How does Congress get around the first requirement of laws on religion, that
"Congress shall make no law?"
Interesting question, but like the computer said in War Games, perhaps "the
only way to win is not to play."
Ed DarrellDallas
From: Steven Jamar
To: Law Religion & Law List
ent
speech, nor the same as government accommodation of speech or religion.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: "Volokh, Eugene"
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
#
something that way.
Ed DarrellDallas
From: Alan E Brownstein
To: Ed Darrell ; Law & Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
#yiv6280040225 #yiv6280040225 -- _filte
o the religious verse citations listed
on the soft-drink cups at In-n-Out Burgers.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Justin Butterfield
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airpo
rican Airlines), the most
complaints we got was on chapel signage. Passengers found it difficult to
figure out where they were.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Alan E Brownstein
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-
lasses. One steps out on faith when one makes religious claims
against evolution.
So they shouldn't be made in science classes, by honest people of faith. IMHO.
Your mileage shouldn't vary.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:36 AM, Eric Treene wrote:
>
&g
nd
science. Not unconstitutional, but tragic. Denial of reality like that seems
to me to fall into Sloth and Pride, especially when coming from theologians.
Sitting on the razor in my Texas congregation,
Ed Darrell
Dallas
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 9:45 PM, "Finkelman, Paul&q
ent cup at most restaurants
for less than 50 cents. They chose the coffee.
He said with a wink that it was not a sin if he didn't enjoy it, too much.
There are alternative solutions well short of the legal system for a lot of
these issues, it seems to me.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
__
All he needs to do is decline the policy offered. This is not a case in
controversy. I predict dismissal.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: "Penalver, Eduardo"
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 10:06 AM
Su
Good news, for a change!
If I had a dime for every time a rumor about some new form of repression from
the right turned out to be false, I'd have easily $1.50 t $2.00.
Ed Darrell
From: Steven Jamar
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academi
Color photo here:
http://www.freedomforum.org/graphics/2000/09/photos/lemon.alton.9.21.00.jpg
Is it Alton T. Lemon?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: William Janssen
To: "religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu"
Sent: Tue, March 19, 2013 10:09:32 AM
Subjec
A photo of Mr. Lemon can be found at the Freedom From Religion Foundation:
http://ffrf.org/news/day/?day=19&month=10#lemon
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: William Janssen
To: "religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu"
Sent: Tue, March 19, 2013 10:09:32 AM
Su
I once wrote to Milton Friedman to ask for examples he knew of where vouchers
had worked. I needed them for speeches I was writing.
Never did get an answer.
Is he the guy the Friedman Foundation is named for ?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: "Pybas, Kevin M
27;ve
scheduled the game to fit it in. Good, good news.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Alan Brownstein
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Sent: Fri, March 2, 2012 3:35:05 PM
Subject: RE: Basketball tournaments on the Sabbath
A somewhat similar la
free speech
contest?
Or am I barking up a telephone pole here?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Fri, 3/4/11, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
From: Volokh, Eugene
Subject: RE: "Harassment"
To: "Law & Religion issues for Law Academics"
Date: Friday, March 4, 2011, 12:08 AM
Why didn't I think of that.
Still curious about President Harding -- if anyone stumbles into the
information, let me know!
Thanks.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Fri, 2/4/11, Vance R. Koven wrote:
From: Vance R. Koven
Subject: Re: Gamaliel: A Historical Question
To: "Law & Relig
Sorta off topic question: How do you pronounce "Gamaliel?" Is there a story
to how Warren Harding got that for a middle name?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Fri, 2/4/11, Wallace, E. Gregory wrote:
From: Wallace, E. Gregory
Subject: RE: Gamaliel: A Historical Question
To: "Law &a
line of work.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Rick Garnett wrote:
From: Rick Garnett
Subject: Re: Augusta State University student sues school over requirement that
she undergo "remediation" due to her religious views
To: "Law & Religion issues for Law Academics&qu
investigative boards (like the National
Conference of Bar Examiners, or whatever name it goes by these days), federal
regulation of hospitals and procedures, etc., etc.
A student's hair length is almost anarchic, in contrast.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Paul Finkelman wrote:
From:
law is as described by cynical
critics, and not as the law actually is.
