Frank wrote:
To prove my point once and for all, I throw down the following
challenge. Build whatever size tank you want and make it as fast as you
want. We'll give it a 40/4 rating regardless of it's actual
characteristics for your first two years of battling. Then, come to at
least two MAG
Seems to me some of you guys who live in places where there are no
fellow hobbyists, and few prospects for battling, could be
experimenting with whatever design of tank you like. What about
someone coming up with a design that is a new breakthrough in
simplicity and cost, so that the number of
Mr. Tyng,
Thank you for your inquiry regarding our recent challenge.
Unfortunately, as a paid member of the R/C Tank Combat staff you and
your immediate family are not eligible for any of our marketing
promotions. You are, of course, still eligible for the many sales
bonuses available to
event to make the 11
hour drive worth it? ;)
Mike
From: Steve Tyng steve...@gmail.com
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 7:31 PM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
Dave,
If historical accuracy was used to determine hit points everybody would
On 9/21/2011 9:44 PM, Dave D. wrote:
It stands to reason that a smaller side profile tank will undoubtedly
outperform it's larger adversaries.
Most people would agree that Mr. Tyng and I have roughly the same skill
levels and we have certainly battled enough times so that our records
are
All right! A new Pittelli Prize! :)
Mike
From: Frank Pittelli frank.pitte...@gmail.com
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
On 9/21/2011 9:44 PM, Dave D. wrote:
It stands to reason that a smaller
Mike,
A few years ago I was in MAG territory (from Las Vegas) doing a little spy work
and they invited me to participate Damn them It hooked me and made me
determined to participate in this hobby Thus the Alliance was born and
the mighty Brumm took to the desert to rule
gladly share whatever input I can to help in making this transition.
Dave D.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Pittelli frank.pitte...@gmail.com
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
On 9/21
whatever input I can to help in making this transition.
Dave D.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Pittelli frank.pitte...@gmail.com
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
On 9/21/2011 9:44
, September 22, 2011 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
On 9/21/2011 9:44 PM, Dave D. wrote:
It stands to reason that a smaller side profile tank will undoubtedly
outperform it's larger adversaries.
Most people would agree that Mr. Tyng and I have roughly the same
Dave D , I think Frank realizes that a large tank is easier to hit
than a small tank .
the point is its not as big a factor as you would think. look at the
following foto.
http://rctankcombat.com/tanks/T055/14-large.jpg
T051 is 3 foot long , T055 is 2 foot 2 inchs long. now look at the
stats for
I build to the 1/6th scale standard because there are a ton of accessories
in 1/6th scale. Since there have been no battles in my area and I've been
out of the country, my tanks are mainly for my enjoyment (and showing off my
building skills to everyone who thinks I'm just a computer geek). :)
It's not about courage ... it's about hard work. Build a working
tank, battle it somewhere, and then start re-writing the rules. If you
can convince a majority of veteran battlers (i.e., those who have
battled more than once) to change the rules, they will be changed.
More work, less
@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
It's not about courage ... it's about hard work. Build a working
tank, battle it somewhere, and then start re-writing the rules. If you
can convince a majority of veteran battlers (i.e., those who have
battled more than once) to change
.
- Original Message -
From: Frank Pittelli frank.pitte...@gmail.com
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
It's not about courage ... it's about hard work. Build a working
tank, battle it somewhere
Dave,
If historical accuracy was used to determine hit points everybody would be
building modern MBT's. I agree that the current setup is not perfect but it
is working for the limited number of battling tanks. This is first and
foremost a battling hobby and not a scale hobby.
Since the
valued input. D.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Tyng
To: rctankcombat@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2011 8:31 PM
Subject: [TANKS] Re: I'll float this idea again...
Dave,
If historical accuracy was used to determine hit points everybody would be
building
17 matches
Mail list logo
