I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 server to allow DNS traffic on
port 53.
I have RedHat 9.0 installed and everything is fine except I can't seem to
change the security level configuration to allow traffic on port 53. Other
services (httpd(80), ssh(22), etc.,) are working
the security
level configuration to allow port 53 (DNS)
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 server to allow DNS traffic on
port 53.
I have RedHat 9.0 installed and everything is fine except I can't seem to
change the security level configuration to allow traffic on port 53. Other
?
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS)
I need assistance in allowing my Redhat 9.0 server to allow DNS traffic
on
port 53
I still didn't see it listening on any port. Show me the full netstat -an
-Original Message-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS)
I
-
From: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port
53
(DNS)
I forgot to mention that I'm using TinyDNS. All appears to be running
properly, I just can't get to it from
: Brent Herring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Changing the security level configuration to allow port 53
(DNS)
Ok. It's kinda big. You're right. It's not listening which seems to be
my problem. named is not listd in my services
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 23:42, tirumal b wrote:
hello
I have installed redhat linux 8.0(Psyche).During
the installation i set no firewall but when i see it
in the security level after installation the level is
high by default. I change my option to medium and
selected customize option
hello
I have installed redhat linux 8.0(Psyche).During
the installation i set no firewall but when i see it
in the security level after installation the level is
high by default. I change my option to medium and
selected customize option and selected some of the
services to be allowed.I
that config tool can't read the settings u have made before. u need to
check /etc/sysconfig/iptables or ipchains to verify the settings.
Also, u can use:
iptables -L
ipchains -L
cheers.
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 06:39, Joel Lopez wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to change the security level from
been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
Does anyone know how to allow changes to the security level?
thanks,
Joel
--
xwangbu [EMAIL
been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
Does anyone know how to allow changes to the security level?
thanks,
Joel
--
xwangbu [EMAIL
Hi,
I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
Does anyone know how to allow changes to the security level?
thanks,
Joel
--
redhat-list
again etc.
I know the behavior above is confusing but that's how it is. It freaked me
too.
Terry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Joel Lopez
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Security Level Configuration
I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
Does anyone know how to allow changes to the security level?
thanks,
Joel
FAQ Joel.
Please
Joel Lopez wrote:
Hi,
I've been trying to change the security level from High to Medium. But,
even though I'm logged in as root when I open up the tool to see if my
changes are there it always shows the Level as High.
If your using ipchains or Linux 7.3, after you modify your security
Bret
Thanks. here is output
samba-common-2.2.5-10
samba-2.2.7a-1
samba-client-2.2.5-10
so it's mixed up! What now?
Kind Regards
Ashley
On Sun, 2003-02-02 at 16:28, Bret Hughes wrote:
New point of view with no 8.0 experience.
First, what does rpm think you have
what does
rpm
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 12:00, Ashley Kitson wrote:
Bret
Thanks. here is output
samba-common-2.2.5-10
samba-2.2.7a-1
samba-client-2.2.5-10
so it's mixed up! What now?
OK
keep in mind I am not an up2date user and there may be a better way to
do this using the tool.
This should not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 13:00:40 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
samba-common-2.2.5-10
samba-2.2.7a-1
samba-client-2.2.5-10
so it's mixed up! What now?
As root user:
rpm --erase samba --nodeps
up2date --nox samba-swat
The 2.2.7a-1 package is not one
Bret
Thanks for that. I had to force rpm to de-install using --notriggers
--noscripts but it did clear samba out. I've now re-installed and 'rpm
-qa|grep samba' now gives
samba-2.2.5-10
samba-common-2.2.5-10
samba-client-2.2.5-10
samba-swat-2.2.5-10
I then did
chkconfig smb on
chkconfig
At 16:28 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
However .. Now instead of Mozilla telling me I cannot connect when I
type in the http://localhost:901/ url I get an alert message stating
that 'The operation timed out when attempting to contact
www.localhost.com' This is progress of sorts I guess :-)
Any
Nick
I don't recall seeing that IP address anywhere. Where might I find it?
Regards
Ashley
Use the IP address of the samba server instead of localhost.
This will also allow you access from other machines so you don't
have to run X on the server.
hih
nick@nexnix
--
redhat-list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 16:28:38 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
However .. Now instead of Mozilla telling me I cannot connect when I
type in the http://localhost:901/ url I get an alert message stating
that 'The operation timed out when attempting to contact
At 17:06 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
Nick
I don't recall seeing that IP address anywhere. Where might I find it?
