kernel-2.4.0-0.43.4

2000-12-15 Thread Edward S. Marshall
Hmm. "CONFIG_IDE=m"? So now basically everyone with ordinary PC hardware gets to use initrd? A word to the wise: if you don't currently need initrd to get your system online, don't blindly upgrade to 2.4.0-0.43.4; do: mkinitrd -v /boot/initrd-2.4.0-0.43.4.img 2.4.0-0.43.4 And then add

SOLVED: RH7 won't install on my new Celeron 566 machine

2000-12-15 Thread Peter Kiem
I doubt this is a hardware error so does anyone have any suggestions? Probably IS a hardware issue. We just went through a similar scenario but no windows. Turned out to be the brnad new out of the box mother board ( one of four) after swapping out every cable memory harddrive processor

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread M. Neidorff
..and howdy back to you, Couple of comments: 1. The reason that back up software vendors can charge for their products is that they provide the fallover/failproof features, tested and guaranteed that you require without you having to write the programs yourself (can you do the level of

Re: RAID

2000-12-15 Thread Luke C Gavel
Does this particular card have the capability (using it's own hardware) for RAID5? It should be done by the card (hardware RAID) instead of Linux (Software RAID) because software RAID will choke the PC's CPU(s). One other queestion, does your particular version of RH have a module for this

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread John Aldrich
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: Howdy, Now that we've spent a good deal of time setting up our system of servers, it's occurred to us that we should be dome something more rigorous then once a week manual "cp -a /etc /backup/$DATE" [snip] 8. It needs to have some sort of

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Bill Carlson
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: I can think of several considerations: 1. At least some level of backup needs to happen every day, i.e. at least a back up of /etc to a local tarball. 2. Though we have lots of space and can get more, we can't keep archives forever. There

RE: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Kevin Thorpe
We use BRU and a DAT drive for backups. Commercial I know but it is reliable. We run a set of daily tapes Mon-Thu and a set of five Friday tapes. The last Friday tape of every month gets taken off-site. Restoration of single files is relatively easy from the supplied X front end. We try and

Slow Rlogins (Once Again)

2000-12-15 Thread Tom Browder
I Recently did a clean install of RH 7.0 on two machines on my company's network. I then restored my previous system files (/etc/hosts, /etc/hosts.equiv, ~/.rhosts, /etc/passwd, /etc/group, etc/X0.hosts) and get starnge results when users try to rlogin to one of the machines but not the other.

Service connection problems (Was: Slowdown in morning)

2000-12-15 Thread Bruce Sackett
I am still having slowdowns on first connecting in the morning, after all connections to the server have been dropped the night before. I disabled identd and added myself to /etc/hosts, which, according to one source, should have fixed the problem. If anyone has had this experience, I

rsync questions

2000-12-15 Thread Brad Doster
1) It appears that 'rsync -e ssh...' does not get hidden (.*) files. I've tried using the '--include ".*"' option to no avail. Is there a way to get these files? 2) When using 'rsync server::module/path...', on the client side I get "Permission denied" and the server side shows the rsync

Re: FrontPage extensions on RH7 again - authentication woes.

2000-12-15 Thread jack wallen
why is this message coming into the list about a thousand times a day? On 2000.12.06 15:15:23 -0500 Brian Wright wrote: :First of all, I was able to get the FrontPage Server Extensions :installed :successfully on RH7. This is the M$ extensions, not the cloned :version. I

named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I need help with is requests outside my domain. DNS is working for lookups and reverse lookups within the domain I have set-up. What does not work is the forwarders. i.e. nslookup www.yahooo.com. this fails. Even a ping

Re: FrontPage extensions on RH7 again - authentication woes.

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
I haven't received it since 12-6. Check your mailer...do you have it set to delete messages from the server when you download them? On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:40:11 -0500, jack wallen wrote: why is this message coming into the list about a thousand times a day? On 2000.12.06 15:15:23 -0500

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
What do you have as the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file? You need to have at least one valid DNS server listed in that file in order for outside lookups to work. Two or three is even better. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:37:14 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote: I have almost figured out how to

StarOffice aborts on rh7.0 (UPDATE)

2000-12-15 Thread Carey F. Cox
Please recall that I have been having problems with running StarOffice and having it abort abruptly at start up. I reinstalled it yet again, but this time I decided to let root do a local install after the /net install. When logged in as root, soffice came up fine. No problems! Summary, it

IDE RAID

2000-12-15 Thread Mike Neal
Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller cards under Linux? Thanks, Mike ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: IDE RAID

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
A buddy of mine is using one in one of his servers...raves about it. I can't find the name/model that I wrote down, but I'll drop him a note and ask. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:45:51 -0800, Mike Neal wrote: Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller cards under

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Wilson
At 05:48 AM 12/15/2000 -0500, you wrote: ..and howdy back to you, :-) Couple of comments: 1. The reason that back up software vendors can charge for their products is that they provide the fallover/failproof features, tested and guaranteed that you require without you having to write the

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Michael, What do you have as the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file? You need to have at least one valid DNS server listed in that file in order for outside lookups to work. Two or three is even better. The machine that is the DNS only needs a reference to itself