Gee, wish I had some time to track it down.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Thu, 3/4/10, Volokh, Eugene wrote:
From: Volokh, Eugene
Subject: FW: Public Housing Authority Says No More On-Site Church Services
To: "'Law &
uaded is the public court, not
the one vested with the legal authority. In many ways, that court has already
ruled.
How will the legal courts catch up?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Tue, 4/7/09, Roger Severino wrote:
From: Roger Severino
Subject: RE: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on stri
No, I don't know the child's age. I am assuming, due to the nature of the
assignment, that the child is in a grade below 6th.
Interesting responses on this one. A lot of light in a very dark area.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
James Maule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can convey to the family? Thanks!
Not my case, I'm grateful to say. Not my homework, either.
What should the parents do?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or g
tc.
By the way, I don't think the divorce rate has doubled. I think it's dropping,
in fact. Anybody got a current statistic?
Ed Darrell
Working in Dallas to get the curriculum planned out for 2008-2009, no thanks to
the State School Board
Gordon James Klingenschmitt <[EMAI
sible purpose would be served by adding that line in, other
than knocking otu something already there?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Alan Leigh Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have heard (hearsay) someone
say that FDR gave two speeches that
day one with "so help us God." and one without.
f the speech (it's almost 8 minutes):
http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/real/decwarsp.rm
Here's the text from the FDR Library:
http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/decwart.html
That's the one Congress got.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Alan Leigh Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hav
More Center probably didn't exist
prior to 1983.)
There are safety and environmental concerns. This is an old zoning issue. Are
there special conditions for this case that might change the outcome?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Ed Brayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Messa
legal
journal.
That's what I get for responding while on hold with a government agency I was
arguing with.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Steven Jamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm sorry, Ed, but I'm missing the
problem. Free exercise or free
speech -- is that the conflict you ar
Just out of curiosity, what happens in a hypothetical if the family of the
soldier claims the funeral is a religious service which deserves special
protection from such disruption? Let's assume the family has a long record of
attending church -- oh, heck, let's assume the soldier is himself a R
I thought it was a good discussion for the list. Drat!
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Steven Jamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My apologies to the list -- I have no
idea how or why google put this
address into this private email!
Some bug in gmail I've run into once before.
Steve
On 9/23/07,
rs of questions in elders' quorums,
queries from potential spouses' parents, and the general disapproval of
everyone a person knows, would think it's a voluntary sort of thing that is
optional, and no big deal.
People are encouraged to breathe, but it's not required . . .
Now, should federal law require it? If
West Virginia doesn't have a Blaine amendment in its constitution, doesn't its
state constitution require it, too?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
"Volokh, Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
http://www.foxnews.co
n the list who could explain
why there's little effect, if that's the case?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an informational item.
The Department of Defense on June 19 withdrew from publication in the
CFR the regulations concerning conscientious objection,
if Texans bellyache much more about
being only the second largest state in the union in land area, Alaska will
petition for splitting, making Texas the third largest. Not much chance of
that, either.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Paul Finkelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
alternatively, Texas
ople and had already contracted for the refreshments, how would I calculate
the dollar value of the different alternatives open?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
"David E. Guinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are several policy and politics issues arising in this
exception:
7;d want to defend a right for a church congregation to
watch an NFL game, but I wonder if the NFL hasn't overreached here, just a bit.
Your opinions?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Louisville Courier-Journal:
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070201/SPORTS/702
dn't live up to the same high standards? Why not
follow the example of our founders, and avoid insulting the faiths of others? Ed Darrell DallasGordon James Klingenschmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Perhaps Marty's right about one thing...our modern "enlightened&quo
nt handles the issue. But it would be a good plot device for a novel: Murderer commits the crime in front of an atheist, then moves to disqualify the eyewitness account at trial on the basis of Article 19 of the Alabama Constitution . . . Ed Darrell DallasJoel <[EMAIL PROT
uling from a federal
court is not enough to preserve religious rights against a mob. I'm deeply troubled by that. Ed Darrell DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Here is the way I look at it. "One poor kid" tried to censor his classmates with the help of
, one wonders how lawyers for each side might argue it affects such a case. Ed Darrell Dallas"David E. Guinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (inter alia):This strikes me as theologically incoherent as well as constitutionally troubling (though more in terms of constitutional mor
ntrast the two organizations and how they deal with these issues. I would like a copy of whatever you write up on the issue, if you don't mind. Ed Darrell Dallas"Volokh, Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd think there aren't any legal implications from the
27;t it? Ed Darrell Dallas"Vance R. Koven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't know about Dallas, but they certainly do in Boston, especiallyaround the time of the gay pride parade.VanceOn 3/4/06, Ed Darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:>> Alas, lack of understanding won
And, by the way -- do you know of any city that has put up a gay pride banner? How many times has this happened? Ed Darrell DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I read the text of the Mo resolution, and what I read there between the lines is not so much the desire to make C
favor action over argument? Ed Darrell DallasPaul Finkelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Creches on public property are only legal if surrounded by Santa,!
