data 451 qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)

2001-07-17 Thread Steve Wilson
come across some strange goings on, I frequently get the message data 451 qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0) I have found a couple of mails in the list pertaining to this, but they all suggest queue corruption that can be fixed with queue-fix, this is not the case here, queue-fix

Re: delivery causing trouble

2001-07-12 Thread Henning Brauer
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:42:54AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote: > I tried a simple alias-list whith .qmail-liste containing as follows: > Sending a mail to "liste" qmail resolves it like it should but then > delivers the mail to every recipient in the list EACH That's the way it works with qmai

Re: delivery causing trouble

2001-07-12 Thread John White
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:42:54AM +0200, Peter Klingeberg wrote: > How can I configure qmail to send the mail only once (per hop) with all > recipients in one Mail? You can't. John

delivery causing trouble

2001-07-12 Thread Peter Klingeberg
Hi ! I installed qmail 1.03 for mail and listserver purpose but without ezmlm. I tried a simple alias-list whith .qmail-liste containing as follows: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- I

Re: tcprules & is this list having trouble

2001-06-20 Thread Chris Johnson
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:53:25AM +1000, arnie wrote: > Sorry about the intrusion but is the Qmail list having Mailer-Daemon trouble ? > I have been trying to send an important email to the list at "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > and I keep getting: > > Sorry. Your message

Re: tcprules & is this list having trouble

2001-06-20 Thread arnie
Roger Arnold wrote: Sorry about the intrusion but is the Qmail list having Mailer-Daemon trouble ? I have been trying to send an important email to the list at "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" and I keep getting: Sorry. Your message could not be delivered to: test test (Mailbox or Conferen

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-15 Thread Dave Sill
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So, is Charles right? He knows a thing or two about qmail... >Does this indicate somebody is reattempting delivery? Looks like it to me. >> No "supervise" directory... Further evidence that supervise isn't >> running. > >*rattles head* > >So... okay..

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Charles Cazabon
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Each of those messages has a different qmail-queue PID. From this, you > > can deduce that the sender is connecting to your server, sending the > > message, and somehow disconnecting or misinterpreting qmail's response to > > the DATA command. Th

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Stephen Bosch
Hullo again... Dave Sill wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> my /var/log/maillog fills up with stuff like this: > >> > >> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.411296 end msg 1005715 > >> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.507199 new msg 1005716 > >> Jun 12 14:0

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Stephen Bosch
Charles Cazabon wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dave Sill wrote: > > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >Well, my logs are filling up with garbage > > > > > > Garbage or log entries? Sample, please? > > > > Sorry -- it's just that I quoted it at great l

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Charles Cazabon
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Sill wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >Well, my logs are filling up with garbage > > > > Garbage or log entries? Sample, please? > > Sorry -- it's just that I quoted it at great length before... [...] > > Jun 12 14:09:12

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Dave Sill
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> my /var/log/maillog fills up with stuff like this: >> >> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.411296 end msg 1005715 >> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.507199 new msg 1005716 >> Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.507323 info msg 1005

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Stephen Bosch
Hello... Dave Sill wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Well, my logs are filling up with garbage > > Garbage or log entries? Sample, please? Sorry -- it's just that I quoted it at great length before... okay, I'll get it. Stephen Bosch wrote: > > Hello, gentlemen: > >

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Dave Sill
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Well, my logs are filling up with garbage Garbage or log entries? Sample, please? >(and I get that silly "file >does not exist" error when I run qmail stat) Sample? -Dave

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Stephen Bosch
Dave Sill wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Dave Sill wrote: > >> > >> Logging via splogger (syslog). > > > >Which is deprecated in LWQ, now, correct? > > Yes. > > >> Sure that's qmail-smtpd/log/run? Looks more like qmail-smtpd/run. > > > >D'oh! > > > >#!/bin/sh > >exec

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-14 Thread Dave Sill
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Dave Sill wrote: >> >> Logging via splogger (syslog). > >Which is deprecated in LWQ, now, correct? Yes. >> Sure that's qmail-smtpd/log/run? Looks more like qmail-smtpd/run. > >D'oh! > >#!/bin/sh >exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/mult