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi David, I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I need help with is requests outside my domain. It's been a while since I have done anything with DNS, but I set up a DNS for a tiny domain over a year ago. I don't remember any of the details,

Re: How to increase file handles? [SOLVED]

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jonathan, i'm not sure when sysctl.conf was introduced to redhat. 6.2 Bye, Leonard. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi again David, Even a ping to an IP address on the internet from the DNS server fails as well. A little oversight from me here. If you can't ping an IP address something else is wrong. You don't need DNS for this, because you are not resolving names in this case. Maybe

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
True...but if "nameserver 127.0.0.1" isn't included in that resolv.conf file, lookups won't work. Also, even if it is included, if the connection to the net isn't there, it won't work, either. In other words, as long as you have a working DNS setup on 127.0.0.1, and a connection to the net, it

networking issue

2000-12-15 Thread Ryan Ulrich
For testing I have been switching my IP address about 4 or 5 times a day for a week now through linuxconf, from an internal to an external. Now when set to an external IP my machine won't ping its gateway. I looked at all the files in /etc and /etc/sysconfig and linuxconf is making the changes

Re: networking issue

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
Can you define, for us, your take on internal vs. external? The reason I ask is that if the network portion of the IP address (the first 2 or 3 octets) doesn't match any IP address assigned to the gateway, you won't be able to ping it. Also, the netmask has to match, as well. If you mean an

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
Here is the contents of the /etc/resolv.conf file. The last two entrys I put in to see if this would help. I also tried nameserver as 127.0.0.1 as well. None of these configurations worked. I did restart named after each change domain company.com search company.com nameserver

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Wilson
For everyone who has suggested RAID: I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does, but the long hours we've spent setting up. Also, while RAID and mirroring are great for hard drive

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
Well, we're going to have to look more at your networking issues. If you can not ping anything outside your network, you're looking at other problems...not DNS, as Leonard noted. Do you have your gateway and netmask set properly? On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:05:48 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote:

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
I have the HOWTO and unfortunately, to me it looks like everything is correct david On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi David, I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I need help with is requests outside my domain. It's

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
Hi Lenord If I stop named, then ping works correctly. If I ping an address in the DNS then it works. It looks to me like I have DNS configured incorectly for looking up external addresses. david On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi again David, Even a

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
Hi Michael If I stop named. All network connections work properly (including ping internet addresses) When I start named I can no longer ping any ip address not in dns. I cannot do a lookup of any ip address not in the local domain All local domain entries are pingable and can be looked up

Re: networking issue

2000-12-15 Thread Ryan Ulrich
by internal i mean 10.x.x.x. by external i mean 216.x.x.x the netmasks are correct. in fact the connections worked properly for some time. when i use the external IP i try to ping my external gateway (@home's upstream router). when i use my internal IP i try to ping the internal gateway

Orbacus, GCC, RedHat...Oh my

2000-12-15 Thread Austin
Help! I am trying to compile Orbacus on Redhat 7.0 using gcc 2.96.54, I've run ./runconfig, setup up my configuration and proceeded to type make After compiling a few files, I get a Segmentation fault. So I re-typed make and it would pickup where it left off and eventually I'd get a

Re: StarOffice aborts on rh7.0 (UPDATE)

2000-12-15 Thread Duane Clark
Carey F. Cox wrote: Please recall that I have been having problems with running StarOffice and having it abort abruptly at start up. I reinstalled it yet again, but this time I decided to let root do a local install after the /net install. When logged in as root, soffice came up fine. No

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Bill Carlson
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: For everyone who has suggested RAID: I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does, but the long hours we've spent setting up. Also,

Re: StarOffice aborts on rh7.0 (SOLVED)

2000-12-15 Thread Carey F. Cox
Thanks to all that attempted to help. I finally found the problem, and it was a permissions problem. For some reason, the file .user52.rdb had been set to read only and StarOffice uses that file to store user info, so it must be writeable by the user. Worse, reinstallation couldn't help because

Re: IDE RAID

2000-12-15 Thread Michael Burger
Here you go, from a friend of mine, using one: 3Ware (www.3ware.com) Escalade 5400. these cards are excellent for ide raid IMHO... On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:45:51 -0800, Mike Neal wrote: Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller cards under Linux? Thanks, Mike

firewall log entries

2000-12-15 Thread Eric Clover
is this something i need to worry about? thank you eric Dec 15 14:01:56 blacktrenchcoat kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=1 151.20.76.228:8 206.191.251.8:0 L=28 S=0x00 I=29237 F=0x T=111 (#5) Dec 15 14:07:04 blacktrenchcoat kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0 PROTO=1

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Duane Clark
Jonathan Wilson wrote: Howdy, Now that we've spent a good deal of time setting up our system of servers, it's occurred to us that we should be dome something more rigorous then once a week manual "cp -a /etc /backup/$DATE" First off, we do NOT want to buy a commercial app like Arieka or

Re: IDE RAID

2000-12-15 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Mike Neal wrote: Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller cards under Linux? Thanks, Mike I haven't tried it yet, but I picked up an Iwill SIDE-RAID66 from Computer Geeks that they say works with Linux. It only does Raid 0 and 1.

