Hmm. "CONFIG_IDE=m"?
So now basically everyone with ordinary PC hardware gets to use initrd?
A word to the wise: if you don't currently need initrd to get your system
online, don't blindly upgrade to 2.4.0-0.43.4; do:
mkinitrd -v /boot/initrd-2.4.0-0.43.4.img 2.4.0-0.43.4
And then add
I doubt this is a hardware error so does anyone have any suggestions?
Probably IS a hardware issue. We just went through a similar scenario
but no
windows. Turned out to be the brnad new out of the box mother board ( one
of
four) after swapping out every cable memory harddrive processor
..and howdy back to you,
Couple of comments:
1. The reason that back up software vendors can charge for their products
is that they provide the fallover/failproof features, tested and guaranteed
that you require without you having to write the programs yourself (can you
do the level of
Does this particular card have the capability (using it's own
hardware) for RAID5? It should be done by the card (hardware
RAID) instead of Linux (Software RAID) because software RAID will
choke the PC's CPU(s).
One other queestion, does your particular version
of RH have a module for this
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Howdy,
Now that we've spent a good deal of time setting up our system of servers, it's
occurred to us that we should be dome something more rigorous then once a week manual
"cp -a /etc /backup/$DATE"
[snip]
8. It needs to have some sort of
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
I can think of several considerations:
1. At least some level of backup needs to happen every day, i.e. at least a back up
of /etc to a local tarball.
2. Though we have lots of space and can get more, we can't keep archives forever.
There
We use BRU and a DAT drive for backups. Commercial I know but it is
reliable. We run a set of daily tapes Mon-Thu and a set of five Friday
tapes.
The last Friday tape of every month gets taken off-site.
Restoration of single files is relatively easy from the supplied X front
end.
We try and
I Recently did a clean install of RH 7.0 on two machines on my company's network. I
then restored my previous system files
(/etc/hosts, /etc/hosts.equiv, ~/.rhosts, /etc/passwd, /etc/group, etc/X0.hosts) and
get starnge results when users try to rlogin to
one of the machines but not the other.
I am still having slowdowns on first connecting in the morning,
after all connections to the server have been dropped the night
before. I disabled identd and added myself to /etc/hosts, which,
according to one source, should have fixed the problem. If anyone
has had this experience, I
1) It appears that 'rsync -e ssh...' does not get hidden (.*) files. I've
tried using the '--include ".*"' option to no avail. Is there a way to get
these files?
2) When using 'rsync server::module/path...', on the client side I get
"Permission denied" and the server side shows the rsync
why is this message coming into the list about a thousand times a day?
On 2000.12.06 15:15:23 -0500 Brian Wright wrote:
:First of all, I was able to get the FrontPage Server Extensions
:installed
:successfully on RH7. This is the M$ extensions, not the cloned
:version. I
I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I
need help with is requests outside my domain. DNS is working for lookups
and reverse lookups within the domain I have set-up. What does not work
is the forwarders. i.e. nslookup www.yahooo.com. this fails. Even a
ping
I haven't received it since 12-6.
Check your mailer...do you have it set to delete messages from the
server when you download them?
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 02:40:11 -0500, jack wallen wrote:
why is this message coming into the list about a thousand times a day?
On 2000.12.06 15:15:23 -0500
What do you have as the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file?
You need to have at least one valid DNS server listed in that file in
order for outside lookups to work. Two or three is even better.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 12:37:14 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote:
I have almost figured out how to
Please recall that I have been having problems with running StarOffice
and having it abort abruptly at start up. I reinstalled it yet again,
but this time I decided to let root do a local install after the /net
install. When logged in as root, soffice came up fine. No problems!
Summary, it
Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller
cards under Linux?
Thanks,
Mike
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
A buddy of mine is using one in one of his servers...raves about it.
I can't find the name/model that I wrote down, but I'll drop him a
note and ask.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:45:51 -0800, Mike Neal wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller
cards under
At 05:48 AM 12/15/2000 -0500, you wrote:
..and howdy back to you,
:-)
Couple of comments:
1. The reason that back up software vendors can charge for their products is that
they provide the fallover/failproof features, tested and guaranteed that you require
without you having to write the
Hi Michael,
What do you have as the contents of your /etc/resolv.conf file?
You need to have at least one valid DNS server listed in that file in
order for outside lookups to work. Two or three is even better.
The machine that is the DNS only needs a reference to itself
Hi David,
I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I
need help with is requests outside my domain.