a few
clowns, candy canes and enough other junk to destroy the religious meaing; the 10 commandments on texas lawn was legal only bec
hem that what they ask is already the law? Ed Darrell DallasSteven Jamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: is this much different from Reagan's [in]famous proclamation that !
we are
Christian country? The resolution seems not to be any sort of law with impact -- just some hortatory langua
gated for leaders only. Ed Darrell DallasPaul Diamond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A problem is that the Govt. enters the 'moral arena' in an ideological (not societal sense)in which a particular viewpoint is promoted. (ie. homosexuality is good, or not good). Either position te
osition reversed, that the BSA National Council required sponsoring organizations to allow homosexuals as leaders: How would such a rule be interpreted with regard to Mormon, Catholic, or Muslim sponsors? In the end, Scouting may not be enough of a religious monolith to be able to ma
ons. Why do you ask, Eugene? Is this a wholly hypothetical situation (I hope)? Ed Darrell DallasAlan Brownstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think the answer to this question depends on what the Scouts believeand why they require a belief in G-d and reverence to G-d as a conditionf
truth, and in the prac!
tice of
law. Will the legislature be in session when the science changes? I don't think a case is yet made that current systems are inadequate to determine what is known by science and what gets put in the textbooks. Ed Darrell Dallas"Gibbens, Dan
ristian Scientists, I think. Is there any valid reason to want to contradict so much science -- valid secular or religious reason? I haven't had my coffee yet. I may be missing problems with the language, but that's my first reaction. Ed Darrell Dallas "Gibbens, Dan
Compare the Alabama "moment of silence" case with Brown v. Georgia. Does that qualify? Ed Darrell Dallas"Conkle, Daniel O." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been asked the following question and don't have a good answer: Do you know of a case from a
ously-dedicated land and mineral rights (and I suppose the litigation over Black Mesa in Arizona might be the case). Way behind on keeping up with this area of law, Ed Darrell DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Doug Laycock writes: "Unfortunately, RLUIPA defines lan
I'd think that more advantage for homeschoolers could be obtained with judicial note of the idea that education is not a nuisance, but quite the opposite. Calling educational activities "noxious" surely runs counter to public policy in every state, doesn't it? Ed
In the Mermelstein case in California, the judge took judicial note of the accuracy of the history of the Holacaust. Was there a number mentioned in that decision? Ed Darrell DallasPaul Finkelman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: fair enough; I am just trying to get Larry Darby to expla
igh school classroom, without raising eyebrows, at least. Ed Darrell Dallas"Vance R. Koven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As one who over the last few weeks has been made painfully--very painfully--aware of this design, it appears to point to the inescapable reality that there i
t's not made by school boards that micromanage, either. Ed Darrell Dallas Steven Jamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so!
mething
can be true without being the full truth.2+2 = 4. That is true.But it does a poor job of fully describing nature. Or math.Setve O
nce of any possible answer to that question points to the lack of science behind ID. That is the whole issue. Ed Darrell DallasPerry Dane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robert Lipkin wrote:>I would argue that Steve's inference from the facts of "disease, war,>violence, in
epeat the cases, and outcomes. Ed Darrell Dallas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 12/21/2005 8:42:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Interesting that you think that a judge's job does not include being aware of the political impact of his or her d
trowels as trowels, and spades as spades!
.