Re: warning: trouble opening remote

2001-06-14 Thread Dave Sill
Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >If you're running qmail configured as per >http://www.lifewithqmail.org, then the following commands will fix the >problem: > >svc -dx /service/qmail >setlock /service/qmail/supervise/lock sh -c >'/var/qmail/queue/*/0/{348381,348335,348013}' For LWQ,

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Stephen Bosch
Dave Sill wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Okay, here is what I have in /var/qmail/rc: > > > >#!/bin/sh > > > ># Using splogger to send the log through syslog. > ># Using procmail to deliver messages to /var/spool/mail/$USER by > >default. > > > >exec env - PATH="/var/qma

Re: warning: trouble opening remote

2001-06-13 Thread Russell Nelson
dgrer writes: > Jun 14 08:28:24 seic8 qmail: 992478504.218230 warning: trouble opening >remote/0/348013; will try again later > ... > > When I enter /var/qmail/queue/remote/0/, I con not find file 348381,348335 and >348013, > What I showld do to deal with this prob

warning: trouble opening remote

2001-06-13 Thread dgrer
My qmail log always say: Jun 14 08:24:16 seic8 qmail: 992478256.893320 warning: trouble opening remote/0/348381; will try again later Jun 14 08:24:16 seic8 qmail: 992478256.894017 warning: trouble opening remote/0/348335; will try again later Jun 14 08:24:16 seic8 qmail: 992478256.894706

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Dave Sill
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Okay, here is what I have in /var/qmail/rc: > >#!/bin/sh > ># Using splogger to send the log through syslog. ># Using procmail to deliver messages to /var/spool/mail/$USER by >default. > >exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \ >qmail-start '|preline p

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Russell Nelson
Stephen Bosch writes: > > This is the old-fashioned way to log. > > But Dave... what's wrong with my setup? =) splogger is slow. It's incompatible between systems. > Should I just reconfigure everything according to the new LWQ? Yes. That's the first thing I do when I get to a new custom

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Stephen Bosch
Dave Sill wrote: > > Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> qmail-send/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > > > >There is no need for qmail-send/log. > > Sure there is, if you want the logging supervised. > > >qmail

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Stephen Bosch
Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: > > Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > qmail-send/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > > There is no need for qmail-send/log. qmail-send starts up the logger > by itself as given on it's command line. See /var/qmail/rc. > > Seems that you

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Dave Sill
Frank Tegtmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> qmail-send/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist > >There is no need for qmail-send/log. Sure there is, if you want the logging supervised. >qmail-send starts up the logger >by itself as g

Re: yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-13 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > qmail-send/log: unable to open supervise/ok: file does not exist There is no need for qmail-send/log. qmail-send starts up the logger by itself as given on it's command line. See /var/qmail/rc. Seems that you simply messed up the logging. What do you

yet more trouble with daemontools and supervise

2001-06-12 Thread Stephen Bosch
Hello, gentlemen: I've looked in the archives for this little issue. Lots of people report it, but I *think* I've got my system correctly configured. A couple of problems: my /var/log/maillog fills up with stuff like this: Jun 12 14:09:12 hotcube qmail: 992376552.411296 end msg 1005715 Jun 12

Spamcontrol trouble

2001-05-21 Thread Philipp Steinkrüger
Hello, i am having trouble with qmail and the spamcontrol patch. i am using qmail with vpopmail and the spamcontol patch. I have a tcp.smtp file to allow clients to relay mail, and i have a roaming users system set up. Now what i want to do is to only allow deliveries to existing users on the

Re: Trouble with date

2001-05-15 Thread Patrick Starrenburg
Dear Andrey There are a number of things to consider here - the server (qmail) side and your client (MUA) side: * qmail uses a more intelligent system of time stamping emails which pass through its system using GMT time which it (correctly) represents as (in your case) 06:57:47 - this say

Re: Trouble with date

2001-05-15 Thread Frank Tegtmeyer
Andrey Shirshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > why in my messages date is not rigth? It is right, but Qmail does not use your local timezone. It uses UTC (GMT). > .. with SMTP; 15 May 2001 06:57:47 - > date is 10:54!!! Because you are in the timezone GMT +0400, the times have a difference o

