RE: General Linux ListServ

2003-10-07 Thread Buck
out the strengths and weaknesses of what I am trying to accomplish. I always seem to have a not-so normal way of doing things for whatever reason. Maybe what I need is a mentor type conversation. Thanks, I'll look it up and book mark the URL. I'll be back with the questions later. Buck

RE: General Linux ListServ

2003-10-07 Thread Buck
I just sent a subscribe message. Thanks Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith Morse Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: General Linux ListServ The following is a general list

RE: This assignment would exceed your allowed subscriptions

2003-10-06 Thread Buck
You'll have to talk to RH sales, but from what they tell me, you are just paying for the service contract. The boxed set just comes along for the ride. When you talk to sales, don't forget to ask about quantity discounts. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Red Hat Professional Workstation - it lives!

2003-10-06 Thread Buck
And I thought I was cheap! That's only $50 per computer. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of T. Ribbrock Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 5:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Red Hat Professional Workstation - it lives! On Mon

General Linux ListServ

2003-10-06 Thread Buck
I have several questions that are general to Linux. I have had my nose bitten several times now on various lists asking what isn't Red Hat specific. I am wondering if there is a listserv for General Linux questions. Thanks for the help Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto

RE: Red Hat Professional Workstation - it lives!

2003-10-06 Thread Buck
OOPS, I misunderstood, I thought it was for up to two computers. My apologies. I am still cheap and $100 is the edge. I am not sure what kind of support you get though. I know you will get the updates, but for someone supporting the larger systems on RHEL, that would be good deal. Buck

RE: General Linux ListServ

2003-10-06 Thread Buck
properly. I am a member of several lists and one of them got upset that I asked about backups once. Thanks for asking Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Wimmer Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 7:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: red hat 10 release date

2003-10-05 Thread Buck
And another one crawls out from under a rock. ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Szilagyi Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 5:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: red hat 10 release date Does anyone happen to know what it is? Thanks.

RE: red hat 10 release date

2003-10-05 Thread Buck
Sorry, This discussion has raised about 200 messages a day for the last two weeks. Red Hat Linux is no more. Now there is Fedora. Please check out http://fedora.redhat.com also check out the archives. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Connecting to ISP?

2003-10-01 Thread Buck
I am afraid I can't be of much help, but if you list the name of your ISP and it's website address for the settings, I am sure someone on this list will help. Some of the world's fines people are here! Good Luck, Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Mounting Drive Partitions

2003-09-30 Thread Buck
is well. But if the partitions have to be assigned a directory name when they are formatted, I may be out of luck. Will Linux allow me to do this for backup or will I need to find another way to clone my drives? Thanks Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Mounting Drive Partitions

2003-09-30 Thread Buck
Thank you very much. It sounds like a little script for replacing the drive and I am set to go. Thanks again Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Hodgson Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: Backup options and considerations

2003-09-29 Thread Buck
Sorry, I am using this on RHL 9. I got distracted and forgot to add the question about what backup software would be best. Thanks Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 12:40 AM To: Red Hat

RE: Backup options and considerations

2003-09-29 Thread Buck
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 7:19 AM To: Red Hat Mailing List Subject: RE: Backup options and considerations On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 03:22, Buck wrote: Sorry, I am using this on RHL 9

RE: samba writable share

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
Did you set the permissions on the folders? Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rene's Caltech Email Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: samba writable share im having trouble creating a writable

Remote Keyboard and mouse

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
to learn how? Thanks Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Remote Keyboard and mouse

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
I have seen SSH referred to in several postings on the listservs. Is that what I want to study? Thanks Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reuben D. Budiardja Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: Remote Keyboard and mouse

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
get paid for it. Thanks again, Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Reuben D. Budiardja Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Keyboard and mouse On Sunday 28 September 2003 05:30 pm, Buck wrote

RE: Remote Keyboard and mouse

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
A Wonderful answer. Thank you very much. It is on the list. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kent Borg Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 6:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Remote Keyboard and mouse On Sun, Sep 28, 2003

RE: Remote Keyboard and mouse

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
I am curious to know Is there a way I can run the GUI on my local machine pointed to the remote machine? Thanks Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: Remote Keyboard and mouse

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
Thanks, I would want the keyboard, mouse and monitor all to be on the remote computer. I guess I forgot to include that little detail. I'll have more specific questions in a few days after I set it up to use. I may have enough parts to make up a second computer for Linux. Buck

Backup options and considerations

2003-09-28 Thread Buck
procedures look like, I don't think I have seen any since about 1990. Anyone have any helpful suggestions? Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

RE: connecting linux to internet

2003-09-26 Thread Buck
Try disabling the iptables temporarily. I had that problem on Knology. Once disabled, it worked. I will figure out why later when I have something worth protecting. I am afraid if someone wants to steal Linux they would be better to download the ISOs. Buck -Original Message- From

RE: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Buck
Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access to binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL. Up2Date Demo was free for 2 months for each installation with a unique email address. At the end

RE: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Buck
, I have not heard whether or not Fedora will offer the priced version. Standard disclaimer: Always verify that what I say is correct. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin J. Weiss Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:45 PM

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
Getting technical here, I was referring to the technical upgrades from 9.0 to 9.2 or 10.0. I realize Fedora will upgrade Red Hat, but while Red Hat may have some equity in the name, we won't be upgrading to Red Hat Linux. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: How to access a Linux box behind a router?