Judge Jones' carefully labeling a lie as a lie should leave no question, at least. Ed Darrell DallasBrad Pardee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps. If he had stopped at saying he believed they lied, that would be one thing. When th
s case. Consequently, I don't think the issue gratuitous at all. I think Judge Jones' standing up for high standards on this issue is a good thing. Ed Darrell Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, Ed Darrell distorts my post. I never said or implied that Kuhn&#x
x27;s been reported separately by two newspapers and captured on videotape. Judge Jones was probably wise to include this statement about the defendants' testimony, as a help for appellate courts. Ed Darrell DallasBrad M Pardee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The judge wrote, "T
onist advocates chose to try to subvert the legal machinery rather than go into the lab. Shakespeare was right about tangled webs. In nature, of course, we don't find tangled webs. Judge Jones saw that, and noted it accurately. IMHO, of course. Ed Darrell Dallas [EM
faith after striking down Alabama's law. If evolution critics want to make a label to avoid religious offense while withstanding judicial scrutiny, they need to compose a warning that avoids religious defense, too.&nb!
sp;
There's the rub.
Ed Darrell
Dallas"Volokh, Eugene&
hen the science is taught, why not simply disclaim that religious view and leave the science alone? Surely it would be within the law for a governmental agency to note that it makes no religious endorsement in a given case, in support of Constitutional principles.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
[
rnment steps in to shore up ID, ID will fade away if it is not workable science. That is true of almost all science applications.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
"Christopher C. Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't want to get into an argument defending ID. Others do it better. And I do
1831 and 1836.
Do you know who is teaching the course, and whether there are any recommended texts?
Ed Darrell
Dallas"Christopher C. Lund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The University of Kansas is planning to teach a course on intelligent design next semester. But it's not a sc
#x27;m surprised, with Ed Brayton, that this case is still in the system.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the key question whether the public schools rent to groups 52 weeks/year for long periods of time? Many of the church-planting initiatives involve using the school t
gh I am interested in the Nebraskans singing Texas aspect,
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess I don't understand the difference between "speech on a religious topic" and a "religious service." The "services" I attend most Sun
My apologies to the list. Wrong Art. Wrong list. I need more coffee.
Ed DarrellEd Darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You graduated from Cornell, and moved to Kentucky?
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscrib
You graduated from Cornell, and moved to Kentucky?
Cornell's student paper has had several ID pieces in the last year. Is it a bit of a campus controversy? Rawlings seems eminently rational on the issue. Watch for attacks from the ID camp.
And thanks for the URL.
Ed[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ing a statement that is factual, and which does not offend them, either.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
"Volokh, Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, all the views noted on the site(http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/articles/7445_statements_from_religious_org_12_19_2002
ut infringing on anyone's religious freedoms.
Without additional action to infer religious intent on the part of the band director, I think it would be difficult to maintain a case that a marching band's instrumental music violates the reasonable separation of church and state.
Ed Da
music without objection.
Duncanville's school lawyers may be more up on the law than other school lawyers.
Ed Darrell
Dallas (Duncanville ISD, by the way)"Volokh, Eugene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An amusing little incident; thanks to Becky Dale for thepointer:http://w
the soldiers' rights, not exercise their own.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim, of course, has taken my points out of context. When a recruit seeks out a chaplain for information about the chaplain's religion, that is entirely different from a chaplain engaging in proselyti
ADF is larger than ACLU now? Amazing.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Here is an ADF press release concerning a victory in a public school censorship case:
On with the show: ADF secures student's right to dance to religious music Once-censored song back
How are we counting Cardozo?
Ed DarrellRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now that the President has nominated Roberts for CJ, any predictions on who will be nominated to fill O'C's seat?
Here is mine--Judge Emilio Garza of the 5th Circuit (New Orleans).
This is a political 3-base hit--G
But don't forget Roberts' time as clerk, and his Washington experience. Plus, soon there will be another new justice, with less time on the Court than Roberts has. There will be a shuffling of relationships, and a lot of new ties formed (and rather quickly, everyone hopes).
The big question r
xercise. There is no Constitutional right against being offended. There is a Constitutional right not to have religion imposed, even one's own religion (see Lee v. Weisman, for example). Religious views of students are even protected.
Ed Darrell
DallasSteven Jamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
inst the governor of Louisiana. Her call for prayer doesn't exhibit any of the problems Judge Dement noted in the earlier case.
