed when I set mine up:
you wrote:
NOTE: Apparently, you must set inbox-path as an absolute path (which
means you can't set it to ~/Maildir because pine doesn't seem to
recognize ~/ as /home/$USER/).
For me
Actually, last I checked those patches don't work with the newest pine
sources.
In this case RTFM'ing wouldn't help now would it. Perhaps he should have
asked the list; oh wait he did.
did I say the patches work on the latest pine version ? umm... nope.
if he's so eager to have the latest
Stefan Laudat wrote:
there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
I am working on this issue right now. What it's boiled down to has
been my installing the courier-imap package with the intent of having
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
Stefan Laudat wrote:
there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
I am working on this issue right now. What it's boiled down to has
been my installing
AIL="/home/$USER/Maildir").
NOTE: Apparently, you must set inbox-path as an absolute path (which
means you can't set it to ~/Maildir because pine doesn't seem to
recognize ~/ as /home/$USER/). This, obviously, will make root's
Maildir inaccessible on 99% of Linux systems, to solve this, e
I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir
directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any?
Thanks,
Steven
--- Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from Maildir
directly, rather than moving them to 'mail'. Anyone know of any?
Thanks,
Steven
To my knowledge, pine does not directly read Maildir formatted
mailboxes. If your server runs
there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:37PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote:
--- Steven Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a version of Pine that will read messages from
The RedHat RPM of pine is patched to support Maildirs.
--Pete
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Stefan Laudat wrote:
there are patches for pine Maildir access, please rtfm at www.qmail.org
I've tested that and worked a couple of months ago.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:49:37PM -0700, Al Sparks wrote
Just to stick in another random opinion:
I've been pretty pine die hard for almost 3 years now.
I tried out mutt about a month ago, and just couldn't make the switch.
Went back to pine and Mailbox, despite personally preferring Maildir.
Tried it again about 3 days ago due to peer pressure and
Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:29AM +, James R Grinter wrote:
But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point
Pine at that.
Seems pretty simple to me.
"Pavel Kankovsky" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:
The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir.
Umm...doesn't it sound familiar? ;)
But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 01:32:29AM +, James R Grinter wrote:
But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point
Pine at that.
Seems pretty simple to me.
How about this: Use a non-crappy, open source
But, it doesn't matter - Pine does IMAP right? (Isn't that it's real
reason for existence?) So hook your Maildirs up with IMAP, and point
Pine at that.
Seems pretty simple to me.
How about this: Use a non-crappy, open source e-mail client instead?
--Adam
And what MUA is that?
Peter Cavender [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty
console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes
without having to RTFM.
If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an accurate
description.
But as I
PINE may be limited, but it sure is useful as a quick and dirty
console-base MUA. I figured out how to use in in about 3 minutes
without having to RTFM.
If you've ever had to deal with the code, dirty is definitely an accurate
description.
Well, yes. I once tried to hack just pico,
.
This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization
is. But you can't please them all, right?
this is the absolute worst argument i've ever heard in my entire life.
don't ever email me again.
Dish it but can't take it.
for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Adam McKenna wrote:
The author of PINE flat out refuses to support Maildir.
Umm...doesn't it sound familiar? ;)
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 10:42:11PM -, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
In discusion - regard to Maildir versus mailbox question - for
promoting Maidir were is useful to encourage pine authors to
adapting the pine program for directly work with Maildir fromat.
maybe you find this useful, I don't.
Hello
Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better.
I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use
Mutt with plesure.
Piotr
---
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 12:12:55AM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
start a MUA discussion here. If you want pine to support Maildirs natively
(mutt does btw) contact the pine authors, this is _ways_ OT here.
The author of
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:45:31PM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
Hello
Maybe you just don't spend enough effort to understand mutt, but I won't
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better.
I let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use
Mutt
of mutt's web page,
and some other stuff on the web pages, just makes me think that the author
is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning.
old redhat releases of pine included a patch for maildir support.
however, pine is _extremely_ inefficient when it comes to large mailboxes
* Adam McKenna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:45:31PM +, Piotr Kasztelowicz wrote:
This is the good opportunity to make functionality of Mutt better. I
let to see to much porblems and this is reason, that I don't use Mutt
with plesure.
Are you using babelfish to
Hello
take a few days for most pine users to make the switch.
I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-)
For me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall
be placed in sent folder - Neverless it don't me simple :-(
and I have to less time to sacrificate
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST),
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
P I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For
P me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be placed
P in sent folder.
If you want a copy of all your sent
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 09:56:27PM -0500, Karl Vogel wrote:
On Sat, 20 Jan 2001 20:24:05 -0500 (EST),
Piotr Kasztelowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
P I will not say, that mutt is not-useful, but it could be better :-) For
P me - the first problem is how make, that the sent mail shall be
that the author
is an idiot. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning.
This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization
is. But you can't please them all, right?
for now i'm still using an old pine with the maildir patch, as that mutt
date interpretation thing simply makes
. but that's certainly not very objective reasoning.
This is coming from someone who doesn't know what capitalization
is. But you can't please them all, right?
this is the absolute worst argument i've ever heard in my entire life.
don't ever email me again.
for now i'm still using an old pine
It seems I am behind: I just noticed that pine-4.21 supports maildir.
Or is it just the version RH made?
Thx
Mate
I see now, that RH applies the maildir patch and another one called
maildirfix. The maildir patch is Mattias Larsson's.
Mate
Try ftp://158.195.33.220/pub/pine/, the pine-4.20-maildir.patch should be
the one. The rest are older patches included in this one.
Don't use the -sk.patch, it translates most of pine texts into Slovak,
wouldn't be of much use I'd say.
--
jozef :-)
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into
I've D/Led the c-client for Pine and followed the directions.
The problem is that it simply doesn't compile with pine4.21 and
the latest stable GCC. Is there anywhere I can D/L an already
patched source? All the links that I found in the archives seemed
to have dissapeard. I prefer a
is a
rather old version.
As a secondary note, is UW planning on adding Maildir support to pine at any
time? It would seem that this would be a worthwhile feature.
--Adam
35 matches
Mail list logo
