Re: [Qt-creator] Creator editor color control.

On Oct 24, 2010, at 2:19 AM, ext Clark Williams wrote: > I set my background to black and my foreground color to a dark orange (black > on white is just too tiring on everyone's eyes). > But when I do that the cursor is extremely difficult to see. > Is there an IDE-editor cursor color control? >

[Qt-creator] Creator editor color control.

I set my background to black and my foreground color to a dark orange (black on white is just too tiring on everyone's eyes). But when I do that the cursor is extremely difficult to see. Is there an IDE-editor cursor color control? If not then there should be. If you allow me to change my backgro

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator destroys my HTML code

Hi Nikos, > >> Whenever I edit a QTextEdit or QTextBrowser, Creator always utterly > >> destroys it by inserting CSS code, forcing particular fonts and font > >> sizes, ignoring application/system defaults, and other evil things, > >> resulting in breakage on other systems than my own. Is that wh

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator destroys my HTML code

I don't need HTML accuracy, actually. All I need is to have my *basic* HTML formatted stuff not messed around with. And of course the font not forced to DejaVu Sans 9pt :-/ On 09/28/2010 05:10 AM, Coda Highland wrote: > Don't use QTextEdit for things that need HTML accuracy. It's not > intende

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator destroys my HTML code

Don't use QTextEdit for things that need HTML accuracy. It's not intended for that use -- try QtWebKit if you need actual HTML editing. QTextEdit just uses an HTML subset to provide basic rich text support. /s/ Adam On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > Whenever I edit a QT

[Qt-creator] Creator destroys my HTML code

Whenever I edit a QTextEdit or QTextBrowser, Creator always utterly destroys it by inserting CSS code, forcing particular fonts and font sizes, ignoring application/system defaults, and other evil things, resulting in breakage on other systems than my own. Is there a way around that "feature"?

[Qt-creator] Creator master, hoto build Debuging helper?

Creator wrote:   Qt preference page: Where is the button "Rebuild"? ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

[Qt-creator] Creator incorrectly underlines size_t as 'not a type name'

I working on a simple C program and I'm using variables and parameters of type size_t. Although the code compiles fine, Creator insists on underlining in green every occurrence of the size_t symbol with the tooltip "'size_t' is not a typename". I'm on OSX and size_t is defined in stddef.h which

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files

On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:59:10 ext Liebe Markus (RtP2/TEF72) wrote: > > If that works, I'd be interested in that line. > > That worked for me! Thanks. > The line is in the attached file. After looking at the code in some detail, the only changes to the restore/saving code was back in the Qt 4.

[Qt-creator] Creator doesn't set LD_LIBRARY_PATH and project runs with wrong Qt libs

Before filing a bug about this, I though I'd post here first in case this is actually not a bug. The problem is the version of Qt I configured in the project settings. When I select something else than "Qt in PATH" in "Build Settings" (using for example, "/home/me/opt/qt-4.6.3-debug/bin/qmake")

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files

> If that works, I'd be interested in that line. That worked for me! Thanks. The line is in the attached file. Markus trimmed_Trolltech.conf Description: trimmed_Trolltech.conf ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltec

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files

On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:24:04 ext Liebe Markus (RtP2/TEF72) wrote: > > Well that usually means out of memory. That's strange. Did > > you try cleaning > > the build directory and made sure no stale plugins are still left. > > I did a git clean -dxf before building > > > If the crash still is

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files

> Well that usually means out of memory. That's strange. Did > you try cleaning > the build directory and made sure no stale plugins are still left. > I did a git clean -dxf before building > If the crash still is present with a clean build try > debugging where the > std::bad_alloc exception is

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files

> As soon as I want to open a file / project using ctrl+o or the menu entry > "open" creator crashes with the following message: > > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' > what(): std::bad_alloc Well that usually means out of memory. That's strange. Did you try c

[Qt-creator] Creator from git crashes when opening files

Hi there, I have just built qt and qt-creator from git. Build was successful. As soon as I want to open a file / project using ctrl+o or the menu entry "open" creator crashes with the following message: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' what(): std::bad_alloc I

[Qt-creator] Creator shows syntax errors when it shouldn't

I get a lot of syntax errors in many files unless I explicitly place an #include in the source that contains the declaration of the missing symbols. However, this is not appropriate for the application in question; those headers must not be included directly in those source files. Is there a w

[Qt-creator] Creator 2.0 branch requires latest qt.git/4.7

Hi, Because of a change in qt.git/4.7 in the QtDeclarative module we had to patch creator/2.0 branch. Commit 74a615fbeec95786dfc3d85a667e994f731b73dd will hit the public repo with the usual 12 hour delay. Once you pull this commit, you've to update also your qt ... Regards Kai -- Kai Köhne S