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
NAT in their operation. I have seen that a lot on DLS or ADSL. I know this isn't much help, but for what it's worth, its here. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rodolfo J. Paiz Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:36 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
logical from that point of view? Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnathan Bailes Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fedora On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 10:09, Mike Vanecek wrote: [snip] What

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
I think that the real problem is that we once had available the download of the grand package and updates for $60.00 and now we can only get a part of the package and updates for $349. Sticker shock to those of us used to free. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
is in it for the money. They will go to where the money is. And I wish them well. Maybe some day they'll see me there, but if not, I'll keep on keeping on. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of gh Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:33 AM

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
is long enough to declare a system reliable. My 1/2 cents worth. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Sisler Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 10:37 AM To: RedHat List Subject: Re: Fedora Snip I think there needs to be something like

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
Support What support? The products you listed are only the product and up2date for 1 year! The cost of these two products is actually $799 and $299 respectively. Look again my friend. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
on several machines and never need support, other than up2dates occasionally, but here we are with per-machine licenses again. (Yes, I am aware it isn't a license but the effect is the same). Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
Correct me if I am still wrong, but my understanding was that RHL offered all the features of AS but without the convenient package. The items would have to be individually installed as needed. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
, I could sell them installation and support their server for a year. Better bargain than MS. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Ihnat Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 1:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fedora On Tue, Sep

RE: Fedora

2003-09-23 Thread Buck
] On Behalf Of Sean Estabrooks Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:40 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fedora On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:31:20 -0400 Buck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Support What support? The products you listed are only the product and up2date for 1 year! The cost of these two

W2KP to RH9 expectations?

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
specific questions along the way as I learn more. Thank you, Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

W2KP to RH9: Samba User Group Folder Access

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
I am unable to access anything other than my home folder from my XP computer. Linux is setup as follows: User: buck Member of buck and processors Groups: buck, processors Folders: /home/buck, /home/processing, /home/shared Properties: (/home/processing) From the Linux computer, I can

RE: W2KP to RH9: Samba User Group Folder Access

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
Thank you, Here is the Samba File (smb.conf) Buck # Samba config file created using SWAT # from penguin.Wildlife.lan (192.168.1.1) # Date: 2003/09/22 09:31:14 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = WILDLIFE netbios name = PENGUIN server string = IBM 300

RE: Fedora

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
to Fedora or will I have to start with Fedora from scratch? 4. Will the Red Hat Enterprise software be allowed to be compiled and distributed freely without support? I can see a new market on ebay for Red Hat ÕÑrprise compiled CDs and ISOs. What else am I missing? Buck -- redhat-list

RE: Fedora

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fedora On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 03:14:35PM -0400, Buck wrote: Being a newbie to all this, I am a little confused

RE: Fedora

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
Hmmm, your cert expires at RH 12 and they just backed up to 3.0? Sounds like your cert could be around a while longer than you expected. LOL ;) Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:01

RE: Fedora

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
I know, I was just making a joke out of it. Lol -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Dixon Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 5:35 PM To: Red Hat Mailing List Subject: RE: Fedora On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 17:23, Buck wrote: Hmmm, your cert

RE: W2KP to RH9: Samba User Group Folder Access

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
I changed the name before sending the config file. I just re-installed Linux and am starting over. I have to reconfigur from scratch at this time. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Edward Dekkers Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 8

RE: Fedora

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Fedora On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:20:42PM -0400, Buck wrote: I just talked to sales on the telephone. From what he said, all the features of the Red Hat Enterprise product is available on the internet, just not assembled the same. Version 2 is based on RH 7.1

RE: Fedora

2003-09-22 Thread Buck
LOL Ok you got me. I guess that because there is no .0 there will be no official upgrade. Maybe this was in the works longer than RH is letting on. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 10:08 PM

RE: Any indication of if/when there will be a RH10 ???