It's been a while since I have done anything with DNS, but I set up a DNS for
a tiny domain over a year ago. I don't remember any of the details,
Hi Jonathan,
i'm not sure when sysctl.conf was introduced to redhat.
6.2
Bye,
Leonard.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi again David,
Even a
ping to an IP address on the internet from the DNS server fails as well.
A little oversight from me here. If you can't ping an IP address something
else is wrong. You don't need DNS for this, because you are not resolving
names in this case. Maybe
True...but if "nameserver 127.0.0.1" isn't included in that
resolv.conf file, lookups won't work. Also, even if it is included,
if the connection to the net isn't there, it won't work, either.
In other words, as long as you have a working DNS setup on 127.0.0.1,
and a connection to the net, it
For testing I have been switching my IP address about 4 or 5 times a day
for a week now through linuxconf, from an internal to an external.
Now when set to an external IP my machine won't ping its gateway. I
looked at all the files in /etc and /etc/sysconfig and linuxconf is
making the changes
Can you define, for us, your take on internal vs. external?
The reason I ask is that if the network portion of the IP address
(the first 2 or 3 octets) doesn't match any IP address assigned to
the gateway, you won't be able to ping it. Also, the netmask has to
match, as well.
If you mean an
Here is the contents of the /etc/resolv.conf file. The last two
entrys I put in to see if this would help. I also tried nameserver as
127.0.0.1 as well. None of these configurations worked. I did restart
named after each change
domain company.com
search company.com
nameserver
For everyone who has suggested RAID:
I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do are
not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does, but the long
hours we've spent setting up.
Also, while RAID and mirroring are great for hard drive
Well, we're going to have to look more at your networking issues. If
you can not ping anything outside your network, you're looking at
other problems...not DNS, as Leonard noted.
Do you have your gateway and netmask set properly?
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:05:48 -0500 (EST), David Brett wrote:
I have the HOWTO and unfortunately, to me it looks like everything is
correct
david
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi David,
I have almost figured out how to get DNS working. The one thing piece I
need help with is requests outside my domain.
It's
Hi Lenord
If I stop named, then ping works correctly. If I ping an address in the
DNS then it works. It looks to me like I have DNS configured incorectly
for looking up external addresses.
david
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hi again David,
Even a
Hi Michael
If I stop named. All network connections work properly (including ping
internet addresses)
When I start named I can no longer ping any ip address not in dns. I
cannot do a lookup of any ip address not in the local domain
All local domain entries are pingable and can be looked up
by internal i mean 10.x.x.x. by external i mean 216.x.x.x
the netmasks are correct. in fact the connections worked properly for some
time.
when i use the external IP i try to ping my external gateway (@home's
upstream router). when i use my internal IP i try to ping the internal
gateway
Help!
I am trying to compile Orbacus on Redhat 7.0 using gcc 2.96.54,
I've run ./runconfig, setup up my configuration and proceeded to type make
After compiling a few files, I get a Segmentation fault. So I re-typed make
and it would pickup where it left off and eventually I'd get a
Carey F. Cox wrote:
Please recall that I have been having problems with running StarOffice
and having it abort abruptly at start up. I reinstalled it yet again,
but this time I decided to let root do a local install after the /net
install. When logged in as root, soffice came up fine. No
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
For everyone who has suggested RAID:
I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do
are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does, but the
long hours we've spent setting up.
Also,
Thanks to all that attempted to help. I finally found the problem, and it
was a permissions problem. For some reason, the file .user52.rdb
had been set to read only and StarOffice uses that file to store user
info, so it must be writeable by the user. Worse, reinstallation couldn't
help because
Here you go, from a friend of mine, using one:
3Ware (www.3ware.com) Escalade 5400. these cards are
excellent for ide raid IMHO...
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 09:45:51 -0800, Mike Neal wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller
cards under Linux?
Thanks,
Mike
is this something i need to worry about?
thank you
eric
Dec 15 14:01:56 blacktrenchcoat kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0
PROTO=1 151.20.76.228:8 206.191.251.8:0 L=28 S=0x00 I=29237 F=0x
T=111 (#5)
Dec 15 14:07:04 blacktrenchcoat kernel: Packet log: input DENY ppp0
PROTO=1
Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Howdy,
Now that we've spent a good deal of time setting up our system of servers, it's
occurred to us that we should be dome something more rigorous then once a week
manual "cp -a /etc /backup/$DATE"
First off, we do NOT want to buy a commercial app like Arieka or
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Mike Neal wrote:
Anyone have any suggestions/experience with any of the IDE RAID controller
cards under Linux?