Re: Trouble with date

2001-05-15 Thread Robin S. Socha
* Andrey Shirshov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > why in my messages date is not rigth? Because your software sucks. > ... with SMTP; 15 May 2001 06:57:47 - date is 10:54!!! No, it isn't. ,[ http://www-archive.ornl.gov:8000/ ] | Mailing List Archive Search Results | | Documents 1 to

Trouble with date

2001-05-14 Thread Andrey Shirshov
Hello, . why in my messages date is not rigth? ... with SMTP; 15 May 2001 06:57:47 - date is 10:54!!! -- Whith the best regards, Andrey mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread Tim Legant
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Cameron Hanover wrote: > okee dokee. i'm having quite a time trying to get qmail to work right. [snip...] > any help anybody could give me would be greatly appreciated. Please post the output of 'qmail-showctl' (don't edit it!) and the unedited content

Re: trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread RC
not sure. ps -x doesn't show it, but it doesn't show any of the other ones, and the only place the install docs said to make a start script was in inetd.conf, which is the line pasted below. if i try and start wmail-send manually, i get this: alert: cannot start: hath the daemon spawn no fire?

Re: trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread Chris Johnson
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 08:37:34PM -0400, RC wrote: > and, of course, nothing was delivered. sure enough, it's sitting in > ~qmail/queue/mess/20/ > > this us just a thought, and i'm going to seem incredibly stupid if > this is the answer: > the file permissions for my mailbox are: > -rw---

Re: trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread RC
well, that part of the documentation finally made sense, so here's what i got doing the commands in the doc [chanover@ltg-pmac2 chanover]$ telnet .edu smtp Trying 141.213.36.39... Connected to .edu. Escape character is '^]'. 220 .edu ESMTP helo dude 250 .edu mail jesus@.edu 250 ok rcpt jesus@.ed

Re: trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread Al Lipscomb
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 05:43:36PM -0400, RC wrote: > okee dokee. i'm having quite a time trying to get qmail to work right. > > for a while i was at least able to send mail from my box [running > openbsd2.8] and receive it on my box, or send mail from it, and > receive elsewhere, but not send f

trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread RC
okee dokee. i'm having quite a time trying to get qmail to work right. for a while i was at least able to send mail from my box [running openbsd2.8] and receive it on my box, or send mail from it, and receive elsewhere, but not send from elsewhere and receive on it. now i can't send or receive

trouble with qmail

2001-04-29 Thread Cameron Hanover
okee dokee. i'm having quite a time trying to get qmail to work right. for a while i was at least able to send mail from my box [running openbsd2.8] and receive it on my box, or send mail from it, and receive elsewhere, but not send from elsewhere and receive on it. now i can't send or receive

Re: Trouble with qmail on Redhat 6.2

2001-03-20 Thread Dave Sill
"Iain Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The run file for qmail-smtpd is: > >#!/bin/sh >QMAILDUID='is -u qmaild' >NOFILESGID='id -g qmaild' >MAXSMTPD='cat /var/qmail/control/concurrencyincoming' Should be back quotes (`) not single quotes ('). -Dave

Re: Trouble with qmail on Redhat 6.2

2001-03-20 Thread James Raftery
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:48:55AM -, Iain Morrison wrote: > The problem is that I am unable to connect to the SMTP server even via the > loopback address. When I telnet to port 25 I get connected but get a dead > prompt. [snip] > The run file for qmail-smtpd is: ...riddled with typos...

Re: Trouble with qmail on Redhat 6.2

2001-03-20 Thread Yves Caetano
hi, > > After qmail has supposedly started up I have the following processes > running: > > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND > 415 ?S 0:00 svscan > 416 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-send > 417 ?S 0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd > 418 ?S 0:00 /usr/

Trouble with qmail on Redhat 6.2

2001-03-20 Thread Iain Morrison
works without any problems at all for local addresses and external addresses. I am able to retrieve mail via pop3 with no trouble, I just cant send it the SMTP server. I have enclosed below the various startup and config files used for this system. Any ideas are gratefully recieved. TIA Iain

Re: qmail-iject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)

2001-03-02 Thread Dave Sill
"Hatem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I tried to test local-local part in the TEST.deliver.. >but unfortunately I got the above error!! > >Can someone help me out here!! You didn't follow the installation instructions carefully. Either blow everything away and start from scratch, or go back throug

Re: qmail-iject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)

2001-03-02 Thread Charles Cazabon
Hatem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried to test local-local part in the TEST.deliver.. > but unfortunately I got the above error!! Next time include the error in the body of your message, not just the subject. Possible problems causing this error include the queue disk being full or out of in

qmail-iject: fatal: qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)

2001-03-02 Thread Hatem
I tried to test local-local part in the TEST.deliver.. but unfortunately I got the above error!!   Can someone help me out here!!  

