Looking for video id, photo sequencer, 2-8 watts out so that I may attach
20watt final amp. Also what controller may be used most affectively. I need a
good jobber that may head me in the direction.
Eastern Pa. 800' level ant. de WB3DTG, Bethlehem, Pa. fn20hq73
what is the input power on the 200 watt Vocom amp?
K+John
- Original Message -
From: n2len
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 9:24 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Stuff For Sale!
Motorola RKR-1225 VHF Repeater with Rack
Joe - the picture was inside the e-mail.
Bob - it is an SO-239 Tee, and it is into
a dummy load. (checked on 2 different ones).
Tim
At 7/31/2010 09:31, you wrote:
Joe - the picture was inside the e-mail.
Bob - it is an SO-239 Tee, and it is into
a dummy load. (checked on 2 different ones).
Longshot, but try replacing the T, preferably with a silver-plated one. I
know I've had old PL259/SO239 elbows generate desense when I
n...@no6b.com wrote:
At 7/31/2010 09:31, you wrote:
Joe - the picture was inside the e-mail.
Bob - it is an SO-239 Tee, and it is into
a dummy load. (checked on 2 different ones).
Longshot, but try replacing the T, preferably with a silver-plated one. I
know I've had old
Hi Kev,
Yeah, I used the silver plated ones. Originally had some of the
chrome plated ones (cheap ones), but changed them out.
Thanks,
Tim
Tim,
I have a two meter repeater that outputs 250 watts (approximately +54
dBm) into the duplexer. After the 93 dB of rejection that the duplexer
provides for shear power reduction toward the receiver port, -39 dBm of
transmitter power leaves the duplexer receiver port - headed toward the
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the info. I've used the PLL MastrII exciter on a couple of
systems also.
Now, since this duplexer is of the 'notch' variety, I already have about
100db of notch (on the TX side) that is tuned to the RX freq. Shouldn't
this be enough?
Tim
With 250mW (+24dBm) into the transmit port... antenna port is
a quality 50 ohm load, I see -72dBM at the receiver port. (pretty
much what I expect.. 1.8dB loss through the xmit side, 100dB
notch through the RX side.
Those numbers are fine.
With it all hooked up receiving an input signal
AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater transmit levels at the receiver?
Tim,
I have a two meter repeater that outputs 250 watts (approximately +54 dBm) into
the duplexer. After the 93 dB of rejection that the duplexer provides for
shear power
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the reality check... loved the real-world example of
the mobile unit.
At this point, I'm leaning towards the bad mojo/karma phase
of the moon!
Got a 'spare' set of low-band cans that need to be stored somewhere
it's warm? :-)
Thanks,
Tim
feet
tall.
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jeff DePolo
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 7:30 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater transmit
Tim wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the info. I've used the PLL MastrII exciter on a couple of
systems also.
Now, since this duplexer is of the 'notch' variety, I already have about
100db of notch (on the TX side) that is tuned to the RX freq. Shouldn't
this be enough?
Yes, 100 dB of
On 7/30/2010 10:15 AM, Kevin Custer wrote:
Tim wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the info. I've used the PLL MastrII exciter on a couple of
systems also.
Now, since this duplexer is of the 'notch' variety, I already have about
100db of notch (on the TX side) that is tuned to the RX
Larry - I didn't.
The 250 watts is produced by a GE MASTR Pro/II 4EF5A1 capable of 330
watts continuous. The MICOR high-band tube amplifier, IMHO, is junk
compared to the GE 4CX250R based VHF power amplifier. The 4EF5A1 is
designed to operate from 144 to 174 MHz. without modification.
Hi
as do most european 6mtr repeaters, 500Kc split
73
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater transmit levels at the receiver?
Jeff,
You did
Hi Tim
it should be plenty, what about the notch on,the rx side, which
I assume is tuned to reject the tx freq.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Tim tahr...@swtexas.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater
Hi Steve,
Both sides are exhibiting pretty much the same specs - about a 100dB
notch (each side tuned to the opposite freq), and about 1.5dB attenuation
at the desired freq.
All cables are new RG142.
Something's gotta be bad wrong if a 250mW input on the TX side will
make noise.
Using the
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater transmit levels at the receiver?
Larry - I didn't.
The 250 watts is produced by a GE MASTR Pro/II 4EF5A1 capable of 330
watts continuous. The MICOR high-band tube amplifier, IMHO, is junk
compared to the GE 4CX250R based VHF power amplifier
Hi Tim
that should work fine, very strange. As a matter of interest how far
apart are the tx and rx units and I take it all the covers and screening
cans are fitted..