Thanks,
Mike
I haven't tried it yet, but I picked up an Iwill SIDE-RAID66 from Computer
Geeks that they say works with Linux. It only does Raid 0 and 1.
Comments follow:
-Original Message-
From: Ralph Slooten [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 1:41 PM
To: Leonard den Ottolander; Burke, Thomas G.
Subject: Firewall problemsome answers.
Ok guys, just gonna send this message to you both personally, as
Greetings everyone.
Here's the scenario:
My company just installed a RH6.2 box to be a fax server and a file
server. Our main application that all of the users work in is on an NCR
Unix server. (For now, it will soon be moving to a Solaris box). It's
character based, so everyone uses terminal
After further investigation I discovered the problem is the forwarder is
not responding. The DNS server has a private IP address and the forwarder
is a public ip address. There is a firewall between the two servers.
What is required to get replys back from the forwarder?
david
On Fri, 15 Dec
Ok people,
I have been off the list for quite some time now so I am out of the loop. I
have a box that is in need of an upgrade. I am looking to upgrade to a 1GHz
chip and am wondering if anyone can recommend a good processor/board combo
that is 100% Linux compatable? TIA for any help!
Tom
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Tom Browder wrote:
I Recently did a clean install of RH 7.0 on two machines on my company's network. I
then restored my previous system files
(/etc/hosts, /etc/hosts.equiv, ~/.rhosts, /etc/passwd, /etc/group, etc/X0.hosts) and
get starnge results when users try to
Howdy,
When I installed RH I let it take care of my partitioning for me. I have 2 matching
hard drives (13 GB, I think) but the RH installer only use 15 MB of one (/dev/hdc1),
for /boot. Everything else it put on the second drive. That's pretty wasteful and I'd
like to make a /dev/hdc2 for
As long as the rest of your existing installation is not going to change,
you can add as many hard drives and/or partitions as you like, and still
be able to boot with no problem.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
Howdy,
When I installed RH I let it take care of my partitioning for
So the two disks are the only IDE devices in that system (no cd drives or
tape drives)? Just making sure.. some people screw it up and pair CD
drives with hard disks (which is a major no-no).. and the faster disk (be
there one), the one with the / partition, should be master.
If you'll never
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Wayne Stout wrote:
Greetings everyone.
Here's the scenario:
My company just installed a RH6.2 box to be a fax server and a file
server. Our main application that all of the users work in is on an NCR
Unix server. (For now, it will soon be moving to a Solaris box).
I have installed 7.0 on an HP Omnibook laptop. It will hang on boot up at
the enabling swap space. 6.2 runs fine. I have done a fresh install and it
hangs. I upgraded and it worked a couple of times then it would hang. The
machine is dual booted with Win98.
Any ideas?
TIA
Boot up in rescue mode and edit the following file /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit
remark the lines listed below:
# Load agpgart here. This is a hack, and will probably go away soon.
if grep "driver: agpgart" /etc/sysconfig/hwconf /dev/null 21 ; then
modprobe agpgart /dev/null 21
fi
save the
The only IDE RAID to work under Linux is the 3Ware controller.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Bill Carlson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
For everyone who has suggested RAID:
I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently do
are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does, but the
long hours we've
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok people,
I have been off the list for quite some time now so I am out of the loop. I
have a box that is in need of an upgrade. I am looking to upgrade to a 1GHz
chip and am wondering if anyone can recommend a good processor/board combo
that is 100% Linux
Be CERTAIN that you do not change the partition naming of your current
partitions or you'll have a trashed system. If, for instance, you add a
partition BEFORE your current ones, all the labels will change. Add new
ones AFTER your current install. FWIW, IMHO, if you've never done this
before,
Bill Anderson wrote:
Bill Carlson wrote:
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jonathan Wilson wrote:
For everyone who has suggested RAID:
I like RAID, it's very cool. However, the kind of things are servers currently
do are not "worthy" of the price. What's valuable here, is not what it does,
Please unsubscribe me from your mailing list cause i have been getting as
many as 70 mails a day from you so i would to ask for your help on how to
get my e-mail out of your subscription list
Regards
Winston
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
follow the directions at the bottom of any of the emails from the list :)
well.. that's for general list stuff which includes what you want.
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
58 matches
Mail list logo