451 qq trouble creating files in queue with noatime UFS mount option

2001-03-02 Thread Curtis Generous
r about 1000 mails: > > 451 qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0) > > Has anybody else seen this in a qmail+Solaris 7 > environment? What can I do to stop it? > > The queue is completely empty at the start of the test, > the filesystem on the disk is just created

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-26 Thread Alex Pennace
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 05:11:56PM +0800, flint wrote: > Dear Alex Pennace > > >In that case, send SIGTERM to the qmail-send process. > > I have tried to do so. But can you tell me where I can find PID of qmail-send >process? Use ps.

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-26 Thread flint
Dear Alex Pennace >In that case, send SIGTERM to the qmail-send process. I have tried to do so. But can you tell me where I can find PID of qmail-send process? flint

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-25 Thread Alex Pennace
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:30:17PM +0800, flint wrote: > Dear Charles Cazabon > > >I take it that you are not the one that installed qmail on this system. > >There's a thousand ways to start/stop qmail. [snip] > >If none of those work, see if you have /var/qmail/bin/rc -- that tells you > >how

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-25 Thread flint
Dear Charles Cazabon >I take it that you are not the one that installed qmail on this system. >There's a thousand ways to start/stop qmail. > >You don't have a svc command, so it's probably not running under svscan. >If it's installed with a SysV-like startup script, try >/etc/rc.d/init.d/q

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-23 Thread Charles Cazabon
flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver. > >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either > >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server. > >Yes! It's really our DNS problem. [...] >

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-23 Thread flint
Dear Charles Cazabon >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver. >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server. > >Charles Yes! It's really our DNS problem. Several days ago,we

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-23 Thread flint
Dear Charles Cazabon >Your problem could be ident and DNS lookup timeouts from tcpserver. >Investigate the possibility of turning off ident lookups, and either >disabling DNS lookups or fixing your DNS resolver/content server. > >Charles Yes! It's really our DNS problem. Several days ago,we

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-22 Thread Charles Cazabon
flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >You can either use queue-fix to replace/fix the (non-existent?) queue, or > >restore from your backups and THEN use queue-fix to fix the queue. > I have fix the queue using queue-fix. It unlinked some file under > /var/qmail/queue/remote, but now I sti

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-21 Thread flint
Dear Charles Cazabon > >You can either use queue-fix to replace/fix the (non-existent?) queue, or >restore from your backups and THEN use queue-fix to fix the queue. > >You can't just restore from tape; files in the queue are named based on the >inodes they reside on. Restoring from tape will co

Re: Fw: Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-21 Thread Charles Cazabon
flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Today,I saw there were many messages like this in the maillog: > >> 982653149.920320 warning: trouble opening remote/4/r > >Your queue is corrupt. Did you manually remove any messages from the queue? > >Get qmail-

Fw: Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-20 Thread flint
>> Today,I saw there were many messages like this in the maillog: >> 982653149.920320 warning: trouble opening remote/4/r >Your queue is corrupt. Did you manually remove any messages from the queue? >Get qmail-queuefix from www.qmail.org to fix this. >Charles Tha

Re: warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-20 Thread Charles Cazabon
flint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Today,I saw there were many messages like this in the maillog: > 982653149.920320 warning: trouble opening remote/4/r Your queue is corrupt. Did you manually remove any messages from the queue? Get qmail-queuefix from www.qmail.org to fix

warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-19 Thread flint
Hi everybody, Today,I saw there were many messages like this in the maillog: 982653149.920320 warning: trouble opening remote/4/r Who can tell me what those mean? Thanks flint [EMAIL PROTECTED]

warning: trouble opening remote/4/r

2001-02-19 Thread flint
Hi everybody, Today,I saw there were many messages like this in the maillog: 982653149.920320 warning: trouble opening remote/4/r Who can tell me what those mean? Thanks flint [EMAIL PROTECTED]

451 qq Trouble creating files in Queue

2000-11-13 Thread Michael Maier
Hi all! When I send out dozens of Messages I get that Error 451 qq Trouble creating files in Queue. I did already make setup check but it didn't help! So why is that Error occuring ? Can it be possible that my Hard Disk is to busy/slow Thanks in Advance, Michael!