Steve
Tim wrote:
Using the Micor's exciter - about 270mW. Cannot see any spurs/noise
within 80dB of the main carrier.
I wonder Most of the MICOR exciters I have converted to 6M
result in more than 270 mW of power - in fact, 400 to 600 mW is
common. I wonder if something is amiss at the
Actually, the output is about +26dBm, so it's closer to 400mW.
I've also tried a VX-5 on low power, and got the same result.
Tim
On 7/30/2010 9:52 AM, Kevin Custer wrote:
Tim wrote:
Using the Micor's exciter - about 270mW. Cannot see any spurs/noise
within 80dB of the main carrier.
I
Hi Kev
would it be feasable to use a sig gen cranked right up ?
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer kug...@kuggie.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 5:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater transmit levels at the receiver?
Tim wrote
Agree on the MSTR PRO 4EF5A1. Had one in service on the amateur band (VHF HI)
and it ran withoout a burp for 8 years. Would like to find another one to use
with the MASTR II.
David
Jul 30, 2010 03:39:08 PM, Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Larry - I didn't.
The 250 watts is
You did an excellent job of explaining the complex
interrelationships among
2m repeaters. However, not all 6m repeaters have a 1 MHz split; my 6m
repeater on Tranquillon Peak follows the California band plan
and has a 500
kHz split. The duplexer has four cans about 12 in diameter
and
At this point, I'm leaning towards the bad mojo/karma phase
of the moon!
Let's start out with the basics:
1. How much desense do you have?
2. How are you injecting the Rx signal, and what are you using for the
signal source?
3. What are you using for a dummy load when doing the desense
Steve wrote:
Hi Kev
would it be feasable to use a sig gen cranked right up ?
Depends on how clean the signal generator is. I'd think it doesn't have
enough smoke (output capability) to really be beneficial
Many generators have a strong carrier (here we go again) adjacent from
the desired
Tim wrote:
Actually, the output is about +26dBm, so it's closer to 400mW.
Good - that's more like it.
I've also tried a VX-5 on low power, and got the same result.
Obviously, something is wrong with the operation of your duplexer or
interconnecting cabling. I really don't think it's
: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater transmit levels at the receiver?
Steve wrote:
Hi Kev
would it be feasable to use a sig gen cranked right up ?
Depends on how clean the signal generator is. I'd think it doesn't have
enough smoke (output capability) to really be beneficial
Many generators have
I think they use that spec trace on the opening of the tv show Fraser
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Custer
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:51 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder
I wonder how many of the -53 naysayers have or have used a Cushman
CE-3? LOL! The folks that have looked at the output of one of
these on
a spectrum analyzer will get it.
K
Where I come from, we call that a comb generator, not a signal generator...
Ya gotta know the limitations of your
Sounds like someone has been watching The EnforcerMr
Eastwood.every man has got to know his limitations?
Soory could not resist!!
D
On 30/07/2010 22:35:35, Jeff DePolo (j...@broadsci.com) wrote:
I wonder how many of the -53 naysayers have or have used a Cushman
CE-3? LOL! The
Hi Kevin,
Yes, the original used RG-58.. couldn't see using it. Figured
it would give me desense!
As far as the amount of notch, I was surprised that the total
was more than each one added, but with 50 watts
coming out of the antenna port, I see -55dBm at the RX
port. - kinda made me think the
Tim wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Yes, the original used RG-58.. couldn't see using it. Figured
it would give me desense!
As far as the amount of notch, I was surprised that the total
was more than each one added,
Don't be - it's common for the apparent notch to be deeper than the
measured addition
Hi guys,
Took some time away from the project... loosing too many hairs.
Ok, I've gotten another receiver strip, and it has the specified
sensitivity per Mot.
Guess I want to bounce some ideas around with those of you
who are more learned in the arts!
With 250mW (+24dBm) into the transmit
I have this lowband Micor receiver
that I want to test for adjacent channel
rejection.
I have two calibrated signal generators
and a calibrated spectrum analyzer if
I need it.
How can i measure the rejection of the
off channel signal?
Thanks,
Tim
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of tahrens301
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 10:27 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater receiver testing
I have this lowband Micor receiver
that I want to test for adjacent channel
rejection.
I have two calibrated signal generators
I have this lowband Micor receiver that I would like
to check the adjacent channel rejection.
I have two calibrated signal generators, and a calibrated
spectrum analyzer (if needed).
Can I do the measurements with this equipment?
If so, how? Resistor divider network between the
two sig gens?
Hi folks,
Still working on the hardline duplexer for 6 meters, and have some data I'd
like to run by you guys.
