linuxconf-web

2003-10-20 Thread Firmansyah
hello all, i'm sorry if this topic is already discuss before. i want to access linuxconf-web which the default port is 98 from browser. but till now, the page never been appear. my other service which can run from browser like swat and apache, is succesfull running. so, what the pr

Re: Upgrading to Redhat 9 from 7.2 probems (apache and linuxconf)

2003-08-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
llowing > message > > # rpm -e apache > # /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.12333: line 3: /etc/conf.linuxconf: No such file or > directory > # error: %trigger(linuxconf-1.17r2-6) scriptlet failed, exit status 2 > > 2) I also see that linuxconf is still installe

Re: Upgrading to Redhat 9 from 7.2 problems (apache and linuxconf)

2003-08-22 Thread Paul F. Williams
I was able to remove both apache and linuxconf modules by restoring the particular files they were flagging and then rerunning rpm -e on each package. paulw Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:55:16 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: "Paul F. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Upgra

Upgrading to Redhat 9 from 7.2 probems (apache and linuxconf)

2003-08-22 Thread Paul F. Williams
various upgrade documentation and httpd is running again. However when I attempt to remove apache I get the following message # rpm -e apache # /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.12333: line 3: /etc/conf.linuxconf: No such file or directory # error: %trigger(linuxconf-1.17r2-6) scriptlet failed, exit

Re: Linuxconf no longer exists with RedHat 8.0 ... How do I easily configure sendmail/postfix ?

2003-03-09 Thread Brad Alpert
> Hello, > > I recently purchased RedHat 8.0 and I noticed that there is no > linuxconf anymore. > > How do I configure sendmail or postfix so that I can specify > virtual domains, aliases, config options, spam protection, mail > forwarding, ... as it used to be wi

Linuxconf no longer exists with RedHat 8.0 ... How do I easily configure sendmail/postfix ?

2003-03-09 Thread f
Hello,   I recently purchased RedHat 8.0 and I noticed that there is no linuxconf anymore.   How do I configure sendmail or postfix so that I can specify virtual domains, aliases, config options, spam protection, mail forwarding, ... as it used to be with RedHat 5 or 6

re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Jacques Gelinas
> I'm running RH7.1, and every time after I quit Linuxconf I get the = > following. > The following command told me something had to be done > /etc/rc3.d/S55named probe > Executing: /etc/rc3.d/S55named start RedHat /etc/init.d/named script is broken. Well, not exact

re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Jacques Gelinas
> One very important aspect is that it allows the ability to abort any > change at any time (except after it's already been applied, of course) > and not cause any changes to be made irrespective of the will of the > user. My understanding about later versions of linuxconf, this

Re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Eric Wood
ouble with the same things that gave me trouble with > the Redhat-supplied versions. I don't recall your problems comming across the linuxconf mailing list. Can you elaborate on the specific issues you had? -eric wood -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-reques

Re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread ABrady
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002 08:30:54 -0500 "Eric Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What version of linuxconf? Get the latest version here: > http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/ > > The linuxconf version which came with RH 7.2 and below are all > sabotaged by RH. Most p

Re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Eric Wood
- Original Message - From: "Juan Nin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >The linuxconf version which came with RH 7.2 and below are all sabotaged by > RH. > > Do you have any article or something on this? One only needs to review the version of linuxconf bundled at d

Re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Juan Nin
From: Eric Wood >The linuxconf version which came with RH 7.2 and below are all sabotaged by RH. Do you have any article or something on this? Thanks in advance, Juan -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@;redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe ht

Re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Eric Wood
What version of linuxconf?  Get the latest version here: http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/   The linuxconf version which came with RH 7.2 and below are all sabotaged by RH.  Most people run this crippled version and then complain that it don't work.  They are short-sighted.   -eric

Re: linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread Juan Nin
From: RH >I'm running RH7.1, and every time after I quit Linuxconf I get the following. [...] >Please Help me to solve this problem. # rpm -e linuxconf :) never use it, it sucks, it will ruin all your configurations... you'll find macabrous stories about linuxconf in every li

linuxconf

2002-11-07 Thread RH
Hello Group,   I'm running RH7.1, and every time after I quit Linuxconf I get the following.     ─ Status of the system ┐│ The state of the system is not in sync with the current/updated ││ configurations. You are allow

