I seem to be having a problem since doing an upgrade install of RH 9. My apps
keep losing the internet, or more specifically, they SEEM to be losing DNS.
Is this a known issue? I'm on DSL with a Linksys DSL router acting as a
firewall. I've got a hosts file and an up-to-date resolv.conf with my
Title: Network problems
Hi List
I upgraded to Linux 7.3 from 7.2 and I installed samba but when I try to connect to samba it gives me a network path error network not found after following the technical pages for samba it appears that samba works fine on the local machine but not from
Network problemsHi List
I upgraded to Linux 7.3 from 7.2 and I installed samba but when I
try to connect to samba it gives me a network path error network not found
after following the technical pages for samba it appears that samba works
fine on the local machine but not from a windows
Hi guys.
I just installed RH 7.2 on a machine. I has a 3c509 Nic
installed. But it doesn't get up and running upon booting
unless I do 'modprobe 3c509'.
'ONBOOT=yes' is in
'/etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-eth0'
I put 'alias eth0 3c509' in '/etc/modules.conf'
Can anyone tell me what my
Wiencke wrote:
Hi guys.
I just installed RH 7.2 on a machine. I has a 3c509 Nic
installed. But it doesn't get up and running upon booting
unless I do 'modprobe 3c509'.
'ONBOOT=yes' is in
'/etc/sysconfig/network-script/ifcfg-eth0'
I put 'alias eth0 3c509' in '/etc/modules.conf'
The problem is that 3c905 isn't the module name.
Try alias eth0 3c59x and try again.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Ragnar Wiencke wrote:
Hi guys.
I just installed RH 7.2 on a machine. I has a 3c509 Nic
installed. But it doesn't get up and running upon booting
unless I do 'modprobe 3c509'.
Hi again.
My problem seemed to be that I put the 'alias eth0 3c509' at
the end of the last line in the file. Anyway, in a new line,
I tried 3c59x but it didn't work so I changed it back to
3c509 and it worked!!
Thanks guys, I knew you would help me in some way or another
:)
Ragnar W.
I just installed redhat 7.3 and now I have two problems (the second should
be simple):
1- I can't get ppp to work over my modem. I am using the same ppp scripts
that I used with redhat 7.2, but this is what I am getting in
/var/log/messages:
pppd[2042]: Connect ppp0 - /dev/modem
Hi All.
This is my first post... I think.
I am having some problems with my Redhat 6.2 system. It's an AMD
333, The kernel is 2.4.1, custom compiled for the AMD K6-2 Processor.
I am having a problem with downloading from Linuxbox [the computer].
I have a webserver set up on it, as a LAN
Summary of The Problem(s):
1) When I attempt to ping something (by ip address) nothing happens for
a good 10 seconds or so, then I get about 10-15 response all at once, and
then normal operation continues. This problem is not present with http
connects etc.
2) DNS lookups do not seem to
I've got a RedHat 6.2 box here and for some strange reason,
when the machine gets rebooted (whether by me or by some
other reason -- power problems, etc) it inactivates the
eth0 interface. Where can I set it up to automatically
activate this at boot?
Thanks..
John
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
ONBOOT="yes"
charles
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
I've got a RedHat 6.2 box here and for some strange reason,
when the machine gets rebooted (whether by me or by some
other reason -- power problems, etc) it inactivates the
eth0
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
ONBOOT="yes"
Thanks... I wonder how that got changed... *shrug* Oh,
well.. it's fixed now! :-) (Note -- as a fix I had put the
following line in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local file:
echo "activating eth0"
It didn't work because that shoudl be two lines
echo "activating eth0"
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
But, the ONBOOT parameter is better. Also, ifup eth0 is shorter to type :)
charles
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, John Aldrich wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
in
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
ONBOOT="yes"
Thanks... I wonder how that got changed... *shrug* Oh,
well.. it's fixed now! :-) (Note -- as a fix I had put the
following line in my /etc/rc.d/rc.local file:
echo "activating eth0"
Hi,
I just wanted to clarify one tiny thing for lurking newbies.
There is a difference between `ifup' and `ifconfig' commands.
