t=sent,
I didn't get it.
Cheers
Bill
Michael Fratoni wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 16 June 2003 07:52 am, Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
I'm using stock RH9, no mods. I'm running
spamd/spamc and occasionally mail is getting lost
to my users:
I am gettin
cious
to me as majority of my users are IMAP.
Cheers
Bill
Technoslick wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:52, Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
I'm using stock RH9, no mods. I'm running
spamd/spamc and occasionally mail is getting lost
to my users:
I am getting the messsage:
spamd[24614]: bad pro
Hi,
I'm using stock RH9, no mods. I'm running
spamd/spamc and occasionally mail is getting lost
to my users:
I am getting the messsage:
spamd[24614]: bad protocol: header error: (Content-length mismatch:
3907 vs. 3906)
I've googled for solutions, but as I am using a stock RH9
system, I would
te the samba.spec and any other tips
you might have found.
Cheers
Bill
Toby Schaefer wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Bill Dossett
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rh9 samba + ldap NOT THERE
Hi,
If you&#x
nticate via the ldap
server... and I've double checked everything on
it. If anyone has a samba.spec that builds an
rpm from srpm that works with ldap and samba 2.2.7, I'd sure like
to have a peek at it... I'm going back to 2.2.5
for now.
Cheers
Bill
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Bill Dosset
...
Cheers
Bill
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Bill Dossett wrote:
Don't really see why Redhat don't build samba
with ldap support built in... it's hardly experimental
any more...
Probably because if you do so, then samba *requires* LDAP. This
introduces a massive overhead in the initial set
today,
and do it the correct way.
Thanks
Bill
Gordon Messmer wrote:
Bill Dossett wrote:
...
and then ... you need to fix some paths in the ssl headers...
kerberos headers aren't found first... as they are in
/usr/kerberos/include
symlink all the dirs and files there to
/usr/include
...
To
Hi,
www.freeswan.org if you need to interop with the widest
variety of other products. I currently have linux freeswan
to windows xp, 2000 and cisco routers. Both windows gateways
and road warriors work... I'm not sure I'd say setting it
up the first time is easy, depends on how much you've work
if anyone out there builds srpms under
rh9, I'm sure this will be of interest
http://www.rpm.org/hintskinks/unpackaged/
and may save them the 16 hours of grief
i've just been thru... seems they could
have put a little message when rpmbuild
started up saying that the behaviour had
changed.
Cheers
B
ine if you
feel it's safe, I don't.
Took me a day and a half to figure that out,
hopefully it might save someone else the time
as well.
Cheers
Bill
Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
If you're considering using samba, ldap and
Redhat 9, forget it. Spent all day yesterday
trying to get RH9
Hi,
Since installing and cofiguring RH9 on our
mail server, users are getting errors on their
mail clients.
USER PASS failed, and message about the inbox mailbox
not being in the correct format. Upon looking
at the inbox, in /var/spool/mail it initially
looks empty... but actually has 1 byte wh
y are certainly going to be dissapointed if
they try it with RH9.
Don't really see why Redhat don't build samba
with ldap support built in... it's hardly experimental
any more...
Really starting to lose the faith in Redhat these
days... perhaps it's time to move on.
Bill Dossett
--
Hi,
I'm trying to build samba with ldap support under RH9 and
it doesn't like it. I have put --with-ldapsam and --with-ssl
in my samba.spec. The fist attempt to build, it failed because
it couldn't find krb5.h... that's because it was in
/usr/kerberos/include rather than /usr/include where it e
Hi,
I need to run an FTP server and allow unknown
people to upload files to it, anonymous ftp.
I only want people to be able to upload, no
downloads. After they upload, I would like
them to be able to see the files, but not
be able to download anything.
I used to use wuftpd and there was a howto
Hi,
I don't understand this, can someone help?
I've checked (REDHAT RPMS) imap sources and everything
is logged thru the MAIL facility, LOG_MAIL.