Re: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-12 Thread Keith Morse
Hie, Use Linuxconf. http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/ regards keith On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Krishna wrote: > Hi, > Use Webmin. http://www.webmin.com > > regards > Krishna > > Krishna Shekhar > Network Administrator > Wiplash Wireless > -

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-12 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 09:45:41PM -0500, Bret Hughes wrote: > me here. I am truly astounded that it pissed him off enough to post > anonymously. Anybody that is so offended by that advice is either trolling, has way too much free time or a loose chip. -- Hal Burgiss -- redhat-list mai

Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-12 Thread sgarcia
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/10/2002 at 05:08 PM, "John Haverty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I found the following in a Google search while looking for reasonable >answers to finding a non X unified configurator that is extensible / >scriptable, and I found this snarky trollish reply on the

Re: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-12 Thread Krishna
Hi, Use webmin. http://www.webmin.com regards Krishna Krishna Shekhar Network Administrator Wiplash Wireless - Original Message - From: Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:41 AM Subject: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 a

Re: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-12 Thread Edward Dekkers
> Fact is, someone reading a list message without knowing the tone of the > list or the poster would see this as not helpful and obviously offensive > at least to this poster. I know. I was in a bad mood. I thought about it later, but once you press 'send' on the mail client it's near impossible

Re: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-11 Thread Krishna
Hi, Use Webmin. http://www.webmin.com regards Krishna Krishna Shekhar Network Administrator Wiplash Wireless - Original Message - From: Keith Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 10:41 AM Subject: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 a

Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-11 Thread Keith Morse
he topic. Go to linuxconf's main website. Jacques has rpm's for the newest iterations of linuxconf for your perusal and use. -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-11 Thread Bret Hughes
st members we have. You > don't like his answers to your questions? > > Don't ask them then - have a coke and a smile and shut the --- up. > > Get a life. Chill out Ed. I like David too. I also don't trust linuxconf after it rendered a sendmail setup totally

Re: Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-11 Thread Edward Dekkers
I found the following in a Google search while looking for reasonable answers to finding a non X unified configurator that is extensible / scriptable, and I found this snarky trollish reply on the RedHat list. I would say this is horrible P.R. since the rank on Google is impressively high. Mr. Tal

Re:Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-09-11 Thread John Haverty
recommend two things: The return o Linuxconf, as it is useful and familiar. Secondly, I find being shut out of update servers annoying and having to go to speakeasy.rpmfind.net to get critical updates, some involving security kind of unfair. I do pay for RedHat and wish to support it, but I am upset about

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-06 Thread Anthony Abby
>When did RH even try to "support" it? They just gave it a bad rap by >disabling modules, not assisting Jacques into make it compatible with the >next version, yadda yadda yadda. >-eric > They're doing the same thing with KDE too. I think it's disgusting what they're doing to KDE in Null! An

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-06 Thread Eric Wood
- Original Message - From: "Keith Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Redhat doesn't support it anymore, but it is still available from > http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/ if you happen to like it. When did RH even try to "support" it? They just gave i

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Daniel Tan
u need to install webminu not using gui? if yes, try kontrol-panel - Original Message - From: "cj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:39 PM Subject: RE: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 Is it actually being replaced by W

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Aly Dharshi
No actually Nautilus is supposed to be a replacement, I don't quite like that program, but I guess that it may get better with time ??? Till then Webmin (http://www.webmin.com) is as many people say a better replacement. Aly. -- Aly Dharshi [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Administrator

RE: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread cj
Is it actually being replaced by Webmin? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Tan Sent: Friday, 6 September 2002 4:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 i read about it being replaced due to some bugs in it

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Daniel Tan
i read about it being replaced due to some bugs in ittry webmin - Original Message - From: "Keith Morse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 6:30 AM Subject: Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Keith Morse
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any replacement for linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 or why is it removed > in this release. Redhat doesn't support it anymore, but it is still available from http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/ if you happen to like it. --

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Frederic Herman
in for remote configuration in Linux (via web interface). > > >- Original Message - >From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:00 AM >Subject: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 > > > > >>Is there any replac

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Martin Mewes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, moin ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >Is there any replacement for linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 or why is it >removed in this release. I wrote: LinuxConf is for any reason now part of RH 7.3. If you want an "easy to use" Configu

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Martin Mewes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, moin ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >Is there any replacement for linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 or why is it >removed in this release. LinuxConf is for any reason now part of RH 7.3. If you want an "easy to use" Configuration Tool