Running 80 watts out of a Micor tx into the TX bank of cavities. With
test equipment, get about 100dB notch. (shows 50 watts into dummy load as
well).. have about 1.5 - 2dB loss
On 7/23/2010 10:34 AM, tahrens301 wrote:
Hi folks,
Still working on the hardline duplexer for 6 meters, and have some
data I'd like to run by you guys.
Running 80 watts out of a Micor tx into the TX bank of cavities. With
test equipment, get about 100dB notch. (shows 50 watts into
Ok, now I hook the spectrum analyzer up to the receiver port,
and I see
about -55dBm. 50 watts = +47dBm, minus the 100dB notch =
-53dBm that is pretty close to what I'm seeing at the rx antenna port.
Question is: Should this good enough for a low band micor receiver?
Thanks,
Tim
Fellows,
I haven't had any volunteers yet, so I thought I would plead again:
I am writing on behalf of a customer of mine. He bought a 2M repeater
from me and is having trouble getting it going. I think he needs help
getting his duplexer tuned and cabled correctly. He seems like a nice
enough
Fellows,
I am writing on behalf of a customer of mine. He bought a 2M repeater
from me and is having trouble getting it going. I think he needs help
getting his duplexer tuned and cabled correctly. He seems like a nice
enough fellow. He had a fall some time ago that fractured most of his
Well since you have Internet you could also have VoIP phone to maintain the
autopatch. CallCentric or another open peering provider etc
On Jul 8, 2010, at 10:31 PM, Mike Besemer \(WM4B\) mwbese...@cox.net
wrote:
At our club meeting tonight a discussion came up regarding the cost of the
, Ohio
Repeaters 147.165 PL88.5 442.525 PL88.5
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:32 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control
: Thursday, July 08, 2010 9:32 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
At our club meeting tonight a discussion came up regarding the cost of the
phone line to our 2-meter repeater system. Originally
my manual
handy.)
73,
Mike
WM4B
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Cook
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:52 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
At our club meeting tonight a discussion came up regarding the cost of
the phone line to our 2-meter repeater system. Originally it was there
for the Autopatch, but has evolved to being primarily used for me to
program
: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ross Johnson
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 9:13 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
Yet another option. 930Mhz serial
At 05:58 AM 07/09/10, you wrote:
Kenneth,
Can you elaborate on the programming piece? I'm hung up on the fact
that to program the CAT-1000 via serial port, you've got to first
activate the CAT-1000 serial port via the DIP switch. (I'm thinking
there may be a DTMF command to activate the
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 4:19 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
Basically you cross-connect a serial port from the IRLP computer
to the CAT controller. Then you remote into the IRLP computer
.
W8DZN Repeaters in Bucyrus, Ohio
Repeaters 147.165 PL88.5 442.525 PL88.5
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Morris
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 4:19 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 6:12 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
Mike,
Im thinking along the same
Cook
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 7:16 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
Yes there is a DTMF command. Using the CAT-1000 Editor and Communication
program. Start the terminal program and send 100 97
442.525 PL88.5
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Besemer (WM4B)
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:00 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
At our club meeting tonight a discussion came up regarding the cost of the
phone line to our 2-meter repeater system. Originally it was there for the
Autopatch, but has evolved
-Builder] Repeater Control Operator via
Other-Than-Phone-Line
For about 10 years I have been controlling my repeater using an internet
connection. The repeater is 1900 miles away from me. Wireline control is
legal for amateur radio!
-- Original Message --
Received: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07
At our club meeting tonight a discussion came up regarding the cost of the
phone line to our 2-meter repeater system. Originally it was there for the
Autopatch, but has evolved to being primarily used for me to program the
controller (CAT-1000) and to control the system. (The autopatch is rarely
You could get a Magic Jack and keep the same phone number and
everything. The only thing that would change is the bill.
Of course, this requires an internet connection. But, the cost of that
plus the MJ could be lower than what you are paying now.
Joe M.
Mike Besemer (WM4B) wrote:
At our
I would assume conversion of the line to naked dsl is possible offering control
, net connection and voip
it has potentual
_
Need a new place to live? Find it on Domain.com.au
Want jack on the back then use radius or maxtrac 16 pin. Want a real system,
use Kenwood (-:
--- On Wed, 6/9/10, wa4moe wa4...@carolina.rr.com wrote:
From: wa4moe wa4...@carolina.rr.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater radio needed-rig advice.
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date
I've had good luck with the GE Phoenix-S radios. Everything's available
on the back, including pins for toggling through the channels, and
resetting to ch 1 for starter-up/reference.