In my syslog.conf, havne't changed anything yet, I have:
# Log all the mail messages in one place.
mail.* /var/log/maillog
and
hmmm, found an rpm of freeswan-1.99 with x.509 already
patched in for 2.4.20-8 kernel and it works fine...
so guess I'll go down that route rather than building
a kernel as I just do not have time to build and test
everything today myself.
Cheers
Bill
Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
I guess I'
more frequent these days (seems like rh8 was only
around for a few months - but time flies as well...)
Is this the way to go about it, or can I build a new module
for redhat without building the kernel as well?
Thanks
Bill
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi,
I'd like to patch and then build a kernel
from SRPM. Is this possible? and is there
any howto on it?
I used to build kernels under slackware from
kernel.org when I just had one linux box,
now I've got 9 servers and building kernels
on them all isn't practical, I'd like to
be able to patch the
acobs said:
Hello Bill,
Is your pam set correctly?
did u use the RH auth setup?
If so u might wanna use pam-ldap then pam_unix first_pass
HTH,
Jesse
Bill Dossett said:
Hi,
Can anyone please tell me why the following is occurring?
I have one openLDAP server running under RH8.0... I then
have a numbe
mean here... not use padl or anything,
just native RH8
Thanks for your help..
Bill
Jesse
Bill Dossett said:
Hi,
Can anyone please tell me why the following is occurring?
I have one openLDAP server running under RH8.0... I then
have a number of other servers that authenticate via the
mai
are
people that know how to fix this?
Thanks
Bill Dossett
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
Still no ideas on this? I can't build
perl as it complains there is no posix
support in Redhat 8.0 and after 3 days
of searching I can't find squat about
how to build perl from SRPMS without
db support... this is about equivalent
to working with M$ at this rate.
Bill Dossett wrote:
tried that and for it complains that libposix isn't
found and indeed it isn't on redhat 8.0 in the same
form.
thanks
bill
Nick Lindsell wrote:
At 15:41 24/01/2003 +, you wrote:
Hi,
I've got an application server down at the moment, hence
the urgent... hope this is simple but I need to b
Hi,
I've got an application server down at the moment, hence
the urgent... hope this is simple but I need to build
perl without db support. I'm trying to build from
the SRPM but I don't know how to operate the SPECS file
very well yet, can anyone tell me what I have to modify
in perl.spec to get
this is working,
I've hacked the script so it forces it at the moment... guess
I'll open a bug unless someone else can confirm it does work...
Thanks
Bill
Bill Dossett wrote:
hmmm, ok, didn't realize initially that mkinitrd
was a script.. and it needs up-to-date raidtab in order
hmmm, ok, didn't realize initially that mkinitrd
was a script.. and it needs up-to-date raidtab in order to
work correctly with softare raid... guess that will fix it...
sorry for waste of bandwidth.
thanks
Bill
Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for this... it has gotten me about 99% o
ion
in the man pages that seemns to tie in with this...
Thanks
Bill Dossett
Samuel Flory wrote:
Bill Dossett wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone from redhat ever hang out on these lists?
I REALLY, need to figure out how the hell they do bootable
software RAID as modules
Is this some form of mystic secr
Ben Russo wrote:
Well, I guess that might be a bug, open a bug in RedHat's Bugzilla,
you might get a free T-shirt out of it.
ok.. I haven't done that before, some morning around 4am when I have
some time to myself, might give it a try ;-)
But I think that their
answer will be that softwa
Sorry if I sounded a little aggressive here... it was three
days of frustration and then someone pointing me at promise
disk controllers and I was going way way way down the wrong
route.
Anyway, I think most of what you have said will help...
but...
Samuel Flory wrote:
Bill Dossett wrote
Hi,
Does anyone from redhat ever hang out on these lists?
I REALLY, need to figure out how the hell they do bootable
software RAID as modules
Is this some form of mystic secret that redhat don't want
us to know? Or doesn't anyone from Redhat read these lists?
I am trying to convert a syste
30 matches
Mail list logo