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator 2.0 QMLViewer issue

But not in the binary or source downloads of the technology preview offered here: http://qt.nokia.com/developer/qt-qtcreator-prerelease#download I guess I should use GIT to get the very latest version rather than 4.7.0? Thanks, Jack On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Teske wrote: > On Tues

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator 2.0 QMLViewer issue

On Tuesday 13 April 2010 17:16:29 ext Jack Wootton wrote: > Hi all, > > I’m using Qt Creator 2 and Qt 4.7, both built from source. Currently I > experience a problem where the QML editor is very sluggish and slow. The > problem occurs when the QML viewer is launched, aplication is run and then >

[Qt-creator] Creator 2.0 QMLViewer issue

Hi all, I’m using Qt Creator 2 and Qt 4.7, both built from source. Currently I experience a problem where the QML editor is very sluggish and slow. The problem occurs when the QML viewer is launched, aplication is run and then closed. The whole IDE lags a lot and becomes unusable for about 30-40 s

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On Mar 29, 2010, at 1:55 AM, King Bill (Nokia-D-Qt/Brisbane) wrote: > On 03/26/2010 07:18 PM, Ziller Eike (Nokia-D-Qt/Berlin) wrote: >> >> Well, except that we don't have windows binary builds for for various >> reasons at the moment, we have nightly binary builds of Qt Creator master on >> to

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On 03/26/2010 07:18 PM, Ziller Eike (Nokia-D-Qt/Berlin) wrote: > > Well, except that we don't have windows binary builds for for various reasons > at the moment, we have nightly binary builds of Qt Creator master on top of > Qt 4.7 (or before a release the release branches), which you could use t

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On 03/26/2010 05:06 PM, Raggi Roberto (Nokia-D-Qt/Berlin) wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mar 26, 2010, at 12:15 AM, ext Bill King wrote: >>> >> In this case I got a "doesn't happen here" and then it was dropped >> (maybe it was worked on internally), but the email responses from >> roberto showed that it ha

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

ext John Vilburn wrote: > [...] > Creator is working fine for general Qt development for me. My top > request is for Creator to include a way in Design mode to specify > actions and transitions for QML. I know that opens up a lot of > possibilities and a lot of work would be involved. But a good

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On Mar 26, 2010, at 12:20 AM, King Bill (Nokia-D-Qt/Brisbane) wrote: > On 03/25/2010 07:40 PM, Ziller Eike (Nokia-D-Qt/Berlin) wrote: >> >> Especially regarding Qt Creator's Qml support, a CI system for Qt Creator >> would be mostly pointless. >> > Unless it produced a point of stability, say

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Hello Bill! On 26.03.2010 00:15, King Bill (Nokia-D-Qt/Brisbane) wrote: > No, in this case one of your team had a go at me for trying to bring to > light the quality issues I'd seen. Unfortunately we do get too passionate about defending our baby at times:-( >> We are trying hard to keep the res

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Hi, On Mar 26, 2010, at 12:15 AM, ext Bill King wrote: In this case I got a "doesn't happen here" and then it was dropped (maybe it was worked on internally), but the email responses from roberto showed that it had pretty much been ignored (even after me adding extra information, and then even a

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On 03/25/2010 08:18 PM, Poenitz Andre (Nokia-D-Qt/Berlin) wrote: > > There is no promise (and never has been) that Creator master branch > works (including even the weirdest definitions of "works"...) > > If you want something that is known to compile, use a released version. > > We are happy abou

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On 03/25/2010 07:40 PM, Ziller Eike (Nokia-D-Qt/Berlin) wrote: > > Especially regarding Qt Creator's Qml support, a CI system for Qt Creator > would be mostly pointless. > Unless it produced a point of stability, say a branch in both qt and creator called qtcreator_stable, that's had minimal bu

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On 03/25/2010 07:08 PM, Hunger Tobias (Nokia-D/Berlin) wrote: > > Hey Bill! > > >> I thought we were an open company, part of that is being open to >> criticism when things are not working. >> > I really do not understand this critique: > * We did investigate the issue > * We evaluated

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On Mar 24, 2010, at 10:10 PM, wrote: > Well, you can stick to e.g. the Alpha, and even creator 1.3 has some limited > QML support. The QML text editor + runtime infrastructure has been pretty > stable for me anyhow. Regarding QmlDesigner - yeah, the quality is not yet up > to where it shoul