On 6/9/2010 11:31 PM, wa4moe wrote:
I'm searching for a transceiver to put into service for a link on
I'm searching for a transceiver to put into service for a link on existing
network. Have a excellent technician to set levels, and do mods as required and
have proper test equipment.
Q: Please advise on MotorolaSpectra, Maxtrac, Radiusothers...?
Freq: 145-147
Possible -8 channels
Mic
I have a Micro Computer Concepts RC 100 repeater controller for sale. Brand New
, never used, version 3.79. No case, just board and 2 multiconductor cables
with plugs. $75 includes shipping.
Also have a NHRC-2 repeater controller, in a plastic project box with a
multiconductor cable and a DB-25
The repeater controllers RC 100 and NHRC-2 are soldTNX, Bob W2XL
I recently took 2 UHF machines off the air.
I have for a Mastr II 1 5C on 442.050 and 1 EC on 447.050. These were custon
built by Bomar crystal at a cost of $35 each plus shipping and are temp
compensated. Send me $40 and and I will send them to you.
Also for Micor, I have a KXN1052A on
I'll take the Micor elements. PM sent to Terry (hope it didn't get
caught in a spam filter...)
On 04/17/2010 02:58 PM, terry_wx3m wrote:
I recently took 2 UHF machines off the air.
I have for a Mastr II 1 5C on 442.050 and 1 EC on 447.050. These were
custon built by Bomar crystal at a cost
Don,
There is an article on the Repeater-Builder web site (not the Yahoogroup
page) about how to disable the always on channel element in the Micor
exciter. I think this is what you need to eliminate your problem.
It is described in this article:
Hello hope Everyone is doing well, I have ran into a little Problem and
thought I would get some suggestions on how to resolve it
I have a Motorola Micor 224.40 repeater built By Scott N3XCC , here on the
Repeater builder group; it has worked great for over 3 Yrs.
I have a Few Hams in
Sounds like your channel element is running all the time You may need
to force jumper your ptt to ground all the time and reconect your
controllers ptt to the channel element select line so it only runs when
it needs to.
Other than that about the only thing you could do is place an attenuator
Hello to all,
Any one knows where to get the Software upgrade for the controller RC-85?
Linkcomm told me they don't have it.
Thanks
73,
Felix, KC7WVE
Don't know who you talked to over there but here is the link for it off of
their own website...
http://www.link-comm.com/ftp/acc/rc85.zip
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:02 PM, felix rosasco felixp...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hello to all,
Any one knows where to get the Software upgrade for the
OK, I know I've mentioned this before, but I think I'm on to something now...
I wanted to have a stand alone repeater linker, kind of a crossband repeater,
that would link uhf and vhf repeaters together without needing to make any
changes to either repeater. The problem I ran into is when the
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 4:05 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Linking
OK, I know I've mentioned this before, but I think I'm on to something now...
I wanted to have a stand alone repeater linker, kind of a crossband repeater,
that would link
The best way is to have the pl drop when the cor drops
--- On Wed, 1/20/10, Jerry gdste...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jerry gdste...@yahoo.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Linking
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Received: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 6:05 PM
OK, I know I've
At 1/9/2010 20:49, you wrote:
The GP9 I used on the repeaters was on a hill that was about 900 feet
elevation. The problems didn't seem to make any difference regardless if the
user was 2 miles out or 10 miles out.
Then either you had lots of foliage absorption (lots of trees in Oregon),
which
At 1/8/2010 23:39, you wrote:
I used a Comet GP9 for about 2 years on a 444 Mhz repeater, then connected a 2
meter repeater to it. The 2 meter system performed FAR better than the UHF
system. Both repeaters were nearly identical in performance otherwise, the GP9
simply performed much better on 2
From: n...@no6b.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Rebuild Project Input
At 1/8/2010 23:39, you wrote:
I used a Comet GP9 for about 2 years on a 444 Mhz repeater, then connected
a 2
meter repeater to it. The 2 meter system performed FAR better than
-8052 Cellular
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of JOHN MACKEY
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 9:50 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Rebuild Project Input
The GP9 I used
Hello All,
I am looking to rebuild a 70cm repeater with an output within the ham band. We
currently have a non-tunable fiberglass comercial band antenna wich is giving
us a SWR of about 2:1. The first piece of advice we are looking for is
recomendations for replacing the antena. There are some
From the information you've provided I'm look hard at a Motorola R1225
or a pair of GM300s.
The diamond will certialy lower your SWR, but so will a 50 ohm dummy
load. Low SWR isn't the only concern any more than antenna gain is.