Re: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread Teodor Georgiev
use webmin for remote configuration in Linux (via web interface). - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 11:00 AM Subject: Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 > Is there any replacement for linuxconf in RedHat 7

Linuxconf in RedHat 7.3

2002-09-05 Thread jonny . axelsson
Is there any replacement for linuxconf in RedHat 7.3 or why is it removed in this release. \Jonny Axelsson -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread philip
t;[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Saul Arias >Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:07 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3 > > >At 06:41 PM 16-08-02, Anthony Abby wrote: > > >>This is the kind of answer that is

RE: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Anthony Abby
much as it does it can become cumbersome keeping up with the development inherent in the different distros. Case in point was the shift from Redhat 6.2 to 7.0. Does anyone not remember all the grousing about Redhat's changes in 7.0?? I installed Linuxconf on 7.3 and it works great for me. H

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread ABrady
wasn't installed on any install except an "everything" install. It was mentioned that it was going away. Now it has. But, just like many other things that used to be included and no longer are (xv among them), one can still locate and install them. Linuxconf is still active

RE: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Rob Emanuele
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Saul Arias Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 4:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3 At 06:41 PM 16-08-02, Anthony Abby wrote: >This is the kind of answer that is really of no help to a new person >try

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Saul Arias
ection: 1. Open your web browser. 2. Type "www.google.com" in the address bar (without quotes). Hit 3. Type "where is linuxconf in redhat 7.3" in the input box (with the quotes this time) 4. Click with your mouse on the "Google Search" button 5. Click with your mouse on

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Anthony Abby
One point I neglected to point out. Linuxconf is actually comprised of several RPMs if you want the full GUI. Here's a description of the packages from their Redhat download page. linuxconf: This is the main package. Everyone needs it. You do not need any X library to use it. linu

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Anthony Abby
This is the kind of answer that is really of no help to a new person trying to learn Linux. Instead of coming off like a hammer, why not just point the guy in the right direction??? Linuxconf can be downloaded and installed from http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/ Anthony On Fri, 2002-08-16

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Anthony Abby
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 17:43, Robert Vaughn wrote: > Does linuxconf not exist with RedHat 7.3? Is there a > replacement utility? I could not find it when I did > the workstation or server installation. > > Thanks, > ...Robert Redhat no longer ships Linuxconf with 7.3, howeve

Re: LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Saul Arias
At 05:43 PM 16-08-02, you wrote: >Does linuxconf not exist with RedHat 7.3? Is there a >replacement utility? I could not find it when I did >the workstation or server installation. Sometimes it helps to RTFM: From RELEASE-NOTES: The following applications and packages not p

LinuxConf - seems to have dissapeared with 7.3

2002-08-16 Thread Robert Vaughn
Does linuxconf not exist with RedHat 7.3? Is there a replacement utility? I could not find it when I did the workstation or server installation. Thanks, ...Robert __ Do You Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search Thousands of New Jobs http://www.hotjobs.com

Re: linuxconf - segmentation fault ( core dumped )

2002-07-22 Thread Eric Wood
Here recently, linuxconf had a problem parsing the RH network settings files and core dumped. Grab the lastest linuxconf from: http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/download.hc -eric wood - Original Message - From: "kutbuddin ali hussain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

Re: linuxconf - segmentation fault ( core dumped )

2002-07-22 Thread Eric Wood
Here recently, linuxconf had a problem parsing the RH network settings files and core dumped. Grab the lastest linuxconf from: http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/download.hc -eric wood - Original Message - From: "kutbuddin ali hussain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hel

Re: linuxconf - segmentation fault ( core dumped )

2002-07-22 Thread Eric Wood
Here recently, linuxconf had a problem parsing the RH network settings files and core dumped. Grab the lastest linuxconf from: http://www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/download.hc -eric wood - Original Message - From: "kutbuddin ali hussain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello,

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-18 Thread Dave
t; Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:21 AM Subject: Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf > On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 07:39, Eric Wood wrote: > > Jacque is working on a new sendmail config. Even so, it still works great > > as far as I can tell. Is there another gui that handles sendmail > >

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-17 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 07:39, Eric Wood wrote: > Jacque is working on a new sendmail config. Even so, it still works great > as far as I can tell. Is there another gui that handles sendmail > configuration and vdomains better than linuxconf? > -eric I have yet to find something that