`ifup' is a shell script that enables some extra paramators and
interface configurations that are generated by linuxconf,
netconf, or netcfg. You will find within the
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
It didn't work because that shoudl be two lines
echo "activating eth0"
/sbin/ifconfig eth0 up
But, the ONBOOT parameter is better. Also, ifup eth0 is shorter to type :)
Ahh... well, I hadn't had a chance to try it yet... :-)
I'll take note of
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Vidiot wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Charles Galpin wrote:
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
ONBOOT="yes"
Thanks... I wonder how that got changed... *shrug* Oh,
well.. it's fixed now! :-) (Note -- as a fix I had put the
following line in my
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Jason N. Price wrote:
As for the nameserver, I don't have an IP for the one I use. I have DNS
disabled in my TCP/IP settings. Can I use my windows box as the DNS by chance?
I wouldn't use the Win98 box as dns, but you should be able to find out
what it's using as a
At 05:32 PM 8/24/00 -0500, Jason N. Price wrote:
Also, any thoughts on how I can share the net connection? As mentioned
previously, Win98 std. doesn't have net sharing included.
Dont remember the details of your setup - do you want to route traffic thru
your win98 system? Try www.nat32.com -
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Jason N. Price wrote:
I guess I hadn't saved the default gateway setting in
linuxconf. Regardless, that wasn't the problem. I changed it and it
didn't help... :(
Here's my route output:
Destination Gateway GenmaskFlMet Ref Use
I am a new redhat/linux user, so please excuse my ignorance. :)
I'm trying to setup a home LAN with my Win98 box housing the internet connection, and
the Linux
box (RH 6.0) having access to the internet and housing a web and email server. I
realize that the
Linux box would make a better
Hi,
Do you have your hosts file set up on both the
windows and Linux box?
Do you have networking actually started on the
Linux Box? (/sbin/ifconfig should give you information)
Do you have anything in hosts.deny that would
cause trouble?
Just some things to check.
Linda
I do not have a hosts file setup on the windows box. Where would I put it? I did not
realize
windows knew how to use a hosts file... :)
Yes, networking it started. I'm not at home right now, but I have run ifconfig and it
showed both
the 'eth0' and 'lo' interfaces.
I am not familiar with
I know this sounds obvious - but is the physical network working? Do you have link
lights on your network cards on?
Then - the hosts file in Windows is in C:\WINDOWS\hosts - no extension, just hosts.
Probably not one there already.
You can't ping either box from either box? Using ping
y the
IPs. It's always better to troubleshoot network problems that way
first since that way you leave possible problems affecting name resolution
out of the picture.
Finally, how did you physically connect the Win98 box to the Linux
box? Ethernet, I suppose? How? Try to describe it.
Also, what
Yes, the physical network is working. I have a triple boot on this system
(Win98/Win2k/RH6.0) and
the LAN works fine in both Win98 and Win2k. So, hardware-wise I should be fine. I am
unable to
ping either way using either the IP or the boxname.
Speaking of boxname, how do I name the linux
open your
browser, point it to "http://127.0.0.1" and see the homepage from your own
server? Please, post the exact error message that you get.
Also, instead of using the host names make sure you use exclusively the
IPs. It's always better to troubleshoot network problems that way
You might see what /sbin/route gives you ... although I tried this on a box at work
and the command doesn't exist. So I must have something on my home machine that I
don't have at work. If the route command works, you can check your gateway that way -
your gateway should show up as a line
I guess I hadn't saved the default gateway setting in
linuxconf. Regardless, that wasn't the problem. I changed it and it
didn't help... :(
Here's my route output:
Destination Gateway GenmaskFlMet Ref Use Iface
192.168.0.2#
Um - yeah. Your problem is that you can't see 192.168.0.1 from .2, and/or vice-versa;
not gateway problems. Sorry for misleading you!
And the resolv.conf file - "man resolver" says that a line starting with "nameserver"
should give the ip address immediately after it - so if the nameserver
Okay, I can't even begin to tell you how stupid I feel right now. I almost
want to make up some fix that I had to apply to get this to work. Turns
out, I mistyped the IP address for my Windows box. I had it set to
192.160.0.1. Doh! Feel free to call me whatever names you can come up
www.winproxy.com or something?
-Dusty
- Original Message -
From: Jason N. Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2000 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Network problems
Okay, I can't even begin to tell you how stupid I feel right now. I almost
want to make up some fix
Brian, YOU ROCK!!! I downloaded and installed new copies (same
version) of glib, glib10, glibc, glibc-devel, and glibc-profile.
Now, it works. All network problems fixed. Just for future
reference, made my CD from the University of Buffalo .iso image.
Thank you to all who helped!
Jeff
On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 10:32:48AM -0400, Jeff Graves wrote:
I am no expert but on Big Brother I saw this web notice.