Let's not get distracted by unlikely hypotheticals. North Carolina, Florida, Texas, and other coastal areas can still be saved, with action.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[E
to a church up the street, away from the government hall, for prayer and a sermon. I think Judge Dement would have approved of that, too.
Surely there should be no less separation after incorporation.
We can learn a lot from history.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message da
l, although the presentation may be made by the Chaplain in charge, if necessary."
Here's their website: http://www.gideons.org/faq.html
Ed Darrell
DallasGordon James Klingenschmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The mass distribution of Bibles to new recruits is generally done b
Jim, do you mean like Mormons and Moslems who do not accept communism on religious reasons? No, they don't get a pass on the parts of the history or economics exams that deal with communism.
Are there other examples?
Ed Darrell
DallasJames Maule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
everybody else has? And if the religious kid chooses not to study a given subject, why should the consequences of not studying the subject be different for a religious kid than for anyone else who didn't study the subject?
Ed Darrell
DallasJames Maule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
pick one example, having taken Advanced Placement Calculus is not considered automatically as having understood the subject well enough to avoid taking it as the university teaches it. A bad calculus book can sink a kid's hopes for advanced placement in calculus. Why wouldn't a good unive
r could say about the situation. I regret that.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Francis Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Although I defend (and defended at the time) the professors academic freedom to be discretionary in writing letters of recommendation, I dont think that Eds depiction of what
dotal evidence.
Ed Darrell
DallasNewsom Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark, with due respect, I don't think that there is an equivalence here.The news reports about students being driven away from science rest onempirical data. There is no empirical data that the questioner at the
affront to Christians. Before lawyers told them the law, that was the argument of school board members in Pennsylvania, too. As an active and practicing Christian, I have difficulty figuring out what these peole say is offensive in evolution. That is evidence again that it's a sectarian
. There remain some areas where information and education are still our best tools against disease.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Sandy now agree with me that male on male anal sodomy is "victim-causing" behavior? If so, then the law could rational
" that would be acceptable to ID advocates, I think. A fair curriculum would of necessity expose the manifold errors of ID, and ID advocates would protest. That's why high school biology texts take it so easy on creationism now.
Creationists need courses in evidence in civil procedure, not
e churches make adaptations as best they can.
Ed Darrell
DallasFrankie Beckwith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could not a claim both be scientific and religious at the same time? Conceptually, I don't see any problem with that. But this raises an interesting problem. Suppose a particular sc
suspect, when it becomes clear that teaching the controversy frustrates teaching the facts that are necessary to understand the controversy.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Rick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, Ed, I think you are just misreading the decision. The case was decided based solely
g the question. All such commentaries assume that science has been demonstrated, but that assumption has not been borne out in any court, and I don't think it can be.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Rick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Edwards did not hold that "creation science" could
rors of evolution history as well as the basic theory. Health and public health are rife with stories of goofs that led to evolution of newer and hardier breeds of germs and the insects and vermin who carry them. Keeping to the old Hippocratic Oath standard of, "First, do no harm," becomes
the Earth.
And, in any case, it's a college level exam. There is no way this outline could be presented as evidence of what high school texts and curricula say.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/20/2005 12:48:40 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED
audience might make a lot of these cases go away.
Ed Darrell
DallasSanford Levinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim writes:
I believe you have a heart. I suggested nothing to the contrary. I think a physician who believes his competence is confined to the clinical observation that bra
n Ohio, in Kansas, and in Dover, Pennsylvania.
These are evidence issues, I think. In a fair fight, the evidence is solidly in back of Darwinian ideas.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/19/2005 6:02:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I have s
vagus nerve, which is quite real in all mammals, and sharks, and fishes.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/19/2005 5:50:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have methods for determining good science from bad, or current science from disprove
, tends to smoke out charlatans and frauds. Stock brokers are willing to risk their retirement money on evolution. That's a powerful indicator to a free marketeer like me. It also tends to sway judges, but not school boards.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/
); ID advocates ask that legislators get to make the decision.
Ed Darrell
Dallas Sanford Levinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't think the Establishment Clause requires that labelling; I think that respect for science requires it. Indeed, I think it might violate the EC to fo
to qualify as science. If some claim that it frustrates their religion, them's the breaks.
We have methods for determining good science from bad, or current science from disproven science. Those methods work fine with ID.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