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-17 Thread Eric Wood
Jacque is working on a new sendmail config. Even so, it still works great as far as I can tell. Is there another gui that handles sendmail configuration and vdomains better than linuxconf? -eric - Original Message - From: "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-17 Thread Kevin Myers
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:23:48 -0400, you wrote: >I thought the same thing until I was introduced to sendmail. Linuxconf's >virtual domains it very easy and I primarily use linuxconf just for >configuring sendmail. >-eric > Definitely a bad idea. The linuxconf sendmail co

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-17 Thread Eric Wood
I thought the same thing until I was introduced to sendmail. Linuxconf's virtual domains it very easy and I primarily use linuxconf just for configuring sendmail. -eric - Original Message - From: "Kevin Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Since Red Hat 7.3 d

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-17 Thread Kevin Myers
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 19:18:09 +, lcfe wrote: >Since Red Hat 7.3 does not come with linuxconf anymore, which package >should I use instead? I need a text terminal based configuration tool. I steer away from auto configuration tools whenever possible - they are too inclined to mess

Re: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-16 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 lcfe wrote: >I need a text terminal based configuration tool. I'd recommend vi or emacs. - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with p

RE: Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-16 Thread Anthony Abby
You can still download Linuxconf and install it http://www.ccp14.ac.uk/ccp14admin/linux-server/linuxconf/ Anthony > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of lcfe > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 3:18 PM > To: redhat-list

Red Hat 7.3 and linuxconf

2002-07-16 Thread lcfe
Since Red Hat 7.3 does not come with linuxconf anymore, which package should I use instead? I need a text terminal based configuration tool. Thanks, Lucas ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo

RE: linuxconf in RH 7.3 ??? alternatives? (2nd post)

2002-05-24 Thread Devon Harding - GTHLA
Not as intuitive as netconf (linuxconf). It ask me to setup networking, when its already setup. No options for hostname or device drivers. -Devon -Original Message- From: Anthony E. Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: linuxconf in RH 7.3 ??? alternatives? (2nd post)

2002-05-23 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20-May-2002/15:51 -0400, Devon Harding - GTHLA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there a tool for command line instead of X? /usr/sbin/netconfig Tony - -- Anthony E. Greene OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA2

RE: linuxconf in RH 7.3 ??? alternatives? (2nd post)

2002-05-22 Thread Devon Harding - GTHLA
Is there a tool for command line instead of X? -Devon -Original Message- From: Robert Moses [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 1:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: linuxconf in RH 7.3 ??? alternatives? (2nd post) Sorry. I just scanned the archive and saw the

Re: linuxconf in RH 7.3 ??? alternatives? (2nd post)

2002-05-20 Thread Robert Moses
Sorry. I just scanned the archive and saw the discussion about redhat-config-network thank ahead of time -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

linuxconf in RH 7.3 ??? alternatives?

2002-05-20 Thread Robert Moses
I just read the 7.3 release notes (after not being able to run linuxconf from the command line) and discovered that RH had removed the package from the distribution??? Does anyone know why? Also What app has superceded/replaced linuxconf (or am I just missing the boat)..help! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Linuxconf and 7.3

2002-05-13 Thread EricRyd
try redhat-config-network -Original Message- From: Jake McHenry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 10:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Linuxconf and 7.3 Hi, I just installed 7.3, everything going good so far, but I can't get the hostname set correctly.

Linuxconf and 7.3

2002-05-13 Thread Jake McHenry
Hi, I just installed 7.3, everything going good so far, but I can't get the hostname set correctly. What happened to linuxconf? I used that before to set up the network info, but I can't find it on any of the cd's. What can I use in place of linuxconf? I tried using ju

Re: linuxconf - X problem :problem solved

2002-04-20 Thread Hanny Tidore
Thanks. It works. --- ABrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT) > Hanny Tidore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated: > > > Hellp; > > > > I have the following error whenever I start > linuxconf:

Re: linuxconf - X problem

2002-04-20 Thread ABrady
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002 16:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Hanny Tidore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> quietly intimated: > Hellp; > > I have the following error whenever I start linuxconf: > > Error messages from remadin :Xlib: connection to > ":0.0" refused by server &

linuxconf - X problem

2002-04-20 Thread Hanny Tidore
Hellp; I have the following error whenever I start linuxconf: Error messages from remadin :Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server Error messages from remadin :Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to server Error messages from remadin :Error messages from rem

re: Linuxconf: undefined symbol: jpeg_destroy

2002-04-17 Thread Jacques Gelinas
> Hi, > I have compiled Apache (using Apachetoolbox), with > PHP, using GD library on RH 7.2. > Since then my linuxconf is broken: > linuxconf: error while loading shared libraries: > /usr/lib/libgd.so.1.8: undefined symbol: jpeg_destroy jpeg_destroy is part of the libjpeg

Re[2]: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-13 Thread Badger
Hello Bill, Friday, April 12, 2002, 7:04:49 PM, you wrote: BC> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mike Burger wrote: >> Check /etc/passwd, and see if her shell is set to /bin/sh instead of >> /bin/bash. BC> No, Linuxconf didn't add the "-

Re: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-12 Thread Bill Crawford
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Mike Burger wrote: > Check /etc/passwd, and see if her shell is set to /bin/sh instead of > /bin/bash. No, Linuxconf didn't add the "-m" option to useradd. ___ Redhat-list mailing list [E

Linuxconf: undefined symbol: jpeg_destroy

2002-04-12 Thread G Stewart
Hi, I have compiled Apache (using Apachetoolbox), with PHP, using GD library on RH 7.2. Since then my linuxconf is broken: linuxconf: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libgd.so.1.8: undefined symbol: jpeg_destroy I have got two questions: 1) How could I rebuild linuxconf to make

Re: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-12 Thread Mike Burger
Check /etc/passwd, and see if her shell is set to /bin/sh instead of /bin/bash. On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, rob wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm running RH 7.0, and I'm experiencing a perplexing problem. > > What I did was: > > 1) I created a new user in linuxconf called &

RE: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-10 Thread rob
April 11, 2002 1:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linuxconf conundrum! On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:02:48 -0400 "rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm running RH 7.0, and I'm experiencing a perplexing problem. > > What I did was: &g

Re: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-10 Thread Tom Pollerman
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 22:02:48 -0400 "rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm running RH 7.0, and I'm experiencing a perplexing problem. > > What I did was: > > 1) I created a new user in linuxconf called 'carolyn' > &

RE: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-10 Thread Bill Crawford
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, rob wrote: > Same result when I try su - carolyn. > > By the way, this doesn't happen with other users. In that case you have a .bashrc that's different or missing. Perhaps this user was created differently, or has removed the file. ___

RE: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-10 Thread rob
Same result when I try su - carolyn. By the way, this doesn't happen with other users. Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Crawford Sent: April 10, 2002 11:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linuxconf conu

Re: Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-10 Thread Bill Crawford
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, rob wrote: > If I try to 'su carolyn', the prompt I get is 'bash-2.04$' instead of > 'carolyn@athena /root$' Try "su - carolyn" ? ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redha

Linuxconf conundrum!

2002-04-10 Thread rob
Hi folks, I'm running RH 7.0, and I'm experiencing a perplexing problem. What I did was: 1) I created a new user in linuxconf called 'carolyn' 2) The main group is 'carolyn' 3) alternative group is 'mcclear' 4) home directory is '/var/www

re: how to get linuxconf work

2002-02-21 Thread Jacques Gelinas
> I install redhat 7.2 as server. When I try to use linuxconf at root, > I get > error message as fllowing: > bash:linuxconf:Command not found. It is not installed by default. It is on the second CD. But you should really pick the one at www.solucorp.qc.ca/linuxconf/download.hc. It c

RE: how to get linuxconf work

2002-02-20 Thread Paul Hamm
Most likely not installed. You can try "> locate linuxconf" or "> rpm -qs |grep linuxconf" -Original Message- From: Jianping Zhu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:11 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how

how to get linuxconf work

2002-02-20 Thread Jianping Zhu
I install redhat 7.2 as server. When I try to use linuxconf at root, I get error message as fllowing: bash:linuxconf:Command not found. Why and how to fix the problem. Thanks. Jianping Zhu Department of Computer Science Univerity of Georgia Athens, GA 30602

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, Edward Dekkers wrote: >Let's be serious, what is wrong with a tool that does everything? We were >all brought up on .conf files, we learn them, know them, etc. But >really.why the necessity? Why try to remember the syntax of

