Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-07 Thread PeterH5322
More precisely, a CD-ROM _or_ a tape drive. There's only one drive bay available for the removable media drive. No, both ... the floppy can be deleted altogether, or it can be moved down towards the speaker, using the 9150 front plastic and floppy bracket. Hell, I've even installed a SCSI Zip

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-06 Thread Artur Yelchishchev
Derek Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A SCSI conflict will (should) only happen if both devices exist on the same physical bus. Since the 900 / 950 has two physical busses, there should be no conflict, but the internal bus devices take precedence over the external bus devices (until 4.3

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-06 Thread PeterH5322
It seems that 'hardware-wise', it's OK to have both buses fully populated with devices, but most of standard software will go crazy looking at it! :-) The machine was designed to accommodate five internal HDs, and at least in the WGS 95 incarnation it will accommodate a CD-ROM and a tape as

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-04 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:49:09 -0500 From: Derek Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] I really cannot imagine needing more than seven SCSI devices... CD-ROM, M.O., Printer, Scanner... This still leaves three for hard drives (and I doubt many people are running SCSI printers). What else is there? Perhaps

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-04 Thread Jeff Walther
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 23:51:49 EDT Subject: Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950? The idea of the internal bus taking precedence over the external bus comes from Apple documentation. I have never bothered to have identical SCSI IDs on devices

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-04 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:22:52 -0500 From: Derek Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am looking at making a memory card which allows the system to run full bore at zero wait states (RAM and ROM). Think of it as a cache card on steroids. There are a couple of problems, one of which is that the memory is

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-04 Thread PeterH5322
AMP has about 300 in stock, but their minimum order is 1008 at $9 each and all the distributers are out of stock. Call the AMP rep and ask for an engineering sample. Don't go overboard. One or two will usually be provided with no problem. More usually raises suspicion. I usually ask for two

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-04 Thread Derek Morton
Determining the needed speed of the SRAM does not really work in that fashion... although it is a common mistake people make. What you need to keep in mind is that to run at zero wait states the memory must get the data on the bus within the (zero wait state) timing requirements of the CPU.

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-03 Thread SaulBro
In a message dated 10/03/03 16:44:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I really cannot imagine needing more than seven SCSI devices... CD-ROM, M.O., Printer, Scanner... This still leaves three for hard drives (and I doubt many people are running SCSI printers). What else is there? Perhaps I

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-02 Thread Artur Yelchishchev
Jeff Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did a search on my computer on SCSI Manager and found some information I didn't know I had. According to Inside Macintosh, volume Devices, section SCSI_Manager_4.3.pdf, -snip- Thanks for the information, Jeff! WBR, Artur -- Quadlist is sponsored

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-02 Thread Derek Morton
A SCSI conflict will (should) only happen if both devices exist on the same physical bus. Since the 900 / 950 has two physical busses, there should be no conflict, but the internal bus devices take precedence over the external bus devices (until 4.3 loads). I mentioned in an earlier email

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-01 Thread Artur Yelchishchev
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I have another question: where that SCSI Manager 4.3 extension can be found? Included in MacOS 7.6.1 or later. It might be able to be extracted from the 7.6.1 installer files. Hmm, I'm asking because I'm using MacOS v7.6.1 on Quadra-950 right now, and I

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-01 Thread Dirk Kautz
Hmm, I'm asking because I'm using MacOS v7.6.1 on Quadra-950 right now, and I don't see any extensions related to the SCSI management. Also, I'm unable to find them in the installation tomes... Do you know exact filename/location? SCSI manager 4.3 is integrated in the system in 7.6.1, it's not a

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-01 Thread Derek Morton
The idea of the internal bus taking precedence over the external bus comes from Apple documentation. I have never bothered to have identical SCSI IDs on devices residing on both the built-in busses. Seven devices has always been sufficient for my needs... Especially since I use a JackHammer

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-10-01 Thread PeterH5322
The idea of the internal bus taking precedence over the external bus comes from Apple documentation. I have never bothered to have identical SCSI IDs on devices residing on both the built-in busses. I have tested CD-ROMS on the internal and the external buses, both drives being ID=3, and both

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-30 Thread Derek Morton
Jeff, As I mentioned, the order of bus scanning is important to note. If you have devices with the same ID on both the internal bus and the external bus, the device on the internal bus takes precedence. Thus you only have access to 7 devices until 4.3 loads... Or so the theory (and

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-30 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:29:04 -0500 From: Derek Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] As I mentioned, the order of bus scanning is important to note. If you have devices with the same ID on both the internal bus and the external bus, the device on the internal bus takes precedence. Okay. I wasn't sure

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-29 Thread Artur Yelchishchev
Jeff Walther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, if one has SCSI Manager 4.3 loaded (it's an extension as well as built into ROM in later machines) does the Quadra 900 support a full 14 SCSI devices on its two SCSI busses (7 each). Or is it still limited to seven total? Hi Jeff, AFAIK, the MacOS

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-29 Thread PeterH5322
In a message dated 9/29/03 8:05:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AFAIK, the MacOS doesn't support separate SCSI buses, so it uses both of them as single 'virtual bus', with no duplicate ID allowed. MacOS supports two SCSI buses (as on the Q950) mapped into a single, virtual SCSI bus with the

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-29 Thread PeterH5322
In a message dated 9/29/03 8:27:27 AM, PeterH5322 writes: But I have another question: where that SCSI Manager 4.3 extension can be found? Included in MacOS 7.6.1 or later. It might be able to be extracted from the 7.6.1 installer files. Don't know if it could be installed on an earlier

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-29 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:25:19 +0300 From: Artur Yelchishchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] But I have another question: where that SCSI Manager 4.3 extension can be found? I did a search on my computer on SCSI Manager and found some information I didn't know I had. According to Inside Macintosh, volume

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-29 Thread Jeff Walther
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:05:55 -0500 From: Derek Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] When SCSI manager 4.3 is active you should indeed have access to 14 total devices. Unfortunately since SCSI manager 4.3 is not active until after the system loads, you really don't have access to all the devices at boot

SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-28 Thread Jeff Walther
The Quadra 900 and 950 each have two hardware SCSI busses. I.e., they each have two NCR 53C96 chips connected to electrically separate SCSI bus hardware. However, the Apple hardware developer document Mac_Quadra_900.pdf states that The internal and external SCSI buses are logically

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-28 Thread PeterH5322
In a message dated 9/27/03 11:13:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, if one has SCSI Manager 4.3 loaded (it's an extension as well as built into ROM in later machines) does the Quadra 900 support a full 14 SCSI devices on its two SCSI busses (7 each). Or is it still limited to seven total?

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-28 Thread Jeff Walther
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:19:26 EDT In a message dated 9/27/03 11:13:01 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, if one has SCSI Manager 4.3 loaded (it's an extension as well as built into ROM in later machines) does the Quadra 900 support a full 14 SCSI devices on its two SCSI

Re: SCSI Manager 4.3 and the Q900/950?

2003-09-28 Thread Derek Morton
Jeff, When SCSI manager 4.3 is active you should indeed have access to 14 total devices. Unfortunately since SCSI manager 4.3 is not active until after the system loads, you really don't have access to all the devices at boot time. Even with the workgroup server card which gives you two