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Frank: I agree with most of what you wrote. I have used the master branch to build Creator from source for a while now, and have to regrets in that regard. Yes, sometimes that have forced me to revamp my Qt installation, but at the end nothing I wouldn't have ended up doing sooner or later. QM

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

André Pönitz, Thursday 25 March 2010: > There is no promise (and never has been) that Creator master branch > works (including even the weirdest definitions of "works"...) > > If you want something that is known to compile, use a released version. > > We are happy about anybody actually using mas

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On Thursday 25 March 2010 01:50:12 ext ext Raul Fernandes wrote: > Hi, > > as user of different IDEs, I don't understand why qtcreator is trying > to provide more advanced features (such as QML support) if more > basic features are not implement/working properly. Important point: > how can the te

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On Thursday 25 March 2010 00:46:46 King Bill (Nokia-D-Qt/Brisbane) wrote: > Bringing this over here as was requested ;) > I was just criticized for criticizing the quality of creator ("on the > basis of one bug report"). > > I thought we were an open company, part of that is being open to > critic

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

On Mar 25, 2010, at 12:46 AM, King Bill (Nokia-D-Qt/Brisbane) wrote: > Bringing this over here as was requested ;) > > > I was just criticized for criticizing the quality of creator ("on the > basis of one bug report"). > > I thought we were an open company, part of that is being open to > cri

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

From: qt-creator-boun...@trolltech.com [qt-creator-boun...@trolltech.com] On Behalf Of ext Brett Morgan [brett.mor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 9:29 AM To: qt-creator@trolltech.com Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability >

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Hey Bill! On 25.03.2010 00:46, King Bill (Nokia-D-Qt/Brisbane) wrote: > Bringing this over here as was requested ;) > I was just criticized for criticizing the quality of creator ("on the > basis of one bug report"). For reference: http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTCREATORBUG-807 is the bu

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Kai, I'm compiling and using qt-creator in multiple environments, primarily OSX 10.6 and a variety of Linux distributions. I'm happy to give you details of my environments and stack traces. brett On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 7:10 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > since this partly about Qml support which I'm pe

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Hi, since this partly about Qml support which I'm personally involved in, I'd like to add my two cents :) > [...] > Creator mainline is not working. I have reports both from internal and > external users on a regular basis of either creator not building, or > creator crashing upon startup. I hav

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

Hi, as user of different IDEs, I don't understand why qtcreator is trying to provide more advanced features (such as QML support) if more basic features are not implement/working properly. Important point: how can the team adopts qtcreator as main development environment if it is not even getting

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator stability

As a user in the field who is bringing a development team from web development across to embedded development using QML and Qt/Embedded I second Bill's call for qt-creator's git to be put under some form of automatic build testing. I need this stable so that my team will have confidence to move ahe

[Qt-creator] Creator stability

Bringing this over here as was requested ;) I was just criticized for criticizing the quality of creator ("on the basis of one bug report"). I thought we were an open company, part of that is being open to criticism when things are not working. Creator mainline is not working. I have reports bo

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator and Qt < 4.7

On Thursday 04 March 2010 10:27:41 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:04:34AM +0100, ext Enrico Ros wrote: > > I'm developing a plugin for Creator, rebasing every day over creator's > > "master" branch. Since distributions are starting to support Qt 4.6 (I'm > > shipping on gent

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator and Qt < 4.7

On Thursday 04 March 2010 11:02:24 ext Eirik Ulvik wrote: > Den 04.03.2010 10:27, skrev Oswald Buddenhagen: > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:04:34AM +0100, ext Enrico Ros wrote: > >> I'm developing a plugin for Creator, rebasing every day over creator's > >> "master" branch. Since distributions are s

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator and Qt < 4.7

Den 04.03.2010 10:27, skrev Oswald Buddenhagen: > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:04:34AM +0100, ext Enrico Ros wrote: > >> I'm developing a plugin for Creator, rebasing every day over creator's >> "master" branch. Since distributions are starting to support Qt 4.6 (I'm >> shipping on gentoo and ubu

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator and Qt < 4.7

On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 09:04:34AM +0100, ext Enrico Ros wrote: > I'm developing a plugin for Creator, rebasing every day over creator's > "master" branch. Since distributions are starting to support Qt 4.6 (I'm > shipping on gentoo and ubuntu 10.4), mandating 4.7 means that I have to stop > tra

[Qt-creator] Creator and Qt < 4.7

Hello, I've just noticed the requirement for Qt 4.7 in Creator's qmake script. I'm developing a plugin for Creator, rebasing every day over creator's "master" branch. Since distributions are starting to support Qt 4.6 (I'm shipping on gentoo and ubuntu 10.4), mandating 4.7 means that I have to s