From a command line:-
ifconfig - you're probably looking for the eth0 device if you have only
one network card.
hih
nick@nexnix
Regards
Ashley
Use the IP address of the
Michael
http://127.0.0.1:901 works!! brilliant
However, in case this is helping anyone else my /etc/hosts file contains
192.168.1.102 Prospect3
192.168.1.100 Prospect2
192.168.1.101 Prospect1 localhost
192.168.1.101 Prospect1.Prospect
Prospect 2 and 3 were entered
Nick
Thanks for the help. The eth0 address is what I know as my local
machine address. As you can see from a reply to Michael, the loopback
address works as well (http://127.0.0.1:901).
Regards
Ashley
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 12:25, Nick Lindsell wrote:
At 17:06 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 17:39:12 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
http://127.0.0.1:901 works!! brilliant
However, in case this is helping anyone else my /etc/hosts file contains
192.168.1.102 Prospect3
192.168.1.100 Prospect2
192.168.1.101
Michael
As far as I am aware, I didn't do anything. Do these entries look odd
then?
Regards
Ashley
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 13:01, Michael Schwendt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04 Feb 2003 17:39:12 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
http://127.0.0.1:901 works!!
Michael
This is not true for Red Hat's samba-swat packages. There the server
line points to /usr/sbin/swat. Whatever you did, you damaged the
xinetd config files in several places.
Whatever I did, was done under strict direction from the install
directions from the RH8 install guide and
On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 19:57, Ashley Kitson wrote:
Michael
You miss the point. here is a timeline:
1/ RH6.2 Loaded sometime back
2/ Machine nuked
3/ RH 8.0 loaded including Samba
4/ RH autoupdate updates Samba to 2.2.7
5/ I get around to using it, configure Samba to run manually and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03 Feb 2003 20:57:52 -0500, Ashley Kitson wrote:
This is not true for Red Hat's samba-swat packages. There the server
line points to /usr/sbin/swat. Whatever you did, you damaged the
xinetd config files in several places.
Whatever I did,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 17:20:19 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
Thanks for persevering. I ran the tail on messages as suggested. It
turned out that the server= line in the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file is
pointing to something that doesn't exist (it reads
: RH8.0 - Altering Security Level
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Ashley Kitson wrote:
I think I have my system open at the moment (which is a risk except I'm
hidden behind a cable router) and still cannot connect to SWAP using
SWAT?
http
I got a
/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables program
/lib/iptables folder with lots of .so files in it
/sbin/iptables program
but no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file
This on RH8.0 newly installed. Any ideas as to what I should be editing?
Thanks.
Kind Regards
Mr Ashley Kitson
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ricky
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:16:18 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
I got a
/etc/rc.d/init.d/iptables program
/lib/iptables folder with lots of .so files in it
/sbin/iptables program
but no /etc/sysconfig/iptables file
This on RH8.0 newly installed.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:07:37 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
etc/xinetd.d/swat is configured as
#chkconfig: 35 20 80
#description: SWAT
service swat
{
disable = no
port = 901
socket_type = stream
wait = no
only_from =
Regards
Mr Ashley Kitson
- Original Message -
From: Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: RH8.0 - Altering Security Level
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:07:37 -, Ashley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 11:01:38 -, Ashley Kitson wrote:
The 2 comment lines were the ones suggested when I read the man page
for chkconfig (as I didn't know what it was until then).
No. The chkconfig man page doesn't suggest to add anything like
On Friday 31 January 2003 09:07, Ashley Kitson wrote:
Matthew
etc/xinetd.d/swat is configured as
#chkconfig: 35 20 80
#description: SWAT
service swat
{
disable = no
port = 901
socket_type = stream
wait = no
only_from = localhost
user = root
Michael
Thanks for persevering. I ran the tail on messages as suggested. It turned
out that the server= line in the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file is pointing to
something that doesn't exist (it reads server=/etc/xinetd/swat i.e. itself).
The log message shows that the server doesn't exist. That got
What files do I have to edit to change the security settings
on my Redhat 8.0 box?
Im trying to set up samba, but as it is, I cant even get localhost to accept my connection. The firewall/security setting is stuck at high
and when I attempt to change it via the gnome Security Level
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RH8.0 - Altering
Security Level
What files do I have to edit to
change the security settings on my Redhat 8.0
box? I'm trying to set up samba,
but as it is, I can't even get localhost to accept
my connection. The
firewall/security setting is stuck
Doug,
I have run into the same issue. When I make changes using the Security
Level tool and then close that tool. The settings stick. However, if the
machine is shutdown (for any reason) or that application is opened once
more, the security settings go back the way they were
Ricky
Bingo. having exactly the same problem. Red-hat couldn't care less as
I am just a prole user and their support for 'personal' edition seems to
extend to 'can you see the prompt'.