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Howard Miller
Aaron, I am very sorry it won't happen again. I was really quite upset by Mr. McKenna's attitude. I questioned as aspect of his HOWTO and he became very personal and insulting. I have had a great deal of help from this list and wouldn't have got my system running without it. His attitude was quit

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Jerry Lynde
At 11:10 AM 11/3/2000, Aaron L. Meehan wrote: >Quoting Howard Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > >Oh and I posted this to the mailing list as well. I am sure everybody > > >will be interested! in your behaviour!! > >Excuse me, Howie, but STOP posting private messages to the list >just to spite pe

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Adam McKenna
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 05:05:11PM -0800, Howard Miller wrote: > >Yes, well it's remarkably easy to talk big when you on the other side of > >the Atlantic isn't it? I haven't at any stage been rude to anybody. You've been rude to everyone on the list. The fact that you didn't think you were bei

Re: Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Aaron L. Meehan
Quoting Howard Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >Oh and I posted this to the mailing list as well. I am sure everybody > >will be interested! in your behaviour!! Excuse me, Howie, but STOP posting private messages to the list just to spite people. We have some real work to do here. Goodness.

Fwd: Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Howard Miller
>Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2000 16:59:04 -0800 >To: Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >From: Howard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: More trouble >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Yes, well it's remarkably easy to talk big when you on the other side

Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread David Dyer-Bennet
Howard Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 3 November 2000 at 16:16:55 -0800 > Well, we all had to start somewhere didn't we? Did you know everything > about MTAs the first time you installed one? I am almost completely new to > Unix systems but have had many years experience on various ot

Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Adam McKenna
On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 04:16:55PM -0800, Howard Miller wrote: > Well, we all had to start somewhere didn't we? Did you know everything > about MTAs the first time you installed one? I am almost completely new to > Unix systems but have had many years experience on various other platforms. > I

Re: More trouble

2000-11-03 Thread Howard Miller
Well, we all had to start somewhere didn't we? Did you know everything about MTAs the first time you installed one? I am almost completely new to Unix systems but have had many years experience on various other platforms. I am the first to admit that I am used to commercial, expensively docum

Re: qmail-1.03 on OpenBSD 2.7 newbie trouble

2000-10-14 Thread Chris K. Young
Quoted from [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > no problem with the first line, except that I don't know if /etc/tcp.smtp > was supposed to exist or it just had to be created (in fact it didn't > exist beforehand). You write it yourself. > The second line is another story. /usr/local/sbin/

qmail-1.03 on OpenBSD 2.7 newbie trouble

2000-10-14 Thread zleepless
I installed qmail, daemontools and ucspi-tcp from the OpenBSD ports. Then went to the lwq.html and howto for configuration. I connect through one isp, but usually send/receive mail through other accounts on different isps. After creating the supervise/ directories and files, I followed the

Re: Trouble starting qmail on boot

2000-09-17 Thread wolfgang zeikat
the K* symlinks kill the processes on shutdown, for startup you need the S* symlinks in /etc/rc.d/rc*.d, e.g. S95svscan wolfgang Also sprach Gadoury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 17.09.2000: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Sep 14 08:17 K30svscan -> ../init.d/svscan

Trouble starting qmail on boot

2000-09-17 Thread Gadoury
Hi, My qmail setup is based on the HOW-TO from www.flounder.net. I am using RH 6.2. When I run /etc/rc.d/init.d/svscan start Qmail starts up without any trouble, however when I restart my server, Qmail is not being started up. I then have to log into the server and run /etc/rc.d/init.d/svscan

Re: trouble injecting ....

2000-09-04 Thread Adam McKenna
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 11:44:02PM +1200, Chris K. Young wrote: > Quoted from Adam McKenna: > > Most likely you have the wrong permissions set on qmail-queue, it should look > > like this: > > > > -rws--x--x1 qmailq qmail 11308 May 2 02:57 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue > > I initally t

Re: trouble injecting ....