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator forcing nmake version

On Saturday 05 December 2009 00:11:45 ext Hari Sundar wrote: > Hi, > > When I use cmake (from the cmd line or the GUI) to produce nmake > files, it produces it based on the version I have specified as the > default version. However, it forces it to VC 9 if I invoke it within > Creator. This might

[Qt-creator] Creator forcing nmake version

Hi, When I use cmake (from the cmd line or the GUI) to produce nmake files, it produces it based on the version I have specified as the default version. However, it forces it to VC 9 if I invoke it within Creator. This might also be due to the fact that I used VC9 to compile Qt. How do I specify

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Ken Ray wrote: > > Is it possible to get user interface files for the demos that come along with > Creator ? Sure, they're part of the Qt source distribution. /s/ Adam ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.c

[Qt-creator] Creator

Is it possible to get user interface files for the demos that come along with Creator ? ___ Qt-creator mailing list Qt-creator@trolltech.com http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator 1.3 release date?

On Tuesday 17 November 2009 10:10:47 ext Danny Price wrote: > What's the release data for Creator 1.3? There have been so many > improvements in the snapshots and last 'official' version, 1.2.1, is > looking seriously dated by comparison. We've just released the rc of both Creator 1.3 and Qt 4.6.

[Qt-creator] Creator 1.3 release date?

What's the release data for Creator 1.3? There have been so many improvements in the snapshots and last 'official' version, 1.2.1, is looking seriously dated by comparison. Please don't say it will be released when Qt 4.6 is ___ Qt-creator mailing li

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator uses wrong icons when files are under Tortoise version control

I didn't expect Creator to pick up the icon changes at all - the other IDE's I've used (XCode and MSVC) certainly don't! It would be great if it did show the up to date icons, even if the IDE doesn't not support Tortoise. I've gotten used to switching to Explorer/Finder/Nautilus just to check the

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator uses wrong icons when files are under Tortoise version control

ext Danny Price wrote: > I just checked a project I'm working on into SVN via Tortoise (Vista) > and I've noticed that the project tree started using the icon badges > from Tortoise - the wrong icon badges at that. All my files (all of > which are up-to-date in SVN) now have the 'modified' badge

[Qt-creator] Creator uses wrong icons when files are under Tortoise version control

I just checked a project I'm working on into SVN via Tortoise (Vista) and I've noticed that the project tree started using the icon badges from Tortoise - the wrong icon badges at that. All my files (all of which are up-to-date in SVN) now have the 'modified' badge and I can't get rid of them.

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator does not display correct icons for .c and .hpp files

OK thanks Bjørn! On 15 Jul 2009, at 16:57, Thorbjørn Lindeijer wrote: > ext Daniel Price wrote: >> I use a mix of c and c++ code bases and I'm trying to use .hpp >> extensions over .h extensions for strictly c++ headers. I've noted >> that although Creator has a preference option for the suffix t

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator does not display correct icons for .c and .hpp files

ext Daniel Price wrote: > I use a mix of c and c++ code bases and I'm trying to use .hpp > extensions over .h extensions for strictly c++ headers. I've noted > that although Creator has a preference option for the suffix to use > when generating files, it only displays a blank/generic file ic

[Qt-creator] Creator does not display correct icons for .c and .hpp files

I use a mix of c and c++ code bases and I'm trying to use .hpp extensions over .h extensions for strictly c++ headers. I've noted that although Creator has a preference option for the suffix to use when generating files, it only displays a blank/generic file icon in the project list for .hp

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

2009/7/8 Thorbjørn Lindeijer > ... > > > > One thing is becoming clear. The fact that there is a legal barrier > > which effectively removes the bulk of the Qt development from group > > participation is going to greatly limit Qt's evolution into a true > > open-source project. That Qt rocks wi

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

ext Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > A small detail might be inserted here. While its not mandated, "master" > is the generally accepted name of the "it works" branch of a repo. > Obviously, we can use "master-stable" but methinks it would be better to > have master be master and any other "less tha

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

2009/7/7 Thorbjørn Lindeijer > ext Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Andre Poenitz > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > (can't imagine why that policy exists other than CVS / SVN > > hangover... > > > git branches

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

ext Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Andre Poenitz > > wrote: > > > > (can't imagine why that policy exists other than CVS / SVN > hangover... > > git branches and direct repo access are a much better appro

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Daniel Teske wrote: > >> Thats the thing... DVCS doesn't have the same notion of "commit" which lies >> at the heart of why SVN / CVS is broken / painful / bad.  The idea is that >> one can publish to a separate repo or non-master branch but it doesn't get >> mer

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

> Thats the thing... DVCS doesn't have the same notion of "commit" which lies > at the heart of why SVN / CVS is broken / painful / bad. The idea is that > one can publish to a separate repo or non-master branch but it doesn't get > merged into "blessed" branch / repo until its been vetted.

