.
Eugene
> -Original Message-
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
> boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Will Linden
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 1:54 PM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: The racist p
Maybe I am missing something but would not the choice of who to
engage in sex with come under the "right of privacy" doctrine iniitiated
by Griswold?
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change option
lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Graber, Mark
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 5:27 PM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
>
> Dear All:
>
> This goes back in time a bit, but I have had a busy weekend and wanted to
>
aw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *James Oleske
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 15, 2015 6:20 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
>
>
>
> Sorry -- I hit "s
t free exercise under any definition that has any meaning.
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of James Oleske
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 6:20 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The racist prostitute hypothet
... thanks for that. It's an interesting distinction.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 15, 2015, at 8:26 PM, Graber, Mark wrote:
>
> Dear All:
>
> This goes back in time a bit, but I have had a busy weekend and wanted to
> respond to those who wondered why I think the racist prostitute should be
>
Mark,
Do I take you to mean that not only do you not distinguish between services
once they have been placed into the stream of commerce, you do not
distinguish between services and goods?
-K
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Graber, Mark
wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> This goes back in time a bit, but
Dear All:
This goes back in time a bit, but I have had a busy weekend and wanted to
respond to those who wondered why I think the racist prostitute should be
subject to anti-discrimination laws.
One feature of several rights is that we do not allow people to commodify them,
or at least commodi
he basis of the exercise in question. In my
>> opinion, the reason why I think Employment Division v Smith ranks right up
>> with Dred Scott v Sandford among the worst decisions the Supreme Court has
>> ever issued.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *James Oleske
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 14, 2015 10:25 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
eme Court has ever issued.
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of James Oleske
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 10:25 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
Brad writes:
Finkelman, Paul
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 9:59 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
Brad:
Tell me why is the wedding cake which I pick up at your bakery and take to
my wedding any different than the rental tux I pick up, th
ionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *K Chen
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 15, 2015 7:53 AM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
>
>
>
> Then we simply postulate that the objection is stated, sincerely,
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 7:53 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
Then we simply postulate that the objection is stated, sincerely, to be on the
objector's religious beliefs. No race, no mere cosmetics, but a deeply held
mp; Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
>
>
>
>
> Brad you said:
>
> "The problem with comparing a same sex wedding with an interracial wedding
> is that the color of a person's skin is no different than the colo
s in
> baseball have gone by the wayside and yet nobody is saying that the players
> of the WNBA should just try to make the teams in the NBA.
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Hillel Y. Levin
Academics
Subject: RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
Brad you said:
"The problem with comparing a same sex wedding with an interracial wedding is
that the color of a person's skin is no different than the color of a person's
hair or the color of a person's eyes. I
lto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Hillel Y. Levin
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 8:48 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
Brad:
The distinction you see between same-sex relationships and interracial
relationships makes
27;Law & Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
Let me clearer. There is a difference between saying you won't serve certain
people and saying you won't be a participant in a certain event. A wedding
cake is part and parcel of the
; religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *James Oleske
> *Sent:* Saturday, February 14, 2015 11:27 AM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: The racist prostitute hypothetical
>
>
>
> "Refusing to bake a wedding cake for [interraci
don't think anybody would
> say that the difference in genders is a strictly cosmetic distinction.
>
>
>
> Brad
>
>
>
> *From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *James Oleske
> *Sent:* Saturday, Feb
ould say that the
difference in genders is a strictly cosmetic distinction.
Brad
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of James Oleske
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 11:27 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academic
A similar hypothetical (but one more legally plausible in states beyond
Nevada) would be a racist surrogate. Someone who offers to carry a child
in exchange for money, but only if she approves of the race of the parents.
A quick Google search shows that discrimination by surrogates has already
be
op loving her than I could stop breathing.)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
> [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Graber, Mark
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 4:49 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Su
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-
> boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Finkelman, Paul
> Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 8:33 AM
> To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> Subject: RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
>
> One thoug
lvania
>
> 518-439-7296 (p)
> 518-605-0296 (c)
>
> paul.finkel...@albanylaw.edu
> www.paulfinkelman.com
> *
>
>
>
>
> From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla
--
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Graber, Mark
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 4:49 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: The racist prostitute hypothetical
I confess that I get off at the second
ary 14, 2015 12:01 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics (religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu)
Subject: The racist prostitute hypothetical
I’ve been thinking about a little thought experiment, and I
thought I’d run it past this list to see whether people see it as helpful.
ay, February 14, 2015 12:01 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics (religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu)
Subject: The racist prostitute hypothetical
I’ve been thinking about a little thought experiment, and I
thought I’d run it past this list to see whether people see it as helpfu
I've been thinking about a little thought experiment, and I
thought I'd run it past this list to see whether people see it as helpful.
Imagine a state in which prostitution is legalized. A
prostitute offers her services to the general public (perhaps through a web
30 matches
Mail list logo