2000-09-04 Thread Chris K. Young
Quoted from Adam McKenna: > Most likely you have the wrong permissions set on qmail-queue, it should look > like this: > > -rws--x--x1 qmailq qmail 11308 May 2 02:57 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue I initally thought that too, but then I read the whole of Fabio's message, and realised th

Re: trouble injecting ....

2000-09-03 Thread Adam McKenna
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 08:46:47PM +0200, Fabio Pedrazzoli wrote: > Hi, > I have problems when delivering some kind of messages; > by command line, i can deliver JUST FROM ROOT and JUST REMOTE messages: > Most likely you have the wrong permissions set on qmail-queue, it should look like this:

trouble injecting ....

2000-09-03 Thread Fabio Pedrazzoli
Hi, I have problems when delivering some kind of messages; by command line, i can deliver JUST FROM ROOT and JUST REMOTE messages: this work: # echo to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|/var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject # tail -f /var/log/qmail/current | tai64nlocal 2000-09-02 03:57:16.713748500 new msg 48075 2000-0

RE: trouble with outlook??

2000-08-29 Thread Brett Randall
look in /var/qmail/control/me and make sure it is the right domain /BR Manager InterPlanetary Solutions http://ipsware.com/ > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Ackermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2000 5:02 PM > To: qmail > Subject: troub

Re: trouble with outlook??

2000-08-29 Thread Magnus Bodin
On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 09:02:21AM +0200, Thomas Ackermann wrote: > > trying my qmail-server with outlook now i encountered some strange things like > outlook sending to another outlook the adress of my server as answer to: adress > but sending to linux or from linux to outlook i see the correct a

trouble with outlook??

2000-08-29 Thread Thomas Ackermann
trying my qmail-server with outlook now i encountered some strange things like outlook sending to another outlook the adress of my server as answer to: adress but sending to linux or from linux to outlook i see the correct answer to: adress, whts happenin here ???

Re: Installation Trouble

2000-08-28 Thread chicken
That solved it. Thanks! It turns out alias did not have execute permissions on ~alias. -Aaron On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, James Raftery wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:25:07AM -0700, chicken wrote: > > I have created .qamil-* files. I have tried using them empty as well, as > > with ./Maildir/ in

Re: Installation Trouble

2000-08-28 Thread James Raftery
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:25:07AM -0700, chicken wrote: > I have created .qamil-* files. I have tried using them empty as well, as > with ./Maildir/ in them. Neither have worked. Here's is a copy from the > logs, of what I assume is likely the culprit > > Aug 29 10:14:21 tatooine qmail: 96756926

Re: Installation Trouble

2000-08-28 Thread chicken
Hi James, I have created .qamil-* files. I have tried using them empty as well, as with ./Maildir/ in them. Neither have worked. Here's is a copy from the logs, of what I assume is likely the culprit Aug 29 10:14:21 tatooine qmail: 967569261.251639 starting delivery 174: msg 23847 to local [EMAIL

Re: Installation Trouble

2000-08-28 Thread James Raftery
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 10:05:22AM -0700, chicken wrote: > If I send mail from an external machine to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message > is received. If I send mail from an external machine to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or mailer-daemon, or root) the message is not > received. Hi Aaron, Did you create

Installation Trouble

2000-08-28 Thread chicken
Hi All, It's been a couple years since I last installed qmail. I'm trying to install to Redhat 6.2. Durring the installation, everything ran smoothly, but a few of the tests failed. If I send mail from an external machine to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is received. If I send mail from an exte

Re: Trouble compiling qmail under RedHat v6.2 Intel

2000-08-09 Thread Steve Woolley
Peter Green wrote: > Either re-install (with --force) kernel-headers to get all of the proper > symlinks back, or check the following: After doing this I got ALOT further, unfortunately it crapped out on: ... ... rm -f tryshsgr.o tryshsgr ./compile prot.c ./compile coe.c ./compile cdb_hash.c ./c

Re: Trouble compiling qmail under RedHat v6.2 Intel

2000-08-08 Thread Peter Green
also sprach steve.woolley: > Petr Novotny wrote: > > > > > ./compile sig_alarm.c > > > In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, > > > from sig_alarm.c:1: > > > /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm/sigcontext.h: No such file or > > > > You need glibc-devel and kernel-he