RE: Firewall problem....some answers.

2000-12-15 Thread Burke, Thomas G.
Comments follow: -Original Message- From: Ralph Slooten [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 1:41 PM To: Leonard den Ottolander; Burke, Thomas G. Subject: Firewall problemsome answers. Ok guys, just gonna send this message to you both personally, as

mail folder linking

2000-12-15 Thread Wayne Stout
Greetings everyone. Here's the scenario: My company just installed a RH6.2 box to be a fax server and a file server. Our main application that all of the users work in is on an NCR Unix server. (For now, it will soon be moving to a Solaris box). It's character based, so everyone uses terminal

Re: named running ping fails

2000-12-15 Thread David Brett
After further investigation I discovered the problem is the forwarder is not responding. The DNS server has a private IP address and the forwarder is a public ip address. There is a firewall between the two servers. What is required to get replys back from the forwarder? david On Fri, 15 Dec

Linux compatable Mother Board

2000-12-15 Thread magoo
Ok people, I have been off the list for quite some time now so I am out of the loop. I have a box that is in need of an upgrade. I am looking to upgrade to a 1GHz chip and am wondering if anyone can recommend a good processor/board combo that is 100% Linux compatable? TIA for any help!

Re: Slow Rlogins (Once Again)

2000-12-15 Thread Charles Galpin
Tom On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Tom Browder wrote: I Recently did a clean install of RH 7.0 on two machines on my company's network. I then restored my previous system files (/etc/hosts, /etc/hosts.equiv, ~/.rhosts, /etc/passwd, /etc/group, etc/X0.hosts) and get starnge results when users try to

Can I add a partition and still boot my current install?

2000-12-15 Thread Jonathan Wilson
Howdy, When I installed RH I let it take care of my partitioning for me. I have 2 matching hard drives (13 GB, I think) but the RH installer only use 15 MB of one (/dev/hdc1), for /boot. Everything else it put on the second drive. That's pretty wasteful and I'd like to make a /dev/hdc2 for

Re: Can I add a partition and still boot my current install?

2000-12-15 Thread Mike Burger
As long as the rest of your existing installation is not going to change, you can add as many hard drives and/or partitions as you like, and still be able to boot with no problem. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: Howdy, When I installed RH I let it take care of my partitioning for

Re: Can I add a partition and still boot my current install?

2000-12-15 Thread Statux
So the two disks are the only IDE devices in that system (no cd drives or tape drives)? Just making sure.. some people screw it up and pair CD drives with hard disks (which is a major no-no).. and the faster disk (be there one), the one with the / partition, should be master. If you'll never

Re: mail folder linking

2000-12-15 Thread Mikkel L. Ellertson
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Wayne Stout wrote: Greetings everyone. Here's the scenario: My company just installed a RH6.2 box to be a fax server and a file server. Our main application that all of the users work in is on an NCR Unix server. (For now, it will soon be moving to a Solaris box).

7.0 hangs on boot on Laptop

2000-12-15 Thread Brian Schneider
I have installed 7.0 on an HP Omnibook laptop. It will hang on boot up at the enabling swap space. 6.2 runs fine. I have done a fresh install and it hangs. I upgraded and it worked a couple of times then it would hang. The machine is dual booted with Win98. Any ideas? TIA

Re: 7.0 hangs on boot on Laptop

2000-12-15 Thread Ray Parish
Boot up in rescue mode and edit the following file /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit remark the lines listed below: # Load agpgart here. This is a hack, and will probably go away soon. if grep "driver: agpgart" /etc/sysconfig/hwconf /dev/null 21 ; then modprobe agpgart /dev/null 21 fi save the

IDE RAID

2000-12-15 Thread Edward Schernau
The only IDE RAID to work under Linux is the 3Ware controller. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Bill Anderson
Bill Carlson wrote: On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: For everyone who has suggested RAID: I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does, but the long hours we've

Re: Linux compatable Mother Board

2000-12-15 Thread Bill Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok people, I have been off the list for quite some time now so I am out of the loop. I have a box that is in need of an upgrade. I am looking to upgrade to a 1GHz chip and am wondering if anyone can recommend a good processor/board combo that is 100% Linux

Re: Can I add a partition and still boot my current install?

2000-12-15 Thread John P. Verel
Be CERTAIN that you do not change the partition naming of your current partitions or you'll have a trashed system. If, for instance, you add a partition BEFORE your current ones, all the labels will change. Add new ones AFTER your current install. FWIW, IMHO, if you've never done this before,

Re: Best backup system/plan for maximum safety - what do y'all do?

2000-12-15 Thread Bret Hughes
Bill Anderson wrote: Bill Carlson wrote: On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote: For everyone who has suggested RAID: I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does,

unsubscibe me

2000-12-15 Thread winston
Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list cause i have been getting as many as 70 mails a day from you so i would to ask for your help on how to get my e-mail out of your subscription list Regards Winston ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL

Re: unsubscibe me

2000-12-15 Thread Statux
follow the directions at the bottom of any of the emails from the list :) well.. that's for general list stuff which includes what you want. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list