2003-09-20 Thread Buck
Correct me if I am wrong but I believe that a year ago, I was downloading the freshly released RH 8.0. Do a search on Google. I saw a review about 10.0 yesterday. Unfortunately I don't remember where. It was a first look at the beta. BTW when did 9.0 release? Buck -Original Message

RE: Windows to Linux

2003-01-31 Thread Buck
You might also do a search on Google. I found a couple of places that try to help in that matter. Good luck, we're in the same boat. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joe Polk Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:30 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: VPN opinions

2003-01-30 Thread Buck
computer. Now I want to setup the firewalls so I can link into the entire network. Unfortunately, Netgear has not been much help so unless someone else on the list has done better and knows something I don't, I won't recommend netgear. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: u.s. government recognizes Linux as

2003-01-28 Thread Buck
and usable for the business. I have a home business right now and I am learning Linux and it's software. First I want to create a server then I'll work on the desktop idea. Just my .01, if its worth that much. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: allowing short passwords

2003-01-27 Thread Buck
I looked around, but in all my ignorance, didn't see anything. I get the feeling that it is in the compiled code or possibly in the kernel. But, don't count on my answer, I can barely find an RPM. Good luck, Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: mysql

2003-01-26 Thread Buck
Let me take a shot at my now born knowledge: Insert disc 3 From the command line as root type: Rpm -ivh /mnt/cdrom/RedHat/RPMS/my* I think that will do it or try Up2date my* And see if Red Hat will update it. Good luck Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

RE: lokkit

2003-01-26 Thread Buck
RH 8.0 has done away with ipchains and uses iptables exclusively. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Elacion, Jr. Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 11:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: lokkit lokkit with RH 7.3 Mike Burger

RE: allowing short passwords

2003-01-26 Thread Buck
Philip, Are you having one of those, I just need an answer days? I set one users password to 4 characters in mine for testing purposes. As root, I changed the password and it fussed, but it took it. I am using RH 8.0, btw. Good luck, Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: email server with private 192.168.1.200 address

2003-01-25 Thread Buck
Am I correct in understanding that you want the email servers in a closed network for testing and educational use only rather than for connection through the internet? Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Sent: Saturday, January 25

RE: Phoebe - 8.0.93

2003-01-24 Thread Buck
Nodeps is no dependants. That is why it is more likely to disrupt your system. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Messmer Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Phoebe - 8.0.93 On Fri, 2003

RE: Burning CD's of 8.1 beta

2003-01-23 Thread Buck
Do you have more than one installed cd drive or a cd and dvd? I had to disconnect one of the drives because it couldn't make up its mind which drive the disc was in. (vs 7.2). 8.0 only worked from the DVD drive. This is probably a shot in the dark for you, but I hope it is helpful Buck

RE: (no subject)

2003-01-22 Thread Buck
and it lists the services available. One of those is squirl mail. I saw that today when I was installing it. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:22 PM To: RH Mail List Subject: (no subject

RE: How do I unsuscribe

2003-01-22 Thread Buck
I think I remember that it takes a while for the list to be updated before you are actually removed. Maybe you will be removed by tomorrow. Just my .02 worth. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua Schmidlkofer Sent: Wednesday

RE: How do I unsuscribe

2003-01-22 Thread Buck
Did he spell Unsubscribe correctly when he sent the email? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joshua Schmidlkofer Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 7:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: How do I unsuscribe On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 16:24,

RE: Advance Server build iso cd

2003-01-21 Thread Buck
Is the advanced server build available for free to the public or is it proprietary to Red Hat? I downloaded the 8.0 isos and created the discs but it looked like the only way to get advanced server was to pay RedHat. Thanks Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto

VNC

2003-01-16 Thread Chip Buck
Has anyone successfully set up VNC with Redhat 8.0? I can start vncserver successfully and connect from a remote client, however I do not get any window manager, only a grey screen with cursor. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe

Re: VNC--or other remote X tools

2003-01-16 Thread Chip Buck
solution. - Original Message - From: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:55 PM Subject: RE: VNC On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Patrick Nelson wrote: Chip Buck wrote: - Has anyone successfully set up VNC with Redhat 8.0

RE: NAT and Redhat 8.0

2002-12-16 Thread Buck
Would you not use DHCP server? I am a newbie in Linux, but that's my guess. Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 16, 2002 5:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NAT and Redhat 8.0

RE: ipconfig --- SOLVED!

2002-12-14 Thread Buck
abort the install and go back to what I was using. Thanks again. Buck -Original Message- From: Len Philpot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 8:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ipconfig On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:28:26PM -0500, Buck wrote: At least

RE: What do I need to do to run Windows apps.

2002-12-14 Thread Buck
You may also setup for a dual boot between Linux and windows. That way you can use Linux until you need cold fusion or other programs. Its not perfect but an option until things get better. Good luck Buck -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

ipconfig

2002-12-13 Thread Buck
Buck -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list