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16 Jan 2002, Bret Hughes wrote: >On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 18:40, Anthony E. Greene wrote: >> That's for old timers. These days, people want more than an old text >> editor like vi. That's why I switched to vim ;-) > >I gave up on the old text based s

Re[2]: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Badger
Hello David, Wednesday, January 16, 2002, 5:58:40 PM, you wrote: DT> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- DT> Hash: SHA1 DT> ABrady wrote: >>> Dumb newbie question, but what do people use in place of linuxconf? >>> This isn't installed, by default, for m

The Linuxconf Substitute-s

2002-01-17 Thread Michael Jang
Folks, Perhaps I missed something in the thread, but I read the subject line question a bit differently - i.e. since Linuxconf is deprecated, what is Red Hat doing to replace Linuxconf? I assume the answer is related to the variety of GUI front-ends that Red Hat has developed (and presumably is

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Chuck Mead
>I use Webmin extensively to run about five servers in three countries. It RJP>has *never* (repeat, *never*) broken anything. It runs in my browser, with RJP>SSL encryption. It does everything I need it to do, and it does so well. RJP> RJP>Linuxconf broke my sendmail 30 seconds after

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
owser, with SSL encryption. It does everything I need it to do, and it does so well. Linuxconf broke my sendmail 30 seconds after I first tried it. Throughout the years (since RedHat 3.0.3) I've used both the RH LC and the author's LC a few times. Each time I had problems. After about f

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Chuck Mead
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17 Jan 2002, Bret Hughes posted the following: BH>Speaking of the shell-scripting list I guess chuck locked down hie mail BH>server REALLY tight. I can not longer post to it or sen him a mail to BH>complain about it. I think it is because I use

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Eric Wood
What's kills me is that RH "deprecates" Linuxconf in there docs and has no substitute - what a testimony! In fact, RH always ships a outdated version of LC, with most of the modules disabled. RH never has considered pulling the latest LC down from Jacques' site which he

RE: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Ani_Adarsh
Are we talkin about editors or linuxconf ?? I thought linuxconf was cool i upgraded to RH 7.2 and installed linuxconf too ... Although editing the files is ok but its pretty tiresome when ur changin things quite often ... occassionally when X dies i go back to vi ... but for linuxconf is

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-17 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
[Bloatmail snipped] On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:34:40PM -0600, JW wrote: > Hey, no need to change, you were right the first time. emacs has an X > Window mode too :-) Tsk, tsk, tsk - if you want to use emacs under X, use XEmacs... :-) Cheerio, Thomas -- http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2qu

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 23:06, David Talkington wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Bret Hughes wrote: > > >> >vi. > >> > >> That's for old timers. These days, people want more than an old text > >> editor like vi. That's why I switched to vim ;-) > > > >I gave up o

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread Devon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 17 January 2002 12:06 am, David Talkington wrote: > Bret Hughes wrote: > >> >vi. > >> > >> That's for old timers. These days, people want more than an old text > >> editor like vi. That's why I switched to vim ;-) > > > >I gave up on the

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread David Talkington
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bret Hughes wrote: >> >vi. >> >> That's for old timers. These days, people want more than an old text >> editor like vi. That's why I switched to vim ;-) > >I gave up on the old text based stuff now that I user real machines. I >use gvim --reverse

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread Bret Hughes
On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 18:40, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, David Talkington wrote: > >Chris Montgomery wrote: > > > >>Dumb newbie question, but what do people use in place of linuxconf? This > >>isn't installed, by default, for my RH7.1

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread Jacques Gelinas
just > don't think Linuxconf is the best tool for that. Indeed, linuxconf does just that. In graphical mode, you have a pane at the bottom showing all files modified. For each file, you can view the diff between the new version and the old version browse the RCS archiv

Re: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread Chuck Mead
;that. I really do think it IS all a little backwards and not exactly ED>progression. I think the point that both David and were making (he said it whilst I thunk it :-) is that linuxconf isn't safe or robust enough to use. I don't actually have anything against GUI config tools a

RE: Linuxconf Substitute?

2002-01-16 Thread Robert Finneran
OTECTED] Subject: Re: Linuxconf Substitute? -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Edward Dekkers wrote: >Imagine all the newbie questions dissappearing off this list for starters >about where things are. And imagine all the other newbie questions appearing from guys who have no idea

  1   2   3   4   >