Re: Trouble compiling qmail under RedHat v6.2 Intel

2000-08-08 Thread Steve Woolley
Petr Novotny wrote: > > > ./compile sig_alarm.c > > In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, > > from sig_alarm.c:1: > > /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm/sigcontext.h: No such file or > > You need glibc-devel and kernel-headers packages. > I checked and I believe

Re: Trouble compiling qmail under RedHat v6.2 Intel

2000-08-07 Thread Petr Novotny
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7 Aug 00, at 9:24, Steve Woolley wrote: > ./compile sig_alarm.c > In file included from /usr/include/signal.h:300, > from sig_alarm.c:1: > /usr/include/bits/sigcontext.h:28: asm/sigcontext.h: No such file or You need glibc-devel

Trouble compiling qmail under RedHat v6.2 Intel

2000-08-07 Thread Steve Woolley
I am having trouble compiling qmail from the source distribution unde RedHat 6.2 Intel. According to the README's I should not have to anything special to compile but I seem to be blowing up because of a simple standard header file not being found. I know I could probably go back and locate

Re: trouble

2000-08-04 Thread Sean C Truman
ED]> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 9:13 AM Subject: RE: trouble > > Everythings fine but the smtp server takes a long time > > to initialize..like when I telnet to port 25 on my > > localhost...the 220 host.domain.com ESMTP appears but > > after a long time. > > >

RE: trouble

2000-08-04 Thread Greg Owen
> Everythings fine but the smtp server takes a long time > to initialize..like when I telnet to port 25 on my > localhost...the 220 host.domain.com ESMTP appears but > after a long time. > > Has anybody experienced such a problem and was able to > solve this... Your tcpserver invocation

trouble

2000-08-04 Thread Sumith Ail
Hi All I've installed qmail+patches from source rpms on my RH 6.2 1386 linux box from Bruce Guenter source distribution 1. daemontools 70-1 2. ucpspi-tcp-0.88-1 3. supervise-scripts-2.4 4. qmail-1.03+patches-14 Everythings fine but the smtp server takes a long time to initialize..like when I te

Re: trouble injecting bounce message

2000-08-03 Thread Joel Gautschi
yslog file. what do these > entries mean? do I have to care about them or are these messages just > 'information'? > > Aug 3 06:26:22 joshua qmail: 965276782.869518 warning: trouble injecting > bounce message, will try later > > thanks for an answer > Joel > > >

RE: trouble injecting bounce message

2000-08-03 Thread Slider
. what do these entries mean? do I have to care about them or are these messages just 'information'? Aug 3 06:26:22 joshua qmail: 965276782.869518 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later thanks for an answer Joel

trouble injecting bounce message

2000-08-03 Thread Joel Gautschi
hi, I have a lot of these entries in my /var/log/syslog file. what do these entries mean? do I have to care about them or are these messages just 'information'? Aug 3 06:26:22 joshua qmail: 965276782.869518 warning: trouble injecting bounce message, will try later thanks for an answer Joel

trouble creating files in queue - partly solved ...

2000-07-25 Thread Toens Bueker
Hi *, after testing various configurations of qmail (different conf-splits, with/without patches), I moved the queue-dir to a partition, which resides on two disks - in fact RAID1+0 via SDS. And the errors went away. Furthermore, I learned, that sending via qmail-inject doesn't have these proble

451 qq trouble creating files in queue (again) ...

2000-07-24 Thread Toens Bueker
Hi *, when I try to torture my brand new qmail installation (qmail-1.03 + bigtodo + bigconcurrency on Solaris 7, queue on a separate 9 GB disk, mounted with 'noatime', conf-split 521 or 321) a little bit, I get this error message after about 1000 mails: 451 qq trouble creating file

qq trouble creating files in queue

2000-07-21 Thread Toens Bueker
Hi *, qmail-1.03 with bigtodo- and the big-queue-patch gives this error-message, when I relay mails with smtpstone through it. root@:~# qmail-qstat messages in queue: 1221 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 77 Hints, where to look for a solution? By Töns -- Linux. The dot in /.

  1   2   >