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Roberto Raggi wrote: > > We noticed a > bug in Qt/master that can easily crash Creator. If you are using Qt from the > master's branch you should consider to revert to a more stable version, for > example I did a git reset --hard 099a32d121cbc80a1a234c3146f4be9b52

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Andre Poenitz < andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > > > (can't imagine why that policy exists other than CVS / SVN hangover... > > git branches and direct repo access are a much better approach) > > It is a good idea to have a grace period to press th

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

We noticed a bug in Qt/master that can easily crash Creator. If you are using Qt from the master's branch you should consider to revert to a more stable version, for example I did a git reset --hard 099a32d121cbc80a1a234c3146f4be9b5237e7e8 in my Qt directory and Creator definitely looks u

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:25:44AM -0700, Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote: > Has there been a shift away from "master" being ready for testing? Not intentionally. > Hopefully, the questionable practice of "pushing" from the "inside" repo to > gitorious isn't being used for Creator as it is for Qt It is

[Qt-creator] Creator segmentation faults becoming common...

I like to work with the bleeding edge yet released version of Qt and Creator to help identify bugs. However, for the last few days, Creator has become extremely unstable, crashing so frequently its not usable. Scanning the lists, crashing doesn't appear widely reported so I was wondering if its t

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator-Snapshots

Hi Marc, ext Ladnar, Marc schrieb: > are Creator's snapshots only reachable by git? Or is there another way > maybe to get a sinple tar.gz for extracting and compiling? The source package is available from git. The advantage is that your get the "latest" source, as opposed to a snapshot. You ca

[Qt-creator] Creator-Snapshots

Hello all, are Creator's snapshots only reachable by git? Or is there another way maybe to get a sinple tar.gz for extracting and compiling? On the homepage I only get the git repository to see and I don't find a possibillity to donwload a source package there. Is the old stuff under Qt-labs ki

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator "breaks" qmake generated custom config file

hi, On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:12:20PM +0200, Martin Hauner wrote: > After editing and saving the pro file in Qt Creator my build.conf looks like > this. > > SVN_INCLUDES = /include/subversion-1 > SVN_LIBS = -L/lib -lsvn_client-1 > SVN_PATH = > > Any idea what's going on here? > creator does i

[Qt-creator] Creator "breaks" qmake generated custom config file

Hi, I have a qmake pro that generates a config file that is included in a number of other subdir pro files. Strange is that while editing the pro file in Qt Creator it somehow "runs" the pro file (while re-indexing?). Unfortunately this kills my config file because the SVN_PATH input is missin

[Qt-creator] Creator as DDD replacement

André Pönitz writes: > Then, please, stick to ddd. It's perfect for you. Andre', if you had bothered to read my initial post to this thread, you would understand that DDD is not perfect for me. Clearly, DDD is a much more useful debugger at this point than Creator. I am only here to learn if

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator as DDD replacement

On Saturday 25 April 2009 03:27:10 ext Karl Robillard wrote: > > you can just enter stuff into the gdb input pane and press ctrl-enter in > > that line. > > This seems pretty useless in it's current state. I need a normal command > line > where commands can be typed at a prompt (with history)

[Qt-creator] Creator as DDD replacement

> you can just enter stuff into the gdb input pane and press ctrl-enter in > that line. This seems pretty useless in it's current state. I need a normal command line where commands can be typed at a prompt (with history) and get responses in the same window (and without all the communication g

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator as DDD replacement

> you can just enter stuff into the gdb input pane and press ctrl-enter in > that line. This seems pretty useless in it's current state. I need a normal command line where commands can be typed at a prompt (with history) and get responses in the same window (and without all the communication g

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator as DDD replacement

> you can just enter stuff into the gdb input pane and press ctrl-enter in > that line. This seems pretty useless in it's current state. I need a normal command line where commands can be typed at a prompt (with history) and get responses in the same window (and without all the communication g

Re: [Qt-creator] Creator as DDD replacement

On Friday 24 April 2009 05:29:48 ext Karl Robillard wrote: > I'd like to use Creator as a replacement for DDD since it's GUI is archaic > and > quite flaky (on Fedora at least). However, I don't see any command line for > GDB in Creator. There is a Gdb window, but this only seems to show inter