It's likely the Diamond will work, but these ham market antennas
Depending on what coverage you are looking to expect, will help you choose
the proper gain antenna.
A higher gain antenna is not always a good choice and can cause more
problems and poor coverage then you would expect nearby the repeater.
What is you HAAT? Are most the user going to be fixed
At 1/8/2010 16:22, you wrote:
Depending on what coverage you are looking to expect, will help you
choose the proper gain antenna.
A higher gain antenna is not always a good choice and can cause more
problems and poor coverage then you would expect nearby the repeater.
Andrew said he wants
I changed sites and the repeaters each got their own
antennas. Then they performed roughly the same.
-- Original Message --
Received: Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:35:36 PM PST
From: n...@no6b.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Rebuild Project Input
I
It is time for me to start thinking about
new batteries. I have a solar repeater
site with 210 watts charging two CAT
153-5720 batteries. These were one
year old when they were removed
from a commercial repeater site and
then donated to my repeater. My
repeater site is not in a building, it
Mark wrote:
John,
Regarding the hum - it's just trying to remember the words... ;-)
More than anything else, I suspect the radio you're using to listen,
John. Even newer made-for-ham rigs have problems with not having good
filtering of CTCSS tones. My Kenwood 742 lets some through,
Hello,
I wanted to thank everyone again for the recommendations on how to fix our
system. I made several of the changes posted and we replaced the antenna and
hardline with new ones.
The system is working right now. The problem with the radio power going up has
stopped and the noise is all
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W3ML
Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 5:43 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] repeater problems solved
Hello,
I wanted to thank everyone again for the recommendations on how to fix our
system. I made several
John,
Regarding the hum - it's just trying to remember the words... ;-)
Seriously, it sounds as if you suspect CTCSS coming through, and I would
agree. First you need to know is whether this happens ALL the time or not.
If it occurs all the time, it sounds as if your repeater's CTCSS tone
I received the below text from a non group member... who
was at one time very active in Amateur Repeaters.
His opinion and some technical ideas...
enjoy,
s.
[pasted text]
In my repeater days I went both ways. Started by wanting
to add anything that showed the repeater to be more
At 11/3/2009 11:05, you wrote:
I love the notion of the courtesy beep as a diagnostic tool, provided it
doesn't distract from the content of the traffic. When I was working on
repeaters for the Blue Ridge Amateur Radio Society in the Carolinas in the
'80s, we were transitioning to CTCSS, but
, 2009 10:46 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Bells and Whistles (from an off group
source)
In my repeater days I went both ways. Started by wanting
to add anything that showed the repeater to be more
advanced. We had custom-recorded audio IDs, and at one
point, over 500
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kenwood TKR-720
Hello Gustavo, (in English)
Try this one and tell if you can use this or not. I hope it is what you are
looking for.
Cheers
http://www.eserviceinfo.com/index.php?what=search2searchstring=TKR-720
In Portuguese
Olá Gustavo,
Tente este e
and I need is the User manual or operations manual.
Again grateful
Gustavo - Pu3gbw
*From:* Richard Fletcher rickfle...@yahoo.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 28, 2009 1:23 AM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kenwood TKR-720
Hello Gustavo
Greetings to all the group!
Hello everybody I am a resident of the Brazilian city of São Lourenço do Sul,
State of Rio Grande do Sul, which I am very sorry for layman
the English language.
I come to ask some of the friends who have possession of the old manual
Repeater Kenwood TKR-720 model.
que você
está procurando.
abraço
-Richard
From: Gustavo (Pu3gbw) pu3...@hotmail.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 1:54:17 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Kenwood TKR-720
Greetings to all the group!
Hello
I have an RF Technology VHF repeater for sale. !00 watts 140-162Mhz
programmable frequency and pl tone. Comes with or without power supply.
Programming software and cable. Never put into service.
David Epley, N9CZV
Randolph County Emergency Coordinator
4866N 400E
Winchester, Indiana
Hi all,
We have a puzzling problem with our two 2m repeater networks.
They all use Mitrek's on 2m and Maxtrac's on UHF for linking; each network has
a handful of satellite repeaters, all on diff. 2m freqs of course. All
satellites use one of two UHF freqs for simplex linking to their hub
,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: John Sehring
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:35 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater trouble
Hi all,
We have a puzzling problem with our two 2m repeater networks.
They all use
Dear everybody;
i made a repeater by using 2x gm160 with hlnb repeater interface. and i
make 1st gm 160 as transmitter and the 2nd as reciever and all work DPL the
problem is when i talk by the handheld ( gp360 ) the other one (gp360) receive
only carrier without any voice but the
1 - 100 of 1024 matches
Mail list logo