Anyway, flame out of the way, I know this much:
The Security Level and Lokkit utilities *do not* read
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Robert Adkins wrote:
Doug,
I have run into the same issue. When I make changes using the Security
Level tool and then close that tool. The settings stick. However, if the
machine is shutdown (for any reason) or that application is opened once
more, the security
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Ashley Kitson wrote:
I think I have my system open at the moment (which is a risk except I'm
hidden behind a cable router) and still cannot connect to SWAP using
SWAT?
http://localhost:901/. localhost is set in
First restart the service via ... service samba restartamzy
___Get the FREE email that has everyone talking at http://www.mail2world.com
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Ricky Deitemeyer wrote:
What files do I have to edit to change the security settings on my
Redhat 8.0 box? I'm trying to set up samba, but as it is, I can't even
/etc/sysconfig/iptables
--
Of course I'm in shape! Round's a shape, isn't it?
--
redhat-list mailing
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:31:32PM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
Actually on my RH 8.0 boxes, iptables starts BEFORE the network is brought
up - so you're good to go.
in /etc/rc.d/rc3.d you have the following:
S08iptables
S10network
That brings up iptables first :-)
Well I'll be
Hello there...
I have install the redhat 8.0 in my computer as a server, but facing a
problem... when i try to configure my firewal, it doesnt change, what i mean
is that: by default my security level (of the firewal) is hight, but when i
change the value to no security or median security
is that: by default my security level (of the firewal) is hight, but when i
change the value to no security or median security it doesnt change (he ask
me if i want to change the config i select ok, but when i open it again it
level is again high)
try (as root): service iptables restart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 10:47:42 +, Tiago Andre wrote:
I have install the redhat 8.0 in my computer as a server, but facing a
problem... when i try to configure my firewal, it doesnt change, what
i mean is that: by default my security level
.
Good luck,
-Original Message-
From: Tiago Andre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 5:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Security level
Hello there...
I have install the redhat 8.0 in my computer as a server, but facing a
problem... when i try to configure my
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Security level
is that: by default my security level (of the firewal) is hight, but
when i
change the value to no security or median security it doesnt change (he
ask
me if i want to change the config i select ok, but when i open it again it
level is again high)
try
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:54:43AM -0500, Matthews, John wrote:
I believe firewall rules are sometimes kept in /etc/sysconfig/firewall, so
you might want to read the contents of that file too and ensure you don't
have rules being set there.
I just set up iptables on my cable cnxn (Works
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:54:43AM -0500, Matthews, John wrote:
|
|I believe firewall rules are sometimes kept in /etc/sysconfig/firewall, so
|you might want to read the contents of that file too and ensure you don't
|have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:13:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 09:54:43AM -0500, Matthews, John wrote:
I believe firewall rules are sometimes kept in
/etc/sysconfig/firewall, so you might want to read the contents of
that
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 11:15:47AM -0800, Rick Johnson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| I just set up iptables on my cable cnxn (Works great!), and one of the
| items left sort of open was exactly where the iptables rules should be
| placed in order to have them run at startup time.
| I
Hi Rick, Thank you!
This is a nice clean solution. It integrates so well with the existing
system thats its almost like someone designed it that way :-)
Does anybody know if there is a gap in coverage between the time the
network is started up and the time the iptables rules become
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Wang Guojiang wrote:
configuration again, it is still set to High. I tried at least 10 times
now using exact same methods as described in the Customization Guide.
It *does* save it. It's just that every time you re-open the dialog, it
resets all fields to the defaults.
I installed Linux 8.0 on my i86 machine with
security level set to High. Now I want to modify the setting so that it will not
block all ports. I used the security level configuration to change to
"customize" to open up WWW and some other TCP ports. It allows me
to work
well except that when I attempt to change the Security Level
Configuration from High to Medium or No Firewall, it always stay at
High no matter what I do. I even reinstalled RH Linux 8.0 on the same
machine, explicitly picked No Firewall option during the
installation. I eventually
I downloaded RH Linux 8.0 from one of the mirror sites a few weeks ago.
I installed it on my desktop (P4 - 1.8GHz processor). The installation
(Server installation) went smoothly. It seems to work well except that
when I attempt to change the Security Level Configuration from High to
Medium
Level Configuration from High to
Medium or No Firewall, it always stay at High no matter what I do. I
even reinstalled RH Linux 8.0 on the same machine, explicitly picked No
Firewall option during the installation. I eventually ended up with
High Security Level anyway. That makes me wonder
63 matches
Mail list logo