Perhaps it is worth trying.
Note RedHat 6.1 users
ping = on 6.1 is broken, get
www.rpmfind.net/linux/RPM/redhat/6.0/i386/netkit-base-0.10-29.i386.html
a working
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Jeff Graves wrote:
I still haven't figured out why my networking isn't working on my
new 6.2 mail server. Does anyone know if a busted reverse DNS could
cause ping to seg fault? Also does anyone know exactly what packages
control networking? I wonder if maybe I should
Here's the output
-Original Message-
From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 9:25 AM
To: Redhat List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Still having network problems in 6.2
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Jeff Graves wrote:
I still haven't figured out why my networking isn't
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ashe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2000 2:52 AM
To: Jeff Graves
Subject: Re: Still having network problems in 6.2
Hi Jeff,
Well I've been following the thread here, and I have a few
suggestions/ideas/things to try.
1. Can you give
I still haven't figured out why my networking isn't working on my
new 6.2 mail server. Does anyone know if a busted reverse DNS could
cause ping to seg fault? Also does anyone know exactly what packages
control networking? I wonder if maybe I should try a different
(older version). I tried
Let's start from the "beginning". What's the output of ifconfig -a?
I still haven't figured out why my networking isn't working on my
new 6.2 mail server. Does anyone know if a busted reverse DNS could
cause ping to seg fault? Also does anyone know exactly what packages
control networking? I
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Rooney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 12:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Still having network problems in 6.2
Let's start from the "beginning". What's the output of
ifconfig -a?
[root@mailsrv floppy]
So, you can ping outside of your network but you can't ping your router,
right? Is your router denying ICMP requests? What kinda box is your
router?
Let's start from the "beginning". What's the output of
ifconfig -a?
[root@mailsrv floppy]# ifconfig -a
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Still having network problems in 6.2
So, you can ping outside of your network but you can't ping your
router,
right? Is your router denying ICMP requests? What kinda box is
your
router?
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 2:34 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Still having network problems in 6.2
So, you can ping outside of your network but you can't ping your
router,
right? Is your router denying ICMP requests? What kinda box is
your
router?
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Rooney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 3:12 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Still having network problems in 6.2
Ok, does your /etc/sysctl.conf look like this?
# Disables packet forwarding
net.ipv4.ip_forward = 0
# Enables
-Original Message-
From: Mike Vevea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2000 3:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Still having network problems in 6.2
If I remember the last couple of posts from you, you were able to
resolve
host names if you used nslookup
First of all,sorry about my bad english,when we talk about linux problems
it's a kind a hard to me to explain,becose,this is an english that i didn't
learn at school.
My server it's an Redhat 6.0 compatible (portuguese ver name
Conectiva4.0,kernel 2.2.12-5)with 2 interfaces eth0 and eth1.
"R. Kuijvenhoven" wrote:
From the second workstation I can't
ping anything.
Still doesn't work.
Stage 1) Check cabling.
Thanks, it was the cabling indeed. There is fibre optic cable between the
part of the network this computer is in and the rest of the network. The
company who
"R. Kuijvenhoven" wrote:
From the second workstation I can't
ping anything.
Still doesn't work.
Stage 1) Check cabling.
Stage 2) turn off the other chatterboxes, so only the linux server and
the windows box are on. use "tcpdump -i eth0" to watch for traffic on
the eth0 interface. Try
Hello,
I have been setting up a RH 6.1 firewall/router for a LAN (Novell) with 8
(windoze) workstations. Configuring the first 5 workstations to use the
firewall went smoothly. I did not get the other three workstations
configured however. From the first workstation I can't ping the
Hello,
I have been setting up a RH 6.1 firewall/router for a LAN (Novell) with 8
(windoze) workstations. Configuring the first 5 workstations to use the
firewall went smoothly. I did not get the other three workstations
configured however. From the first workstation I can't ping the firewall and
You have to have your network cable plugged in when you boot. Otherwise it
won't know which type of wiring to select when it initializes the card.
I.E.,, plug in your 10-base-T or 10-base-2 or AUI before starting up. Does
that help?
Hi!
I've just got a problem with the onboard network card
Hi!
I've just got a problem with the onboard network card of my Multia.
Using the distribution boot floppy of RH5.0, the card is recognized, but
seems not to work. With a Linux 2.0.18 kernel (I think from an earlier RH4
install), it is recognized (obviously with a different message), and it
53 matches
Mail list logo
